學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 中俄黑瞎子島問題解決研究
A Study on Sino-Russian Approaches to the Solvation of Disputes over Bol’shoy Ussuriyskiy Island作者 徐凱琳
Hsu, Kai Lin貢獻者 王定士
Wang, Ding Shu
徐凱琳
Hsu, Kai Lin關鍵詞 Modern Sino-Russia Relation
Heixiazi Island Dispute
Treaty of Aigun
Treaty of Beijing
Modern Sino-Russia Relation
Heixiazi Island Dispute
Treaty of Aigun
Treaty of Beijing日期 2013 上傳時間 25-八月-2014 15:30:16 (UTC+8) 摘要 中俄關係始於十六世紀中俄邊界接觸開始，中俄邊境問題始於1652年清朝與俄羅斯帝國開始有共同邊界。 中俄邊境是由清朝與俄羅斯帝國之間許多條約所產生，在璦琿條約與北京條約之中，俄羅斯取得了滿洲超過一百萬平方公里的土地，並透過之後的條約取得了中國西部超過50萬平方公里的土地，中國把這些條約認定為不平等條約，這樣的問題更在中俄關係破裂之後更形嚴重，如此的緊張關係終於在1969年導致烏蘇里江上的珍寶島軍事衝突。 在2004年，中國與俄羅斯簽訂條約和平解決黑瞎子島領土紛爭，本研究主要在於探討此次條約中俄兩國和平解決領土紛爭的成因。
Sino-Russian relations began in the 16th century when the Russian Empire expanded its territory toward Far East. Border disputes between China and Russia began specifically in 1652 when the Qing Empire and Russian Empire started to share a common border. Sino-Russian border was a legacy of various treaties between the Qing Dynasty and Russian Empire. By Treaty of Aigun and Treaty of Beijing, Russia gained over one million square km (400,000 square mile) of territory in Manchuria at China`s expense, and Russia took another 500,000 square km in the western regions of China from several other treaties. These treaties have long been regarded by Chinese as unequal treaties, and the issue partially arose again with the Sino-Soviet split, with tensions eventually leading to division-scale military clashes along the border in 1969. Damansky, or Zhenbao Island along the Ussuri River, was the site of the 1969 Damansky Island incident. In 2004, China and Russia signed a treaty about islands of Bol’shoy Ussuriyskiy and Tarabarov Island near Khabarovsk, along the junction of the Amur and Ussurii rivers. The two islands are referred to collectively in Chinese as Heixiazi, although the smaller Tarabarov is sometimes called Yinlong. According to the treaty, Russia returns Tarabarov and approximately 50% of Bolshoi Ussuriiskii to China. This study explores why Russia and China solve this dispute peacefully.參考文獻 Bakshi, Jyotsna, 2004. Russia-China Relations, Relevance for India. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. Bassin, Mark, and Ely, Christopher, 2010. Space,Place, and Power in Modern Russia, essays in the New Spatial History. Illinois: Illinois University Press. Day, Alan J., 1982. Border and Territorial Disputes. London：Longman. Gungwu, Wang, and Yongnian, Zheng, China and the New International Order. New York: Routledge. Hara, Kimie, and Jukes, Geoffrey, 2009. Northern Territories, Asia-Pacific Regional Conflicts and the Aland Experience, Untying the Kurillian Knot. New York: Rouledge. Hart, Liddell B. H. 1967, Strategy. London: Faber & Faber. Hermann, Charles F. and East, Maurice A.. 1982. Why Nations Act. Beverly Hills/London: SAGE publications. Hickey, Dennis, and Guo, Baogang, 2010. Dancing with the Dragon, China’s Emergence in the Developing World. Maryland: Lexington Books. Ioffe, Grigory, 2008. Russia and the Near Abord. New York: McGraw-Hill Company. Kaplan, Morton A. 1967. System and Process in International Politics. New York: Wiley. Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye, 1989. Power and Independence. Boston: Little Brown. Klintworth, Gary, 1995. New Taiwan, New China. South Melbournr: Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Ltd. Kornberg, Judith F., and Faust, John R. 2005. China in World Politics, Policies, Processes, Prospects. Londen: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Trofimenko, Henry, 1999. Russian National Interests and the Current Crisis in Russia. Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Lo, Bobo, 2008. Axis of Convenience, Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. Baltimore: Brookings Institution Press. Lomperis, Timothy J., 1996. From People’s War to People’s Rule. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. Morgenthau, Hans and Thompson, Kenneth, 1985. Politics among Nations, 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Paul H. B. Godwin, 2003. China’s Asian Policy in the 1990s: Adjusting to the Post-Cold War Environment,” East Asian Security. Telis, Ashley J, Janice L. Bially, Christopher Layne, et al, 2001. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age: Analyst`s Handbook. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Tsygankov, Andreu P., 2010. Russia’s Foreign Policy, Change and Continuity in National Identity. Maryland: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS)
97925010
102資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097925010 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 王定士 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Ding Shu en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 徐凱琳 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Hsu, Kai Lin en_US dc.creator (作者) 徐凱琳 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Kai Lin en_US dc.date (日期) 2013 en_US dc.date.accessioned 25-八月-2014 15:30:16 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 25-八月-2014 15:30:16 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 25-八月-2014 15:30:16 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0097925010 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69272 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 97925010 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 中俄關係始於十六世紀中俄邊界接觸開始，中俄邊境問題始於1652年清朝與俄羅斯帝國開始有共同邊界。 中俄邊境是由清朝與俄羅斯帝國之間許多條約所產生，在璦琿條約與北京條約之中，俄羅斯取得了滿洲超過一百萬平方公里的土地，並透過之後的條約取得了中國西部超過50萬平方公里的土地，中國把這些條約認定為不平等條約，這樣的問題更在中俄關係破裂之後更形嚴重，如此的緊張關係終於在1969年導致烏蘇里江上的珍寶島軍事衝突。 在2004年，中國與俄羅斯簽訂條約和平解決黑瞎子島領土紛爭，本研究主要在於探討此次條約中俄兩國和平解決領土紛爭的成因。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Sino-Russian relations began in the 16th century when the Russian Empire expanded its territory toward Far East. Border disputes between China and Russia began specifically in 1652 when the Qing Empire and Russian Empire started to share a common border. Sino-Russian border was a legacy of various treaties between the Qing Dynasty and Russian Empire. By Treaty of Aigun and Treaty of Beijing, Russia gained over one million square km (400,000 square mile) of territory in Manchuria at China`s expense, and Russia took another 500,000 square km in the western regions of China from several other treaties. These treaties have long been regarded by Chinese as unequal treaties, and the issue partially arose again with the Sino-Soviet split, with tensions eventually leading to division-scale military clashes along the border in 1969. Damansky, or Zhenbao Island along the Ussuri River, was the site of the 1969 Damansky Island incident. In 2004, China and Russia signed a treaty about islands of Bol’shoy Ussuriyskiy and Tarabarov Island near Khabarovsk, along the junction of the Amur and Ussurii rivers. The two islands are referred to collectively in Chinese as Heixiazi, although the smaller Tarabarov is sometimes called Yinlong. According to the treaty, Russia returns Tarabarov and approximately 50% of Bolshoi Ussuriiskii to China. This study explores why Russia and China solve this dispute peacefully. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………..1 1.1 Motivation and purpose of the study………………………………..………1 1.1.1 Motivation 1.1.2 Purpose of the study 1.2 Hypothesis and framework………………………………….………………3 1.2.1 Hypothesis 1.2.2 Framework 1.3 Literature review and mythology……………………………………………3 1.3.1 Literature review 1.3.2 Mythology 2 Historical Background…………………………….……………………………..15 2.1 The contacts of the eastern boundary line between China and Russia………16 2.1.1 Russian-Manchu border conflicts and Treaty of Nerchinsk 2.1.2 The Influences of the Treaty of Nerchinsk, the Treaty of Tientsin, and the Convention of Beijing 2.1.3 The influences of treaties and territorial loss on Bolshoi Ussuriysky Island 2.2 The Evolution of the Modern Sino-Russian Diplomatic Relations…………..26 2.2.1 The Sino-Russian Relations from the last of Qing Dynasty to 1917 2.2.2 The Sino-Russian Relations (1917-1949) 2.3 The Sino-Russian relations after the foundation of People’s Republic of China…………………………………………………………………………36 2.3.1 Comrade and brother, the new chapter of the Sino-Russian Relations 2.3.2 The Conflict of Zhenbao Island 2.3.3 New situation of both countries and improvement of relations 3 From System, Domestic Politics and Leadership to Discuss the Territorial Disputes in Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island………………………………………….49 3.1 International system……………………………………………………….…51 3.1.1 The Sino-Russian Split 2.1.2 The United States’ Encirclement 3.2 Governmental Politics………………………………………………………..61 3.2.1 Deng’s 24 words motto 3.2.2 Peaceful Rise and Peaceful Development 3.2.3 Three Neighbourliness Policy(三鄰政策): Amicability(睦鄰), Security(安鄰), Prosperity(富鄰) 3.3 Policy maker………………………………………………………………….67 4 Analysis of resolution of Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island Dispute…………………...70 4.1 Transition of international relations system and resolution of Bolshoy Ussuriyskiy Island dispute…………………………………………………...71 4.2 Peaceful resolution of Bolshoy Ussuriyskiy Island dispute………………….74 4.3 The Influence of Deng Xiao-Ping on the Resolution of Bolshoy Ussuriyskiy Island Dispute………………………………………………………………..77 5 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………..79 5.1 Study Result and Discovery………………………………………………….81 5.2 Suggestion for the Future Study……………………………………………..84 zh_TW dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097925010 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Modern Sino-Russia Relation zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Heixiazi Island Dispute zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Treaty of Aigun zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Treaty of Beijing zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Modern Sino-Russia Relation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Heixiazi Island Dispute en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Treaty of Aigun en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Treaty of Beijing en_US dc.title (題名) 中俄黑瞎子島問題解決研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Study on Sino-Russian Approaches to the Solvation of Disputes over Bol’shoy Ussuriyskiy Island en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bakshi, Jyotsna, 2004. Russia-China Relations, Relevance for India. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. Bassin, Mark, and Ely, Christopher, 2010. Space,Place, and Power in Modern Russia, essays in the New Spatial History. Illinois: Illinois University Press. Day, Alan J., 1982. Border and Territorial Disputes. London：Longman. Gungwu, Wang, and Yongnian, Zheng, China and the New International Order. New York: Routledge. Hara, Kimie, and Jukes, Geoffrey, 2009. Northern Territories, Asia-Pacific Regional Conflicts and the Aland Experience, Untying the Kurillian Knot. New York: Rouledge. Hart, Liddell B. H. 1967, Strategy. London: Faber & Faber. Hermann, Charles F. and East, Maurice A.. 1982. Why Nations Act. Beverly Hills/London: SAGE publications. Hickey, Dennis, and Guo, Baogang, 2010. Dancing with the Dragon, China’s Emergence in the Developing World. Maryland: Lexington Books. Ioffe, Grigory, 2008. Russia and the Near Abord. New York: McGraw-Hill Company. Kaplan, Morton A. 1967. System and Process in International Politics. New York: Wiley. Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye, 1989. Power and Independence. Boston: Little Brown. Klintworth, Gary, 1995. New Taiwan, New China. South Melbournr: Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Ltd. Kornberg, Judith F., and Faust, John R. 2005. China in World Politics, Policies, Processes, Prospects. Londen: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Trofimenko, Henry, 1999. Russian National Interests and the Current Crisis in Russia. Vermont: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Lo, Bobo, 2008. Axis of Convenience, Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. Baltimore: Brookings Institution Press. Lomperis, Timothy J., 1996. From People’s War to People’s Rule. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press. Morgenthau, Hans and Thompson, Kenneth, 1985. Politics among Nations, 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Paul H. B. Godwin, 2003. China’s Asian Policy in the 1990s: Adjusting to the Post-Cold War Environment,” East Asian Security. Telis, Ashley J, Janice L. Bially, Christopher Layne, et al, 2001. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age: Analyst`s Handbook. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Tsygankov, Andreu P., 2010. Russia’s Foreign Policy, Change and Continuity in National Identity. Maryland: The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. zh_TW
