1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of International Affairs
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 葉爾欽時期俄羅斯派系政治之研究
Research of the Russian Factional Politics during the Presidency of Boris Yeltsin
作者 賴怡君
Lai, Yi Chun
貢獻者 吳玉山
Wu, Yu Shan
賴怡君
Lai, Yi Chun
關鍵詞 俄羅斯政治
派系政治
葉爾欽
Russian Politics
factional politics
Boris Yeltsin
日期 2000
上傳時間 1-Jun-2015 11:07:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文以葉爾欽時期的派系政治為分析中心，認為派系是延續了過去的政治菁英文化傳統，不但在新的俄羅斯民主制度下繼續存活下來，還進一步成為主導整個俄羅斯發展的重要行動者。本文的研究發現主要有三方面：第一項發現是派系政治是分析葉爾欽時期政治的一個具有解釋力的模式。第二項發現是建構一個分析葉爾欽派系互動規則與架構，在此架構中建立一個評估派系政治穩定程度的指標，運用這個指標來分析俄羅斯派系政治的發展與演進。第三項發現是派系政治的穩定程度與俄羅斯的政經發展具有密切的關係存在，亦即俄羅斯的派系互動愈不穩定，俄羅斯的政治也隨之愈不穩定、人事互動愈頻繁，政策產出更加不確定，尤其是經濟政策隨著派系勢力的上上下下而來回擺盪變動。
參考文獻 一、英文部分
Ahl, Richard. 1999. “Society and Transition in Post-Soviet Russia,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 32 : 175-193.
Almond, Gabriel A. Powell, G. Bingham. and Mundt, Robert J. 1993. Comparative Politics. A Theoretical Framework. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc..
Arnaud de Borchgrave, 1997. Russian Organized Crime, Testimony before the U.S. House of Representative Committee on International Relations. http://www.csis.org/hill/ts100197.html.
Barber-Barry, Carol and Hody, Cynthia A. 1995. The Politics of Change. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Blondel, Jean. 1984. “Dual Leadership in the Contemporary World: A Step Towards Executive and Regime Stability? ” in Dennis Kavanagh and Gillian Peele, eds.. Comparative Government and Politics: Essays in Honour of S. E. Finer. London: Heinemenn Educational Books Ltd..
Breslauer, George W. 1982. Krushchev and Brezhnev as Leader: Building Authority in Soviet Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Breslauer, George W. 1999 “ Boris Yeltsin as Patriarch,” Post-Soviet Affairs 15( 2) : 186-200.
Breslauer, George W. 2001.“Personalism Versus Proceduralism,” in Victoria E. Bonnell and George W. Breslauer ed.. Russia in the New Century Stability or Disorder? Westview.
Brown, Archie. 1997. “The Transformation of Russia and East European Politics,” paper delivered at the XII World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Seoul.
Clark, William A. 1998. “Presidential Prefects in the Russian Provinces: Yeltsin’s Regional Cadres Policy,” in Graeme Gill ed.. Elites and Leadership in Russian Politics. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Clifford, Gaddy and Ickes, Barry W.1998. “Russia’s Virtual Economy, ” Foreign Affairs 77(5).
Colloudon, V. 1997.“The Criminalization of Russia`s Political Elite, ” East European Constitutional Review.
Dallin, Alexander. 1994. “Where Have All the Flowers Gone?” in Lapidus, Gail W. ed.. The New Russia. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Dinello, Natalia. 1998. “Bankers` War in Russia Trophies and Wounds, ” CSIS: Post-Soviet Prospects 6(1). http://www.csis.org/ruseura/psp/pspvil.html.
Dittermer, Lowell , Haruhoro Fukui and Lee, Peter N. S. 2000. Informal Politics in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dittmer, Lowell and Wu, Yu-shan. 1995. “The Modernization of Factionalism in Chinese Politics,” World Politics 47(4) : 467-494.
Easter, Gerald M. 1996, “Personal Network and Post Revolutionary State Building Soviet Russia Reexamined, ” World Politics 48(3) : 551-578.
Fortescue, Stephen. 1997. Policy-Making for Russian Industry. London: Macmillan Press ltd..
Fossato, Floriana. and Kachkaeva, Anna. 1997. “Russian Media Empires,” http://www.rferl.org/nca/special/RUMEDIA/index.html.
Hazan, Baruch A. 1987. From Brezhnev to Gorbachev Infighting in the Kremlin. London: Westview Press.
Hosking, Geoffrey A. Aves, Jonathan and Duncan, Peter J. S. 1992. The Road to Post-Communism. Independent Political Movements in the Soviet Union 1985-1991. London and New York: Printer Publishers.
http://www.nupi.no/ForskEng/forsk-set-en.htm
Huskey, Eugene. 1994. “Yeltsin as State Builder, ” Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 21(1) : 61-72.
Huskey, Eugene 1996. “The Making of Economic Policy in Russian: Changing Relations between Presidency and Government,” Review of Central and East European Law 22(4) : 366-367.
Jensen, Donald N. 1998. “How Russia Is Ruled,” http://www.rferl.org/nca/special/ruwhorules/index.html
Johnson, J. 1997. “Carving up the Bear: Banks and the Struggle for Power in Russia,” CSIS: Post-Soviet Prospects.
Klebnikov, Paul. 2000. Godfather of the Kremlin Boris Berezovsky and the Looting of Russia. NY: Harcourt Int..
Lande, Carl H. 1997. “Introduction: The Dyadic Basis of Clientelism,” in Steffen W. Schmidt, James C. Scott, Carl H. Lande and Laura Guasti eds.. Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. California: University of California Press.
Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mau, Vladimir. 1994. “The Ascent of the Inflationist,” Journal of Democracy 12(2) : 32-35.
Nathan, J.Andrew.1973. “A Factionalism Model for CCP Politics” The China Quarterly 53.
Pye, Lucian W. 1981. The Dynamics of Chinese Politics. Cambridge: Olegeschlager.
Razuvaev, V. V. 1996. “Power in Russia – The Bureaucratic Dimension,” Russian Politics and Laws.
Reminton, Thomas F. 1998. Politics in Russia. New York: Longman.
Rigby, T. H. and Harasymiw, Bohdan. 1983. Leadership Selection and Patron-Client Relations in the USSR and Yugoslavia. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Rigby, T. H. 1990. Political Elites in the USSR. England: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Sajo, Andras. “Corruption, Clientelism, and the Future of the Constitutional State in Eastern Europe,” http://www.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol17num2/special/special.html
Shevtosova, Lilia. 1999. Yeltsin`s Russia Myths and Reality. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “Blaming Russia First,” Foreign Affairs 79(6) : 146-155.
Tsou, Tang. 1986. “Prolegomenon to The Study of Informal Groups in CCP Politics,” The Cultural Revolution & Post-Mao Reforms: A History Perspective. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.
Volkov, Vadim, 1999. “Violent Entrepreneurship in Post-Communist Russia,” European-Asia Studies 51(5) : 741-754.
Willerton, John P. 1992. Patronage and Politics in the USSR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willerton, John P. 1997. “Presidential Power,” in Stephen, Alex Pravda and Zvi Gitelman ed.. Developments in Russian Politics 4. Durham: Duke University Press.
Willerton, John P. 1998, “Post-Soviet Clientelist Norms at the Russian Federal Level,” in Graeme Gill ed.. Elites and Leadership in Russian Politics. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Willterton, John P. and Shulus, Aleksei A. 1995. “Constructing a New Political Process: The Hegemonic Presidency and the Legislature,” The John Marshall Law Review 28(4) : 787-825.
Yablinsky, Grigory. 1998. “Russia’s Phony Capitalism,” Foreign Affairs 77(3) : 67-79.
Yeltsin, Boris. 1990. Against the Grain. New York: Summit Books.
Yeltsin, Boris. 1994. The Struggle for Russia. New York: Random House.
Yeltsin, Boris. 2000. Midnight Diaries. New York: Public Affairs.

二、中文部分
孔寒冰、關貴海，2000，《葉爾欽執政年代》，鄭州：河南文藝出版社。
王定士，1999，「車臣戰爭研究：車臣戰爭決策中的克里姆林宮政治因素」，《俄語學報》，第二期，頁233-256。
王定士，2001，「蘇聯解體後俄羅斯對外政策路線的克里姆林宮政治因素」，《俄羅斯學報》，創刊號，頁61-97。
王定士，2001，「俄羅斯金融寡頭在民主化與經濟改革的角色」，《俄羅斯學報》，創刊號，頁11-60。
王躍生，1997，《新制度主義》，台北：揚智出版社。
吳玉山，1996，《遠離社會主義》，台北：中正。
吳玉山，1996，「中國大陸派系鬥爭與經濟循環互動之研究」，台北市：行政院國科會科資中心，NSC84-2414-H002-037。
吳玉山，2000，《俄羅斯轉型1992-1999》，台北：五南。
吳玉山，2000，「合作還是對立？半總統制府會分立下的憲政運作」，憲政體制與政黨政治的新走向研討會。
吳玉山，2001，「制度、非正式制度與結構對政治穩定的影響」，中國政治學會九十年年會暨學術論文研討會論文。
吳東野，1996，「『半總統制』政府體系的理論與實際」，《問題與研究》，第35卷，第8期，頁37-49。
李英明，1999，《中國大陸學》，台北：楊智。
畢英賢，1994，《俄羅斯》，台北：政大國關中心。
許瑜玟，1998，「俄羅斯府會政爭之研析：一九九二年至一九九三年」，政大俄羅斯研究所論文。
陳明通，1995，《派系政治與台灣政治變遷》，台北：月旦。
彭懷恩，1996，《比較政治》，台北：風雲論壇。
馮紹雷，1997，《制度變遷與對外關係-1992年以來的俄羅斯》，上海：上海人民出版社。
董曉陽，1999，「俄羅斯情勢回顧與展望1998-1999」，《東歐中亞研究》1999年第一期，頁4-24。
趙春山，1990，《蘇聯領導權力的移轉－從列寧到戈巴契夫》，台北：桂冠。
鄭異凡，2000，「葉爾欽現象析」，《東歐中亞研究》，2000年第一期，頁5-12。
賴榮偉，1998，「中共政治研究之派系模式探討」，《東亞季刊》，第29卷，第4期，頁112。
羅嗣炬、王鵬，2000，「從俄羅斯威權政治看葉爾欽辭職」，《世界知識》，頁7-8。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
俄羅斯研究所
85263002
89
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0085263002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳玉山zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Yu Shanen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 賴怡君zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lai, Yi Chunen_US
dc.creator (作者) 賴怡君zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lai, Yi Chunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2000en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Jun-2015 11:07:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Jun-2015 11:07:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Jun-2015 11:07:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0085263002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75448-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 俄羅斯研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 85263002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 89zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文以葉爾欽時期的派系政治為分析中心，認為派系是延續了過去的政治菁英文化傳統，不但在新的俄羅斯民主制度下繼續存活下來，還進一步成為主導整個俄羅斯發展的重要行動者。本文的研究發現主要有三方面：第一項發現是派系政治是分析葉爾欽時期政治的一個具有解釋力的模式。第二項發現是建構一個分析葉爾欽派系互動規則與架構，在此架構中建立一個評估派系政治穩定程度的指標，運用這個指標來分析俄羅斯派系政治的發展與演進。第三項發現是派系政治的穩定程度與俄羅斯的政經發展具有密切的關係存在，亦即俄羅斯的派系互動愈不穩定，俄羅斯的政治也隨之愈不穩定、人事互動愈頻繁，政策產出更加不確定，尤其是經濟政策隨著派系勢力的上上下下而來回擺盪變動。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
第一節 研究動機與目的-----------------------------------------------------------2
第二節 文獻分析---------------------------------------------------------------------8
第三節 研究範圍--------------------------------------------------------------------32
第四節 研究方法與章節安排---------------------------------------------------33
第二章 俄羅斯派系政治的形成----------------------------------------------37
第一節 制度因素層面-------------------------------------------------------------39
第二節 政治文化層面-------------------------------------------------------------50
第三節 葉爾欽的領導風格------------------------------------------------------60
第三章 俄羅斯派系政治的運作架構與模式--------------------------66
第一節 俄羅斯派系分類---------------------------------------------------------66
第二節 派系的互動----------------------------------------------------------------78
第四章 俄羅斯派系政治的實際運作與影響--------------------------92
第一節 派系建立期----------------------------------------------------------------92
第二節 派系穩固期---------------------------------------------------------------102
第三節 派系混戰期---------------------------------------------------------------107
第四節 派系對俄羅斯政經影響---------------------------------------------125
第五章 結論-----------------------------------------------------------------------------131
第一節 研究發現-------------------------------------------------------------------132
第二節 檢討與建議---------------------------------------------------------------134
參考文獻-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------139

表目錄
表一：俄羅斯總統與總理合作關係-------------------------------------------------------44
表二：學者與媒體曾經提出的俄羅斯派系種類----------------------------------------72
表三：俄羅斯派系穩定程度表-------------------------------------------------------------90
表四：派系互動的人事變動與政策變動------------------------------------------------127


圖目錄
圖一：制度研究的上、中、下游-----------------------------------------------------------7
圖二：派系基本結構圖----------------------------------------------------------------------11
圖三：葉爾欽時期總統、國會與政府的權力競爭關係-------------------------------45
圖四：俄羅斯總統行政機構----------------------------------------------------------------62
圖五：葉爾欽時期俄羅斯派系結構圖----------------------------------------------------77
圖六：俄羅斯兩種派系模式互動循環----------------------------------------------------87
圖七：政治勢力的轉變與經濟政策的擺盪、經濟運行波動關係圖----------------88
圖八：俄羅斯派系發展演進圖-------------------------------------------------------------91
圖九：俄羅斯派系演進圖------------------------------------------------------------------130		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2362880 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0085263002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 俄羅斯政治zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 派系政治zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 葉爾欽zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Russian Politicsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) factional politicsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Boris Yeltsinen_US
dc.title (題名) 葉爾欽時期俄羅斯派系政治之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Research of the Russian Factional Politics during the Presidency of Boris Yeltsinen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、英文部分
Ahl, Richard. 1999. “Society and Transition in Post-Soviet Russia,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 32 : 175-193.
Almond, Gabriel A. Powell, G. Bingham. and Mundt, Robert J. 1993. Comparative Politics. A Theoretical Framework. New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc..
Arnaud de Borchgrave, 1997. Russian Organized Crime, Testimony before the U.S. House of Representative Committee on International Relations. http://www.csis.org/hill/ts100197.html.
Barber-Barry, Carol and Hody, Cynthia A. 1995. The Politics of Change. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Blondel, Jean. 1984. “Dual Leadership in the Contemporary World: A Step Towards Executive and Regime Stability? ” in Dennis Kavanagh and Gillian Peele, eds.. Comparative Government and Politics: Essays in Honour of S. E. Finer. London: Heinemenn Educational Books Ltd..
Breslauer, George W. 1982. Krushchev and Brezhnev as Leader: Building Authority in Soviet Politics. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Breslauer, George W. 1999 “ Boris Yeltsin as Patriarch,” Post-Soviet Affairs 15( 2) : 186-200.
Breslauer, George W. 2001.“Personalism Versus Proceduralism,” in Victoria E. Bonnell and George W. Breslauer ed.. Russia in the New Century Stability or Disorder? Westview.
Brown, Archie. 1997. “The Transformation of Russia and East European Politics,” paper delivered at the XII World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Seoul.
Clark, William A. 1998. “Presidential Prefects in the Russian Provinces: Yeltsin’s Regional Cadres Policy,” in Graeme Gill ed.. Elites and Leadership in Russian Politics. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Clifford, Gaddy and Ickes, Barry W.1998. “Russia’s Virtual Economy, ” Foreign Affairs 77(5).
Colloudon, V. 1997.“The Criminalization of Russia`s Political Elite, ” East European Constitutional Review.
Dallin, Alexander. 1994. “Where Have All the Flowers Gone?” in Lapidus, Gail W. ed.. The New Russia. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Dinello, Natalia. 1998. “Bankers` War in Russia Trophies and Wounds, ” CSIS: Post-Soviet Prospects 6(1). http://www.csis.org/ruseura/psp/pspvil.html.
Dittermer, Lowell , Haruhoro Fukui and Lee, Peter N. S. 2000. Informal Politics in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dittmer, Lowell and Wu, Yu-shan. 1995. “The Modernization of Factionalism in Chinese Politics,” World Politics 47(4) : 467-494.
Easter, Gerald M. 1996, “Personal Network and Post Revolutionary State Building Soviet Russia Reexamined, ” World Politics 48(3) : 551-578.
Fortescue, Stephen. 1997. Policy-Making for Russian Industry. London: Macmillan Press ltd..
Fossato, Floriana. and Kachkaeva, Anna. 1997. “Russian Media Empires,” http://www.rferl.org/nca/special/RUMEDIA/index.html.
Hazan, Baruch A. 1987. From Brezhnev to Gorbachev Infighting in the Kremlin. London: Westview Press.
Hosking, Geoffrey A. Aves, Jonathan and Duncan, Peter J. S. 1992. The Road to Post-Communism. Independent Political Movements in the Soviet Union 1985-1991. London and New York: Printer Publishers.
http://www.nupi.no/ForskEng/forsk-set-en.htm
Huskey, Eugene. 1994. “Yeltsin as State Builder, ” Soviet and Post-Soviet Review 21(1) : 61-72.
Huskey, Eugene 1996. “The Making of Economic Policy in Russian: Changing Relations between Presidency and Government,” Review of Central and East European Law 22(4) : 366-367.
Jensen, Donald N. 1998. “How Russia Is Ruled,” http://www.rferl.org/nca/special/ruwhorules/index.html
Johnson, J. 1997. “Carving up the Bear: Banks and the Struggle for Power in Russia,” CSIS: Post-Soviet Prospects.
Klebnikov, Paul. 2000. Godfather of the Kremlin Boris Berezovsky and the Looting of Russia. NY: Harcourt Int..
Lande, Carl H. 1997. “Introduction: The Dyadic Basis of Clientelism,” in Steffen W. Schmidt, James C. Scott, Carl H. Lande and Laura Guasti eds.. Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. California: University of California Press.
Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mau, Vladimir. 1994. “The Ascent of the Inflationist,” Journal of Democracy 12(2) : 32-35.
Nathan, J.Andrew.1973. “A Factionalism Model for CCP Politics” The China Quarterly 53.
Pye, Lucian W. 1981. The Dynamics of Chinese Politics. Cambridge: Olegeschlager.
Razuvaev, V. V. 1996. “Power in Russia – The Bureaucratic Dimension,” Russian Politics and Laws.
Reminton, Thomas F. 1998. Politics in Russia. New York: Longman.
Rigby, T. H. and Harasymiw, Bohdan. 1983. Leadership Selection and Patron-Client Relations in the USSR and Yugoslavia. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Rigby, T. H. 1990. Political Elites in the USSR. England: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Sajo, Andras. “Corruption, Clientelism, and the Future of the Constitutional State in Eastern Europe,” http://www.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol17num2/special/special.html
Shevtosova, Lilia. 1999. Yeltsin`s Russia Myths and Reality. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “Blaming Russia First,” Foreign Affairs 79(6) : 146-155.
Tsou, Tang. 1986. “Prolegomenon to The Study of Informal Groups in CCP Politics,” The Cultural Revolution & Post-Mao Reforms: A History Perspective. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.
Volkov, Vadim, 1999. “Violent Entrepreneurship in Post-Communist Russia,” European-Asia Studies 51(5) : 741-754.
Willerton, John P. 1992. Patronage and Politics in the USSR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willerton, John P. 1997. “Presidential Power,” in Stephen, Alex Pravda and Zvi Gitelman ed.. Developments in Russian Politics 4. Durham: Duke University Press.
Willerton, John P. 1998, “Post-Soviet Clientelist Norms at the Russian Federal Level,” in Graeme Gill ed.. Elites and Leadership in Russian Politics. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Willterton, John P. and Shulus, Aleksei A. 1995. “Constructing a New Political Process: The Hegemonic Presidency and the Legislature,” The John Marshall Law Review 28(4) : 787-825.
Yablinsky, Grigory. 1998. “Russia’s Phony Capitalism,” Foreign Affairs 77(3) : 67-79.
Yeltsin, Boris. 1990. Against the Grain. New York: Summit Books.
Yeltsin, Boris. 1994. The Struggle for Russia. New York: Random House.
Yeltsin, Boris. 2000. Midnight Diaries. New York: Public Affairs.

二、中文部分
孔寒冰、關貴海，2000，《葉爾欽執政年代》，鄭州：河南文藝出版社。
王定士，1999，「車臣戰爭研究：車臣戰爭決策中的克里姆林宮政治因素」，《俄語學報》，第二期，頁233-256。
王定士，2001，「蘇聯解體後俄羅斯對外政策路線的克里姆林宮政治因素」，《俄羅斯學報》，創刊號，頁61-97。
王定士，2001，「俄羅斯金融寡頭在民主化與經濟改革的角色」，《俄羅斯學報》，創刊號，頁11-60。
王躍生，1997，《新制度主義》，台北：揚智出版社。
吳玉山，1996，《遠離社會主義》，台北：中正。
吳玉山，1996，「中國大陸派系鬥爭與經濟循環互動之研究」，台北市：行政院國科會科資中心，NSC84-2414-H002-037。
吳玉山，2000，《俄羅斯轉型1992-1999》，台北：五南。
吳玉山，2000，「合作還是對立？半總統制府會分立下的憲政運作」，憲政體制與政黨政治的新走向研討會。
吳玉山，2001，「制度、非正式制度與結構對政治穩定的影響」，中國政治學會九十年年會暨學術論文研討會論文。
吳東野，1996，「『半總統制』政府體系的理論與實際」，《問題與研究》，第35卷，第8期，頁37-49。
李英明，1999，《中國大陸學》，台北：楊智。
畢英賢，1994，《俄羅斯》，台北：政大國關中心。
許瑜玟，1998，「俄羅斯府會政爭之研析：一九九二年至一九九三年」，政大俄羅斯研究所論文。
陳明通，1995，《派系政治與台灣政治變遷》，台北：月旦。
彭懷恩，1996，《比較政治》，台北：風雲論壇。
馮紹雷，1997，《制度變遷與對外關係-1992年以來的俄羅斯》，上海：上海人民出版社。
董曉陽，1999，「俄羅斯情勢回顧與展望1998-1999」，《東歐中亞研究》1999年第一期，頁4-24。
趙春山，1990，《蘇聯領導權力的移轉－從列寧到戈巴契夫》，台北：桂冠。
鄭異凡，2000，「葉爾欽現象析」，《東歐中亞研究》，2000年第一期，頁5-12。
賴榮偉，1998，「中共政治研究之派系模式探討」，《東亞季刊》，第29卷，第4期，頁112。
羅嗣炬、王鵬，2000，「從俄羅斯威權政治看葉爾欽辭職」，《世界知識》，頁7-8。		zh_TW