Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 Inflow-weighted pulmonary perfusion: Comparison between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus perfusion scintigraphy in complex pulmonary circulation
作者 蔡尚岳
Lin,Yi-Ru ; Tsai,Shang-Yueh ;Huang,Teng-Yi ;Chung,Hsiao-Wen ; Huang,Yi-Luan ;Wu,Fu-Zong ;Lin, Chu-Chuan ;Peng, Nan-Jing ;Wu,Ming-Ting
貢獻者 應物所
關鍵詞 Pulmonary perfusion; MRI; Pulmonary scintigraphy; Dynamic contrast enhancement-MRI
日期 2013-03
上傳時間 27-Nov-2013 16:09:18 (UTC+8)
摘要 Background: Due to the different properties of the contrast agents, the lung perfusion maps as measured by 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin perfusion scintigraphy (PS) are not uncommonly discrepant from those measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) using indicator-dilution analysis in complex pulmonary circulation. Since PS offers the pre-capillary perfusion of the first-pass transit, we hypothesized that an inflow-weighted perfusion model of DCE-MRI could simulate the result by PS. Methods: 22 patients underwent DCE-MRI at 1.5T and also PS. Relative perfusion contributed by the left lung was calculated by PS (PSL%), by DCE-MRI using conventional indicator dilution theory for pulmonary blood volume (PBVL%) and pulmonary blood flow (PBFL%) and using our proposed inflow-weighted pulmonary blood volume (PBViwL%). For PBViwL%, the optimal upper bound of the inflow-weighted integration range was determined by correlation coefficient analysis. Results: The time-to-peak of the normal lung parenchyma was the optimal upper bound in the inflow-weighted perfusion model. Using PSL% as a reference, PBVL% showed error of 49.24% to −40.37% (intraclass correlation coefficient RI = 0.55) and PBFL% had error of 34.87% to −27.76% (RI = 0.80). With the inflow-weighted model, PBViwL% had much less error of 12.28% to −11.20% (RI = 0.98) from PSL%. Conclusions: The inflow-weighted DCE-MRI provides relative perfusion maps similar to that by PS. The discrepancy between conventional indicator-dilution and inflow-weighted analysis represents a mixed-flow component in which pathological flow such as shunting or collaterals might have participated.
關聯 Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance ,15(21)
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-21
dc.contributor 應物所en_US
dc.creator (作者) 蔡尚岳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin,Yi-Ru ; Tsai,Shang-Yueh ;Huang,Teng-Yi ;Chung,Hsiao-Wen ; Huang,Yi-Luan ;Wu,Fu-Zong ;Lin, Chu-Chuan ;Peng, Nan-Jing ;Wu,Ming-Tingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2013-03en_US
dc.date.accessioned 27-Nov-2013 16:09:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-Nov-2013 16:09:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Nov-2013 16:09:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61889-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Background: Due to the different properties of the contrast agents, the lung perfusion maps as measured by 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin perfusion scintigraphy (PS) are not uncommonly discrepant from those measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) using indicator-dilution analysis in complex pulmonary circulation. Since PS offers the pre-capillary perfusion of the first-pass transit, we hypothesized that an inflow-weighted perfusion model of DCE-MRI could simulate the result by PS. Methods: 22 patients underwent DCE-MRI at 1.5T and also PS. Relative perfusion contributed by the left lung was calculated by PS (PSL%), by DCE-MRI using conventional indicator dilution theory for pulmonary blood volume (PBVL%) and pulmonary blood flow (PBFL%) and using our proposed inflow-weighted pulmonary blood volume (PBViwL%). For PBViwL%, the optimal upper bound of the inflow-weighted integration range was determined by correlation coefficient analysis. Results: The time-to-peak of the normal lung parenchyma was the optimal upper bound in the inflow-weighted perfusion model. Using PSL% as a reference, PBVL% showed error of 49.24% to −40.37% (intraclass correlation coefficient RI = 0.55) and PBFL% had error of 34.87% to −27.76% (RI = 0.80). With the inflow-weighted model, PBViwL% had much less error of 12.28% to −11.20% (RI = 0.98) from PSL%. Conclusions: The inflow-weighted DCE-MRI provides relative perfusion maps similar to that by PS. The discrepancy between conventional indicator-dilution and inflow-weighted analysis represents a mixed-flow component in which pathological flow such as shunting or collaterals might have participated.-
dc.format.extent 1077979 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance ,15(21)en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Pulmonary perfusion; MRI; Pulmonary scintigraphy; Dynamic contrast enhancement-MRIen_US
dc.title (題名) Inflow-weighted pulmonary perfusion: Comparison between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus perfusion scintigraphy in complex pulmonary circulationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1186/1532-429X-15-21en_US
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-21en_US