學術產出-會議論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 Measuring boundary objects in an attempt to explain innovativeness
作者 Huang, Eugenia Y.;Huang, Travis K.
管郁君
貢獻者 資管系
關鍵詞 Boundary objects; Innovativeness; Measuring boundaries; Semantic boundary; Systems analysis; Semantics
日期 2013-01
上傳時間 28-五月-2015 16:52:30 (UTC+8)
摘要 This study explores types of boundary objects, their relationships, and their effect on project innovativeness in the context of systems analysis. Four types of boundary objects are identified and their content discussed. Based on data collected from 258 student analysts, the results indicate that out of syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and metaphoric boundary objects, only pragmatic boundary objects had a strong positive effect on project innovativeness. Metaphoric boundary objects are shown to have positive effect on all other three types of boundary objects. Metaphoric boundary object affects project innovativeness indirectly through pragmatic boundary objects. Surprisingly, semantic boundary objects negatively affect project innovativeness, although not very strongly. A practical implication is the possibility of increasing project innovativeness by enhancing both pragmatic boundary objects and metaphoric boundary objects. © 2012 IEEE.
關聯 Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2013, 論文編號 6480285, 3645-3653, 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2013; Wailea, Maui, HI; United States; 7 January 2013 到 10 January 2013; 類別編號P4892; 代碼 96307
資料類型 conference
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.394
dc.contributor 資管系
dc.creator (作者) Huang, Eugenia Y.;Huang, Travis K.
dc.creator (作者) 管郁君zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2013-01
dc.date.accessioned 28-五月-2015 16:52:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-五月-2015 16:52:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-五月-2015 16:52:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75342-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study explores types of boundary objects, their relationships, and their effect on project innovativeness in the context of systems analysis. Four types of boundary objects are identified and their content discussed. Based on data collected from 258 student analysts, the results indicate that out of syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and metaphoric boundary objects, only pragmatic boundary objects had a strong positive effect on project innovativeness. Metaphoric boundary objects are shown to have positive effect on all other three types of boundary objects. Metaphoric boundary object affects project innovativeness indirectly through pragmatic boundary objects. Surprisingly, semantic boundary objects negatively affect project innovativeness, although not very strongly. A practical implication is the possibility of increasing project innovativeness by enhancing both pragmatic boundary objects and metaphoric boundary objects. © 2012 IEEE.
dc.format.extent 176 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2013, 論文編號 6480285, 3645-3653, 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2013; Wailea, Maui, HI; United States; 7 January 2013 到 10 January 2013; 類別編號P4892; 代碼 96307
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Boundary objects; Innovativeness; Measuring boundaries; Semantic boundary; Systems analysis; Semantics
dc.title (題名) Measuring boundary objects in an attempt to explain innovativeness
dc.type (資料類型) conferenceen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1109/HICSS.2013.394
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.394 en_US