1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 文學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 「女性研究 」文獻之書目計量學研究
A Bibliometric Study of Women`s Studies Literature
作者 李家寧
Li, Chia Ning
貢獻者 蔡明月
Tsay, Ming Yueh
李家寧
Li, Chia Ning
關鍵詞 女性研究
書目計量學
布萊德福定律
布萊德福-齊夫定律
普萊斯平方根定律
80/20定律
Women`s Studies
Bibliometrics
Bradford’s Law
Bradford-Zipf’s Law
Price Square Root Law
80/20 Rule
日期 2013
上傳時間 29-七月-2014 16:07:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在應用書目計量學方法分析1900年至2013年間，女性研究文獻之特性，藉以探討女性研究之發展情形。研究樣本取自WOS資料庫（包含三個子資料庫SSCI、SCIE和A&HCI），計16,852篇相關書目資料。期望本研究結果能提供女性研究學界與圖書館或資料單位參考，協助其做有效之館藏規劃及期刊資訊服務。

本研究結果歸納如下：(1) 女性研究文獻篇數與年代是成正比的狀況，較符合指數成長模式。進一步以指數迴歸預測成長篇數的話，顯示女性研究文獻有成長減緩的趨勢。(2)女性研究文獻之主要出版國為美國、英國、加拿大、荷蘭、德國等國。 (3)英文為女性研究文獻最重要之寫作語文。(4)女性研究文獻之出版類型以期刊文章為主，佔總文獻之62.86%。(5)女性研究廣泛應用於各學科，主題領域前五名分別為心理學相關、女性研究（狹義）、歷史、文學及教育與教育研究。 (6) 女性研究之文獻分布相當分散，但仍有其核心期刊。(7)本研究符合布萊德福定律，但不符合布萊德福-齊夫定律曲線。(8) 高生產力期刊與高被引期刊的主題明顯分散。 (10) 洛卡定律、普萊斯平方根定律、80/20 定律不適用於本研究。(11) 研究機構的生產力分散，大學校院為主要研究機構，機構下的系所分布以心理學系所最多。(12) 美國與英國為相關研究機構最多的國家，也是延攬他國學術成果的最多的國家。

本研究最後依據研究發現之結果，提出以下建議：(1)本研究之各項研究成果，可作為圖書資訊界館藏發展與管理之參考。(2)女性研究相關研究人員，應具備跨主題領域的合作研究能力且法文、德文、西班牙文等外語能力。(4)資料庫公司應提升書目資料精確性，以利研究。(5)定期對女性研究文獻進行分析，有助於女性研究相關研究人員瞭解該領域之研究發展。
The purpose of the study is to understand the contents, relations, development, and trends between various disciplines of “women’s studies.” This study analyzes the characteristics of women’s studies literature during 1900-2013 by bibliometric approach, collecting analytical components such as the frequencies of the publication, publication languages, countries of publications, journal sources, cited times, disciplines of subject categories and document type from three major sub-databases of Web of Science services: SCIE, SSCI, and A&HCI. A total of 16,852 bibliographic records were retrieved from the databases.

The results of the present study are as follows. (1) The growth pattern of women’s studies literature during 1900-2013 generally fits exponential growth, but the growth has been slowed down since 2011. (2) United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Netherlands and Germany are five major countries of women’s studies publications. (3) English is the most often used language. (4) Journal articles are the major type of women’s studies publications, accounting for 62.86% of total publications. (5) Women’s studies are scattered in multiple disciplines, with five subjects significantly contributing to the literature count: psychology and its related disciplines, women’s studies (in narrow definition), history, literature, and education and educational research. (6) Despite of the scattered distribution of women’s studies literature, core journals of women’s studies still can be identified. (7)The distribution of journal articles fits Bradford Law, but it does not fit the typical Bradford-Zipf’s S-shaped curve. (8) The journal subjects of highly productive journals and highly cited journals vary. (9) Author distribution is counted by single authorship and collaborative authorship; the results show that author distribution neither fits Lotka’s law, Square Root Law or 80/20 Rule. (10) Academic institutions are major producers of women’s studies, with departments in universities and colleges concerning psychology and its related disciplines being the main contributors to the publications. (11) Most productive research institutions are distributed over United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Turkey.

The findings of the study may provide better understanding of the past, current and future of women’s studies, and serve as references to identify more suitable, popular and influential journals and literature for both research purposes and library collection development and management.
參考文獻 IBM Corporation（2011）。IBM SPSS Statistics 20簡易使用指南。檢索自ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/20.0/zh_TW/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Brief_Guide.pdf
The Reimagined.重組想像的.青春無敵篇（2006，6月7日）。【女性主義理論】Haraway`s Cyborg Manifesto (人機合體宣言,1991)【部落格文字資料】。檢索自http://blog.roodo.com/sabinasun/archives/1724217.html
中國大百科出版社編（2005）。文獻計量學【中國大百科全書智慧藏知識庫】。檢索自http://ermg.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/er/swlink.cgi?ccd=vG9bz1&o=e2
尤慧敏 （2002）。台灣地區生命科學生產力之國際指標研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
王明玲、杜立中、曾彩娥（2009，6月）。臺灣出版五四運動文獻之書目計量研究。國家圖書館館刊，1，93-113。
何光國（1994）。文獻計量學導論。臺北市：三民。
李光 （2013）。國內圖書館館際合作研究文獻的計量分析。圖書館學刊，2，119-120，127。
李根芳（2011）。「定位政治作為跨國女性主義批評實踐」：一種文化翻譯的可 能。載於編者游素玲（主編），跨國女性研究導讀（90-103頁）。臺北市：五南。
李銀河（2004）。女性主義。臺北市：五南。
林怡甄（2008）。「輸送現象」之文獻特性分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
林信成、洪銘禪（2011）。布萊德福與洛卡定律於Wiki網站計量之分析。教育資料與圖書館學，48（3），325-346。
林麗珊（2013）。女性主義與性別關係。臺北市：五南。
邱子修（2009，4月）。西方第三波女性主義思潮概述。婦研縱橫，90，56-61。
邱信一（2010）。臺灣公共衛生系所文獻作者生產力與影響力之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
洪世芳（2003）。OPAC文獻之書目計量學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
許文華（2002）。醫學基因工程文獻之書目計量學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
通色. 通性-性傾向及性別身分認同通識教材（2010）。酷兒理論（Queer Theory）。檢索自http://leslovestudy.com/liberal-studies/concept14.shtml
陳昭如（2013）。Catharine A. MacKinnon：宰制論女性主義法學的開創者。婦研縱橫，98，51-62。
陳寶華（2009）。燃料電池文獻與專利之科學計量研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
彭慰（1995，12月）。書目計量法【圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典】。檢索自 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681681/?index=2
黃秀琴（1999）。會議文獻作者生產力與其延續出版品之研究:以國防科技學術研討會為例（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
楊彥緒（2003）。 隨機對照試驗醫學文獻之書目計量學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
楊雅婷、顏詩怡、司馬學文、林育如（譯）（2009）。性別與女性研究手冊（原作者：K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber）。新北市：韋伯。（原著出版年：2006）
董蕙茹（2008）。台灣地區的世界文學翻譯作品：書目計量分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
蔡明月（1987）。書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，24（3），261-296。
蔡明月（1997）。文獻成長現象。中國圖書館學會會報，59，135-153。
蔡明月（1998）。 布萊德福定律 Bradford’s Law。資訊傳播與圖書館學，5（2），25-27。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。 臺北市：華泰。
蔡明月、邱琦茹（2013）。臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究。教育資料與圖書館學，51（3），111-138。
蔡明月、陳憶玲（2006）。生醫科學期刊引用數據之分析比較。國家圖書館館刊，95（1），1-33。
蔡明月、劉瓊芳（2007，6月）。1992-2005資訊計量學研究及其發展演變。圖書與資訊學刊，61，42-56。
Abramo, G., D`angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517-539. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8
Afolabi, M. (1989). The literature of onchocerciasis: 1960-1681. International Library Review, 21, 487-493.
Ahmed, S. M. Z., & Rahman, M. A. (2008). Nutrition literature of Bangladesh: A bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(1), 35-43.
Aksnes, D., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628-636. doi: 10.1002/asi.21486
Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., & Borrego, A. N. (2013). Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis. Scientometrics, 95(1), 15-23. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0816-4
Bennett, J. M. (1989). Feminism and History. Gender & History, 1(3), 251-272.
Bobel, C. (2006). “Our revolution has style”: Contemporary menstrual product activists “doing feminism” in the third wave. Sex Roles, 54, 331-345. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9001-7
Bottle, R.T., & Efthimiadis, E.N. (1984). Library and information science literature: authorship and growth patterns. Journal of Information Science, 9(3), 107-116.
Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford law and the bibliography of science. Nature, 224(5223), 953.
Cambridge University Press (2014). American Political Science Review. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSRAmerican
Cott, N. F. (1987). The grounding of modern feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cronin, B., & Overfelt, K. (1994). Citation-based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 61-72.
Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford’s law: theory, empiricism and the gaps between. Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52.
Efthimiadis, E.N. (1990). The growth of the OPAC literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5), 342-347.
Egghe, L. (1994). A theory of continuous rates and applications to the theory growth and obsolescence rates. Information Processing & Management, 30(2), 279.
Elsevier (2014). Women`s Studies International Forum. Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/womens-studies-international-forum
Feminist Studies (2014). About us. Retrieved from http://www.feministstudies.org/home.html
Frame, J. D., & Narin, F. (1987). The Growth of Chinese Scientific Research, 1973-84. Scientometrics, 12(1-2), 135-144.
Frame, J. D., Baum, J. J., & Card, M. (1979). An information approach to examining developments in an energy technology: coal gasification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 193-201.
Freedman, E. B. (2006). Beyond the waves: rethinking the history of feminisms. In C. R. Berkin, J. L. Pinch, & C. S. Appel (Eds.), In Exploring Women’s Studies: Looking Forward, Looking Back . New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4(19), 476-483.
Gerhard, K. H. (1998). Women’s studies serials: a quarter-century of development. The Serials Librarian, 35(1-2), 1-7.
Goffman, W., & Morris, T. G. (1967). Bradford’s law and library acquisitions. Nature 226, 197-207.
Gupta, B.M., Kumar, S., Syed, S., and Singh, K.V. (1996). Distribution of Productivity among Authors inPotato Research 1900-1980. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 33(3), 127-134.
Hawkins, D. T. (1978). The literature of noble gas compounds. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 18(4), 190-199.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane , W. E., Lucker , G. W., & Matthews, K. A. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 896-908.
Hemmings, C. (2006). The life and times of academic feminism. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of Gender and Women’s Studies (pp. 13-34). London: Sage.
Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L., & Balakrishnan, M. R. (1994). Scientometric portrait of P. K. Iyengar. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 31(4), 155-176.
Krikos, L. A. (1994). Women’s studies periodical indexes: An in-depth comparison. Serials Review, 20(2), 65-78.
Krikos, L. A. (2004). Periodicals. In L. A. Krikos & C. Ingold (Eds.), Women`s studies: a recommended bibliography (pp. 721-730). Westport: Libraries Unliminted.
Krolokke, C., & Sorensen, A. S. (2006). Three waves of feminism: from suffrages to grrls. In Gender Communication Theories and Analyses. California: Sage Publication. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/6236_Chapter_1_Krolokke_2nd_Rev_Final_Pdf.pdf
Leavens, D. H. (1953). Letter to the editor in Econometrica. Econometrica, 21(4), 630-632.
Lewison, G. (2001). The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1), 29-43.
Lewison, G., & Markusova, V. (2011). Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible? Scientometrics, 89(1), 139-152.
Library of Congress. Library of Congress subject headings. Retrieved from http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects.html
Line, M. B., & Roberts, S. (1976). The size, growth and composition of social science literature. Internal Social Science Journal, 28(1), 122-159.
Lotka, Alfred J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Science, 16(12), 317-323.
Mack, T. (1991). A model methodology for selecting women’s studies core journals. Library & Information Science Research, 13(2), 131-145.
Magyar, G. (1974). Bibliometric analysis of a new research subfield. Journal of Documentation, 30, 32-40.
Maparyan, L. (2012). Feminism. In C. M. Orr, A. Braithwaite, & D. Lichtenstein, (Eds.), Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies (pp 15-33). New York: Routledge.
Merlo, C. R., Hoeffner, L., Merlo, J. M., & Moscatelli, R. (2011). An analysis of computer science education publication using Lotka`s law. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 26(3), 85-92.
Mommoh, O. M. (1995/96). Characteristics of the literature of library education in Nigeria, 1948-1995. Library Focus, 13 & 14, 76-92.
Mozaffarian, M., & Jamali, H. R. (2008). Iranian women in science: a gender study of scientific productivity in an Islamic country. Aslib Proceedings, 60(5), 463-473.
Murphy, L. J. (1973). Lotka’s Law in the Humanities? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24(6), 461-462.
National Women’s Studies Association. What Is Women’s Studies? Retrieved from http://www.nwsa.org/content.asp?pl=19&contentid=21
Nisonger, T. (2008). The “80/20 Rule” and core journals. The Serials Librarian, 55(1), 62-84.
Nweke, K.M.C. (1989). Citation analysis Study of Authors of the Literature Used by Reaearch Scholars in Zoology at the Ibadan University, Nigeria. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 36(4), 139-147.
Offen, K. (2001). Women’s suffrage. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (1st ed., pp.16534-16538). New York: Elsevier.
Oliver, M. R. (1971). The effect of growth on the obsolescence of semiconductor physics literature. Journal of Documentation, 27(1), 11-17.
Oxford University Press (2014). The American Historical Review. Retrieved from http://ahr.oxfordjournals.org/
Pao, M. L. (1986). An Empirical Examination of Lotka’s Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 26-33
Pinto, M. a., Escalona-Ferna´ndez, M. a. I., & Pulgarı´n, A. (2013). Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: a bibliometric study (1974–2011). Scientometrics, 95(3), 1071-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0899-y
Potter, W. G. (1981, Summer). Lotka’s law revisited. Library Trends, 30, 36-37.
Price, D. J. d. S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
Prozesky, H., & Boshoff, N. (2012). Bibliometrics as a tool for measuring gender-specific research performance: an example from South African invasion ecology. Scientometrics, 90(2), 383-406. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0478-7
Psychological Association (2013). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/psp/
Psychology’s Feminist Voices (2012). About us. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/about
Robinson, V. (1993). Introducing women’s studies. In D. Richardson, & V. Robinson (Eds.), Introducing Women’s Studies (pp. 1-26). Hampshire: Macmillan.
Sage Journals (2012). Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. Retrieved from http://csx.sagepub.com/
Sengupta, I. N. (1985). Bibliometrics: A bird’s eye view. LASLIC Bulletin, 60, 167-174.
Signs (2012). About Signs. Retrieved from http://signsjournal.org/about-signs/
Smith, J. H. (1984). The Application of Selected Bibliometric Techniques to the Recent Learning Style Literature (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delta State University, United States.
Spinger (2013). Sex Roles. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/psychology/personality+%26+social+psychology/journal/11199
Stack, S. (2002). Gender and scholarly productivity: The case of criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 175-182.
Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2001). Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics. Scientometrics, 51(2), 405-414.
Synder-Hall, R. C. (2010). Third-wave feminism and the defense of “choice”. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 255-261.
The Ohio State University (2014). About Frontiers. Retrieved fromhttps://frontiers.osu.edu/about-us
The University of Chicago Divinity School (2013). Jean Bethke Elshtain, scholar of religion and political philosophy, 1941-2013. Retrieved from https://divinity.uchicago.edu/jean-bethke-elshtain-scholar-religion-and-political-philosophy-1941-2013
Thomas, W. J., & Younce, L. (2008). Investigating women’s studies core journals: librarians’ tools, citations and speculations. In B. R. Bernharclt, T. Daniels, & K. Steinle (Eds.), Charleston Conference Proceedings 2007 (pp.107-118). Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
UCLA Center for the Study of Women (2014). Ellen Carol DuBois. Retrieved from http://www.csw.ucla.edu/people/advisory-committee/ellen-dubois
Ulrichsweb global serials directory (2013). About the Ulrich`s knowledgebase. Retrieved from http://www.ulrichsweb.com/ulrichsweb/faqs.asp
University of Kent (2014). Social policy, sociology and social research. Retrieved from http://www.kent.ac.uk/sspssr/staff/academic/sayers.html
University of Oxford (2013). The million women study. Retrived from http://www.millionwomenstudy.org/introduction/
University of Wisconsin (2012). Professor Myra Marx Ferree. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~mferree/
University of York (2014, May). Professor Celia Kitzinger. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/sociology/our-staff/academic/celia-kitzinger/
Wiley Online Library (2014). Medical Education. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2923/homepage/ProductInformation.html
Woman Suffrage. (2013). In The Columbia Encyclopedia. Retrieved from　http://www.credoreference.com/topic/woman_suffrage/
Women & Gender Studies Section (2008, June). Core list of journals for women and gender studies. Retrieved from http://libr.org/wgss/projects/serial.html
Zhang, H. (1994). A bibliometric study on medicine Chinese traditional in MEDLINE database. Scientometrics, 31(3), 241-251
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
101155010
102
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101155010
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡明月zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Tsay, Ming Yuehen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 李家寧zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Li, Chia Ningen_US
dc.creator (作者) 李家寧zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Li, Chia Ningen_US
dc.date (日期) 2013en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-七月-2014 16:07:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-七月-2014 16:07:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-七月-2014 16:07:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0101155010en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67881-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101155010zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 102zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在應用書目計量學方法分析1900年至2013年間，女性研究文獻之特性，藉以探討女性研究之發展情形。研究樣本取自WOS資料庫（包含三個子資料庫SSCI、SCIE和A&HCI），計16,852篇相關書目資料。期望本研究結果能提供女性研究學界與圖書館或資料單位參考，協助其做有效之館藏規劃及期刊資訊服務。

本研究結果歸納如下：(1) 女性研究文獻篇數與年代是成正比的狀況，較符合指數成長模式。進一步以指數迴歸預測成長篇數的話，顯示女性研究文獻有成長減緩的趨勢。(2)女性研究文獻之主要出版國為美國、英國、加拿大、荷蘭、德國等國。 (3)英文為女性研究文獻最重要之寫作語文。(4)女性研究文獻之出版類型以期刊文章為主，佔總文獻之62.86%。(5)女性研究廣泛應用於各學科，主題領域前五名分別為心理學相關、女性研究（狹義）、歷史、文學及教育與教育研究。 (6) 女性研究之文獻分布相當分散，但仍有其核心期刊。(7)本研究符合布萊德福定律，但不符合布萊德福-齊夫定律曲線。(8) 高生產力期刊與高被引期刊的主題明顯分散。 (10) 洛卡定律、普萊斯平方根定律、80/20 定律不適用於本研究。(11) 研究機構的生產力分散，大學校院為主要研究機構，機構下的系所分布以心理學系所最多。(12) 美國與英國為相關研究機構最多的國家，也是延攬他國學術成果的最多的國家。

本研究最後依據研究發現之結果，提出以下建議：(1)本研究之各項研究成果，可作為圖書資訊界館藏發展與管理之參考。(2)女性研究相關研究人員，應具備跨主題領域的合作研究能力且法文、德文、西班牙文等外語能力。(4)資料庫公司應提升書目資料精確性，以利研究。(5)定期對女性研究文獻進行分析，有助於女性研究相關研究人員瞭解該領域之研究發展。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of the study is to understand the contents, relations, development, and trends between various disciplines of “women’s studies.” This study analyzes the characteristics of women’s studies literature during 1900-2013 by bibliometric approach, collecting analytical components such as the frequencies of the publication, publication languages, countries of publications, journal sources, cited times, disciplines of subject categories and document type from three major sub-databases of Web of Science services: SCIE, SSCI, and A&HCI. A total of 16,852 bibliographic records were retrieved from the databases.

The results of the present study are as follows. (1) The growth pattern of women’s studies literature during 1900-2013 generally fits exponential growth, but the growth has been slowed down since 2011. (2) United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Netherlands and Germany are five major countries of women’s studies publications. (3) English is the most often used language. (4) Journal articles are the major type of women’s studies publications, accounting for 62.86% of total publications. (5) Women’s studies are scattered in multiple disciplines, with five subjects significantly contributing to the literature count: psychology and its related disciplines, women’s studies (in narrow definition), history, literature, and education and educational research. (6) Despite of the scattered distribution of women’s studies literature, core journals of women’s studies still can be identified. (7)The distribution of journal articles fits Bradford Law, but it does not fit the typical Bradford-Zipf’s S-shaped curve. (8) The journal subjects of highly productive journals and highly cited journals vary. (9) Author distribution is counted by single authorship and collaborative authorship; the results show that author distribution neither fits Lotka’s law, Square Root Law or 80/20 Rule. (10) Academic institutions are major producers of women’s studies, with departments in universities and colleges concerning psychology and its related disciplines being the main contributors to the publications. (11) Most productive research institutions are distributed over United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Turkey.

The findings of the study may provide better understanding of the past, current and future of women’s studies, and serve as references to identify more suitable, popular and influential journals and literature for both research purposes and library collection development and management.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論

第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究問題 4
第四節 預期貢獻 5
第五節 名詞解釋 6

第二章 文獻探討

第一節 書目計量學之歷史發展 10
第二節 文獻成長模式與實證研究 11
第三節 期刊文獻分佈與實證研究 17
第四節 作者生產力分布與實證研究 22
第五節 女性研究之歷史發展 28
第六節 女性研究相關之書目計量學研究 32

第三章 研究方法與步驟

第一節 研究對象 41
第二節 研究工具 43
第三節 研究範圍與限制 45
第四節 研究設計與步驟 47

第四章 女性研究文獻特性探討

第一節 女性研究文獻成長情形 51
第二節 女性研究文獻出版國別 55
第三節 女性研究文獻語言分布 57
第四節 女性研究文獻類型分布 59
第五節 女性研究主題領域分析 63
第六節 綜合討論 68

第五章 女性研究期刊文獻分布

第一節 布萊德福之應用 70
第二節 核心期刊品質之驗證 74
第三節 綜合討論 98

第六章 女性研究文獻作者暨研究機構探討

第一節 女性研究作者生產力之驗證 102
第二節 女性研究文獻研究機構分布 118
第三節 綜合討論 127

第七章 結論與建議

第一節 結論 131
第二節 建議 135
第三節 後續研究建議 137

參考文獻 140

附錄

附錄一 女性研究文獻出版國別分布表 146
附錄二 女性研究文獻主題領域分布表 152
附錄三 女性研究期刊文獻分布統計表 197
附錄四 高生產力期刊列表（核心區期刊）199
附錄五 期刊刊載高被引文獻數量表 207
附錄六 核心區期刊影響係數表 220
附錄七 女性研究文獻作者著作量分布表 222
附錄八 女性研究文獻作者所屬機構國家之分布表 225		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 4386384 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101155010en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 女性研究zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 書目計量學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 布萊德福定律zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 布萊德福-齊夫定律zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 普萊斯平方根定律zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 80/20定律zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Women`s Studiesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bibliometricsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bradford’s Lawen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bradford-Zipf’s Lawen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Price Square Root Lawen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 80/20 Ruleen_US
dc.title (題名) 「女性研究 」文獻之書目計量學研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Bibliometric Study of Women`s Studies Literatureen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IBM Corporation（2011）。IBM SPSS Statistics 20簡易使用指南。檢索自ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/20.0/zh_TW/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Brief_Guide.pdf
The Reimagined.重組想像的.青春無敵篇（2006，6月7日）。【女性主義理論】Haraway`s Cyborg Manifesto (人機合體宣言,1991)【部落格文字資料】。檢索自http://blog.roodo.com/sabinasun/archives/1724217.html
中國大百科出版社編（2005）。文獻計量學【中國大百科全書智慧藏知識庫】。檢索自http://ermg.lib.nccu.edu.tw/cgi-bin/er/swlink.cgi?ccd=vG9bz1&o=e2
尤慧敏 （2002）。台灣地區生命科學生產力之國際指標研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
王明玲、杜立中、曾彩娥（2009，6月）。臺灣出版五四運動文獻之書目計量研究。國家圖書館館刊，1，93-113。
何光國（1994）。文獻計量學導論。臺北市：三民。
李光 （2013）。國內圖書館館際合作研究文獻的計量分析。圖書館學刊，2，119-120，127。
李根芳（2011）。「定位政治作為跨國女性主義批評實踐」：一種文化翻譯的可 能。載於編者游素玲（主編），跨國女性研究導讀（90-103頁）。臺北市：五南。
李銀河（2004）。女性主義。臺北市：五南。
林怡甄（2008）。「輸送現象」之文獻特性分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
林信成、洪銘禪（2011）。布萊德福與洛卡定律於Wiki網站計量之分析。教育資料與圖書館學，48（3），325-346。
林麗珊（2013）。女性主義與性別關係。臺北市：五南。
邱子修（2009，4月）。西方第三波女性主義思潮概述。婦研縱橫，90，56-61。
邱信一（2010）。臺灣公共衛生系所文獻作者生產力與影響力之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
洪世芳（2003）。OPAC文獻之書目計量學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
許文華（2002）。醫學基因工程文獻之書目計量學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
通色. 通性-性傾向及性別身分認同通識教材（2010）。酷兒理論（Queer Theory）。檢索自http://leslovestudy.com/liberal-studies/concept14.shtml
陳昭如（2013）。Catharine A. MacKinnon：宰制論女性主義法學的開創者。婦研縱橫，98，51-62。
陳寶華（2009）。燃料電池文獻與專利之科學計量研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
彭慰（1995，12月）。書目計量法【圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典】。檢索自 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681681/?index=2
黃秀琴（1999）。會議文獻作者生產力與其延續出版品之研究:以國防科技學術研討會為例（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
楊彥緒（2003）。 隨機對照試驗醫學文獻之書目計量學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
楊雅婷、顏詩怡、司馬學文、林育如（譯）（2009）。性別與女性研究手冊（原作者：K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber）。新北市：韋伯。（原著出版年：2006）
董蕙茹（2008）。台灣地區的世界文學翻譯作品：書目計量分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
蔡明月（1987）。書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，24（3），261-296。
蔡明月（1997）。文獻成長現象。中國圖書館學會會報，59，135-153。
蔡明月（1998）。 布萊德福定律 Bradford’s Law。資訊傳播與圖書館學，5（2），25-27。
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。 臺北市：華泰。
蔡明月、邱琦茹（2013）。臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究。教育資料與圖書館學，51（3），111-138。
蔡明月、陳憶玲（2006）。生醫科學期刊引用數據之分析比較。國家圖書館館刊，95（1），1-33。
蔡明月、劉瓊芳（2007，6月）。1992-2005資訊計量學研究及其發展演變。圖書與資訊學刊，61，42-56。
Abramo, G., D`angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79(3), 517-539. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-2046-8
Afolabi, M. (1989). The literature of onchocerciasis: 1960-1681. International Library Review, 21, 487-493.
Ahmed, S. M. Z., & Rahman, M. A. (2008). Nutrition literature of Bangladesh: A bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(1), 35-43.
Aksnes, D., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628-636. doi: 10.1002/asi.21486
Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., & Borrego, A. N. (2013). Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis. Scientometrics, 95(1), 15-23. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0816-4
Bennett, J. M. (1989). Feminism and History. Gender & History, 1(3), 251-272.
Bobel, C. (2006). “Our revolution has style”: Contemporary menstrual product activists “doing feminism” in the third wave. Sex Roles, 54, 331-345. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9001-7
Bottle, R.T., & Efthimiadis, E.N. (1984). Library and information science literature: authorship and growth patterns. Journal of Information Science, 9(3), 107-116.
Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford law and the bibliography of science. Nature, 224(5223), 953.
Cambridge University Press (2014). American Political Science Review. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSRAmerican
Cott, N. F. (1987). The grounding of modern feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cronin, B., & Overfelt, K. (1994). Citation-based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 61-72.
Drott, M. C. (1981). Bradford’s law: theory, empiricism and the gaps between. Library Trends, 30(1), 41-52.
Efthimiadis, E.N. (1990). The growth of the OPAC literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5), 342-347.
Egghe, L. (1994). A theory of continuous rates and applications to the theory growth and obsolescence rates. Information Processing & Management, 30(2), 279.
Elsevier (2014). Women`s Studies International Forum. Retrieved from http://www.journals.elsevier.com/womens-studies-international-forum
Feminist Studies (2014). About us. Retrieved from http://www.feministstudies.org/home.html
Frame, J. D., & Narin, F. (1987). The Growth of Chinese Scientific Research, 1973-84. Scientometrics, 12(1-2), 135-144.
Frame, J. D., Baum, J. J., & Card, M. (1979). An information approach to examining developments in an energy technology: coal gasification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 193-201.
Freedman, E. B. (2006). Beyond the waves: rethinking the history of feminisms. In C. R. Berkin, J. L. Pinch, & C. S. Appel (Eds.), In Exploring Women’s Studies: Looking Forward, Looking Back . New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Essays of an Information Scientist, 4(19), 476-483.
Gerhard, K. H. (1998). Women’s studies serials: a quarter-century of development. The Serials Librarian, 35(1-2), 1-7.
Goffman, W., & Morris, T. G. (1967). Bradford’s law and library acquisitions. Nature 226, 197-207.
Gupta, B.M., Kumar, S., Syed, S., and Singh, K.V. (1996). Distribution of Productivity among Authors inPotato Research 1900-1980. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 33(3), 127-134.
Hawkins, D. T. (1978). The literature of noble gas compounds. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 18(4), 190-199.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., Beane , W. E., Lucker , G. W., & Matthews, K. A. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 896-908.
Hemmings, C. (2006). The life and times of academic feminism. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of Gender and Women’s Studies (pp. 13-34). London: Sage.
Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L., & Balakrishnan, M. R. (1994). Scientometric portrait of P. K. Iyengar. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 31(4), 155-176.
Krikos, L. A. (1994). Women’s studies periodical indexes: An in-depth comparison. Serials Review, 20(2), 65-78.
Krikos, L. A. (2004). Periodicals. In L. A. Krikos & C. Ingold (Eds.), Women`s studies: a recommended bibliography (pp. 721-730). Westport: Libraries Unliminted.
Krolokke, C., & Sorensen, A. S. (2006). Three waves of feminism: from suffrages to grrls. In Gender Communication Theories and Analyses. California: Sage Publication. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/6236_Chapter_1_Krolokke_2nd_Rev_Final_Pdf.pdf
Leavens, D. H. (1953). Letter to the editor in Econometrica. Econometrica, 21(4), 630-632.
Lewison, G. (2001). The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1), 29-43.
Lewison, G., & Markusova, V. (2011). Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible? Scientometrics, 89(1), 139-152.
Library of Congress. Library of Congress subject headings. Retrieved from http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects.html
Line, M. B., & Roberts, S. (1976). The size, growth and composition of social science literature. Internal Social Science Journal, 28(1), 122-159.
Lotka, Alfred J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Science, 16(12), 317-323.
Mack, T. (1991). A model methodology for selecting women’s studies core journals. Library & Information Science Research, 13(2), 131-145.
Magyar, G. (1974). Bibliometric analysis of a new research subfield. Journal of Documentation, 30, 32-40.
Maparyan, L. (2012). Feminism. In C. M. Orr, A. Braithwaite, & D. Lichtenstein, (Eds.), Rethinking Women’s and Gender Studies (pp 15-33). New York: Routledge.
Merlo, C. R., Hoeffner, L., Merlo, J. M., & Moscatelli, R. (2011). An analysis of computer science education publication using Lotka`s law. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 26(3), 85-92.
Mommoh, O. M. (1995/96). Characteristics of the literature of library education in Nigeria, 1948-1995. Library Focus, 13 & 14, 76-92.
Mozaffarian, M., & Jamali, H. R. (2008). Iranian women in science: a gender study of scientific productivity in an Islamic country. Aslib Proceedings, 60(5), 463-473.
Murphy, L. J. (1973). Lotka’s Law in the Humanities? Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24(6), 461-462.
National Women’s Studies Association. What Is Women’s Studies? Retrieved from http://www.nwsa.org/content.asp?pl=19&contentid=21
Nisonger, T. (2008). The “80/20 Rule” and core journals. The Serials Librarian, 55(1), 62-84.
Nweke, K.M.C. (1989). Citation analysis Study of Authors of the Literature Used by Reaearch Scholars in Zoology at the Ibadan University, Nigeria. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 36(4), 139-147.
Offen, K. (2001). Women’s suffrage. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (1st ed., pp.16534-16538). New York: Elsevier.
Oliver, M. R. (1971). The effect of growth on the obsolescence of semiconductor physics literature. Journal of Documentation, 27(1), 11-17.
Oxford University Press (2014). The American Historical Review. Retrieved from http://ahr.oxfordjournals.org/
Pao, M. L. (1986). An Empirical Examination of Lotka’s Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 26-33
Pinto, M. a., Escalona-Ferna´ndez, M. a. I., & Pulgarı´n, A. (2013). Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: a bibliometric study (1974–2011). Scientometrics, 95(3), 1071-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0899-y
Potter, W. G. (1981, Summer). Lotka’s law revisited. Library Trends, 30, 36-37.
Price, D. J. d. S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
Prozesky, H., & Boshoff, N. (2012). Bibliometrics as a tool for measuring gender-specific research performance: an example from South African invasion ecology. Scientometrics, 90(2), 383-406. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0478-7
Psychological Association (2013). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/psp/
Psychology’s Feminist Voices (2012). About us. Retrieved from http://www.feministvoices.com/about
Robinson, V. (1993). Introducing women’s studies. In D. Richardson, & V. Robinson (Eds.), Introducing Women’s Studies (pp. 1-26). Hampshire: Macmillan.
Sage Journals (2012). Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews. Retrieved from http://csx.sagepub.com/
Sengupta, I. N. (1985). Bibliometrics: A bird’s eye view. LASLIC Bulletin, 60, 167-174.
Signs (2012). About Signs. Retrieved from http://signsjournal.org/about-signs/
Smith, J. H. (1984). The Application of Selected Bibliometric Techniques to the Recent Learning Style Literature (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delta State University, United States.
Spinger (2013). Sex Roles. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/psychology/personality+%26+social+psychology/journal/11199
Stack, S. (2002). Gender and scholarly productivity: The case of criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 175-182.
Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2001). Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics. Scientometrics, 51(2), 405-414.
Synder-Hall, R. C. (2010). Third-wave feminism and the defense of “choice”. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 255-261.
The Ohio State University (2014). About Frontiers. Retrieved fromhttps://frontiers.osu.edu/about-us
The University of Chicago Divinity School (2013). Jean Bethke Elshtain, scholar of religion and political philosophy, 1941-2013. Retrieved from https://divinity.uchicago.edu/jean-bethke-elshtain-scholar-religion-and-political-philosophy-1941-2013
Thomas, W. J., & Younce, L. (2008). Investigating women’s studies core journals: librarians’ tools, citations and speculations. In B. R. Bernharclt, T. Daniels, & K. Steinle (Eds.), Charleston Conference Proceedings 2007 (pp.107-118). Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
UCLA Center for the Study of Women (2014). Ellen Carol DuBois. Retrieved from http://www.csw.ucla.edu/people/advisory-committee/ellen-dubois
Ulrichsweb global serials directory (2013). About the Ulrich`s knowledgebase. Retrieved from http://www.ulrichsweb.com/ulrichsweb/faqs.asp
University of Kent (2014). Social policy, sociology and social research. Retrieved from http://www.kent.ac.uk/sspssr/staff/academic/sayers.html
University of Oxford (2013). The million women study. Retrived from http://www.millionwomenstudy.org/introduction/
University of Wisconsin (2012). Professor Myra Marx Ferree. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~mferree/
University of York (2014, May). Professor Celia Kitzinger. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/sociology/our-staff/academic/celia-kitzinger/
Wiley Online Library (2014). Medical Education. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2923/homepage/ProductInformation.html
Woman Suffrage. (2013). In The Columbia Encyclopedia. Retrieved from　http://www.credoreference.com/topic/woman_suffrage/
Women & Gender Studies Section (2008, June). Core list of journals for women and gender studies. Retrieved from http://libr.org/wgss/projects/serial.html
Zhang, H. (1994). A bibliometric study on medicine Chinese traditional in MEDLINE database. Scientometrics, 31(3), 241-251		zh_TW