學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 日常生活的科技社交角色—— 以Facebook打卡為核心的媒體實踐為例
Technologies’ Social Roles in Everyday Life: A Case Study on Media Practice through Facebook’s Check-ins作者 石婉婷
Shih, Wan Ting貢獻者 王淑美
Wang, Su Mei
石婉婷
Shih, Wan Ting關鍵詞 日常生活
社交
社群網站
空間
智慧型手機
媒體實踐
漫遊者
凝視
Facebook打卡
check-ins
social
social network website
space
smart phone
media practice
flâneur
gaze
Facebook
check-ins日期 2013 上傳時間 10-二月-2014 14:45:42 (UTC+8) 摘要 本文主要討論在日常生活中，以智慧型手機和社群網站Facebook打卡為主的媒體實踐所扮演的社交角色以及實踐者的空間經驗感受，試圖描繪科技帶來社交網絡的連結，並且透過現代科技漫遊者的實踐，混淆日常性和觀光凝視的界線。從媒體實踐取徑，觀察生活中各種實踐行動，試圖勾勒媒體實踐如何定錨社交關係，以及人為主體的媒介消費複雜性。 研究以民族誌法為研究方法，結合線上觀察、線下田野、深度訪談，研究三個身處不同社交圈位置的個案；研究者以參與觀察的方式進入研究對象的生活、工作、休閒場域，期以從實踐者的生活方式，理解日常生活中細瑣行動的動態關係。研究發現，作為新科技的Facebook打卡和智慧型手機，身處社交圈不同位置的實踐者在近用之後能發展機會，包括鞏固意見領袖地位、晉升為領導者、創造與他人的連結；而Facebook的標籤功能、打卡時機的調整、省略打卡位置等實踐，成為實踐者挪用以建立社交關係。 實踐者是為現代的科技漫遊者，在漫遊城市時透過打卡找到新空間經驗感受，這些經驗包括：(1) 日常生活與觀光凝視的界線流動，實踐者凝視平凡的日常找到非比尋常，將之轉化為打卡題材；(2) 打卡實踐是實踐者既地方性又全球性的文本生產，讓地標賦予了既真實又虛擬的混合空間意涵，實踐者於其中觀展表演而自我揭露；(3) 打卡鞏固了觀光凝視的空間經驗，實踐者的空間感受並非固定，而可能既溫暖有情感又陳悶的儀式，打卡實踐添增了生活中面對鏡頭的觀光客姿態。實踐者面對科技物質特性、社會關係、監視構成的結構性限制，能找到方式因應，但其能施展的自由與機會也有局限性。
The aim of the research investigates Facebook’s check-ins as a media practice that plays a crucial social role in everyday life. While walking in the city nowadays, a practitioner can convey his/her feelings, uploading stories and photos to social network websites through mobile technologies. A practitioner’s gaze upon spectacle of the city brings him/her complicated media experience in the media-drenched world, which turns a practitioner into a tourist and a flâneur. The study explores practitioners’ media consumption in everyday life.My empirical study focuses on three cases, who are heavy users of smart phones and in favor of check-ins on Facebook. The three cases situate in different social status and develope different social relationships through Facebook. By choosing ethnography as my method, I am a participant-as-observer who immerse in on-line and off-line field work.My findings indicate that smart phones and check-ins on Facebook provide opportunities and resources for practitioners. A keen adopter of technologies becomes an opinion leader, and her practice of check-ins brings her a fashionable image. The person who owns ordinary fellowship becomes an opinion leader in his peer group by acquiring technology skills. The practitioners use tagging and adjust the timing of check-ins to create social connection with friends.A practitioner, who is also a tourist and a flâneur, finds new feelings through mobile technologies when walking in the city. (1) The boundary between everyday life and tourism is not fixed, but weaves in a flow instead. (2) Geo-tagging symbolizes a hybrid space, in which contains virtual and physical information. (3) The practices of check-ins embody the tourist gaze. The sense of place is a flow, and practitioners may find warm or chill places through different media practices. However, the tension of interaction between people and technologies brings several unexpected troubles. The practitioner combats these problems by using tactics with agency, while he/she faces the power of structure which limits agency at the same time.參考文獻 中文部分王志弘譯（2009）。〈城市裡的世界〉，《城市世界》，頁55-100。台北：群學。（原書：Allen, J. [1999]. Worlds within cities. In D. Massey, J. Allen & S. Pile (Eds.), City worlds. (pp. 55-100). London: Routledge.）王佳煌（2005）。《手機社會學？》。台北：學富文化。石婉婷（2012年7月）。〈Facebook打卡和自我表現— —從所在地意識出發〉，「中華傳播學會2012年年會論文」。取自http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/history_paper_content.php?P_ID=1450&P_YEAR=2012李美華、孔祥明、王婷玉、林嘉娟、黃玉枝、陳雅潔等譯（1998）。《社會科學研究方法》。台北：時英。（原書：Babbie, E. [1995]. The practice of social research. [8th ed.]. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.）林姿吟（2008）。《從攝影部落格觀看自我的呈現：觀展／表演典範之初探》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。林福岳（1996）。〈閱聽人地理學──以民族誌法進行閱聽人研究之緣起與發展〉，《新聞學研究》，52: 167-186。周群英譯（2005）。《日常生活與文化理論》。台北：韋伯文化。（原書：Highmore, B. [2002]. Everyday life and cultural theory. New York: Routledge.）吳筱玫（2009）。〈俗民分類與知識型：Tag的資訊秩序〉。《中華傳播學刊》，15: 3-31。吳筱玫、周芷伊（2009）。〈Taggging的分類與知識意涵：以flickr首頁圖片為例〉。《新聞學研究》，99: 265-305。吳嘉苓（2012）。〈訪談法〉，瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞（編），《社會及行為科學研究法》，頁33-60。台北：東華書局。徐江敏等譯（1992）。《日常生活中的自我表演》。台北：桂冠。（原書Goffman, E. [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.）高宣揚（2002）。《流行文化社會學》。台北：揚智文化。馬國明（1998）。《班雅明》。台北：東大。班雅明／許綺玲譯（1999）。《迎向靈光消逝的年代》。台北：臺灣攝影工作室。唐維敏（1995）。〈破媒體時代：科技與文化的思考〉，《當代》，106: 28-43。Poster, M.／唐維敏譯（1995）。〈第二媒體世代：資訊高速公路的互連〉，《當代》，106: 8-27。張玉佩（2000）。〈網路閱聽人：主動／批判／自我展示〉，《當代》，159: 90-101。張玉佩（2005）。〈從媒體影像觀照自己—觀展∕表演典範之初探〉，《新聞學研究》82: 41-85。張可婷譯（2010）。《民族誌與觀察研究法》。台北：韋伯文化。（原書：Angrosino, M. [2007]. Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage. ）張旭東、魏文生譯（2010）。《發達資本主義的抒情詩人：論波特萊爾》。台北：臉譜。（原書：Benjamin, W. [1938]. Charles Baudelaire: Ein Lyriker im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus.）張逸安譯（2004）。《聰明行動族——下一場社會革命》。台北：聯經。（原書：Rheingold, H. [2002]. Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: MA: Perseus Publishing.）陳之昊、張嘉盈（2012年7月）。〈在世界各地演出的演員：Facebook打卡之展演行為研究〉，「中華傳播學會2012年年會論文」。取自http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/history_paper_content.php?P_ID=1449&P_YEAR=2012陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。陳志萍（2008）。〈精進網路研究方法──網路民族誌〉，《圖書資訊學研究》，2(2): 1-15。陳品秀譯（2010）。《和蘇格拉底吃早餐，與傅柯一起跑步，跟著佛洛伊德去shopping，隨著彌爾去蹺班……哲學家教你學會過一天》。台北：臉譜。（原書：Smith, R. [2009]. Breakfast with Socrates: The philosophy of everyday life. Free Press.）詹宏志（1996）。《城市人：城市空間感覺、符號與解釋》。台北：麥田。葉浩譯（2007）。《觀光客的凝視》。台北：書林。（原書：Urry, J. [2002]. The tourist gaze. London: Sage.）資策會FIND／經濟部技術處（2013年2月23日）。「2012民眾ICT應用調查」。取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=342資策會FIND／經濟部技術處（2013年7月16日）。「資策會FIND(2013)／服務創新體驗設計系統研究與推動計畫(1/4)」。取自http://www.iii.org.tw/Service/3_1_1_c.aspx?id=1163劉仲冬（1996）。〈民族誌研究法及實例〉，胡幼慧（編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁173-194。台北：巨流。趙釧玲（2006）。〈從班雅明的城市漫遊者現象談起--初探網路漫遊者現象〉，《網路社會學通訊期刊》，57。取自：http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/57/57-13.htm熊瑞梅（2009）。〈團體與組織〉，王振寰、瞿海源（編），《社會學與臺灣社會》，頁51-74。台北：巨流。賴文福譯（2000）。《民族誌學》。台北：弘智文化。（原書：Fetterman, D. M. [1989]. Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.）盧嵐蘭（2005）。《媒介消費：閱聽人與社會》。台北：揚智文化。盧嵐蘭（2007）。《閱聽人與日常生活》。台北：五南書局。羅世宏等譯（2004）。《文化研究：理論與實踐》。台北：五南書局。（原書：Barker, C. [2000]. Cultural studies: Theory and practice. London: Sage.）嚴祥鸞（1996）。〈參與觀察法〉，胡幼慧（編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁195-222。台北：巨流。龔卓軍、王靜慧譯（2003），《空間詩學》，台北：張老師文化事業。（原書：Bachelard, G. [1957]. La poétique de l’espace. Presses Universitaires de France.）Facebook打卡統計：http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/taiwan英文部分Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949Albrechtslund, A. (2012). Socializing the city: Location sharing and online social networking. In C. Fuchs, K. Boersma, A. Albrechtslund & M. Sandoval (Eds.), Internet and surveillance (pp. 187-197). New York: Routledge.Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). The legibility of the everyday city. In Cities: Reimagining the urban (pp. 7-30). Cambridge: Polity Press.Apostol, I., Antoniadis, P., & Banerjee, T. (2012). Flânerie between net and place: Possibilities for participation in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(1), 20-33.Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). USA, UK: Verso.boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.Bird, S. E. (2003). Beyond the audience: Living in a media world. In S. E. Bird (Ed.), The audience in everyday life: Living in the media world (pp. 1-20). NY: Routledge.Bull, M. (2000). The world of personal-stereo users: An intrudoucton. In M. Bull (Ed.), Sounding out the city: Personal stereos and the management of everyday life (pp. 17-28). Oxford: Berg.Bull, M. (2007). Sound moves: iPod culture and urban experience. London: Routledge.Bull, S. (2010). Photography. USA: Routledge.Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132.Debord, G. (1995). The society of the spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). New York: Zone Book. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/debord/society.htmDourish, P., & Genevieve, B. (2011). A role for ethnography: methodology and theory. In Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous (pp. 61-89). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261-278.de Souza e Silva, A., & Frith, J. (2010). Locational privacy in public spaces: Media discourses on location-aware mobile technologies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(4), 503-525.du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.Farman, J. (2012). Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative Media. New York: Routledge.Frith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7(1), 131-149.Germann Molz, J. (2006). `Watch us wander`: Mobile surveillance and the surveillance of mobility. Environment and Planning A, 38, 377-393.Goggin, G. (2008). Cultural studies of mobile communication. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 353-366). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Gray, A. (2003). Research practice for cultural studies: Ethnographic methods and lived cultures. London: Sage.Green, N. (2002). On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. The Information Society, 18, 281-292.Gretzel, U. (2010). Travel in the network: Redirected gazes, ubiquitous connections and new frontiers. In M. Levina & G. Kien (Eds.), Post-global network and everyday life. (pp. 41-58). New York: Peter Lang.Hanson, J. (2007). 24/7: Anytime, anywhere. In 24/7: How cell phones and the Internet change the way we live, work, and play (pp.1-15). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257-270). London: SAGE.Humphreys, L. (2008). Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 341-360. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/458362/Mobile_Social_Networks_and_Social_Practice_A_Case_Study_of_DodgeballHumphreys, L., & Liao, T. (2011). Mobile geotagging: Reexamining our interactions with urban space. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 407-423. Refrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01548.x/abstractJansson, A. (2006a). Texture and fixture: Understanding urban communication geographies. Paper presented at the Cities and Media: Cultural Perspectives on Urban Identities in a Mediatized World, Vadstena, Sweden.Jansson, A. (2006b). Textual analysis: Materialising media space. In J. Falkheimer & A. Jansson (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 87-103). Sweden: Nordicom.Jansson, A., & Falkheimer, J. (2006). Towards a geography of communication. In A. Jansson & J. Falkheimer (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 9-25). Sweden: Nordicom.Larsen, J. (2006). Geographies of tourist photography: Choreographies and performances. In J. Falkheimer & A. Jansson (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 243-260). Goteborg: Nordicom.Leach, N. (2005). Belonging: Towards a theory of identification with space. In J. Hiller & E. Rooksby (Eds.), Habitus: A sense of place (pp. 297-311). Aldershot: Ashgate.Lee, Dong-Hoo. (2009). Re-imaging urban space: Mobility, connectivity, and a sence of place. In G. Goggin., & L. Larissa (Eds.), Mobile technologyies: From telecommunication to media (pp. 235-251). New York and London: Routledge.Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38(1), 27-35.May, H., & Hearn, G. (2005). The mobile phone as media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(2), 195-211.Miller, H. (1995). The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the Internet, 1-8. Retrieved from http://ess.ntu.ac.uk/miller/cyberpsych/goffman.htmMorley, D. (2007). Public issues and intimate histories: Mediation, domestication and dislocation. In D. Morley (Ed.), Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new (pp. 199-234). London: Routledge.Morozov, E. (2012, Feburary, 5). The death of the cyberflâneur, The New York Times, p. SR6. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/opinion/sunday/the-death-of-the-cyberflaneur.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0Page, R. E. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. New York: Routledge.Postill, J. (2010). Introduction: Theorising media and practice. In B. Bräuchler& J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising media and practice. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.Powell, A. (2008). WiFi publics: Producing community and technology. Information, Communication & Society, 11(8), 1068-1088.Rybas, N., & Gajjala, R. (2007). Developing cyberethnographic research methods for understanding digitally mediated identities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0703355Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207-226.Silverstone, R. (2005). Introduction. In Media, technology and everyday life in Europe: from information to communication (pp. 1-18). Hants: Ashgate Pub Ltd.Smith, G. (2008). Tagging: People-powered metadata for the social web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Spitulnik, D. (2002). Mobile machines and fluid audience: Rethinking reception through Zambian radio culture. In F. D. Ginsburg, L. Abu-Lughod & B. Larkin (Eds.), Media worlds (pp. 337-354). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Tanaka, A., & Gemeinboeck, P. (2009). Net_Dérive: Connecting and producing a locative media artwork. In G. Goggin & L. Hjorth (Eds.), Mobile technologies: From telecommunications to media. New York, NY: Routledge.Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). Theory, culture & society: The tourist gaze 3.0. London: Sage.Valli, C., & Hannay, P. (2010, July 12-15). Geotagging where cyberspace comes to your place. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Security & Management (SAM `10), Las Vegas, USA.Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227-252. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
100451008
102資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100451008 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 王淑美 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Su Mei en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 石婉婷 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Shih, Wan Ting en_US dc.creator (作者) 石婉婷 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Shih, Wan Ting en_US dc.date (日期) 2013 en_US dc.date.accessioned 10-二月-2014 14:45:42 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 10-二月-2014 14:45:42 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 10-二月-2014 14:45:42 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0100451008 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63632 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100451008 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文主要討論在日常生活中，以智慧型手機和社群網站Facebook打卡為主的媒體實踐所扮演的社交角色以及實踐者的空間經驗感受，試圖描繪科技帶來社交網絡的連結，並且透過現代科技漫遊者的實踐，混淆日常性和觀光凝視的界線。從媒體實踐取徑，觀察生活中各種實踐行動，試圖勾勒媒體實踐如何定錨社交關係，以及人為主體的媒介消費複雜性。 研究以民族誌法為研究方法，結合線上觀察、線下田野、深度訪談，研究三個身處不同社交圈位置的個案；研究者以參與觀察的方式進入研究對象的生活、工作、休閒場域，期以從實踐者的生活方式，理解日常生活中細瑣行動的動態關係。研究發現，作為新科技的Facebook打卡和智慧型手機，身處社交圈不同位置的實踐者在近用之後能發展機會，包括鞏固意見領袖地位、晉升為領導者、創造與他人的連結；而Facebook的標籤功能、打卡時機的調整、省略打卡位置等實踐，成為實踐者挪用以建立社交關係。 實踐者是為現代的科技漫遊者，在漫遊城市時透過打卡找到新空間經驗感受，這些經驗包括：(1) 日常生活與觀光凝視的界線流動，實踐者凝視平凡的日常找到非比尋常，將之轉化為打卡題材；(2) 打卡實踐是實踐者既地方性又全球性的文本生產，讓地標賦予了既真實又虛擬的混合空間意涵，實踐者於其中觀展表演而自我揭露；(3) 打卡鞏固了觀光凝視的空間經驗，實踐者的空間感受並非固定，而可能既溫暖有情感又陳悶的儀式，打卡實踐添增了生活中面對鏡頭的觀光客姿態。實踐者面對科技物質特性、社會關係、監視構成的結構性限制，能找到方式因應，但其能施展的自由與機會也有局限性。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The aim of the research investigates Facebook’s check-ins as a media practice that plays a crucial social role in everyday life. While walking in the city nowadays, a practitioner can convey his/her feelings, uploading stories and photos to social network websites through mobile technologies. A practitioner’s gaze upon spectacle of the city brings him/her complicated media experience in the media-drenched world, which turns a practitioner into a tourist and a flâneur. The study explores practitioners’ media consumption in everyday life.My empirical study focuses on three cases, who are heavy users of smart phones and in favor of check-ins on Facebook. The three cases situate in different social status and develope different social relationships through Facebook. By choosing ethnography as my method, I am a participant-as-observer who immerse in on-line and off-line field work.My findings indicate that smart phones and check-ins on Facebook provide opportunities and resources for practitioners. A keen adopter of technologies becomes an opinion leader, and her practice of check-ins brings her a fashionable image. The person who owns ordinary fellowship becomes an opinion leader in his peer group by acquiring technology skills. The practitioners use tagging and adjust the timing of check-ins to create social connection with friends.A practitioner, who is also a tourist and a flâneur, finds new feelings through mobile technologies when walking in the city. (1) The boundary between everyday life and tourism is not fixed, but weaves in a flow instead. (2) Geo-tagging symbolizes a hybrid space, in which contains virtual and physical information. (3) The practices of check-ins embody the tourist gaze. The sense of place is a flow, and practitioners may find warm or chill places through different media practices. However, the tension of interaction between people and technologies brings several unexpected troubles. The practitioner combats these problems by using tactics with agency, while he/she faces the power of structure which limits agency at the same time. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論-------------------------------------------------------- 1第一節、研究動機-------------------------------------------------- 1壹、從個人經驗出發---------------------------------------------- 1貳、以Facebook打卡為主軸--------------------------------------- 2參、千奇百種的打卡---------------------------------------------- 3第二節、問題意識-------------------------------------------------- 5第二章 文獻回顧---------------------------------------------------- 7第一節、城市漫遊與媒體實踐---------------------------------------- 7壹、城市漫遊的今昔意涵轉變-------------------------------------- 7貳、空間意涵與感覺的轉化--------------------------------------- 11參、媒體實踐取徑----------------------------------------------- 15第二節、攜著媒體科技的觀光客------------------------------------- 21壹、觀光客：日常生活中發現非比尋常----------------------------- 21貳、媒體科技與凝視--------------------------------------------- 23第三節、參與監視的表演舞台--------------------------------------- 26壹、打卡的步驟：社群網站的功能與訊息特質----------------------- 26貳、參與式監視------------------------------------------------- 31參、表演的線上舞台--------------------------------------------- 32肆、小結------------------------------------------------------- 34第三章 研究方法--------------------------------------------------- 36第一節、研究問題------------------------------------------------- 36壹、第一個提問------------------------------------------------- 36貳、第二個提問------------------------------------------------- 37參、第三個提問------------------------------------------------- 38第二節、為什麼採用民族誌法--------------------------------------- 38壹、一窺日常生活的樣貌----------------------------------------- 38貳、民族誌法概述----------------------------------------------- 40參、研究對象--------------------------------------------------- 45第四章 打卡實踐與社交關係----------------------------------------- 50第一節、打卡實踐的因緣與收穫------------------------------------- 50壹、近用打卡作為社交力量--------------------------------------- 50第二節、科技建立生活中的社交連結--------------------------------- 55壹、此時彼處：製造聯繫與話題----------------------------------- 55貳、Tagging朋友：我們的故事 ----------------------------------- 57參、有時候，打卡可有可無--------------------------------------- 62肆、本章小結--------------------------------------------------- 64第五章 城市漫遊的新經驗感受--------------------------------------- 66第一節、日常生活與觀光的界線流動--------------------------------- 66壹、無所不在的媒介化凝視--------------------------------------- 66貳、日常生活裡的驚奇瞬間--------------------------------------- 70參、展示與建構混合空間----------------------------------------- 72第二節、鞏固觀光凝視的空間經驗----------------------------------- 80壹、空間感受的轉化與消費--------------------------------------- 80貳、扮演觀光客------------------------------------------------- 82參、本章小結--------------------------------------------------- 86第六章 媒體實踐的限制--------------------------------------------- 88第一節、科技物質性的限制----------------------------------------- 88壹、空白的地圖------------------------------------------------- 89貳、創私人地標不易--------------------------------------------- 90參、訊號與定位問題--------------------------------------------- 91第二節、實踐與社會關係的阻力------------------------------------- 92壹、社交位置難以改變------------------------------------------- 92貳、忽略身旁的人們--------------------------------------------- 93第三節、實踐的監視時空限制--------------------------------------- 95壹、員工的打卡戰術--------------------------------------------- 96貳、本章小結--------------------------------------------------- 98第七章 結論------------------------------------------------------- 99第一節、研究發現------------------------------------------------- 99壹、資料分析簡述----------------------------------------------- 99貳、媒介消費的推力與阻力-------------------------------------- 100參、漫遊混合空間---------------------------------------------- 102參、移動中的媒體實踐------------------------------------------ 104肆、研究貢獻-------------------------------------------------- 105第二節、研究限制與未來研究建議---------------------------------- 106壹、研究限制-------------------------------------------------- 107貳、未來研究建議---------------------------------------------- 107參考書目---------------------------------------------------------- 109附錄一、訪談大綱-------------------------------------------------- 116附錄二、研究對象保護聲明與同意書---------------------------------- 117 zh_TW dc.format.extent 3722490 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100451008 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 日常生活 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社交 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社群網站 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 空間 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 智慧型手機 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 媒體實踐 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 漫遊者 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 凝視 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Facebook打卡 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) check-ins en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) social en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) social network website en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) space en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) smart phone en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) media practice en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) flâneur en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) gaze en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Facebook en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) check-ins en_US dc.title (題名) 日常生活的科技社交角色—— 以Facebook打卡為核心的媒體實踐為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Technologies’ Social Roles in Everyday Life: A Case Study on Media Practice through Facebook’s Check-ins en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分王志弘譯（2009）。〈城市裡的世界〉，《城市世界》，頁55-100。台北：群學。（原書：Allen, J. [1999]. Worlds within cities. In D. Massey, J. Allen & S. Pile (Eds.), City worlds. (pp. 55-100). London: Routledge.）王佳煌（2005）。《手機社會學？》。台北：學富文化。石婉婷（2012年7月）。〈Facebook打卡和自我表現— —從所在地意識出發〉，「中華傳播學會2012年年會論文」。取自http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/history_paper_content.php?P_ID=1450&P_YEAR=2012李美華、孔祥明、王婷玉、林嘉娟、黃玉枝、陳雅潔等譯（1998）。《社會科學研究方法》。台北：時英。（原書：Babbie, E. [1995]. The practice of social research. [8th ed.]. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.）林姿吟（2008）。《從攝影部落格觀看自我的呈現：觀展／表演典範之初探》。中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。林福岳（1996）。〈閱聽人地理學──以民族誌法進行閱聽人研究之緣起與發展〉，《新聞學研究》，52: 167-186。周群英譯（2005）。《日常生活與文化理論》。台北：韋伯文化。（原書：Highmore, B. [2002]. Everyday life and cultural theory. New York: Routledge.）吳筱玫（2009）。〈俗民分類與知識型：Tag的資訊秩序〉。《中華傳播學刊》，15: 3-31。吳筱玫、周芷伊（2009）。〈Taggging的分類與知識意涵：以flickr首頁圖片為例〉。《新聞學研究》，99: 265-305。吳嘉苓（2012）。〈訪談法〉，瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞（編），《社會及行為科學研究法》，頁33-60。台北：東華書局。徐江敏等譯（1992）。《日常生活中的自我表演》。台北：桂冠。（原書Goffman, E. [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.）高宣揚（2002）。《流行文化社會學》。台北：揚智文化。馬國明（1998）。《班雅明》。台北：東大。班雅明／許綺玲譯（1999）。《迎向靈光消逝的年代》。台北：臺灣攝影工作室。唐維敏（1995）。〈破媒體時代：科技與文化的思考〉，《當代》，106: 28-43。Poster, M.／唐維敏譯（1995）。〈第二媒體世代：資訊高速公路的互連〉，《當代》，106: 8-27。張玉佩（2000）。〈網路閱聽人：主動／批判／自我展示〉，《當代》，159: 90-101。張玉佩（2005）。〈從媒體影像觀照自己—觀展∕表演典範之初探〉，《新聞學研究》82: 41-85。張可婷譯（2010）。《民族誌與觀察研究法》。台北：韋伯文化。（原書：Angrosino, M. [2007]. Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage. ）張旭東、魏文生譯（2010）。《發達資本主義的抒情詩人：論波特萊爾》。台北：臉譜。（原書：Benjamin, W. [1938]. Charles Baudelaire: Ein Lyriker im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus.）張逸安譯（2004）。《聰明行動族——下一場社會革命》。台北：聯經。（原書：Rheingold, H. [2002]. Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: MA: Perseus Publishing.）陳之昊、張嘉盈（2012年7月）。〈在世界各地演出的演員：Facebook打卡之展演行為研究〉，「中華傳播學會2012年年會論文」。取自http://ccs.nccu.edu.tw/history_paper_content.php?P_ID=1449&P_YEAR=2012陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。陳志萍（2008）。〈精進網路研究方法──網路民族誌〉，《圖書資訊學研究》，2(2): 1-15。陳品秀譯（2010）。《和蘇格拉底吃早餐，與傅柯一起跑步，跟著佛洛伊德去shopping，隨著彌爾去蹺班……哲學家教你學會過一天》。台北：臉譜。（原書：Smith, R. [2009]. Breakfast with Socrates: The philosophy of everyday life. Free Press.）詹宏志（1996）。《城市人：城市空間感覺、符號與解釋》。台北：麥田。葉浩譯（2007）。《觀光客的凝視》。台北：書林。（原書：Urry, J. [2002]. The tourist gaze. London: Sage.）資策會FIND／經濟部技術處（2013年2月23日）。「2012民眾ICT應用調查」。取自http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=342資策會FIND／經濟部技術處（2013年7月16日）。「資策會FIND(2013)／服務創新體驗設計系統研究與推動計畫(1/4)」。取自http://www.iii.org.tw/Service/3_1_1_c.aspx?id=1163劉仲冬（1996）。〈民族誌研究法及實例〉，胡幼慧（編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁173-194。台北：巨流。趙釧玲（2006）。〈從班雅明的城市漫遊者現象談起--初探網路漫遊者現象〉，《網路社會學通訊期刊》，57。取自：http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/57/57-13.htm熊瑞梅（2009）。〈團體與組織〉，王振寰、瞿海源（編），《社會學與臺灣社會》，頁51-74。台北：巨流。賴文福譯（2000）。《民族誌學》。台北：弘智文化。（原書：Fetterman, D. M. [1989]. Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.）盧嵐蘭（2005）。《媒介消費：閱聽人與社會》。台北：揚智文化。盧嵐蘭（2007）。《閱聽人與日常生活》。台北：五南書局。羅世宏等譯（2004）。《文化研究：理論與實踐》。台北：五南書局。（原書：Barker, C. [2000]. Cultural studies: Theory and practice. London: Sage.）嚴祥鸞（1996）。〈參與觀察法〉，胡幼慧（編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁195-222。台北：巨流。龔卓軍、王靜慧譯（2003），《空間詩學》，台北：張老師文化事業。（原書：Bachelard, G. [1957]. La poétique de l’espace. Presses Universitaires de France.）Facebook打卡統計：http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/taiwan英文部分Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949Albrechtslund, A. (2012). Socializing the city: Location sharing and online social networking. In C. Fuchs, K. Boersma, A. Albrechtslund & M. Sandoval (Eds.), Internet and surveillance (pp. 187-197). New York: Routledge.Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). The legibility of the everyday city. In Cities: Reimagining the urban (pp. 7-30). Cambridge: Polity Press.Apostol, I., Antoniadis, P., & Banerjee, T. (2012). Flânerie between net and place: Possibilities for participation in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(1), 20-33.Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). USA, UK: Verso.boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.Bird, S. E. (2003). Beyond the audience: Living in a media world. In S. E. Bird (Ed.), The audience in everyday life: Living in the media world (pp. 1-20). NY: Routledge.Bull, M. (2000). The world of personal-stereo users: An intrudoucton. In M. Bull (Ed.), Sounding out the city: Personal stereos and the management of everyday life (pp. 17-28). Oxford: Berg.Bull, M. (2007). Sound moves: iPod culture and urban experience. London: Routledge.Bull, S. (2010). Photography. USA: Routledge.Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 115-132.Debord, G. (1995). The society of the spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). New York: Zone Book. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/debord/society.htmDourish, P., & Genevieve, B. (2011). A role for ethnography: methodology and theory. In Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous (pp. 61-89). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261-278.de Souza e Silva, A., & Frith, J. (2010). Locational privacy in public spaces: Media discourses on location-aware mobile technologies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3(4), 503-525.du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (1997). Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. London: Sage.Farman, J. (2012). Mobile interface theory: Embodied space and locative Media. New York: Routledge.Frith, J. (2012). Splintered space: Hybrid spaces and differential mobility. Mobilities, 7(1), 131-149.Germann Molz, J. (2006). `Watch us wander`: Mobile surveillance and the surveillance of mobility. Environment and Planning A, 38, 377-393.Goggin, G. (2008). Cultural studies of mobile communication. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 353-366). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Gray, A. (2003). Research practice for cultural studies: Ethnographic methods and lived cultures. London: Sage.Green, N. (2002). On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. The Information Society, 18, 281-292.Gretzel, U. (2010). Travel in the network: Redirected gazes, ubiquitous connections and new frontiers. In M. Levina & G. Kien (Eds.), Post-global network and everyday life. (pp. 41-58). New York: Peter Lang.Hanson, J. (2007). 24/7: Anytime, anywhere. In 24/7: How cell phones and the Internet change the way we live, work, and play (pp.1-15). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257-270). London: SAGE.Humphreys, L. (2008). Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 341-360. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/458362/Mobile_Social_Networks_and_Social_Practice_A_Case_Study_of_DodgeballHumphreys, L., & Liao, T. (2011). Mobile geotagging: Reexamining our interactions with urban space. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 407-423. Refrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01548.x/abstractJansson, A. (2006a). Texture and fixture: Understanding urban communication geographies. Paper presented at the Cities and Media: Cultural Perspectives on Urban Identities in a Mediatized World, Vadstena, Sweden.Jansson, A. (2006b). Textual analysis: Materialising media space. In J. Falkheimer & A. Jansson (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 87-103). Sweden: Nordicom.Jansson, A., & Falkheimer, J. (2006). Towards a geography of communication. In A. Jansson & J. Falkheimer (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 9-25). Sweden: Nordicom.Larsen, J. (2006). Geographies of tourist photography: Choreographies and performances. In J. Falkheimer & A. Jansson (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 243-260). Goteborg: Nordicom.Leach, N. (2005). Belonging: Towards a theory of identification with space. In J. Hiller & E. Rooksby (Eds.), Habitus: A sense of place (pp. 297-311). Aldershot: Ashgate.Lee, Dong-Hoo. (2009). Re-imaging urban space: Mobility, connectivity, and a sence of place. In G. Goggin., & L. Larissa (Eds.), Mobile technologyies: From telecommunication to media (pp. 235-251). New York and London: Routledge.Ledbetter, A. M., Mazer, J. P., DeGroot, J. M., Meyer, K. R., Mao, Y., & Swafford, B. (2011). Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of Facebook communication and relational closeness. Communication Research, 38(1), 27-35.May, H., & Hearn, G. (2005). The mobile phone as media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(2), 195-211.Miller, H. (1995). The presentation of self in electronic life: Goffman on the Internet, 1-8. Retrieved from http://ess.ntu.ac.uk/miller/cyberpsych/goffman.htmMorley, D. (2007). Public issues and intimate histories: Mediation, domestication and dislocation. In D. Morley (Ed.), Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new (pp. 199-234). London: Routledge.Morozov, E. (2012, Feburary, 5). The death of the cyberflâneur, The New York Times, p. SR6. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/opinion/sunday/the-death-of-the-cyberflaneur.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0Page, R. E. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. New York: Routledge.Postill, J. (2010). Introduction: Theorising media and practice. In B. Bräuchler& J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising media and practice. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.Powell, A. (2008). WiFi publics: Producing community and technology. Information, Communication & Society, 11(8), 1068-1088.Rybas, N., & Gajjala, R. (2007). Developing cyberethnographic research methods for understanding digitally mediated identities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0703355Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207-226.Silverstone, R. (2005). Introduction. In Media, technology and everyday life in Europe: from information to communication (pp. 1-18). Hants: Ashgate Pub Ltd.Smith, G. (2008). Tagging: People-powered metadata for the social web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Spitulnik, D. (2002). Mobile machines and fluid audience: Rethinking reception through Zambian radio culture. In F. D. Ginsburg, L. Abu-Lughod & B. Larkin (Eds.), Media worlds (pp. 337-354). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Tanaka, A., & Gemeinboeck, P. (2009). Net_Dérive: Connecting and producing a locative media artwork. In G. Goggin & L. Hjorth (Eds.), Mobile technologies: From telecommunications to media. New York, NY: Routledge.Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). Theory, culture & society: The tourist gaze 3.0. London: Sage.Valli, C., & Hannay, P. (2010, July 12-15). Geotagging where cyberspace comes to your place. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Security & Management (SAM `10), Las Vegas, USA.Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227-252. zh_TW
