1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 社會科學學院
  4. 期刊論文
  5. Item

學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 二00八年後梅-普架構下俄羅斯半總統制的檢視
其他題名 A Study of Russian Semi-Presidentialism after 2008 Based on the Medvedev-Putin Framework
作者 趙竹成
ZHAO, Zhu-cheng
貢獻者 民族系
關鍵詞 俄羅斯聯邦 ; 普京 ; 統一俄羅斯黨 ; 蘇聯 ; 聯邦主體
Russian Federation ; Putin ; United Russia ; Soviet Union ; federal subject
日期 2011.03
上傳時間 12-八月-2014 10:08:49 (UTC+8)
摘要 一九九○年後，前蘇聯各加盟共和國在政治轉型過程中無論是聯邦或共和國，在其政體的選擇模式，除了波羅的海三國中的拉脫維亞與愛沙尼亞是選擇內閣制，土庫曼爲總統制外，其餘各國主要是選擇半總統制。就制度形式部分來看，在深化其運作效果後，大部分的例子是向三種不同的道路發展：一種走向總統的實質獨裁，第二種是不斷的出現總統－總理∕國會表面化的政治爭議，第三種是總統與總理協力而實權在總理。俄羅斯則是走過這三種道路，形成一個有趣的案例。本文試圖探討有那種角度可以重新評價俄羅斯的半總統制運作。
After 1990, the states that formed out of the former Soviet Union, with the exception of the Baltic states of Latvia and Estonia which opted for parliamentary systems and Turkmenistan which opted for a presidential system, adopted semi-presidential regimes. In terms of the formation and operation of political systems, we can identify three distinct paths. The first is a gradual move towards presidential dictatorship. The second is the emergence of superficial disputes between the president on the one hand, and premier and parliament on the other. The third is the emergence of cooperative arrangements between president and premier, but with actual power held by the premier. Russia has evolved in the third direction, providing an interesting case study. This paper examines Russian semipresidentialism after 2008 from the perspective of this third path.
關聯 政治科學論叢, No.47, pp.143-174
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 民族系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 趙竹成zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) ZHAO, Zhu-chengen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011.03en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-八月-2014 10:08:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-八月-2014 10:08:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-八月-2014 10:08:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68481-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 一九九○年後，前蘇聯各加盟共和國在政治轉型過程中無論是聯邦或共和國，在其政體的選擇模式，除了波羅的海三國中的拉脫維亞與愛沙尼亞是選擇內閣制，土庫曼爲總統制外，其餘各國主要是選擇半總統制。就制度形式部分來看，在深化其運作效果後，大部分的例子是向三種不同的道路發展：一種走向總統的實質獨裁，第二種是不斷的出現總統－總理∕國會表面化的政治爭議，第三種是總統與總理協力而實權在總理。俄羅斯則是走過這三種道路，形成一個有趣的案例。本文試圖探討有那種角度可以重新評價俄羅斯的半總統制運作。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) After 1990, the states that formed out of the former Soviet Union, with the exception of the Baltic states of Latvia and Estonia which opted for parliamentary systems and Turkmenistan which opted for a presidential system, adopted semi-presidential regimes. In terms of the formation and operation of political systems, we can identify three distinct paths. The first is a gradual move towards presidential dictatorship. The second is the emergence of superficial disputes between the president on the one hand, and premier and parliament on the other. The third is the emergence of cooperative arrangements between president and premier, but with actual power held by the premier. Russia has evolved in the third direction, providing an interesting case study. This paper examines Russian semipresidentialism after 2008 from the perspective of this third path.en_US
dc.format.extent 2625506 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 政治科學論叢, No.47, pp.143-174en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 俄羅斯聯邦 ; 普京 ; 統一俄羅斯黨 ; 蘇聯 ; 聯邦主體en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Russian Federation ; Putin ; United Russia ; Soviet Union ; federal subjecten_US
dc.title (題名) 二00八年後梅-普架構下俄羅斯半總統制的檢視zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) A Study of Russian Semi-Presidentialism after 2008 Based on the Medvedev-Putin Frameworken_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen