學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 永續都市觀點下住商混合社區之都市規劃 與設計模擬分析
Urban design and planning tools in building sustainable mixed-use neighborhoods作者 張懿萱
Chang, Yi Hsuan貢獻者 蔡育新
Tsai, Yu Hsin
張懿萱
Chang, Yi Hsuan關鍵詞 土地混合使用
永續都市
都市設計
都市規劃
建成環境
Mixed-use
Sustainable city
Urban design
Urban planning
Built environment日期 2011 上傳時間 1-四月-2014 11:19:35 (UTC+8) 摘要 土地混合使用，尤其是住商混合使用，一直被認為是達成環境面永續都市或是生態城市的要素之一。其除了提高住商可及性使人們步行與騎自行車的機率增加外，同時也讓公共空間的安全性提高、並增加都市的活力。然而住、商兩者間不完全相容的土地使用型態卻也容易引發對居住環境的負面衝擊，例如噪音、異味、光線侵擾、使人感覺較擁擠、降低隱私性等使環境品質下降，而可能降低人對住商混合住宅社區的偏好。本研究從過去研究中較少提及的都市空間規劃與設計角度切入，探討不同都市規劃與設計元素如何影響住商混合區之環境品質，其研究目的有三：1. 歸納整理可能影響住商混合區建成環境之都市規劃與設計元素2. 建立環境面生態都市概念下，住商混合實質環境品質之評估面向與指標3. 分析各都市規劃與設計元素對住商混合建成環境指標之影響。本研究以台北市的住三分區為基礎，建立模擬住商混合社區，模擬各種都市規劃、設計元素之變化情境，以利衡量每項都市設計元素以及組合情境影響下，住商混合社區各面向建成環境品質評估指標的變化。使用工具包括ArcGIS、Google ShetchUP、及AutoCAD軟體，以建立模擬都市基本圖，並使用空間分析工具、ArcGIS外掛模組及Excel計算各面向之環境指標數值。研究結果顯示降低建築建蔽率有助於提升住商混合社區整體環境品質以及除了商店經營性外所有面向的建成環境(例如行人友善步行空間、居民住家可居住性及自然環境)，商店經營性則於建蔽率40%-55%間時表現較佳。在建物形狀方面，顯示正方塔型與長條型建築在住商混合區建成環境各面向指標上表現的差別不大。此外，階梯式退縮建築對於行人友善步行空間、居民住家可居住性及自然環境等均有提升的效果。
Mixed land use has been widely considered as one of the key planning principles for achieving (environmentally) sustainable city or eco-city in terms of promoting transit patronage, walking and biking, and incubating retail-business friendly communities. However, it may also lower the livability because of the problems like noise, light instruction and downgraded residents privacy as to decrease the residents’ preference to live in mixed-use area. Few studies, nevertheless, has been done on the roles of the various tools in urban planning and design in improving the physical environment for both residents and retail businesses. The objectives of the paper are: (1) to review the urban planning and design tools normally applied by planners which may have impacts on the physical environment of mixed-use community; (2) to compile an inventory of indexes corresponding to the quality of physical environment for both residents and retail businesses; and (3) to examine the impacts of these tools on the physical environment indexes. The research method involves an simulation analysis, which is conducted in a selected mixed-use community in Taipei city, Taiwan. The simulation analysis helps examining the impact of each of the tools on physical environment indexes . The software packages applied are Google SketchUp, AutoCAD, ArcGIS, and Excel. The results of simulation analyses suggest that lowering the building coverage rate (BCR) is helpful in improving overall quality of mixed-use community and all sub-indexes (i.e., pedestrian-friendly environment, residents’ livability and nature environment) except for retail business operation environment. The quality of retail business operation environment performs better when BCR stays at the intermediate level (between 40%-55%). In the aspect of building shape, there is minimal difference showed on the impact on the overall index between tower-shaped and slab-shaped buildings. Besides, the stair-shaped setback is suggested for better pedestrian-friendly environment, residents’ livability, and especially nature environment.參考文獻 中文部分：王小璘、曾詠宜，2003，「都市公園綠地區位景觀生態評估之研究」，『設計學報』，8(3)：53-74。吳綱立，2006，〈從西方近代都市設計思潮的發展看台灣都市設計專業的定位〉，《建築學報》，中華民國建築學會，頁111-146。吳綱立，2008，「生態大眾運輸村Green-TOD 的願景與在地落實---高雄鐵路地下化生態廊帶與生態大眾運輸村的營造」，『建築Dialogue』，(130)：114-121。吳綱立，2009，「高雄市區鐵路地下化站區新生地都市設計開發策略規劃案結案報告書」，高雄：高雄市政府委託研究規劃報告。吳曜馨，2009，「活化型生態大眾運輸村選址評估架構之研究-以高雄市鐵路地下化地區為例」，成功大學都市計畫所碩士論文；台南。吳孟亭，2010，「綠色空間規劃對生態都市建置的影響—土地使用管制與都市設計元素對於生態都市指標影響之模擬分析」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文；台北。李永展，2007，「都市型永續社區之準則：國土永續發展之新趨勢」，『應用倫理研究通訊』，41：p.48-57。李家儂、賴宗裕，2007，「台北都會區大眾運輸導向發展目標體系與策略之建構」，『地理學報』，48：19-42。何友鋒、李融昇，2009，「都市設計永續價值評估指標體系之研究」，『建築學報』，68：201-222。林煥軒，2010，「高密度建成環境下影響住宅可居住性之都市設計元素之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系研究所碩士論文。林欽榮，1996，《都市設計在台灣》，台北，創興出版社有限公司。林寶秀，2010「植栽綠地降溫效果之研究」，國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院園藝學研究所博士論文；台北。邱淑華，2000，「由台灣地區都市體系變遷探討商業空間結構變化趨勢與特性」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。周鼎金，2000，「住宅光汙染之研究以台北市夜間照明為例」，『照明學刊』，39-42。徐志揚，2011，「側懸式廣告招牌視覺辨識之研究」，高雄師範大學視覺傳達設計碩士論文：高雄。孫翠玲，1982，「北京市綠化減噪效果的初步研究」，中國大陸：『林業科學』，18（3）：29-334。陳慶源，1987，「都市招牌問題之研究--以大臺北市區為例」，東海大學建築研究所碩士論文；台中。陳育文，2004，「廣告招牌及植栽對視覺認知與街道景觀偏好之影響」逢甲大學建築學研究所碩士論文；台中。陳鈺秀，2000，「舊市區既有住商綜合建築再開發之可行性研究－以台南市中國城為例」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。張顏鵬，2003，「住商混合開發中商業環境企劃之研究－以運用社區開放空間塑造商店內街之集合住宅案為例」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南張學孔、呂英志，2009，「大眾運輸導向發展下運輸系統技術方案適用性之比較研究」，『都市與計劃』，（36）1：51-80。郭子齊，2000，「都市土地使用型態對消費性旅次運具選擇行為之影響」，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩士班碩士論文；台南。許戎聰，1991，「住宅區有計畫混合使用之研究－以台北市萬華區頂碩里與大安區德安里為例」，私立淡江大學建築研究所碩士論文；台北。莊琮博，2001「從維護居住環境品質觀點探討台北市住宅區混合使用管制實施策略－以大安區車層里與龍雲里為例」，國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文；台北。賀士麃，2005，「台北市都市設計制度之研究」，『南亞學報』，25：31-43。黃光佑，2008，「住商混合區街道廣告照明光侵擾研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。黃健二，1991，「都市住宅區可相容使用用途與分類研究」，內政部委託研究計畫報告。黃書禮、翁瑞豪、陳子淳，1997，「台北市永續發展指標系統之建立與評估」，『都市與計畫』，24(1)：23-42。黃書禮、葉佳宗、陳俐伶，2005，「檢視都市永續發展指標的發展歷程與內涵：從指標系統建構到政策評估」，『都市與計劃』，32(2)：227-251。黃義宏，2005，「捷運車站周邊人行空間設計之研究」，政治大學地政學系碩士論文；台北。曾慧真，1999，「新竹市住宅區商業混合使用環境品質之研究」，私立中華大學建築與都市計畫學系碩士論文；新竹。趙又嬋，2009，「住宅區戶外照明光侵擾之研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文；台南。楊恩捷，2004，「緊密都市之永續性分析」，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文；台北。蔡育新、王大立、劉小蘭，2011，「土地混合使用對住宅價格的影響：解析混合使用、密度與可及性」，『都市與計畫』，38(2)：119-146。蔡佳蓉，2004，「本土化TOD都市設計策略之研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。蔡岡廷，2008，「台南地區都市綠色音環境之研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文；台南。廖俊松，2004，「地方二十一世紀永續發展之策略」，『中國行政評論』，13(2)：183-212。賴彥伶，2006，「由住商混合空間尺度探討居住偏好與居住選擇之關係－台北市實證分析」，逢甲大學都市計畫學系碩士論文;台中。錢學陶1996，「混合使用開發建築規劃準則之研究」，內政部建築研究所專題研究計畫成果報告賴建都、黎佩芬，2010，「戶外廣告設立位置差異及影響可見度之研究」，『廣告學研究』，34：1-24。劉阿榮，2000，「台灣之永續發展-國家與社會的觀點」，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文；台北。Shirvani, H., 1990.『都市設計程序』（謝慶達譯），台北：創興出版社有限公司。英文部分：ASCE, 1999. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 67: wind tunnel studies of buildings and structures. Virginia.Bennett J., 2010, “New Zealand Apartment Living: Developing a Liveability Evaluation Index”, http://www.tbher.org/index.php/tbher/article/download/20/21Blocken, B., J.,Carmeliet, T., and Stathopoulos. 2007. CFD Evaluation of The Wind Speed Conditions In Passages Between Buildings E Effect of Wall-Function Roughness Modifications on the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow.Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95: 941-62.Brook McIlroyInc ,2006,”Burlington Downtown Urban Design Guidelines”Cervero,R. and Kockelman, K, 1997, “Travel demand and 3Ds:Density, diversity, and design”, Transportation Research, 2(3): 199-219.Cervero R and Murakami J., 2009, “Rail and Property Development in Hong Kong: Experiences and Extensions”, Urban Studies46(10): 2019-2043.Cervero R and Sullivan C., 2010, Institute oftransportationstudiesuniversity of California, BerkelyChin G., Niel, K. CortiB.andKnuiman M., 2008, “Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data”, Preventive Medicine, 46(1): 41-45.Churchman, A. 1999, “Disentangling the concept of density”, Journal of Planning Literature 13: 389-411. 13:389-411.Chapman L ,2000” Improved one dimensional energy balance modelling, tilising sky-view factors determinedfrom digital imagery”. 10ThInternational Road Weather Conference, Davos, SwitzerlandChow W.and. Roth M, 2006, “Temporal dynamics of the urban heat island of Singapore”,International Journal of Climatology, 26(15): 2243-2260.Cozens, Saville, Hillier, 2005 "Crime prevention through environmental design: a review and modern bibliography", Property Management, 23(5):328 – 356Elkin, Tim, D. McLaren, and M. Hillman, 1991. Reviving the city: Towards sustainable urban development., London: Friends of the Earth.Envision Utah,2002“Wasachfront transitorienteddevelopmentguideline”Grant, J., 2002, “Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle, Journal of the American Planning Association68(1): 71-85.Hess P., Moudon A, Snyder M, Stanilov K.,1999, “Site Design and Pedestrian Travel, Transportation Research Record” Journal of the Transportation Research Board (1647):9-19Herzele, A. V. and Wiedemann, T., 2003, “A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 63:109-126.Hillier, B., 1996Space is the Machine.” Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University PressHolden E. and I. Norland T., 2005, “Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region”, Urban Studies, 42(12): 2145-2166.Holmes J.,Hemert J, ”Peacefulness and Livability” The Rocky Mountain Land Use InstituteHurM., Nasar J. L. and Chun B., 2010, “Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1): 52-59.IESNA, 2000, “IESNA Technical Memorandum on Light Trespass: Research, Results and Recommendations”, IESNA TM-11-2000., The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New YorkI. Fleming, A. Baum, L. M. Davidson, E. Rectanus and S. McArdle, 1987, “Chronic stress as a factor in physiologic reactivity to challenge”, Health Psychol, 6(3): 221-237.Inam A., 2002,“Meaningful Urban Design: eleological/Catalytic/Relevant”, Journal of Urban Design, 7(1): 35-58.J. Grant, 2002, “Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1): 71-84.Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., and Liu, X., 2005, “Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 72:325-336. Lloyd-Jones T., 2004,Urban Design for sustainability, Final Report of the Working Group on Urban Design for Sustainability to theEuropean Union Expert Group on the Urban EnvironmentMfula, A. M., V. Kukadia, R. F. Griffiths, and Hall D. J., 2005.Wind Tunnel Modeling of Urban Building Exposure to Outdoor Pollution.Atmospheric Environment, 39(15): 2737-45.Maas,J, VerheijR. A, GroenewegenP. P., de Vries S. and SpreeuwenbergP., 2006, “Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?”, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7): 587-592.Ng, E., Chao Y., C. Liang, R. Chao, C.H. F., Jimmy, 2011. Improving the Wind Environment in High-Density Cities By Understanding Urban Morphology and Surface Roughness: A Study In Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, pp. 59–74Niles, J. and Nelson, D. (1999) Measuring the Success of Transit-Oriented Development: Retail MarketDynamics and Other Key Determinants, Seattle, Washington: American Planning Association, NationalPlanning Conference.O’Neill, D. J., 2000,The Smart Growth Tool Kit, Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.S. Porta and J. L. Renne, 2005, “Linking urban design to sustainability: formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia”, Urban Design International, 10(1): 51-64.Raw, G.J., Aizlewood, C.E. and Hamilton, R.M., 2001,”Building regulation, health and safety”, Watford: Building Research Establishment.Ruth S.,1997,”Traditional Neighborhood Shopping Districts: Patterns of Use and Modes of Access” Monograph 54, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, BerkeleyRegister, R., 1987,Eco-city Berkeley:Building Cities for a Healthy Future, Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.R. Plummer, 2006, “The evolution of sustainable development strategies in Canada: an assessment of three federal natural resource management agencies”, Sustainable Development, 14(1): 16-32.Saelens B. E., Sallis J. F. and Frank L. D., 2003, “Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling: Findings From the Transportation, Urban Design, and Planning Literatures”, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2): 80-91.Tan, S., 2005, “Makati Central Business District Pedestrianization and Traffic Segregation Projects.”, Forum on Improving Pedestrian Facilities and Bikeways in Metro Manila, www.cleanairnet.org/caiasia/1412/ articles-69376_ayala.pdfTeller, J., 2003, “A spherical metric for the field-orientated analysis of complex urban open spaces”, Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design,30: 339-365.Turner, A and Penn, A, 1999, “Making isovistssyntatic: Isovist integration analysis”, inProceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax Vol. 3, Universidadde Brasil, Brasilia, Brazil.Turner, P.A., Doxa, M., O Sullivan, D.and Penn, A., 2001,”From Isovist Fields to Visibility Graphs,Environment and Planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28:103-121Thorne, Robert, and William Filmer-Sankey. 2003. Transportation. In Sustainable urbandesign, 25-32. London: Spon Press.Town of Halton Hills Official Plan ,TOWN OF HALTON HILLS OFFICIAL PLAN URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINESY. R. Jabareen, 2006, “Sustainable Urban Forms”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1): 38-52.Yannas, Simon. 1998. “Living with the city: Urban design and environmental sustainability”. In Environmentally friendly cities, 41-48.London:James& JamesYang, P. Putra, S.Y., Li, W., 2005, “Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.Yuen B. and Chor C. H., 1998, “Pedestrian streets in Singapore”, Transportation, 25(3): 225-242.Y.-H. Tsai, 2005, “Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus `Sprawl`”, Urban Studies, 42(1): 141-161.Y-H. Tsai, 2011, “Efficiency of neighbourhood planning and design tools in building eco-cities”, 2011 International Winter Conference on Environmental Innovations and Sustainability, Beppu, Oita, Japan, 28 and 29 January, 2011Y.-H. Tsai, 2012, “Urban Planning and Design Tools for Improving Physical Aspects of Livability inHigh-Density Neighborhoods”Wong, N. H., and C. Yu, 2005. Study of Green Areas and Urban Heat Island in A Tropical City. Habitat International, 29(3): 547-558Wong, M. S., J. E. Nichol, P. H. To, and J. Wang, 2010. A Simple Method for Designation of Urban Ventilation Corridors and Its Application To Urban Heat Island Analysis. Building and Environment,45:1880-89.Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R. and Handley, J. F., 2001, “City from and natural process-indicators for the ecological performance of urban area and their application to Merseyside, UK”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 57:97-103.Zenaida, C., Galingan, 2009, “Pedestrian-Friendly Streetscape in a Tropical Business District”, Journal of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and the Designed Environment, University of the Philippines College of Architecture. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
99257007
100資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099257007 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 蔡育新 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Tsai, Yu Hsin en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 張懿萱 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Chang, Yi Hsuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 張懿萱 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yi Hsuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2011 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-四月-2014 11:19:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-四月-2014 11:19:35 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-四月-2014 11:19:35 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0099257007 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65093 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 99257007 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 土地混合使用，尤其是住商混合使用，一直被認為是達成環境面永續都市或是生態城市的要素之一。其除了提高住商可及性使人們步行與騎自行車的機率增加外，同時也讓公共空間的安全性提高、並增加都市的活力。然而住、商兩者間不完全相容的土地使用型態卻也容易引發對居住環境的負面衝擊，例如噪音、異味、光線侵擾、使人感覺較擁擠、降低隱私性等使環境品質下降，而可能降低人對住商混合住宅社區的偏好。本研究從過去研究中較少提及的都市空間規劃與設計角度切入，探討不同都市規劃與設計元素如何影響住商混合區之環境品質，其研究目的有三：1. 歸納整理可能影響住商混合區建成環境之都市規劃與設計元素2. 建立環境面生態都市概念下，住商混合實質環境品質之評估面向與指標3. 分析各都市規劃與設計元素對住商混合建成環境指標之影響。本研究以台北市的住三分區為基礎，建立模擬住商混合社區，模擬各種都市規劃、設計元素之變化情境，以利衡量每項都市設計元素以及組合情境影響下，住商混合社區各面向建成環境品質評估指標的變化。使用工具包括ArcGIS、Google ShetchUP、及AutoCAD軟體，以建立模擬都市基本圖，並使用空間分析工具、ArcGIS外掛模組及Excel計算各面向之環境指標數值。研究結果顯示降低建築建蔽率有助於提升住商混合社區整體環境品質以及除了商店經營性外所有面向的建成環境(例如行人友善步行空間、居民住家可居住性及自然環境)，商店經營性則於建蔽率40%-55%間時表現較佳。在建物形狀方面，顯示正方塔型與長條型建築在住商混合區建成環境各面向指標上表現的差別不大。此外，階梯式退縮建築對於行人友善步行空間、居民住家可居住性及自然環境等均有提升的效果。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Mixed land use has been widely considered as one of the key planning principles for achieving (environmentally) sustainable city or eco-city in terms of promoting transit patronage, walking and biking, and incubating retail-business friendly communities. However, it may also lower the livability because of the problems like noise, light instruction and downgraded residents privacy as to decrease the residents’ preference to live in mixed-use area. Few studies, nevertheless, has been done on the roles of the various tools in urban planning and design in improving the physical environment for both residents and retail businesses. The objectives of the paper are: (1) to review the urban planning and design tools normally applied by planners which may have impacts on the physical environment of mixed-use community; (2) to compile an inventory of indexes corresponding to the quality of physical environment for both residents and retail businesses; and (3) to examine the impacts of these tools on the physical environment indexes. The research method involves an simulation analysis, which is conducted in a selected mixed-use community in Taipei city, Taiwan. The simulation analysis helps examining the impact of each of the tools on physical environment indexes . The software packages applied are Google SketchUp, AutoCAD, ArcGIS, and Excel. The results of simulation analyses suggest that lowering the building coverage rate (BCR) is helpful in improving overall quality of mixed-use community and all sub-indexes (i.e., pedestrian-friendly environment, residents’ livability and nature environment) except for retail business operation environment. The quality of retail business operation environment performs better when BCR stays at the intermediate level (between 40%-55%). In the aspect of building shape, there is minimal difference showed on the impact on the overall index between tower-shaped and slab-shaped buildings. Besides, the stair-shaped setback is suggested for better pedestrian-friendly environment, residents’ livability, and especially nature environment. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、 緒論 1第一節、 研究動機與目的 1第二節、 研究內容 3第三節、 研究方法與架構 4第二章、 理論與文獻回顧 6第一節、 理論基礎 6第二節、 大眾運輸導向發展與住商混合社區 9第三節、 住商混合區實質環境評估面向、指標與影響因素 12第四節、 都市規劃與設計 23第三章、 研究設計 28第一節、 都市空間模擬研究架構與分析工具 28第二節、 模擬分析範圍 29第三節、 規劃與設計元素及模擬住商混合社區情境 34第四節、 生態住商混合區衡量指標及衡量方法 39第四章、 生態住商混合社區指標與使用者分析 50第一節、 都市設計與規劃元素對永續住商混合區指標影響分析 51第二節、 生態住商混合區使用者面向分析 80第五章、 結論與政策建議 92第一節、 結論 92第二節、 政策建議 95第三節、 研究限制 95 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2758934 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099257007 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 土地混合使用 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 永續都市 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 都市設計 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 都市規劃 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 建成環境 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mixed-use en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sustainable city en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Urban design en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Urban planning en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Built environment en_US dc.title (題名) 永續都市觀點下住商混合社區之都市規劃 與設計模擬分析 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Urban design and planning tools in building sustainable mixed-use neighborhoods en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分：王小璘、曾詠宜，2003，「都市公園綠地區位景觀生態評估之研究」，『設計學報』，8(3)：53-74。吳綱立，2006，〈從西方近代都市設計思潮的發展看台灣都市設計專業的定位〉，《建築學報》，中華民國建築學會，頁111-146。吳綱立，2008，「生態大眾運輸村Green-TOD 的願景與在地落實---高雄鐵路地下化生態廊帶與生態大眾運輸村的營造」，『建築Dialogue』，(130)：114-121。吳綱立，2009，「高雄市區鐵路地下化站區新生地都市設計開發策略規劃案結案報告書」，高雄：高雄市政府委託研究規劃報告。吳曜馨，2009，「活化型生態大眾運輸村選址評估架構之研究-以高雄市鐵路地下化地區為例」，成功大學都市計畫所碩士論文；台南。吳孟亭，2010，「綠色空間規劃對生態都市建置的影響—土地使用管制與都市設計元素對於生態都市指標影響之模擬分析」，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文；台北。李永展，2007，「都市型永續社區之準則：國土永續發展之新趨勢」，『應用倫理研究通訊』，41：p.48-57。李家儂、賴宗裕，2007，「台北都會區大眾運輸導向發展目標體系與策略之建構」，『地理學報』，48：19-42。何友鋒、李融昇，2009，「都市設計永續價值評估指標體系之研究」，『建築學報』，68：201-222。林煥軒，2010，「高密度建成環境下影響住宅可居住性之都市設計元素之研究」，國立政治大學地政學系研究所碩士論文。林欽榮，1996，《都市設計在台灣》，台北，創興出版社有限公司。林寶秀，2010「植栽綠地降溫效果之研究」，國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院園藝學研究所博士論文；台北。邱淑華，2000，「由台灣地區都市體系變遷探討商業空間結構變化趨勢與特性」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。周鼎金，2000，「住宅光汙染之研究以台北市夜間照明為例」，『照明學刊』，39-42。徐志揚，2011，「側懸式廣告招牌視覺辨識之研究」，高雄師範大學視覺傳達設計碩士論文：高雄。孫翠玲，1982，「北京市綠化減噪效果的初步研究」，中國大陸：『林業科學』，18（3）：29-334。陳慶源，1987，「都市招牌問題之研究--以大臺北市區為例」，東海大學建築研究所碩士論文；台中。陳育文，2004，「廣告招牌及植栽對視覺認知與街道景觀偏好之影響」逢甲大學建築學研究所碩士論文；台中。陳鈺秀，2000，「舊市區既有住商綜合建築再開發之可行性研究－以台南市中國城為例」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。張顏鵬，2003，「住商混合開發中商業環境企劃之研究－以運用社區開放空間塑造商店內街之集合住宅案為例」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南張學孔、呂英志，2009，「大眾運輸導向發展下運輸系統技術方案適用性之比較研究」，『都市與計劃』，（36）1：51-80。郭子齊，2000，「都市土地使用型態對消費性旅次運具選擇行為之影響」，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩士班碩士論文；台南。許戎聰，1991，「住宅區有計畫混合使用之研究－以台北市萬華區頂碩里與大安區德安里為例」，私立淡江大學建築研究所碩士論文；台北。莊琮博，2001「從維護居住環境品質觀點探討台北市住宅區混合使用管制實施策略－以大安區車層里與龍雲里為例」，國立台灣科技大學建築研究所碩士論文；台北。賀士麃，2005，「台北市都市設計制度之研究」，『南亞學報』，25：31-43。黃光佑，2008，「住商混合區街道廣告照明光侵擾研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。黃健二，1991，「都市住宅區可相容使用用途與分類研究」，內政部委託研究計畫報告。黃書禮、翁瑞豪、陳子淳，1997，「台北市永續發展指標系統之建立與評估」，『都市與計畫』，24(1)：23-42。黃書禮、葉佳宗、陳俐伶，2005，「檢視都市永續發展指標的發展歷程與內涵：從指標系統建構到政策評估」，『都市與計劃』，32(2)：227-251。黃義宏，2005，「捷運車站周邊人行空間設計之研究」，政治大學地政學系碩士論文；台北。曾慧真，1999，「新竹市住宅區商業混合使用環境品質之研究」，私立中華大學建築與都市計畫學系碩士論文；新竹。趙又嬋，2009，「住宅區戶外照明光侵擾之研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文；台南。楊恩捷，2004，「緊密都市之永續性分析」，國立台北大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文；台北。蔡育新、王大立、劉小蘭，2011，「土地混合使用對住宅價格的影響：解析混合使用、密度與可及性」，『都市與計畫』，38(2)：119-146。蔡佳蓉，2004，「本土化TOD都市設計策略之研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文；台南。蔡岡廷，2008，「台南地區都市綠色音環境之研究」，國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文；台南。廖俊松，2004，「地方二十一世紀永續發展之策略」，『中國行政評論』，13(2)：183-212。賴彥伶，2006，「由住商混合空間尺度探討居住偏好與居住選擇之關係－台北市實證分析」，逢甲大學都市計畫學系碩士論文;台中。錢學陶1996，「混合使用開發建築規劃準則之研究」，內政部建築研究所專題研究計畫成果報告賴建都、黎佩芬，2010，「戶外廣告設立位置差異及影響可見度之研究」，『廣告學研究』，34：1-24。劉阿榮，2000，「台灣之永續發展-國家與社會的觀點」，國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文；台北。Shirvani, H., 1990.『都市設計程序』（謝慶達譯），台北：創興出版社有限公司。英文部分：ASCE, 1999. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 67: wind tunnel studies of buildings and structures. Virginia.Bennett J., 2010, “New Zealand Apartment Living: Developing a Liveability Evaluation Index”, http://www.tbher.org/index.php/tbher/article/download/20/21Blocken, B., J.,Carmeliet, T., and Stathopoulos. 2007. CFD Evaluation of The Wind Speed Conditions In Passages Between Buildings E Effect of Wall-Function Roughness Modifications on the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow.Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95: 941-62.Brook McIlroyInc ,2006,”Burlington Downtown Urban Design Guidelines”Cervero,R. and Kockelman, K, 1997, “Travel demand and 3Ds:Density, diversity, and design”, Transportation Research, 2(3): 199-219.Cervero R and Murakami J., 2009, “Rail and Property Development in Hong Kong: Experiences and Extensions”, Urban Studies46(10): 2019-2043.Cervero R and Sullivan C., 2010, Institute oftransportationstudiesuniversity of California, BerkelyChin G., Niel, K. CortiB.andKnuiman M., 2008, “Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data”, Preventive Medicine, 46(1): 41-45.Churchman, A. 1999, “Disentangling the concept of density”, Journal of Planning Literature 13: 389-411. 13:389-411.Chapman L ,2000” Improved one dimensional energy balance modelling, tilising sky-view factors determinedfrom digital imagery”. 10ThInternational Road Weather Conference, Davos, SwitzerlandChow W.and. Roth M, 2006, “Temporal dynamics of the urban heat island of Singapore”,International Journal of Climatology, 26(15): 2243-2260.Cozens, Saville, Hillier, 2005 "Crime prevention through environmental design: a review and modern bibliography", Property Management, 23(5):328 – 356Elkin, Tim, D. McLaren, and M. Hillman, 1991. Reviving the city: Towards sustainable urban development., London: Friends of the Earth.Envision Utah,2002“Wasachfront transitorienteddevelopmentguideline”Grant, J., 2002, “Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle, Journal of the American Planning Association68(1): 71-85.Hess P., Moudon A, Snyder M, Stanilov K.,1999, “Site Design and Pedestrian Travel, Transportation Research Record” Journal of the Transportation Research Board (1647):9-19Herzele, A. V. and Wiedemann, T., 2003, “A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 63:109-126.Hillier, B., 1996Space is the Machine.” Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University PressHolden E. and I. Norland T., 2005, “Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region”, Urban Studies, 42(12): 2145-2166.Holmes J.,Hemert J, ”Peacefulness and Livability” The Rocky Mountain Land Use InstituteHurM., Nasar J. L. and Chun B., 2010, “Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1): 52-59.IESNA, 2000, “IESNA Technical Memorandum on Light Trespass: Research, Results and Recommendations”, IESNA TM-11-2000., The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New YorkI. Fleming, A. Baum, L. M. Davidson, E. Rectanus and S. McArdle, 1987, “Chronic stress as a factor in physiologic reactivity to challenge”, Health Psychol, 6(3): 221-237.Inam A., 2002,“Meaningful Urban Design: eleological/Catalytic/Relevant”, Journal of Urban Design, 7(1): 35-58.J. Grant, 2002, “Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1): 71-84.Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., and Liu, X., 2005, “Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 72:325-336. Lloyd-Jones T., 2004,Urban Design for sustainability, Final Report of the Working Group on Urban Design for Sustainability to theEuropean Union Expert Group on the Urban EnvironmentMfula, A. M., V. Kukadia, R. F. Griffiths, and Hall D. J., 2005.Wind Tunnel Modeling of Urban Building Exposure to Outdoor Pollution.Atmospheric Environment, 39(15): 2737-45.Maas,J, VerheijR. A, GroenewegenP. P., de Vries S. and SpreeuwenbergP., 2006, “Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?”, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7): 587-592.Ng, E., Chao Y., C. Liang, R. Chao, C.H. F., Jimmy, 2011. Improving the Wind Environment in High-Density Cities By Understanding Urban Morphology and Surface Roughness: A Study In Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, pp. 59–74Niles, J. and Nelson, D. (1999) Measuring the Success of Transit-Oriented Development: Retail MarketDynamics and Other Key Determinants, Seattle, Washington: American Planning Association, NationalPlanning Conference.O’Neill, D. J., 2000,The Smart Growth Tool Kit, Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.S. Porta and J. L. Renne, 2005, “Linking urban design to sustainability: formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia”, Urban Design International, 10(1): 51-64.Raw, G.J., Aizlewood, C.E. and Hamilton, R.M., 2001,”Building regulation, health and safety”, Watford: Building Research Establishment.Ruth S.,1997,”Traditional Neighborhood Shopping Districts: Patterns of Use and Modes of Access” Monograph 54, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, BerkeleyRegister, R., 1987,Eco-city Berkeley:Building Cities for a Healthy Future, Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.R. Plummer, 2006, “The evolution of sustainable development strategies in Canada: an assessment of three federal natural resource management agencies”, Sustainable Development, 14(1): 16-32.Saelens B. E., Sallis J. F. and Frank L. D., 2003, “Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling: Findings From the Transportation, Urban Design, and Planning Literatures”, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2): 80-91.Tan, S., 2005, “Makati Central Business District Pedestrianization and Traffic Segregation Projects.”, Forum on Improving Pedestrian Facilities and Bikeways in Metro Manila, www.cleanairnet.org/caiasia/1412/ articles-69376_ayala.pdfTeller, J., 2003, “A spherical metric for the field-orientated analysis of complex urban open spaces”, Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design,30: 339-365.Turner, A and Penn, A, 1999, “Making isovistssyntatic: Isovist integration analysis”, inProceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax Vol. 3, Universidadde Brasil, Brasilia, Brazil.Turner, P.A., Doxa, M., O Sullivan, D.and Penn, A., 2001,”From Isovist Fields to Visibility Graphs,Environment and Planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28:103-121Thorne, Robert, and William Filmer-Sankey. 2003. Transportation. In Sustainable urbandesign, 25-32. London: Spon Press.Town of Halton Hills Official Plan ,TOWN OF HALTON HILLS OFFICIAL PLAN URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINESY. R. Jabareen, 2006, “Sustainable Urban Forms”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1): 38-52.Yannas, Simon. 1998. “Living with the city: Urban design and environmental sustainability”. In Environmentally friendly cities, 41-48.London:James& JamesYang, P. Putra, S.Y., Li, W., 2005, “Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.Yuen B. and Chor C. H., 1998, “Pedestrian streets in Singapore”, Transportation, 25(3): 225-242.Y.-H. Tsai, 2005, “Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus `Sprawl`”, Urban Studies, 42(1): 141-161.Y-H. Tsai, 2011, “Efficiency of neighbourhood planning and design tools in building eco-cities”, 2011 International Winter Conference on Environmental Innovations and Sustainability, Beppu, Oita, Japan, 28 and 29 January, 2011Y.-H. Tsai, 2012, “Urban Planning and Design Tools for Improving Physical Aspects of Livability inHigh-Density Neighborhoods”Wong, N. H., and C. Yu, 2005. Study of Green Areas and Urban Heat Island in A Tropical City. Habitat International, 29(3): 547-558Wong, M. S., J. E. Nichol, P. H. To, and J. Wang, 2010. A Simple Method for Designation of Urban Ventilation Corridors and Its Application To Urban Heat Island Analysis. Building and Environment,45:1880-89.Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R. and Handley, J. F., 2001, “City from and natural process-indicators for the ecological performance of urban area and their application to Merseyside, UK”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 57:97-103.Zenaida, C., Galingan, 2009, “Pedestrian-Friendly Streetscape in a Tropical Business District”, Journal of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and the Designed Environment, University of the Philippines College of Architecture. zh_TW
