| dc.contributor | 東亞研究所 | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 蔡文軒 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Tsai,Wen-Shuen | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2006-09 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 4-Jun-2014 11:26:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 4-Jun-2014 11:26:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 4-Jun-2014 11:26:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/66443 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文以「知識社會學」為理論，從「老左派」、「新權威主義」、「新左派」、「自由主義」的觀點，來分析知識社群對於「中國該往何處去」的爭論。在具體概念上，以「公平」與「效率」，和「國家」權力與「市場」機制的重要性，來申論這四種理論的內涵。本文認為，自改革開放以來，中國學界對於「中國該往何處去」的辯論一共有三次。而知識社群在歷經上述的辯論後，「自由主義」會是一個較為可行的理論，以修正「新左派」的缺失，並指導中國未來的發展方向。 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In analyzing, "Which Path China Should Take?" we use the theory of "Sociology of Knowledge" to discuss views of the "Old Left", "Neo Authoritarianism", "New Left", and "Liberalism". We apply two concepts, including equality / efficiency and state / market to divide the article into four categories. Since the 1980`s, there have been three main debates focusing on the future path of China`s development. Through analysis of the above debates, we think that the "Liberalism" would be a more feasible theory to revise the defects of "New Left" and guide the future direction for China. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 500224 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 政治科學論叢,29,123-158 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公平 ; 市場 ; 自由主義 ; 老左派 ; 知識社會學 ; 效率 ; 國家 ; 新左派 ; 新權威主義 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | efficiency ; equality ; liberalism ; market ; neo authoritarianism ; new left ; old left ; sociology of knowledge ; state | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 中國該往何處去？知識社群的思考 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | What Path Should China Take? Thoughts from the Academic Community | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | en |
