學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 Strategic project portfolio selection for national research institutes
作者 鄭至甫
Jeng, Don Jyh-Fu
貢獻者 科管智財所
關鍵詞 Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM); National research institute; Project management; Portfolio selection; Research and development management
日期 2015-11
上傳時間 2-十一月-2015 17:18:32 (UTC+8)
摘要 As global competition intensifies, many national research institutes (NRIs) are investing substantial resources in research and development (R&D) to gain competitive advantage and develop the national economy. However, R&D investment involves a high degree of market and technological uncertainty. The literature on project portfolio selection focuses on either quantitative economic benefits or complex criteria to assess project(s). By emphasizing the features of NRIs, the present study proposes a decision model for evaluating a project portfolio at the early initiation stage. This decision model rests on a strategy for differentiating products and services. The decision model provides a solution to a market need to maximize benefits through differentiation. A systematic hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method comprising a modified Delphi method (MDM), a decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method, and an analytic network process (ANP) offers a systematic approach to the project portfolio-selection problem. The present empirical study on the selection of alternative R&D projects in NRIs investigates the flexible electronics industry, using the hybrid MCDM method to test the decision model`s effectiveness. The present study also discusses cognitive differences between NRIs and for-profit organization in terms of their R&D portfolio selection.
關聯 Journal of Business Research, Volume 68, Issue 11, Pages 2305–2311
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.016
dc.contributor 科管智財所
dc.creator (作者) 鄭至甫zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Jeng, Don Jyh-Fu
dc.date (日期) 2015-11
dc.date.accessioned 2-十一月-2015 17:18:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-十一月-2015 17:18:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-十一月-2015 17:18:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79282-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) As global competition intensifies, many national research institutes (NRIs) are investing substantial resources in research and development (R&D) to gain competitive advantage and develop the national economy. However, R&D investment involves a high degree of market and technological uncertainty. The literature on project portfolio selection focuses on either quantitative economic benefits or complex criteria to assess project(s). By emphasizing the features of NRIs, the present study proposes a decision model for evaluating a project portfolio at the early initiation stage. This decision model rests on a strategy for differentiating products and services. The decision model provides a solution to a market need to maximize benefits through differentiation. A systematic hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method comprising a modified Delphi method (MDM), a decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method, and an analytic network process (ANP) offers a systematic approach to the project portfolio-selection problem. The present empirical study on the selection of alternative R&D projects in NRIs investigates the flexible electronics industry, using the hybrid MCDM method to test the decision model`s effectiveness. The present study also discusses cognitive differences between NRIs and for-profit organization in terms of their R&D portfolio selection.
dc.format.extent 402318 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Business Research, Volume 68, Issue 11, Pages 2305–2311
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM); National research institute; Project management; Portfolio selection; Research and development management
dc.title (題名) Strategic project portfolio selection for national research institutes
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.016
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.016