學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 媽在看我臉書?初探Facebook上的親子互動
Is mother watching my Facebook? A preliminary study on parents-children interaction through Facebook作者 李芸珮
Lee, Yun Pei貢獻者 吳筱玫
李芸珮
Lee, Yun Pei關鍵詞 臉書
前喻文化
親子互動
自我揭露
Facebook
prefigurative culture
parents-children interaction
self-disclosure日期 2012 上傳時間 1-十月-2013 15:47:17 (UTC+8) 摘要 科技變遷帶動社群媒體的興起，尤其Facebook快速發展提供了親子互動一個新場域，家長透過Facebook了解更多子女的生活面向、最新動態，但反觀子女有著卻不想被父母親全盤掌握、監視的想法，而希望與父母親保持某種程度的關心與忽略，產生一種矛盾的心態，成為值得探討的有趣現象。家長與子女的Facebook經常性使用已日益普遍，因此，探討Facebook上的親子互動有其必要性，更進一步了解Facebook上人與人互動的樣貌、彌補文獻的不足，進而發掘兩代在使用經驗的差異性與觀念，提供後續研究一些新的啟發。 本研究採用深度訪談法，以13-18歲之間的青少年與其母親做為研究對象，共採訪12位受訪者。研究分為三個層次，先從個人經驗出發，體現親子雙方使用與自我揭露所展現的差異，其次，以Facebook上的親子互動類型分析不同的個案特色，探討親子兩代使用Facebook後產生關係變化，對現實生活中的權力角色產生何種影響？最後，扣連檢視Facebook親子互動中是否出現反向社會化現象做鉅觀思考。 研究結果發現，在Facebook親子互動初期呈現後輩教導長輩使用的反向社會化現象，而母親在使用過程接收到新的刺激與學習後，亦有長者再社會化的情形。兩代在個人隱私揭露上展現極大的差異，母親的管教方式悄悄滲入子女Facebook，親子互動類型表現在具體的面向，以「母親回覆子女留言」與「觀看子女的po文、打卡、連結」，最為凸顯親子代際衝突與觀念差距，「雙向聊天功能」是維繫親子關係願意分享、交流信任的最佳管道，「封鎖」為子女線上自我防衛的最後一道防線，現實生活中的關係修補有助於維持線上的互動平衡。
The emergence of social media, especially in highly growth of using Facebook, which was bring about by new technology, providing the new field where parents and children who can interact with each other. On the parents’ side, they can understand more aspects of lives and last news about children through Facebook; on the children’s side, however, they do not want that parents put them under surveillance through Facebook. Instead, they hope, through using Facebook, that they can keep in touch with their parents occasionally. Thus, the different expectation of using Facebook between parents and children constitute interesting issue which deserves us to study. Moreover, as for parents-children interaction through Facebook which is common phenomenon, we think that it is necessary to study this issue. By doing this , we can understand a little further about the formation of interaction on Facebook, finding the insignificance of existing literature, identifying the different experience of using new media between different generations, and inspiring follow-up studies. This study adopts in-depth interview, with literature review, which focus on 13-18 years old teenagers and their mother; total numbers of interviewers are 12. There are there parts in this study: Firstly, based on personal experience, we analyze the different experience between mothers and children, which focus on how their using experience and their self-discoursing construct different reality separately. Secondly, we construct the parents-children interaction types and, through those conceptual types, analyze the transformation of parents-children relationship, and discuss how this transformation affects power relation in every life, after using Facebook. Thirdly, from macro perspective, we consider whether reverse socialization exist in parents-children interaction on Facebook. The result shows that, from the primary stage, children do teach their mother how to use Facebook. In other words, reverse socialization do exist. At same time, there are re-socialization existing in parents’ side when mother receiving new stimulation and learning. In addition, there is huge difference about privacy issue between generations, and mothers’ parenting embeds deeply in interaction on Facebook. The most significance of conflict and of the idea gap between parents and children appear in “mothers reply message to their children ” and “watching children’s comments, place where they are, and their sharing linking.” The best way of maintaining parents-children relationship which let them will to share and trust each other is “two-way chatting function.” Instead, children will use “block” to not to share comments or linking with their parents and regard this function as their final mean of self-defense. Besides, parents-children interaction on Facebook can be improved through offline interaction in everyday life.參考文獻 一、中文資料王惟芬、黃柏恆、楊雅婷譯，Bilton著（2011）。《一位數位移民的告白：Facebook, iPad, iPhone如何翻轉我們的世界》。臺北：行人。（原著Bilton, N. [2010]. I live in the future & here’s how it works: why your world, work, and brain are being creatively disrupted. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.）江明修（1992）。〈社會科學多崇典範的爭辯：試論質與量研究方法的整合〉，《國立政治大學學報》，64：315-344。李介至（1998）。《青少年親子衝突、因應策略及其相關因素之研究》。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。沈孟燕（2009）。《親情Online：網路媒介與家庭溝通型態之相關研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。周曉虹、周怡譯，Mead著（1987）。《文化與承諾：一項有關代溝問題的研究》，河北：人民。（原著Mead, M. [1970]. Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press / Doubleday & Company.）胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）。《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。臺北：巨流。宣秀慧（2001）。《青少年親子衝突歷程中的親子互動》。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。洪蘭譯，Harris, J. R.著（2000）。《教養的迷思－父母的教養能不能決定孩子的人格發展》，臺北：商周。（原著Harris, J. R. [1998]. The Nurture Assumption - Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York, London, Toronto Sydney: The Free Press.）徐江敏、李姚軍譯，Goffman著（1992）。《日常生活的自我表演》，臺北：桂冠。（原著Goffman, E. [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.）翁樹澍（1990）。《親子互動關係對青少年心理社會福利感之影響研究》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。孫毓英（1986）。《親子互動模式與青少年社會關係之研究》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。張純富（2010）。《社交網站人際關係維繫之研究：以Facebook為例》。世新大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文。郭良文、林素甘（2001）。〈質化與量化研究方法之比較分析〉，《資訊傳播與圖書館學刊》，7 (4)：1-13。陳品宏（2009）。《面對面與Facebook之人際互動研究》。台灣大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。黃守義、許詩嫻譯（2008）。《新媒介科技手冊》。臺北：韋伯。（原著Leah, A., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.). [2006]. Handbook of new media. London, UK: Sage.）黃貝玲、蔡宏明、羅耀宗譯（2009）。《N世代衝撞：網路新人類正在改變你的世界》。臺北：麥格羅希爾。（原著Tapscott, D. [2008]. Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGrow-Hill.）楊秋燕（1992）。《青少年親子衝突、衝突情感經驗及衝突解決策略之研究》。台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文。顏伯霖（2010）。《Facebook對大學生人際關係相關性之研究》。屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文。二、英文資料Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Amato, P. R., & Rivera, F. (1999). Paternal involvement and children’s behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 375-384.Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 181-200.Anthonysamy, P., Rashid, A., & Greenwood, P. (2011, October). Do the privacy policies reflect the privacy controls on social networks? Paper presented at IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust, Boston, MA.Aunola, K., Stattin, H., & Nurmi, J. E. (2000). Parenting styles and children’ achievement strategies. Journal of Adolescence, 23 (2), 205-222.Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Mediapsychology, 3, 265-299.Beniger, J. R. (1987). Personalization of mass media and the groth of pseudo- community. Communication Research,14 (3), 352-371.Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2003). Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 451-467.Boyd, D. M. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), McArthur foundation series on digital learning: Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London, UK: Routledge.Burgoon, J. K., Parrott, R., Lepoire, B. A., LKelley, D. L., Walther, J. B., & Perry, D. (1989) .Maintaining and restoring privacy through communication in different types of relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 131-158.Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009). Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social networking sites. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 945-954.Chen, H., Goh, T.,& Li, W.(2009, November). Welcome to Facebook: How Facebook influences parent-child relationship. Paper presented at the meeting of 2009 TRIS, Hsinchu, Taiwan.Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology & Behavior,12, 341–345.Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2012). Hey mom, what’s on your facebook? Comparing facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3 (1), 48-54.Ciairano, S., Kliewer, W., Bonino, S., & Bosma, H. A. (2008). Parenting and child well-being in two European countries. Adolescence, 43(169), 99-117.Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83-108.Dey, R., Jelveh, Z., & Ross, K. (2012). Facebook users have become much more private: A large-scale study. Paper at the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Security and Social Networking (SESOC), Lugano, Switzerland.Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 153-160.Galegher, J. Sproull, L.,& Kiesler, S. (1998). Legitimacy, authority and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 15, 493-530.Garfinkel, S. (2000). Database nation: The death of privacy in the 21st century. Sebastopol, CA: O`Reilly and Associates, Inc.Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Paper presented ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. Alexandria, VA.Guedj, R. A., ten Hagen, P. Hopgood, J. W., Tucker, F. R., Hugh, A., & Duce, D. A.(1980). Methodology of Interaction. Amseterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland. Horton, D. L., & Wohl, R. R. (1956).Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.Hall, J. A. (1987). Parent-adolescent conflict: An empirical review. Adolescent, 22 (88), 767-789.Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Krieger.Jourard, S. M., & Lasakow, P. (1958). Some factors in self-disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56 (1), 91-98.Kennedy, T. L. M., & Wellman, B. (2007). The Networked Household. Information, Communication & Society, 10 (5), 645-670.Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4 (3), 355-383.Krasnova, H., Kolesnikova, E., & Guenther, O. (2009). ‘It won’t happen to me!’: Self-disclosure in online social networks. Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 343. Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.Lei, L., & Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and internet use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10 (5), 633-639.Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenager’s use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393-411.Luescher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family 60, 413-425.MacDermid, S. M., Franz, C. E., & De Reus, L. A. (1998). Generativity: At the crossroads of social roles and personality. InD. P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adultdevelopment: How and why we care for the next generation. 181-226. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Mahler, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). The diffusion of interactive communication innovations and the critical mass: The adoption of telecommunication services by German banks. Telecommunications policy, 23 (10/11), 719-740.Mannheim, K. (1952). The Problem of generations. In Kecskemeti, P. (Ed.), Karl Mannheim: Essays. 276-322. London, UK: Routledge.Markus, M, (1990).Toward a ‘critical mass theory of interactive media’. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organization and communication technology . 94-218. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.McKnight, D., Lankton, N., & Tripp, J. (2011, January). Social networking information disclosure and continuance intention: A disconnect. Paper presented 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI.McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity is in the eye of the beholder: Function, perception, involvement, and attitude toward the web site. In M. A. Shaver (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. 71-77. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Moore, S., & Gullone, E. (1996). Predicting adolescent risk behavior using a personalized cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 343-359.Newman, B. A., & Murray, C. I., (1983). Identity and family relations in early adolescent. Journal of Early Adolescent, 3, 293-303.Olson, D., Russell, C. S., & Sprinkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex modle of marriage and family system. Family Process, 6 (22), 69-83.Pavlik, J. V. (1998). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Pilcher, J. (1994).Mannheim`s sociology of generations: An Undervalued Legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45 (3), 481-495.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5). Lincoln: NCB University Press.Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R.P. Haekins, J. M. Wiemann & S.Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Process.110-134. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Reich, C. A. (1970). The greening of America: How the youth revolution is trying to make America livable. New York, NY: Bantam.Rubin, Z. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 233-260.Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rule of play: Game design fundamentals. London: The MIT Press.Smith, E.P., Prinz, R. J., Dumas, J. E., & Laughlin, J. (2001). Latent models of family processes in African American families: Relationships to child competence, and problem behavior. Jounal of Marriage & the Family, 63 (4), 967-981.Smyth, J.M. (1998). Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome, types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174-184.Solomon, Y., Warin, J., Lewis, C., & Langford, W. (2002). Intimate talk between parents and their teenage children: Democracitc openness or covert control? Sociology, 36 (4), 965-983.Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330-348.Stutzman, F., & Kramer-Duffield, J. (2010). Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. Proceedings of CHI 2010, 1553-1562.Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and child relationships. Online Communication and Child Relationship, 18 (1), 119-146.Szuprowice, B. (1995). Multimedia networking. New York: McGraw-Hill.Taraszow, T., Arsoy, A., Shitta, G., & Laoris, Y. (2008). How much personal and sensitive information do Cypriot teenagers reveal in Facebook? Proceedings of 7th European Conference on E-Learning, 871-876.Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate? Information, Communication & Society, 11, 544-564.Westin, A., (1967). Privacy and Freedom. New York, NY: Atheneum.White, F. A. (1996). Parent-adolescent communication and adolescent decision-making. Journal of Family Studies, 2, 41-56.三、網站資料Aratani, L. (2008, March, 9). When mom or dad asks to be a Facebook `friend`. The Washington post. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2008-03-09/news/36844336_1_friend-request-facebook-friend-personal-pageBlackshaw, P. (2009, November, 2). A pocket guide to social media and kids, the Nielsen company. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2009/a-pocket-guide-to-social-media-and-kids.htmlCheckFacebook.com（2012）。上網日期：2012年11月28日，取自： http://www.checkfacebook.com/。Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern withinocial networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Proceedings of the thirteenth Americas conference on information systems keystone. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://csis.pace.edu/~dwyer/research/DwyerAMCIS2007.pdfFacebook使用中心的隱私設定（2012）。上網日期：2012年12月05日，取自：https://www.facebook.com/settings?tab=privacy。Kobayashi, E. (2007, June, 1). Parents are killing Facebook. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.thestar.com/life/2007/06/01/parents_are_killing_facebook.htmlKornblum, J. (2007, October, 4). Teens: It`s our Facebook; As parents join in, kids feel their cyberspace invaded. USA Today. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2007-10-03-teens-facebook_N.htmNielsen. (2010, June, 5). Social networks/blogs now account for one in every four and a half minutes spent online. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2010/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online.htmlPew Internet（2012年5月16日）。上網日期：2013年05月11日，取自：http://pewinternet.tumblr.com/post/23177613721/facebook-a-profile-of-its-friends-in-light-ofRosen, J. (2010, July, 21). The web means the end of forgetting. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/magazine/25privacy-t2.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0Schwartz, J. (2004, January, 3). That parent-child conversation is becoming instant and online. The New York Times. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/03/business/that-parent-child-conversation-is-becoming-instant-and-online.html?pagewanted=all&src=pmSprenger, P. (1999, January, 26). Sun on privacy: ‘Get over it.’ Wired Magazine. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538行政院社會福利推動委員會青少年事務促進專案小組（2012）。《青少年政策白皮書綱領》。上網日期：2012年12月17日，取自：http://ey.cbi.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/doc_detail.aspx?uid=381&docid=1513。吳凱琳編譯（2012年10月5日）。〈全球第3大國家！Facebook使用者突破10億〉，《天下雜誌》。上網日期：2012年10月05日，取自：http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5043935&page=1。創市際市場研究顧問（2012）。〈2012年07月 虛擬社群篇〉。上網日期：2012年11月28日，取自：http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/2012_07_09.htm。維基百科（2012）。Facebook。上網日期：2012年11月28日，取自：http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/Facebook。 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院碩士在職專班
100941019
101資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100941019 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 吳筱玫 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) 李芸珮 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Lee, Yun Pei en_US dc.creator (作者) 李芸珮 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lee, Yun Pei en_US dc.date (日期) 2012 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-十月-2013 15:47:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-十月-2013 15:47:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-十月-2013 15:47:17 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0100941019 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61237 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 傳播學院碩士在職專班 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100941019 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 101 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 科技變遷帶動社群媒體的興起，尤其Facebook快速發展提供了親子互動一個新場域，家長透過Facebook了解更多子女的生活面向、最新動態，但反觀子女有著卻不想被父母親全盤掌握、監視的想法，而希望與父母親保持某種程度的關心與忽略，產生一種矛盾的心態，成為值得探討的有趣現象。家長與子女的Facebook經常性使用已日益普遍，因此，探討Facebook上的親子互動有其必要性，更進一步了解Facebook上人與人互動的樣貌、彌補文獻的不足，進而發掘兩代在使用經驗的差異性與觀念，提供後續研究一些新的啟發。 本研究採用深度訪談法，以13-18歲之間的青少年與其母親做為研究對象，共採訪12位受訪者。研究分為三個層次，先從個人經驗出發，體現親子雙方使用與自我揭露所展現的差異，其次，以Facebook上的親子互動類型分析不同的個案特色，探討親子兩代使用Facebook後產生關係變化，對現實生活中的權力角色產生何種影響？最後，扣連檢視Facebook親子互動中是否出現反向社會化現象做鉅觀思考。 研究結果發現，在Facebook親子互動初期呈現後輩教導長輩使用的反向社會化現象，而母親在使用過程接收到新的刺激與學習後，亦有長者再社會化的情形。兩代在個人隱私揭露上展現極大的差異，母親的管教方式悄悄滲入子女Facebook，親子互動類型表現在具體的面向，以「母親回覆子女留言」與「觀看子女的po文、打卡、連結」，最為凸顯親子代際衝突與觀念差距，「雙向聊天功能」是維繫親子關係願意分享、交流信任的最佳管道，「封鎖」為子女線上自我防衛的最後一道防線，現實生活中的關係修補有助於維持線上的互動平衡。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The emergence of social media, especially in highly growth of using Facebook, which was bring about by new technology, providing the new field where parents and children who can interact with each other. On the parents’ side, they can understand more aspects of lives and last news about children through Facebook; on the children’s side, however, they do not want that parents put them under surveillance through Facebook. Instead, they hope, through using Facebook, that they can keep in touch with their parents occasionally. Thus, the different expectation of using Facebook between parents and children constitute interesting issue which deserves us to study. Moreover, as for parents-children interaction through Facebook which is common phenomenon, we think that it is necessary to study this issue. By doing this , we can understand a little further about the formation of interaction on Facebook, finding the insignificance of existing literature, identifying the different experience of using new media between different generations, and inspiring follow-up studies. This study adopts in-depth interview, with literature review, which focus on 13-18 years old teenagers and their mother; total numbers of interviewers are 12. There are there parts in this study: Firstly, based on personal experience, we analyze the different experience between mothers and children, which focus on how their using experience and their self-discoursing construct different reality separately. Secondly, we construct the parents-children interaction types and, through those conceptual types, analyze the transformation of parents-children relationship, and discuss how this transformation affects power relation in every life, after using Facebook. Thirdly, from macro perspective, we consider whether reverse socialization exist in parents-children interaction on Facebook. The result shows that, from the primary stage, children do teach their mother how to use Facebook. In other words, reverse socialization do exist. At same time, there are re-socialization existing in parents’ side when mother receiving new stimulation and learning. In addition, there is huge difference about privacy issue between generations, and mothers’ parenting embeds deeply in interaction on Facebook. The most significance of conflict and of the idea gap between parents and children appear in “mothers reply message to their children ” and “watching children’s comments, place where they are, and their sharing linking.” The best way of maintaining parents-children relationship which let them will to share and trust each other is “two-way chatting function.” Instead, children will use “block” to not to share comments or linking with their parents and regard this function as their final mean of self-defense. Besides, parents-children interaction on Facebook can be improved through offline interaction in everyday life. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究背景 4 一、Facebook網站發展簡史 4 二、Facebook在臺灣使用情形 5 三、Facebook互動功能與隱私設定 6 第三節 研究目的 9 第四節 研究流程 11第二章 文獻探討 12 第一節 文化變遷下的反向社會化現象 12 一、Mead的後喻、並喻與前喻文化 12 二、世代現象與代溝問題 13 第二節 Facebook互動性 15 一、互動性 15 二、Facebook互動性與權力控制 17 第三節 親子互動與Facebook 18 一、親子互動與網路使用 18 二、Facebook上的親子互動 20 第四節 自我揭露與Facebook隱私 21 一、自我揭露 21 二、青少年在使用Facebook的自我揭露差異 22 三、Facebook的個人隱私揭露 23 第五節 文獻探討小結與研究架構 25 第六節 研究問題 27第三章 研究方法 28 第一節 質性研究 28 一、質性研究法 28 二、深度訪談法 29 第二節 研究設計 29 一、資料選取與樣本來源 29 二、研究對象 30 三、受訪者背景介紹 31 第三節 訪談大綱 34第四章 資料分析 37 第一節 Facebook上的個人使用與自我揭露 37 一、親子使用Facebook動機 37 二、年齡設定與多個帳號 41 三、加與不加的考量－朋友數量與隱私設定 42 第二節 Facebook上的親子互動 46 一、被封鎖經驗 46 二、Facebook親子互動類型 51 第三節 使用Facebook親子關係的權力、角色變化 61 一、A家庭：旁敲側擊－漸進式滲透 61 二、B家庭：默默觀看、監控並施以管教 62 三、C家庭：從Facebook互動中發現代溝差距 63 四、D家庭：你進、我守的親子攻防戰 65 五、E家庭：水能載舟亦能覆舟之情境式溝通 66 六、F家庭：平輩式溝通拉近親子距離 68 第四節 Facebook親子互動與反向社會化 69第五章 結論與建議 74 第一節 研究結果概述 74 第二節 研究發現與討論 75 一、顛覆與創造－兩代反向社會化之體現 75 二、衝突或平衡？Facebook親子攻防的矛盾拉扯 76 三、秘密或公開？親子如何跨越隱私界線 78 四、線上與離線－母親的管教行為深入Facebook 79 第三節 研究限制 80 第四節 未來研究建議 81參考書目 83附錄：訪談錄音同意書 91 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2782040 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100941019 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臉書 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 前喻文化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 親子互動 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自我揭露 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Facebook en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) prefigurative culture en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) parents-children interaction en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) self-disclosure en_US dc.title (題名) 媽在看我臉書?初探Facebook上的親子互動 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Is mother watching my Facebook? A preliminary study on parents-children interaction through Facebook en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文資料王惟芬、黃柏恆、楊雅婷譯，Bilton著（2011）。《一位數位移民的告白：Facebook, iPad, iPhone如何翻轉我們的世界》。臺北：行人。（原著Bilton, N. [2010]. I live in the future & here’s how it works: why your world, work, and brain are being creatively disrupted. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.）江明修（1992）。〈社會科學多崇典範的爭辯：試論質與量研究方法的整合〉，《國立政治大學學報》，64：315-344。李介至（1998）。《青少年親子衝突、因應策略及其相關因素之研究》。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。沈孟燕（2009）。《親情Online：網路媒介與家庭溝通型態之相關研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。周曉虹、周怡譯，Mead著（1987）。《文化與承諾：一項有關代溝問題的研究》，河北：人民。（原著Mead, M. [1970]. Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press / Doubleday & Company.）胡幼慧、姚美華（1996）。《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。臺北：巨流。宣秀慧（2001）。《青少年親子衝突歷程中的親子互動》。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。洪蘭譯，Harris, J. R.著（2000）。《教養的迷思－父母的教養能不能決定孩子的人格發展》，臺北：商周。（原著Harris, J. R. [1998]. The Nurture Assumption - Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York, London, Toronto Sydney: The Free Press.）徐江敏、李姚軍譯，Goffman著（1992）。《日常生活的自我表演》，臺北：桂冠。（原著Goffman, E. [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.）翁樹澍（1990）。《親子互動關係對青少年心理社會福利感之影響研究》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。孫毓英（1986）。《親子互動模式與青少年社會關係之研究》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。張純富（2010）。《社交網站人際關係維繫之研究：以Facebook為例》。世新大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文。郭良文、林素甘（2001）。〈質化與量化研究方法之比較分析〉，《資訊傳播與圖書館學刊》，7 (4)：1-13。陳品宏（2009）。《面對面與Facebook之人際互動研究》。台灣大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。黃守義、許詩嫻譯（2008）。《新媒介科技手冊》。臺北：韋伯。（原著Leah, A., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.). [2006]. Handbook of new media. London, UK: Sage.）黃貝玲、蔡宏明、羅耀宗譯（2009）。《N世代衝撞：網路新人類正在改變你的世界》。臺北：麥格羅希爾。（原著Tapscott, D. [2008]. Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGrow-Hill.）楊秋燕（1992）。《青少年親子衝突、衝突情感經驗及衝突解決策略之研究》。台灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文。顏伯霖（2010）。《Facebook對大學生人際關係相關性之研究》。屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文。二、英文資料Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Amato, P. R., & Rivera, F. (1999). Paternal involvement and children’s behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 375-384.Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 181-200.Anthonysamy, P., Rashid, A., & Greenwood, P. (2011, October). Do the privacy policies reflect the privacy controls on social networks? Paper presented at IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust, Boston, MA.Aunola, K., Stattin, H., & Nurmi, J. E. (2000). Parenting styles and children’ achievement strategies. Journal of Adolescence, 23 (2), 205-222.Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Mediapsychology, 3, 265-299.Beniger, J. R. (1987). Personalization of mass media and the groth of pseudo- community. Communication Research,14 (3), 352-371.Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2003). Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 451-467.Boyd, D. M. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), McArthur foundation series on digital learning: Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London, UK: Routledge.Burgoon, J. K., Parrott, R., Lepoire, B. A., LKelley, D. L., Walther, J. B., & Perry, D. (1989) .Maintaining and restoring privacy through communication in different types of relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 131-158.Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2009). Feed me: Motivating newcomer contribution in social networking sites. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 945-954.Chen, H., Goh, T.,& Li, W.(2009, November). Welcome to Facebook: How Facebook influences parent-child relationship. Paper presented at the meeting of 2009 TRIS, Hsinchu, Taiwan.Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology & Behavior,12, 341–345.Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2012). Hey mom, what’s on your facebook? Comparing facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3 (1), 48-54.Ciairano, S., Kliewer, W., Bonino, S., & Bosma, H. A. (2008). Parenting and child well-being in two European countries. Adolescence, 43(169), 99-117.Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83-108.Dey, R., Jelveh, Z., & Ross, K. (2012). Facebook users have become much more private: A large-scale study. Paper at the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Security and Social Networking (SESOC), Lugano, Switzerland.Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 153-160.Galegher, J. Sproull, L.,& Kiesler, S. (1998). Legitimacy, authority and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 15, 493-530.Garfinkel, S. (2000). Database nation: The death of privacy in the 21st century. Sebastopol, CA: O`Reilly and Associates, Inc.Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Paper presented ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. Alexandria, VA.Guedj, R. A., ten Hagen, P. Hopgood, J. W., Tucker, F. R., Hugh, A., & Duce, D. A.(1980). Methodology of Interaction. Amseterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland. Horton, D. L., & Wohl, R. R. (1956).Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.Hall, J. A. (1987). Parent-adolescent conflict: An empirical review. Adolescent, 22 (88), 767-789.Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Krieger.Jourard, S. M., & Lasakow, P. (1958). Some factors in self-disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56 (1), 91-98.Kennedy, T. L. M., & Wellman, B. (2007). The Networked Household. Information, Communication & Society, 10 (5), 645-670.Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4 (3), 355-383.Krasnova, H., Kolesnikova, E., & Guenther, O. (2009). ‘It won’t happen to me!’: Self-disclosure in online social networks. Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 343. Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.Lei, L., & Wu, Y. (2007). Adolescents’ paternal attachment and internet use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10 (5), 633-639.Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenager’s use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393-411.Luescher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family 60, 413-425.MacDermid, S. M., Franz, C. E., & De Reus, L. A. (1998). Generativity: At the crossroads of social roles and personality. InD. P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adultdevelopment: How and why we care for the next generation. 181-226. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Mahler, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). The diffusion of interactive communication innovations and the critical mass: The adoption of telecommunication services by German banks. Telecommunications policy, 23 (10/11), 719-740.Mannheim, K. (1952). The Problem of generations. In Kecskemeti, P. (Ed.), Karl Mannheim: Essays. 276-322. London, UK: Routledge.Markus, M, (1990).Toward a ‘critical mass theory of interactive media’. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organization and communication technology . 94-218. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.McKnight, D., Lankton, N., & Tripp, J. (2011, January). Social networking information disclosure and continuance intention: A disconnect. Paper presented 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI.McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity is in the eye of the beholder: Function, perception, involvement, and attitude toward the web site. In M. A. Shaver (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2000 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising. 71-77. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Moore, S., & Gullone, E. (1996). Predicting adolescent risk behavior using a personalized cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 343-359.Newman, B. A., & Murray, C. I., (1983). Identity and family relations in early adolescent. Journal of Early Adolescent, 3, 293-303.Olson, D., Russell, C. S., & Sprinkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex modle of marriage and family system. Family Process, 6 (22), 69-83.Pavlik, J. V. (1998). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Pilcher, J. (1994).Mannheim`s sociology of generations: An Undervalued Legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45 (3), 481-495.Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5). Lincoln: NCB University Press.Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R.P. Haekins, J. M. Wiemann & S.Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Process.110-134. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Reich, C. A. (1970). The greening of America: How the youth revolution is trying to make America livable. New York, NY: Bantam.Rubin, Z. (1975). Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 233-260.Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rule of play: Game design fundamentals. London: The MIT Press.Smith, E.P., Prinz, R. J., Dumas, J. E., & Laughlin, J. (2001). Latent models of family processes in African American families: Relationships to child competence, and problem behavior. Jounal of Marriage & the Family, 63 (4), 967-981.Smyth, J.M. (1998). Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome, types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174-184.Solomon, Y., Warin, J., Lewis, C., & Langford, W. (2002). Intimate talk between parents and their teenage children: Democracitc openness or covert control? Sociology, 36 (4), 965-983.Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330-348.Stutzman, F., & Kramer-Duffield, J. (2010). Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. Proceedings of CHI 2010, 1553-1562.Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. (2008). Online communication and child relationships. Online Communication and Child Relationship, 18 (1), 119-146.Szuprowice, B. (1995). Multimedia networking. New York: McGraw-Hill.Taraszow, T., Arsoy, A., Shitta, G., & Laoris, Y. (2008). How much personal and sensitive information do Cypriot teenagers reveal in Facebook? Proceedings of 7th European Conference on E-Learning, 871-876.Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate? Information, Communication & Society, 11, 544-564.Westin, A., (1967). Privacy and Freedom. New York, NY: Atheneum.White, F. A. (1996). Parent-adolescent communication and adolescent decision-making. Journal of Family Studies, 2, 41-56.三、網站資料Aratani, L. (2008, March, 9). When mom or dad asks to be a Facebook `friend`. The Washington post. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2008-03-09/news/36844336_1_friend-request-facebook-friend-personal-pageBlackshaw, P. (2009, November, 2). A pocket guide to social media and kids, the Nielsen company. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2009/a-pocket-guide-to-social-media-and-kids.htmlCheckFacebook.com（2012）。上網日期：2012年11月28日，取自： http://www.checkfacebook.com/。Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern withinocial networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Proceedings of the thirteenth Americas conference on information systems keystone. Retrieved May 8, 2013, from http://csis.pace.edu/~dwyer/research/DwyerAMCIS2007.pdfFacebook使用中心的隱私設定（2012）。上網日期：2012年12月05日，取自：https://www.facebook.com/settings?tab=privacy。Kobayashi, E. (2007, June, 1). Parents are killing Facebook. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.thestar.com/life/2007/06/01/parents_are_killing_facebook.htmlKornblum, J. (2007, October, 4). Teens: It`s our Facebook; As parents join in, kids feel their cyberspace invaded. USA Today. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2007-10-03-teens-facebook_N.htmNielsen. (2010, June, 5). Social networks/blogs now account for one in every four and a half minutes spent online. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2010/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online.htmlPew Internet（2012年5月16日）。上網日期：2013年05月11日，取自：http://pewinternet.tumblr.com/post/23177613721/facebook-a-profile-of-its-friends-in-light-ofRosen, J. (2010, July, 21). The web means the end of forgetting. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/magazine/25privacy-t2.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0Schwartz, J. (2004, January, 3). That parent-child conversation is becoming instant and online. The New York Times. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/03/business/that-parent-child-conversation-is-becoming-instant-and-online.html?pagewanted=all&src=pmSprenger, P. (1999, January, 26). Sun on privacy: ‘Get over it.’ Wired Magazine. Retrieved May 28, 2013, from http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538行政院社會福利推動委員會青少年事務促進專案小組（2012）。《青少年政策白皮書綱領》。上網日期：2012年12月17日，取自：http://ey.cbi.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/doc_detail.aspx?uid=381&docid=1513。吳凱琳編譯（2012年10月5日）。〈全球第3大國家！Facebook使用者突破10億〉，《天下雜誌》。上網日期：2012年10月05日，取自：http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5043935&page=1。創市際市場研究顧問（2012）。〈2012年07月 虛擬社群篇〉。上網日期：2012年11月28日，取自：http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/2012_07_09.htm。維基百科（2012）。Facebook。上網日期：2012年11月28日，取自：http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/Facebook。 zh_TW
