學術產出-國科會研究計畫

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 行政命令受行政爭訟審查之研究---以2000年7月1日後之訴願決定與行政法院判決為中心
其他題名 The Research of the Administrative Judicial Remedies in Reviewing Administrative Rules--- with an Overview of Administrative Court and the Administrative Appeals Commissions Cases after 1 July 2000
作者 吳秦雯
貢獻者 法律學系
關鍵詞 行政命令;行政法院;訴願;行政監督
Administrative rules;Administrative Judicial Remedies;Administrative court;Administrative control
日期 2011
上傳時間 21-八月-2014 09:08:22 (UTC+8)
摘要 由行政機關依據職權或受立法者授權所訂定之行政命令,不論其於實務中使用 何種名稱,對於整體社會都產生相當大的拘束力。依據我國憲法明文,命令不得抵 觸法律與憲法,對於違法命令行使有效的審查權,不論對於人民權利保護與依法行 政之遵守,都相當重要。我國訴願法與行政訴訟法於2000 年大幅修正實施後,整體 行政爭訟程序中,對於行政命令受到如何的監督密度與方式,本計畫預計從事較為 整體、全面的量化研究。適圖釐清:我國現行訴願制度運作狀況,是否與行政法院 進行良好的分工、發揮適如其分的行政監督功能;行政法院對於行政命令之監督方 式,是否不區分其正當性基礎來源之差異,進行偏向於形式與程序的監督,但針對 案件涉及之子領域不同,有著不同的審查密度;大法官目前高度介入行政命令之審 查,是否因為行政法院之審查密度不足、審查方式流於形式化,且最高行政法院未 形成對於行政命令效力存續與否之權威性。並以此為基礎,提出我國行政爭訟程序 必要可能的改革建議。
The Administrative Court and all the administrative appeals commissions were reorganized in 1999, since the Administrative Litigation Act and the administrative appeal Act were revised substantially. The new system was launched in 2000; thus, this research will discuss the Administrative Judicial Remedies in reviewing Administrative rules after 2000, as it concerns with constitutional principles of the rule of law and checks and balances of governmental branches. Using data from the electronic databases created by the Judicial Yuan and most of the administrative appeals commissions, this research will employ an empirical method, rather than the traditional leading case approach, to understand and analyze the real situation of court’s and commissions’ decisions. The aim of this research is to examine the relationship between the attitude of control of the Grand Justice, and the way of formal judicial review of the Administrative Judicial Remedies. Based on the findings, this research will provide some suggestions in ways of the protection of human right and the supervision of administration.
關聯 行政院國家科學委員會
計畫編號NSC100-2410-H128-007
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 法律學系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳秦雯zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 21-八月-2014 09:08:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 21-八月-2014 09:08:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 21-八月-2014 09:08:22 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69056-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 由行政機關依據職權或受立法者授權所訂定之行政命令,不論其於實務中使用 何種名稱,對於整體社會都產生相當大的拘束力。依據我國憲法明文,命令不得抵 觸法律與憲法,對於違法命令行使有效的審查權,不論對於人民權利保護與依法行 政之遵守,都相當重要。我國訴願法與行政訴訟法於2000 年大幅修正實施後,整體 行政爭訟程序中,對於行政命令受到如何的監督密度與方式,本計畫預計從事較為 整體、全面的量化研究。適圖釐清:我國現行訴願制度運作狀況,是否與行政法院 進行良好的分工、發揮適如其分的行政監督功能;行政法院對於行政命令之監督方 式,是否不區分其正當性基礎來源之差異,進行偏向於形式與程序的監督,但針對 案件涉及之子領域不同,有著不同的審查密度;大法官目前高度介入行政命令之審 查,是否因為行政法院之審查密度不足、審查方式流於形式化,且最高行政法院未 形成對於行政命令效力存續與否之權威性。並以此為基礎,提出我國行政爭訟程序 必要可能的改革建議。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The Administrative Court and all the administrative appeals commissions were reorganized in 1999, since the Administrative Litigation Act and the administrative appeal Act were revised substantially. The new system was launched in 2000; thus, this research will discuss the Administrative Judicial Remedies in reviewing Administrative rules after 2000, as it concerns with constitutional principles of the rule of law and checks and balances of governmental branches. Using data from the electronic databases created by the Judicial Yuan and most of the administrative appeals commissions, this research will employ an empirical method, rather than the traditional leading case approach, to understand and analyze the real situation of court’s and commissions’ decisions. The aim of this research is to examine the relationship between the attitude of control of the Grand Justice, and the way of formal judicial review of the Administrative Judicial Remedies. Based on the findings, this research will provide some suggestions in ways of the protection of human right and the supervision of administration.en_US
dc.format.extent 482708 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 行政院國家科學委員會en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 計畫編號NSC100-2410-H128-007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 行政命令;行政法院;訴願;行政監督en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Administrative rules;Administrative Judicial Remedies;Administrative court;Administrative controlen_US
dc.title (題名) 行政命令受行政爭訟審查之研究---以2000年7月1日後之訴願決定與行政法院判決為中心zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) The Research of the Administrative Judicial Remedies in Reviewing Administrative Rules--- with an Overview of Administrative Court and the Administrative Appeals Commissions Cases after 1 July 2000en_US
dc.type (資料類型) reporten