1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 文學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 大學圖書館網站首頁讀者視覺注意力之眼動 分析研究
Assessing User’s Visual Attention on University Library Web Page with Eye Tracking Technology
作者 林惠卿
Lin, Hui Ching
貢獻者 陳志銘
Chen, Chih Ming
林惠卿
Lin, Hui Ching
關鍵詞 大學圖書館網站
眼動追蹤
廣告位置
版面編排
注意力
university library website
eye tracking
advertising position
layout
attention
日期 2014
上傳時間 21-七月-2014 15:40:58 (UTC+8)
摘要 隨著網際網路的普及，促使大學圖書館紛紛建立網站服務讀者。目前國內各大專院校圖書館網站的建置已達到百分之百，網頁成為行銷各校學術資源最直接快速的管道，而圖書館網頁也利用廣告吸引讀者對於活動訊息的注意。目前國內大學圖書館網站中，並非每個學校均設有廣告來傳播重要的訊息給讀者，即使擁有廣告也是呈現位置不一。在設計上，大學圖書館網站首頁廣告應與整體版面搭配，以引起讀者視覺關注，並達透過廣告成功行銷圖書館資源與活動的目的；而以圖書館行銷的角度考量，惟有促使圖書館網站首頁的廣告被有效注意與理解，才能達到成功行銷廣告內容的目的。
本研究採用真實驗研究法(true-experiment research method），結合網頁視覺設計相關理論對於讀者目光注意力的吸引原則，以及視覺元素之間如何影響讀者的視覺行為為基礎，設計出三種內容相同但廣告放置於不同位置之圖書館網站首頁，比較讀者視覺注意力行為的差異，並以國立中正大學大學部學生五十四名為研究對象，利用「眼球追蹤儀器」(eye tracker)收集受試者眼動指標資料，並進行廣告傳達內容之記憶效應檢測，以及實驗後輔以問卷調查與訪談，探討大學圖書館網站首頁的廣告位置對於讀者視覺注意力及記憶效應的影響。
研究結果發現，讀者在三種不同廣告圖片位置之眼動訊息、記憶效應、瀏覽順序、整體印象滿意度均具有顯著差異。研究結果歸納如下：
一、讀者在廣告置上版面具有較多的注視次數，但是在廣告置左版面則具有較多的視覺停駐。
二、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之廣告內容的記憶效應具有顯著差異，廣告圖片位置置左版面具有最佳之記憶效應。
三、讀者在廣告置左版面之廣告內容的記憶效應與眼動指標之「平均注視時間」具有顯著關聯性，其他兩種版面則均無顯著關聯。
四、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之其他讀者服務項目所定義興趣區的眼動指標具有顯著差異，廣告置左版面讀者服務項目具有較為平均之視覺分布。
五、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之瀏覽順序具有差異，廣告置左版面之廣告較能引起讀者的優先注視。
六、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之圖書館網站首頁的整體印象具有顯著差異，廣告置左版面獲得較高的評價；其中版面在「簡單的」、「不散亂的」、「可靠信任的」、「引人注目的」等項目上均顯著高於廣告置右與廣告置上版面。
綜合本研究之研究結果，建議圖書館應善用置左廣告位置提升圖書館行銷相關訊息之目的。此外，圖書館網站首頁應重視視覺元素編排對於版面整體印象的提升效應。圖書館網頁編排也應善用接近性與相似性原則，使得版面呈現具一致性。
The popularity of the Internet has pushed university libraries establishing websites to serve readers. The establishment of domestic university library websites has currently reached 100%, web pages become the most direct and rapid channels to market the academic resources, and advertisement on the library web pages is utilized for attracting readers’ attention to activities. So far, not all domestic university library websites are established advertisement for propagating important information to readers; even though there is advertisement, the presentation positions are distinct. In terms of the design, advertisement on the index page of a university library website should match the entire layout so as to appeal readers’ visual saliency and successfully market the library resources and activities. In consideration of library marketing, merely advertisement on the index page of a library website being effectively noticed and comprehended could the successful marketing be achieved.
With true-experiment research method, the visual design of web pages to attract readers’ attention in this study is integrated with the effects of visual elements on readers’ visual behaviors to design three identical advertising contents which are placed in different positions on the index page of the library website in order to compare the difference in readers’ visual attention. Furthermore, 54 undergraduate students in National Chung Cheng University are selected as the research participants. An Eye Tracker is utilized for collecting the participants’ eye-tracking indicators, and the memory effect of the advertisement is tested. Furthermore, the questionnaire survey and interviews are proceeded to discuss the effects of advertising position on the index page of a university library website on readers’ visual attention and memory effect.

The research findings show that the readers present significant difference on the eye-tracking information, memory effect, browsing order, and overall satisfaction of the three advertisement positions. The research results are concluded as follows.
1.The readers appear more attention on top-layout advertisement, but stay the vision more on left-layout advertisement.
2.The readers reveal remarkable difference on memory effect of advertisement among three advertisement positions, where the optimal memory effect appears on the left-layout advertisement.
3.The readers show significant correlations between memory effect of left-layout advertisement and the eye-tracking indicator of Average Fixation Time, while the rest two layouts do not show notable correlations.
4.The readers show remarkable difference on the eye-tracking indicator of interests defined in other reader service items of three advertisement layouts; the reader service items on the left-layout advertisement appear more average visual distribution.
5.The readers reveal distinct browsing orders on the three advertisement positions; the left-layout advertisement could better appeal the readers’ prior attention.
6.The readers show significantly different impression on the index page of the library website with three advertising positions; the left-layout advertisement acquires higher appraisal, where the items of Simple, Not Disordered, Reliable, Attention Attractive reveal higher appraisal than right-layout and top-layout advertisement.
Summing up the research results, the libraries are suggested to well apply left-layout advertisement to enhance the marketing information. What is more, the index page of a library website should focus on the layout of visual elements to promote the overall impression. The layout of library web pages should also well apply the principles of proximity and similarity to present the consistency.
參考文獻 Baltas, G. (1997). Determinants of store brand choice: a behavioral analysis.Journal
of product & brand management, 6(5), 315-324.
Benway, J. P., & Lane, D. M. (1998). Banner blindness: Web searchers often miss
“obvious” links. Internetworking, ITG Newsletter.
Benway, J. P. (1998, October). Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on
the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 463-467). SAGE Publications.
Bernard, M. (2001, March). User expectations for the location of web objects.
InConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI`01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (Vol. 31, pp. 171-172).
Beymer, D., Orton, P. Z., & Russell, D. M. (2007). An eye tracking study of how
pictures influence online reading. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2007 (pp. 456-460). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Borse, J.,&Lang, A. (2000). The effects of web banner advertisements: A study of the
impact of animation and control on affective, cognitive, physiological responses. Paper presented at the Information Systems Division at the 50th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.
Braddy, P. W., Thompson, L. F., Wuensch, K. L., & Grossnickle, W. F. (2003).
Internet Recruiting The Effects of Web Page Design Features. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3), 374-385.
Calisir, F., & Karaali, D. (2008). The impacts of banner location, banner content and
navigation style on banner recognition. Computers in Human Behavior,24(2), 535-543.
Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J. (2005). B2C e-commerce web site quality: an
empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(5), 645-661.
Catledge, L. D., & Pitkow, J. E. (1995). Characterizing browsing strategies in the
World-Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN systems, 27(6), 1065-1073.
Cho, C. H., & as-, U. O. T. A. A. I. A. (2004). Why do people avoid advertising on
the internet?. Journal of advertising, 33(4), 89-97.
Christine, S. (2002). Information Design Desk Reference. Crisp Learning.
Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2006). Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in
mobile commerce. Information & Management, 43(8), 950-963.
Dahal, S. (2010). Eyes don`t lie: understanding users` first impressions on website
design using eye tracking.
Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., & Tullis, T. (2010). Generation Y, web design, and eye
tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(5), 307-323.
Doyle, K., Minor, A., & Weyrich, C. (1997). Banner ad placement study. Online
AVL: URL: http://webreference. com/dev/banners/(Stand: 20.10. 1998).
Dreze, X., & Hussherr, F. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody
watching?. Journal of interactive marketing, 17(4), 8-23.
Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking
applications.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(4),
455-470.
Faraday, P. (2000). Visually critiquing web pages. In Multimedia’99(pp.
155-166). Springer Vienna.
Garcia, M. R., & Stark, P. (1993). Contemporary newspaper design: A structural
approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Garlock, K. L., & Piontek, S. (1999). Designing web interfaces to library services and
resources. American Library Association.
Harpel-Burke, P. (2005). Library homepage design at medium-sized universities: A
comparison to commercial homepages via Nielsen and Tahir.OCLC Systems
& Services, 21(3), 193-208.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated
environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of marketing, 60(3).
management, 30(6/7), 454-468.
Kean, M., & Lambert, A. (2003). Orienting of visual attention based on peripheral
information. The mind`s eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement
research, 2(3), 27.
Kim, H., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2008). Persuasive design of destination web sites: An
analysis of first impression. Journal of Travel Research, 47(1), 3-13.
Kim, Y. M. (2011). Users` perceptions of university library websites: A unifying
view. Library & Information Science Research, 33(1), 63-72.
Li, Y. M., & Yeh, Y. S. (2010). Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design
aesthetics. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 673-684.
LaBerge, D. (1998). Attentional emphasis in visual orienting and resolving.
Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C., Sen, D., Sumegi, L., & Noonan, P. (2011). An exploration
of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
(TOCHI), 18(1), 1.
Lindgaard, G. (2007). Aesthetics, Visual Appeal, Usability and User Satisfaction:
What Do the User`s Eyes Tell the User`s Brain?. Australian Journal of
Emerging Technologies & Society, 5(1).
Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web
designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first
impression!.Behaviour & information technology, 25(2), 115-126.
Lohse, G. L., & Rosen, D. L. (2001). Signaling quality and credibility in yellow pages
advertising: the influence of color and graphics on choice. Journal of advertising, 30(2), 73-83.
Maness, J. M. (2006). Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for
libraries. Webology, 3(2), 2006.
Martey, A. K. (2000). Marketing products and services of academic libraries in
Ghana. Libri, 50(4), 261-268.
Mi, J., & Nesta, F. (2006). Marketing library services to the Net Generation.Library
Management, 27(6/7), 411-422.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on
our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web
site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of
Advertising, 34(2), 71-84.
Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics.International
Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689-709.
Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R. (2007). A Task-Based Model of Perceived Website
Complexity. Mis Quarterly, 31(3).
Newman, M. W., & Landay, J. A. (2000, August). Sitemaps, storyboards, and
specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 263-274). ACM.
Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing for the Web. New Riders Publishing.
Nielsen, J., & Pernice, K. (2010). Eyetracking web usability. New Riders.
Nielsen, J. (1997). How users read on the web. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox.
Nihel, Z. (2013). The Effectiveness of Internet Advertising through Memorization and
Click on a Banner. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(2).
Nooshinfard, F., & Ziaei, S. (2011). Academic library websites as marketing tools.
Oh, J., Fiorito, S. S., Cho, H., & Hofacker, C. F. (2008). Effects of design factors on
store image and expectation of merchandise quality in web-based
stores. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(4), 237-249.
Outing, S., & Ruel, L. (2004). The best of eyetrack III: What we saw when we looked
through their eyes. Published on Poynter Institute (not dated).
Retrieved, 20(06), 06.
Pagendarm, M., & Schaumburg, H. (2006). Why are users banner-blind? The impact
of navigation style on the perception of web banners. Journal of Digital
Information, 2(1).
Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction,
chapter Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. Information Science Reference.
Red-Triangle Co.(1999), http://red-triangle.com/banner.htm
Renborg, G. (2000). Marketing library services. How it all began. IFLA
PUBLICATIONS, 89, 5-11.
Resnick, M., & Albert, B. (2013). The Impact of Advertising Location and User Task
on the Emergence of Banner Ad Blindness: An Eye Tracking
Study.International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (just-accepted).
Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site
design.Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 386-399.
Robins, D., Holmes, J., & Stansbury, M. (2010). Consumer health information on the
Web: The relationship of visual design and perceptions of
credibility.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(1), 13-29.
Ryu, G., Lim, E. A. C., Tan, L. T. L., & Han, Y. J. (2007). Preattentive processing of
banner advertisements: The role of modality, location, and
interference. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(1), 6-18.
Sanders & McCormick (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design.
7th Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Schenkman, B. N., & Jönsson, F. U. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web
pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(5), 367-377.
Schmidt, K. (1996). Building the service-based library web site: A step-by-step guide
to design and options. Serials Review, 22(3), 148-149.
Sevilla, C. (2002). Information Design Desk Reference: Crisp Learning.
Sigel, A., Braun, G., & Sena, M. (2008). The impact of Banner ad styles on
interaction and click-through rates. Issues in Information Systems, 9(2),
337-342.
Solso, R. L. (1996). Cognition and the visual arts. MIT press.
Stevenson, Julie S, Bruner, Gordon C, & Kumar, Anand. (2000). Webpage
background and viewer attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(1/2),
29-34.
Steve, O. and R. Laura. (2004). The best of Eyetrack III : What We Saw When We
Looked Through Their Eyes. Eyetrack III project managers.
Stover, Mark, & Zink, Steven D. (1996). World Wide Web home page design:
patterns and anomalies of higher education library home pages. Reference Services Review, 24(3), 7-20.
Sutcliffe, A. (2002). Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation for Web
site attractiveness and usability. In System Sciences, 2002. HICSS.
Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp.
1838-1847). IEEE.
Tullis, T. S. (1988). Screen design. Handbook of human-computer interaction,2,
503-532.
Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a
generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6),
541-549.
Veen, J. (1997). Hotwired Style: Principles for Building Smart Web Sites. Wired
Books, Incorporated.
Williams, L. M., Loughland, C. M., Green, M. J., Harris, A. W., & Gordon, E. (2003).
Emotion perception in schizophrenia: an eye movement study comparing the effectiveness of risperidone vs. haloperidol. Psychiatry research, 120(1), 13-27.

二、 中文文獻
王世德（1987）。美學辭典。台北市：木鐸出版社。
江義平、俞帛宏（2011）。橫幅廣告點擊效果之影響因素探究. Electronic Commerce Studies, 9(4), 51-76。
吳書宜（2008）。新聞網頁不同廣告型式之注意力研究。中國文化大學碩士論文，
台北市。
呂文耀（2008）。圖文編排比例及圖地色彩組合之閱讀效應：眼動軌跡之分析。
銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士論文。
李玉琇、蔣文郝合譯（2005）。認知心理學(原作者：Stenberg )。臺北：雙葉。
辛玉蘭、薛美寧、周恆德譯（2001）。Patric J.Lynch & Sarah Horton 著。網站技
巧指南-網站的基本設計理論。高雄：高鵬電子商務。
林价興、王年燦（2006）。網頁圖文配置對使用者瀏覽偏好之影響研究。藝術論文集刊，45-50。
林俊良（2004）。視覺傳達設計槪說。台北市：藝風堂出版社。
南雲治嘉作／沙子芳譯（2010）。版面編排。新北市：楓樹林出版事業有限公司。
柯佑欣（2009）。兒童網站視覺吸引力對使用績效和情緒感知影響之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所碩士論文，台北市。
柳閩生（2004）。版面設計。幼獅，台北。
唐大崙與莊賢智（2005）。由眼球追蹤法探索電子報版面中圖片位置對注意力分布之影響。廣告學研究，第24期。
翁慧娟（1998）。我國大學圖書館網站品質評估之研究。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。
陳俊宏、楊東民（2008）。視覺傳達設計概論。台北：全華圖書。
陳瑩珊（2008）。圖書館網站使用者介面之主題資訊呈現與欄位型式之設計研究。國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文，台北市。
陳學志、賴惠德、邱發忠（2010）。眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的應用。教育
科學研究期刊，55(4)，39-68。
陳瀚凱、管倖生（2006）。從注意力觀點探討影響視覺傳達設計之機能性因素。設計研究，（6），200-209。
游婉雲（2009）。網路陳列式廣告的動態結構特徵對注意力與記憶之影響。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文，新竹市。
湯允一、唐大崙、黃憶婷（2005）。新聞網頁版面配置對視線軌跡的影響之研究。在第十三屆中華民國廣告暨公共關係國際學術與實務研討會。台北：政治大學。
楊勝雄（2003）。編排設計。台北市：藝風堂出版社。
管倖生主持（2006）行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(NSC94-2213-E-224-018-)。雲林。國立雲林科技大學設計學研究所。
蔡孟甫（2010）。B2C電子商務網站版面編排對網站績效之影響。北台灣科技學院電子商務研究所碩士論文，台北市。
蔡維君（2006）。大學圖書館網站好用性評估：以臺灣大學圖書館網站為例。臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。
鄭麗玉（2009）。認知心理學：理論與應用。台北市：五南圖書出版社。
蕭國淳（2004）。網頁廣告呈現方式與瀏覽動機對於使用者視覺注意與項目記憶的影響。臺北科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，台北市。
謝坤哲（2010）。網頁圖文數量與位置配置對於成年人與青少年的偏好與眼球運動之影響：以購物網站為例。國立台灣師範大學設計研究所碩士論文，台北市。
謝寶煖（2004）。大學圖書館網站資訊組織之研究。在2004現代資訊組織與檢索研討會（頁1-27）。台北市：淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
101913016
103
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101913016
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Chih Mingen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林惠卿zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Lin, Hui Chingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林惠卿zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Hui Chingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2014en_US
dc.date.accessioned 21-七月-2014 15:40:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 21-七月-2014 15:40:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 21-七月-2014 15:40:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0101913016en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67619-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101913016zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著網際網路的普及，促使大學圖書館紛紛建立網站服務讀者。目前國內各大專院校圖書館網站的建置已達到百分之百，網頁成為行銷各校學術資源最直接快速的管道，而圖書館網頁也利用廣告吸引讀者對於活動訊息的注意。目前國內大學圖書館網站中，並非每個學校均設有廣告來傳播重要的訊息給讀者，即使擁有廣告也是呈現位置不一。在設計上，大學圖書館網站首頁廣告應與整體版面搭配，以引起讀者視覺關注，並達透過廣告成功行銷圖書館資源與活動的目的；而以圖書館行銷的角度考量，惟有促使圖書館網站首頁的廣告被有效注意與理解，才能達到成功行銷廣告內容的目的。
本研究採用真實驗研究法(true-experiment research method），結合網頁視覺設計相關理論對於讀者目光注意力的吸引原則，以及視覺元素之間如何影響讀者的視覺行為為基礎，設計出三種內容相同但廣告放置於不同位置之圖書館網站首頁，比較讀者視覺注意力行為的差異，並以國立中正大學大學部學生五十四名為研究對象，利用「眼球追蹤儀器」(eye tracker)收集受試者眼動指標資料，並進行廣告傳達內容之記憶效應檢測，以及實驗後輔以問卷調查與訪談，探討大學圖書館網站首頁的廣告位置對於讀者視覺注意力及記憶效應的影響。
研究結果發現，讀者在三種不同廣告圖片位置之眼動訊息、記憶效應、瀏覽順序、整體印象滿意度均具有顯著差異。研究結果歸納如下：
一、讀者在廣告置上版面具有較多的注視次數，但是在廣告置左版面則具有較多的視覺停駐。
二、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之廣告內容的記憶效應具有顯著差異，廣告圖片位置置左版面具有最佳之記憶效應。
三、讀者在廣告置左版面之廣告內容的記憶效應與眼動指標之「平均注視時間」具有顯著關聯性，其他兩種版面則均無顯著關聯。
四、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之其他讀者服務項目所定義興趣區的眼動指標具有顯著差異，廣告置左版面讀者服務項目具有較為平均之視覺分布。
五、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之瀏覽順序具有差異，廣告置左版面之廣告較能引起讀者的優先注視。
六、讀者在三種不同廣告位置版面之圖書館網站首頁的整體印象具有顯著差異，廣告置左版面獲得較高的評價；其中版面在「簡單的」、「不散亂的」、「可靠信任的」、「引人注目的」等項目上均顯著高於廣告置右與廣告置上版面。
綜合本研究之研究結果，建議圖書館應善用置左廣告位置提升圖書館行銷相關訊息之目的。此外，圖書館網站首頁應重視視覺元素編排對於版面整體印象的提升效應。圖書館網頁編排也應善用接近性與相似性原則，使得版面呈現具一致性。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The popularity of the Internet has pushed university libraries establishing websites to serve readers. The establishment of domestic university library websites has currently reached 100%, web pages become the most direct and rapid channels to market the academic resources, and advertisement on the library web pages is utilized for attracting readers’ attention to activities. So far, not all domestic university library websites are established advertisement for propagating important information to readers; even though there is advertisement, the presentation positions are distinct. In terms of the design, advertisement on the index page of a university library website should match the entire layout so as to appeal readers’ visual saliency and successfully market the library resources and activities. In consideration of library marketing, merely advertisement on the index page of a library website being effectively noticed and comprehended could the successful marketing be achieved.
With true-experiment research method, the visual design of web pages to attract readers’ attention in this study is integrated with the effects of visual elements on readers’ visual behaviors to design three identical advertising contents which are placed in different positions on the index page of the library website in order to compare the difference in readers’ visual attention. Furthermore, 54 undergraduate students in National Chung Cheng University are selected as the research participants. An Eye Tracker is utilized for collecting the participants’ eye-tracking indicators, and the memory effect of the advertisement is tested. Furthermore, the questionnaire survey and interviews are proceeded to discuss the effects of advertising position on the index page of a university library website on readers’ visual attention and memory effect.

The research findings show that the readers present significant difference on the eye-tracking information, memory effect, browsing order, and overall satisfaction of the three advertisement positions. The research results are concluded as follows.
1.The readers appear more attention on top-layout advertisement, but stay the vision more on left-layout advertisement.
2.The readers reveal remarkable difference on memory effect of advertisement among three advertisement positions, where the optimal memory effect appears on the left-layout advertisement.
3.The readers show significant correlations between memory effect of left-layout advertisement and the eye-tracking indicator of Average Fixation Time, while the rest two layouts do not show notable correlations.
4.The readers show remarkable difference on the eye-tracking indicator of interests defined in other reader service items of three advertisement layouts; the reader service items on the left-layout advertisement appear more average visual distribution.
5.The readers reveal distinct browsing orders on the three advertisement positions; the left-layout advertisement could better appeal the readers’ prior attention.
6.The readers show significantly different impression on the index page of the library website with three advertising positions; the left-layout advertisement acquires higher appraisal, where the items of Simple, Not Disordered, Reliable, Attention Attractive reveal higher appraisal than right-layout and top-layout advertisement.
Summing up the research results, the libraries are suggested to well apply left-layout advertisement to enhance the marketing information. What is more, the index page of a library website should focus on the layout of visual elements to promote the overall impression. The layout of library web pages should also well apply the principles of proximity and similarity to present the consistency.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目次...........................................i
圖目次.........................................ii
表目次.........................................vi
第一章 緒論.....................................1
第一節 研究動機..................................1
第二節 研究目的與問題.............................3
第三節 研究範圍與研究限制..........................4
第四節 名詞解釋..................................5
第二章 文獻探討..................................6
第一節 大學圖書館網站規劃..........................6
第二節 網站廣告位置對於訊息傳遞影響研究..............13
第三節 網頁視覺設計相關研究........................17
第四節 眼動行為.................................23
第三章 研究方法與實驗設計.........................27
第一節 研究架構.................................27
第二節 研究對象.................................29
第三節 實驗工具.................................30
第四節 實驗設計.................................33
第五節 實驗流程.................................39
第六節 資料分析.................................42
第四章 實驗結果分析........................... ..43
第一節 不同廣告位置與相關眼動指標分析...............43
第二節 不同廣告位置之記憶效應分析..................47
第三節 不同廣告位置之記憶效應與眼動指標相關分析..... .48
第四節 不同廣告位置版面之讀者服務項目眼動指標分析.....50
第五節 不同廣告位置版面之讀者瀏覽順序...............58
第六節 實驗問卷調查與訪談.........................62
第五章 結論與建議...............................67
第一節 結論....................................67
第二節 建議....................................70
參考文獻......................................72
附件一........................................78
附件二........................................79		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 3813668 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101913016en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大學圖書館網站zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 眼動追蹤zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廣告位置zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 版面編排zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 注意力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) university library websiteen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) eye trackingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) advertising positionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) layouten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) attentionen_US
dc.title (題名) 大學圖書館網站首頁讀者視覺注意力之眼動 分析研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Assessing User’s Visual Attention on University Library Web Page with Eye Tracking Technologyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baltas, G. (1997). Determinants of store brand choice: a behavioral analysis.Journal
of product & brand management, 6(5), 315-324.
Benway, J. P., & Lane, D. M. (1998). Banner blindness: Web searchers often miss
“obvious” links. Internetworking, ITG Newsletter.
Benway, J. P. (1998, October). Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on
the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 463-467). SAGE Publications.
Bernard, M. (2001, March). User expectations for the location of web objects.
InConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI`01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (Vol. 31, pp. 171-172).
Beymer, D., Orton, P. Z., & Russell, D. M. (2007). An eye tracking study of how
pictures influence online reading. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2007 (pp. 456-460). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Borse, J.,&Lang, A. (2000). The effects of web banner advertisements: A study of the
impact of animation and control on affective, cognitive, physiological responses. Paper presented at the Information Systems Division at the 50th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.
Braddy, P. W., Thompson, L. F., Wuensch, K. L., & Grossnickle, W. F. (2003).
Internet Recruiting The Effects of Web Page Design Features. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3), 374-385.
Calisir, F., & Karaali, D. (2008). The impacts of banner location, banner content and
navigation style on banner recognition. Computers in Human Behavior,24(2), 535-543.
Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J. (2005). B2C e-commerce web site quality: an
empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(5), 645-661.
Catledge, L. D., & Pitkow, J. E. (1995). Characterizing browsing strategies in the
World-Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN systems, 27(6), 1065-1073.
Cho, C. H., & as-, U. O. T. A. A. I. A. (2004). Why do people avoid advertising on
the internet?. Journal of advertising, 33(4), 89-97.
Christine, S. (2002). Information Design Desk Reference. Crisp Learning.
Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2006). Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in
mobile commerce. Information & Management, 43(8), 950-963.
Dahal, S. (2010). Eyes don`t lie: understanding users` first impressions on website
design using eye tracking.
Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., & Tullis, T. (2010). Generation Y, web design, and eye
tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(5), 307-323.
Doyle, K., Minor, A., & Weyrich, C. (1997). Banner ad placement study. Online
AVL: URL: http://webreference. com/dev/banners/(Stand: 20.10. 1998).
Dreze, X., & Hussherr, F. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody
watching?. Journal of interactive marketing, 17(4), 8-23.
Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking
applications.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(4),
455-470.
Faraday, P. (2000). Visually critiquing web pages. In Multimedia’99(pp.
155-166). Springer Vienna.
Garcia, M. R., & Stark, P. (1993). Contemporary newspaper design: A structural
approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Garlock, K. L., & Piontek, S. (1999). Designing web interfaces to library services and
resources. American Library Association.
Harpel-Burke, P. (2005). Library homepage design at medium-sized universities: A
comparison to commercial homepages via Nielsen and Tahir.OCLC Systems
& Services, 21(3), 193-208.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated
environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of marketing, 60(3).
management, 30(6/7), 454-468.
Kean, M., & Lambert, A. (2003). Orienting of visual attention based on peripheral
information. The mind`s eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement
research, 2(3), 27.
Kim, H., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2008). Persuasive design of destination web sites: An
analysis of first impression. Journal of Travel Research, 47(1), 3-13.
Kim, Y. M. (2011). Users` perceptions of university library websites: A unifying
view. Library & Information Science Research, 33(1), 63-72.
Li, Y. M., & Yeh, Y. S. (2010). Increasing trust in mobile commerce through design
aesthetics. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 673-684.
LaBerge, D. (1998). Attentional emphasis in visual orienting and resolving.
Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C., Sen, D., Sumegi, L., & Noonan, P. (2011). An exploration
of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
(TOCHI), 18(1), 1.
Lindgaard, G. (2007). Aesthetics, Visual Appeal, Usability and User Satisfaction:
What Do the User`s Eyes Tell the User`s Brain?. Australian Journal of
Emerging Technologies & Society, 5(1).
Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web
designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first
impression!.Behaviour & information technology, 25(2), 115-126.
Lohse, G. L., & Rosen, D. L. (2001). Signaling quality and credibility in yellow pages
advertising: the influence of color and graphics on choice. Journal of advertising, 30(2), 73-83.
Maness, J. M. (2006). Library 2.0 theory: Web 2.0 and its implications for
libraries. Webology, 3(2), 2006.
Martey, A. K. (2000). Marketing products and services of academic libraries in
Ghana. Libri, 50(4), 261-268.
Mi, J., & Nesta, F. (2006). Marketing library services to the Net Generation.Library
Management, 27(6/7), 411-422.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on
our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
Moore, R. S., Stammerjohan, C. A., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Banner advertiser-web
site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of
Advertising, 34(2), 71-84.
Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics.International
Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689-709.
Nadkarni, S., & Gupta, R. (2007). A Task-Based Model of Perceived Website
Complexity. Mis Quarterly, 31(3).
Newman, M. W., & Landay, J. A. (2000, August). Sitemaps, storyboards, and
specifications: a sketch of Web site design practice. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 263-274). ACM.
Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing for the Web. New Riders Publishing.
Nielsen, J., & Pernice, K. (2010). Eyetracking web usability. New Riders.
Nielsen, J. (1997). How users read on the web. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox.
Nihel, Z. (2013). The Effectiveness of Internet Advertising through Memorization and
Click on a Banner. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(2).
Nooshinfard, F., & Ziaei, S. (2011). Academic library websites as marketing tools.
Oh, J., Fiorito, S. S., Cho, H., & Hofacker, C. F. (2008). Effects of design factors on
store image and expectation of merchandise quality in web-based
stores. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(4), 237-249.
Outing, S., & Ruel, L. (2004). The best of eyetrack III: What we saw when we looked
through their eyes. Published on Poynter Institute (not dated).
Retrieved, 20(06), 06.
Pagendarm, M., & Schaumburg, H. (2006). Why are users banner-blind? The impact
of navigation style on the perception of web banners. Journal of Digital
Information, 2(1).
Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction,
chapter Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. Information Science Reference.
Red-Triangle Co.(1999), http://red-triangle.com/banner.htm
Renborg, G. (2000). Marketing library services. How it all began. IFLA
PUBLICATIONS, 89, 5-11.
Resnick, M., & Albert, B. (2013). The Impact of Advertising Location and User Task
on the Emergence of Banner Ad Blindness: An Eye Tracking
Study.International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (just-accepted).
Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site
design.Information Processing & Management, 44(1), 386-399.
Robins, D., Holmes, J., & Stansbury, M. (2010). Consumer health information on the
Web: The relationship of visual design and perceptions of
credibility.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(1), 13-29.
Ryu, G., Lim, E. A. C., Tan, L. T. L., & Han, Y. J. (2007). Preattentive processing of
banner advertisements: The role of modality, location, and
interference. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(1), 6-18.
Sanders & McCormick (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design.
7th Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Schenkman, B. N., & Jönsson, F. U. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web
pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(5), 367-377.
Schmidt, K. (1996). Building the service-based library web site: A step-by-step guide
to design and options. Serials Review, 22(3), 148-149.
Sevilla, C. (2002). Information Design Desk Reference: Crisp Learning.
Sigel, A., Braun, G., & Sena, M. (2008). The impact of Banner ad styles on
interaction and click-through rates. Issues in Information Systems, 9(2),
337-342.
Solso, R. L. (1996). Cognition and the visual arts. MIT press.
Stevenson, Julie S, Bruner, Gordon C, & Kumar, Anand. (2000). Webpage
background and viewer attitudes. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(1/2),
29-34.
Steve, O. and R. Laura. (2004). The best of Eyetrack III : What We Saw When We
Looked Through Their Eyes. Eyetrack III project managers.
Stover, Mark, & Zink, Steven D. (1996). World Wide Web home page design:
patterns and anomalies of higher education library home pages. Reference Services Review, 24(3), 7-20.
Sutcliffe, A. (2002). Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation for Web
site attractiveness and usability. In System Sciences, 2002. HICSS.
Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp.
1838-1847). IEEE.
Tullis, T. S. (1988). Screen design. Handbook of human-computer interaction,2,
503-532.
Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a
generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6),
541-549.
Veen, J. (1997). Hotwired Style: Principles for Building Smart Web Sites. Wired
Books, Incorporated.
Williams, L. M., Loughland, C. M., Green, M. J., Harris, A. W., & Gordon, E. (2003).
Emotion perception in schizophrenia: an eye movement study comparing the effectiveness of risperidone vs. haloperidol. Psychiatry research, 120(1), 13-27.

二、 中文文獻
王世德（1987）。美學辭典。台北市：木鐸出版社。
江義平、俞帛宏（2011）。橫幅廣告點擊效果之影響因素探究. Electronic Commerce Studies, 9(4), 51-76。
吳書宜（2008）。新聞網頁不同廣告型式之注意力研究。中國文化大學碩士論文，
台北市。
呂文耀（2008）。圖文編排比例及圖地色彩組合之閱讀效應：眼動軌跡之分析。
銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士論文。
李玉琇、蔣文郝合譯（2005）。認知心理學(原作者：Stenberg )。臺北：雙葉。
辛玉蘭、薛美寧、周恆德譯（2001）。Patric J.Lynch & Sarah Horton 著。網站技
巧指南-網站的基本設計理論。高雄：高鵬電子商務。
林价興、王年燦（2006）。網頁圖文配置對使用者瀏覽偏好之影響研究。藝術論文集刊，45-50。
林俊良（2004）。視覺傳達設計槪說。台北市：藝風堂出版社。
南雲治嘉作／沙子芳譯（2010）。版面編排。新北市：楓樹林出版事業有限公司。
柯佑欣（2009）。兒童網站視覺吸引力對使用績效和情緒感知影響之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所碩士論文，台北市。
柳閩生（2004）。版面設計。幼獅，台北。
唐大崙與莊賢智（2005）。由眼球追蹤法探索電子報版面中圖片位置對注意力分布之影響。廣告學研究，第24期。
翁慧娟（1998）。我國大學圖書館網站品質評估之研究。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。
陳俊宏、楊東民（2008）。視覺傳達設計概論。台北：全華圖書。
陳瑩珊（2008）。圖書館網站使用者介面之主題資訊呈現與欄位型式之設計研究。國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所碩士論文，台北市。
陳學志、賴惠德、邱發忠（2010）。眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的應用。教育
科學研究期刊，55(4)，39-68。
陳瀚凱、管倖生（2006）。從注意力觀點探討影響視覺傳達設計之機能性因素。設計研究，（6），200-209。
游婉雲（2009）。網路陳列式廣告的動態結構特徵對注意力與記憶之影響。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文，新竹市。
湯允一、唐大崙、黃憶婷（2005）。新聞網頁版面配置對視線軌跡的影響之研究。在第十三屆中華民國廣告暨公共關係國際學術與實務研討會。台北：政治大學。
楊勝雄（2003）。編排設計。台北市：藝風堂出版社。
管倖生主持（2006）行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(NSC94-2213-E-224-018-)。雲林。國立雲林科技大學設計學研究所。
蔡孟甫（2010）。B2C電子商務網站版面編排對網站績效之影響。北台灣科技學院電子商務研究所碩士論文，台北市。
蔡維君（2006）。大學圖書館網站好用性評估：以臺灣大學圖書館網站為例。臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北市。
鄭麗玉（2009）。認知心理學：理論與應用。台北市：五南圖書出版社。
蕭國淳（2004）。網頁廣告呈現方式與瀏覽動機對於使用者視覺注意與項目記憶的影響。臺北科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文，台北市。
謝坤哲（2010）。網頁圖文數量與位置配置對於成年人與青少年的偏好與眼球運動之影響：以購物網站為例。國立台灣師範大學設計研究所碩士論文，台北市。
謝寶煖（2004）。大學圖書館網站資訊組織之研究。在2004現代資訊組織與檢索研討會（頁1-27）。台北市：淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系。		zh_TW