學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 The Sense and Nonsense of Consumer Product Testing: How to Identify Whether Consumers Are Blindly Loyal?
作者 林穎青
Raghubir, Priya;Tyebjee, yzoon T.;Lin, Ying-Ching
貢獻者 傳播學院
關鍵詞 Product testing; Taste testing; Consumer behavior; Marketing; Psychology; Neuroscience
日期 2008
上傳時間 11-一月-2016 14:36:42 (UTC+8)
摘要 This paper builds on recent research that shows that product experience is based on the interaction of a range of sensory cues whose effect is non-conscious (e.g., visual cues affect taste perception) to revisit the classic issue of product taste testing. We propose that as consumers are unaware of the influence of a range of stimuli on their judgments and experience it is difficult for managers to collect valid and reliable consumer insights regarding the manner in which perceptual and sensory cues affect judgments and how they interact with each other. Therefore, we propose that the methodological paradigm of taste testing can and should be used to examine the effect of strategic and tactical marketing mix decisions in domains when consumer decision-making is non-conscious. Based on previous academic research, specific directions for managers to execute the test are provided: How to design and conduct a taste test, what measures to include and why, and how to analyze taste test results. We provide an example of the insight the methodology can provide using three related taste tests. While we use the attribute of taste as a specific example, the methodology and results can be translated into other domains where consumers may not be able to accurately explicate the reasons for their product experience, but that drive marketing decisions, including and beyond changing intrinsic product attributes.
關聯 Foundations and Trends in Marketing,3(3),127-176
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000009
dc.contributor 傳播學院
dc.creator (作者) 林穎青zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Raghubir, Priya;Tyebjee, yzoon T.;Lin, Ying-Ching
dc.date (日期) 2008
dc.date.accessioned 11-一月-2016 14:36:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-一月-2016 14:36:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-一月-2016 14:36:42 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80491-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper builds on recent research that shows that product experience is based on the interaction of a range of sensory cues whose effect is non-conscious (e.g., visual cues affect taste perception) to revisit the classic issue of product taste testing. We propose that as consumers are unaware of the influence of a range of stimuli on their judgments and experience it is difficult for managers to collect valid and reliable consumer insights regarding the manner in which perceptual and sensory cues affect judgments and how they interact with each other. Therefore, we propose that the methodological paradigm of taste testing can and should be used to examine the effect of strategic and tactical marketing mix decisions in domains when consumer decision-making is non-conscious. Based on previous academic research, specific directions for managers to execute the test are provided: How to design and conduct a taste test, what measures to include and why, and how to analyze taste test results. We provide an example of the insight the methodology can provide using three related taste tests. While we use the attribute of taste as a specific example, the methodology and results can be translated into other domains where consumers may not be able to accurately explicate the reasons for their product experience, but that drive marketing decisions, including and beyond changing intrinsic product attributes.
dc.format.extent 116 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Foundations and Trends in Marketing,3(3),127-176
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Product testing; Taste testing; Consumer behavior; Marketing; Psychology; Neuroscience
dc.title (題名) The Sense and Nonsense of Consumer Product Testing: How to Identify Whether Consumers Are Blindly Loyal?
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1561/1700000009
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000009