學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 非營利組織社會創新網絡之探討
A Study on the Social Innovation Network of Nonprofit Organization
作者 林建宏
貢獻者 蕭乃沂
林建宏
關鍵詞 非營利組織
社會創新
網絡
日期 2015
上傳時間 1-三月-2016 10:46:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 本論文主要研究非營利組織推動社會創新過程中的網絡關係,希望從中瞭解非營利組織推動社會創新的實務情形並從中找到創新成功的關鍵。近年來興起的社會創新活動代表的是一種創新的思維,希望跳脫傳統的框架之外,找到一個更有效解決社會問題的方法或途徑。本研究以網絡關係做為分析的主要理論架構,透過網絡的架構瞭解在創新的過程中有哪些重要的參與者,各自扮演了什麼角色?網絡的建立過程為何?以及社會創新網絡的過程中有哪些因素影響到創新的成效?
本研究採用質性研究,並使用文獻分析、深度訪談和個案研究為主要的研究方法。本研究選定「街遊Hidden Taipei活動」為研究個案,分為創新網絡的萌發期、創新網絡的發展期和創新網絡的困境與未來展望三個部分,透過分析其中幾個主要參與者如芒草心協會、萬華社區大學、萬華社福中心、夢想城鄉協會和街遊活動發起人曾小姐間的互動網絡關係來瞭解街遊創新方案各參與者的動機、互動的模式、創新發展的歷程以及未來可能的創新方案。研究發現包括:
一、 創新網絡的萌發期
(一) 相同的參與動機和跨部門間價值觀的衝突是創新發展初期的基礎
(二) 透過社會資本建立相互合作關係
(三) 各參與者是平等的互動關係
(四) 導覽課程的規劃做為各參與者之間的溝通平台
(五) 跳脫與傳統公部門的互動方式
二、 創新網絡的發展期
(一) 以信任為基礎的合作關係有助於網絡的穩固和擴展
(二) 與社群媒體的互動有助於創新理念在地扎根
(三) 合作的行動策略是影響創新成功的因素之一
(四) 跨部門身分的參與者是創新過程中重要的中介角色
三、 創新網絡的困境與未來展望
(一) 對街遊創新方案價值觀上的差異是主要困境
(二) 跨部門的互動連結是未來發展的重點
關鍵詞:非營利組織、網絡、社會創新
參考文獻 一、 中文部分
王雅林、晚春東(2002)。論社會創新。學習與探索,1,44-95。
司徒達賢(1999)。非營利組織的經營管理。台北:天下遠見事業有限公司。
石桂榕(2007)。遊民問題之研究---以臺北縣為例。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
江明修(1994)。非營利組織領導行為之研究。台北:行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告,未出版。
江明修、陳定銘(1999)。我國基金會之問題與健全之道。中國行政評論,8(3),23-72。
李貞怡(2002)。從社會資本觀點探討非營利組織資源連結過程之研究--以「財團法人伊甸社會福利基金會附設中區服務中心」為例--。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文,未出版,台中。
尚容安譯(2001)。.個案研究(R. K Yin原著)。台北:弘智文化。
林佩璇(2000年1月)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。在國立中正大學主辦,質的研究研討會,嘉義市。
林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務(初版)。台北:巨流。
高華強(1991)。個案研究法。台北:師大書苑。
張強、胡雅萌、陸奇斌(2013)。中國社會創新的階段性特徵─基於” 政府─市場─社會”三元框架的實證分析。經濟社會體制比較,4,125-136。
許世雨(2000)。非營利組織與公共行政。載於江明修(主編),第三部門—經營策略與社會參與。(155-190頁)。台北:智勝文化。
陳向明(2011)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
陳金貴(2005年6月)。非營利組織與社會資本。公共行政與社會資本圓桌論壇(四),台北。
黃俊傑(2004)。全球化時代大學通識教育的新挑戰。高雄:中華民國通識教育學會。
黃昱珽(2014)。「Unseen Tours」到「街遊Hidden Taipei」:社會創新的在地移植,2015年4月10日,取自:http://hisp.ntu.edu.tw/news/epapers/22/articles/62。
黃惠勤(2009)。非營利組織社會創新之研究:以台北市文化教育基金會受託管理四個機構為例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
楊舒蓉(2006)。從社會資本觀點論非營利組織如何協助兒童脫貧-以「台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會」為例。T&D 飛訊,48,1-18。
廖俊松(2006)。非營利組織與福利社區營造--龍眼林社區之經驗分析。環境與藝術期刊,4,81-94。
管倖生等人(2010)。設計研究方法(三版)。新北:全華圖書股份有限公司。
劉維公(2005)。讓創新成為社會運動,2015年3月15日,取自:http://udn.com/news/story/7340/681200。
鄭文義(1989)。公益團體的設立與經營。台北:工商教育出版社。
鄭怡世(2002)。個案研究方法之介紹─兼論其在社會工作實務研究中的運用。社區發展季刊,99,415-430。
鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報,7,65-108。
蕭新煌編著(2000)。非營利部門:組織與運作。台北:巨流圖書。
顧遠(2014)。社會創新中常見的四個盲點,你有幾個?,2015年3月17日,取自:http://www.seinsights.asia/story/1434/794/1897。

二、英文部分
Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 19-42). UK: Greenleaf.
Ashman, D. (2000). Promoting corporate citizenship in the global south: Towards a model of empowered civil society collaboration with business (Rep. No. 16.3). Boston: IDR Publication.
Austin, J. (2000). The collaborative challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bates, S. M. (2012). The social innovation imperative: Create winning products, services, and programs that solve society’s most pressing challenges. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Bessant, J., Lamming, R., Noke, H, & Phillips, W. (2005). Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation, 25(12), 1366-1376.
Bloom.E., Reeves. M., Sunseri A., & Nyhan-Jones V. (2008). Strengthening networks: Using organizational network analysis to promote network effectiveness, scale, and accountability (Rep. Capacity development briefs No. 28). World Bank Institute.
Bodin, Ö., & B, Crona. (2009). The role of socialnetworks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366–374.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002).Government-nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19-30.
Bureau of European Policy Advisers (2010). Empowering people, driving change: social innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. London: Oxford University Press.
De Brentani, U. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 169-187.
Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Edquist, C. (2001). The system of innovation approach and innovation policy: An account of the state of the art. DRUID Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
Franz, H., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (Eds.). (2012). Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Gibson-Graham, J. K., & Roelvink, G. (2009). Social innovation for community economics. In F. Moulaert (Ed), Social innovation and territorial development (pp.25-38). Aldershot: Ashgate
Gilsing, V. A., & Duysters, G. M. (2008). Understanding novelty creation in exploration networks: structural and relational embeddedness jointly considered. Technovation, 28 , 693–708.
Googins, B., & Rochlin, S. (2000). Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 127-144.
Gray, B., & Wood, D. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467-498.
Hämäläinen, T. J., & Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations, institutional change and economic performance: Making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions and societies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Haque, U. (2009). Is your innovation really unnovation? Retrieved Oct 12, 2015, from https://hbr.org/2009/05/unnovation.
Harrison, D. (2012). Social innovation: What is coming apart and what is being rebuilt. H. W. Franz et al. (Eds.), Challenge Social Innovation (pp. 73-86). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Hodgson, L. (2004). Manufactured civil society: Counting the cost. Critical Social Policy, 24(2), 139-164.
Hougaard, K. F. (2014). Understanding barriers to social innovation. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://siresearch.eu/blog/barriers-social-innovation.
Iyer, E. (2003). Theory of alliances: Partnership and partner characteristics. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 41-57.
Kahler, M. (Ed.). (2009). Networked politics: agency, power and governance. New York: Cornell University Press.
Kaplan, K. (2003). The purist’s partnership: Debunking the terminology of partnerships. Partnership Matters Journal, 1, 31-35.
Keast, R., Mandell, M.P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G.(2004).Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371.
Klijn, Erik-Hans (2003). Networks and governance: A perspective on public policy and public administration. In A. Salminen (Ed.), Governing Networks (pp. 29-39). Brussels: International Institute of Administrative Sciences Monographs.
Klitgaard, R., & Treverton, G. F. (2003). Assessing partnerships: New forms of collaboration. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 455-484.
Leadbeater, C. (2008). We-Think: Mass innovation, not mass production. London: Profile books.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17, 251-267.
Light, P. C. (2005, November). Searching for social entrepreneurs: Who they might be, where they might be found, what they do. The meeting of the association for research on nonprofit and voluntary associations, New York.
Lister, Sarah (2000). Power in partnership? An analysis of an NGO’s relationships with its partners, Journal of International Development, 12, 227 -239.
Massarsky, C. W. (2006). Coming of age: Social enterprise reaches its tipping point. In R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field (pp. 67-88). Indianapolis: Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action.
McQuaid, R. W. (2000). The theory of partnership: why have partnerships? In S. Osborne (Ed.), Public-Private Partnerships. Theory and practice in international perspective (pp. 9-35). London: Routledge.
Mette Jørgensen (2006). Evaluating cross-sector partnerships. Public-private partnerships in the post WSSD context, Copenhagen Business School.
Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 60–67.
Miller C., & Ahmad Y. (2000). Collaboration and partnership: An effective response to complexity and fragmentation or solution built on sand? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20, 1 -38
Mirabella, R., & Wish, N. B. (2001). University based educational programs in the management of nonprofit organizations: An updated census on US programs. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(1), 30-41.
Mishler, E.G. (1986). Research interviewing: context and narrative. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Moore, M-L., & Westley F. (2011). Surmountable chasms: networks and social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and Society, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42, 1969-1990.
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sander, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how can it be accelerated. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145-162.
Murray R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. Retrieved from:http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/open-book-social-innovation.
Neff, D. J., & Moss, R.C. (2011). The future of nonprofits: innovate and thrive in the digital age. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research method: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. MA: Boston Press.
Newman, L., & A, Dale. (2005). Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: a response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp2/.
Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to Reconfigure Markets. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD (1999). Social Enterprise. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2011).Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges. Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy (CSTP), Paris.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review 6 (4), 33-43.
Pol, E. & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38 (6), 878-885.
Provan, K., & Kenis, P.(2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
Provan, K., Fish, A., & Sydow, J.(2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479-516.
Roberts, N. C. & Bradley, R. T. (1991). Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: A study of public policy initiation at the state level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 209-227.
Skarzynski, P., Gibson, R. (2008). Innovation to the core: A blueprint for transforming the way your company innovates. Boston: Harvard Business Press .
Song, X.M., Montoya-Weiss, M.M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 124-135.
Sherif, D., Saber, A., & Murad, N. (2011). Prospects for collaboration in the region from the vantage points of government, business and civil society. Deepening Research on Cross‐Sector Social Partnerships in the Middle East, Abu Dhabi.
TEPSIE (2012). Defining social innovation. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from: http://siresearch.eu/sites/default/files/1.1%20Part%201%20%20defining%20social%20innovation_0.pdf.
Totterdill, P., Cressey, P., & Exton, R. (2012). Social innovation at work: Workplace innovation as a social process. In H-W. Franz et al. (Eds.), Challenge social innovation. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
Uzzi, B. (2008). A social network’s changing statistical properties and the quality of human innovation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, 1–12.
Van Slyke, David M. & Newman, Harvey K.(2006). Venture philanthropy and social entrepreneurship in community redevelopment. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16(3), 345-368.
Watts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees: the science of a connected age. New York: W. W. Norton and Company Inc.
Weather, W. B., & E. M. Berman. (2001). Third sector management: The art of managing nonprofit organizations. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Weber, E.P., & Khademian, A.M.(2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334– 349.
Wei-Skillern, J., & S, Marciano. (2008). The network nonprofit. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 38-43.
Westley F., & Antadze N. (2010). Making a difference strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2-19.
Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
Wolf T., & Cater B.,(1999). Managing a nonprofit organization in the twenty-first century. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Wymer, W. W., & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of business and nonprofit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3-22.
Yeung, M. (2007). Social Innovation in Canada: An update. Canada, Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.
Young, D. R. (2001). Organizational identity in nonprofit organizations: Strategic and structural implications. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 12(2), 139-157.
Zammit, Ann (2003). Development at risk: Rethinking UN-Business Partnerships (Rep. Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development). Geneva :United Nations Research institute for Social Development.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
101256002
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1012560021
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蕭乃沂zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林建宏zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林建宏zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2015en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-三月-2016 10:46:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-三月-2016 10:46:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-三月-2016 10:46:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G1012560021en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81557-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 公共行政學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101256002zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文主要研究非營利組織推動社會創新過程中的網絡關係,希望從中瞭解非營利組織推動社會創新的實務情形並從中找到創新成功的關鍵。近年來興起的社會創新活動代表的是一種創新的思維,希望跳脫傳統的框架之外,找到一個更有效解決社會問題的方法或途徑。本研究以網絡關係做為分析的主要理論架構,透過網絡的架構瞭解在創新的過程中有哪些重要的參與者,各自扮演了什麼角色?網絡的建立過程為何?以及社會創新網絡的過程中有哪些因素影響到創新的成效?
本研究採用質性研究,並使用文獻分析、深度訪談和個案研究為主要的研究方法。本研究選定「街遊Hidden Taipei活動」為研究個案,分為創新網絡的萌發期、創新網絡的發展期和創新網絡的困境與未來展望三個部分,透過分析其中幾個主要參與者如芒草心協會、萬華社區大學、萬華社福中心、夢想城鄉協會和街遊活動發起人曾小姐間的互動網絡關係來瞭解街遊創新方案各參與者的動機、互動的模式、創新發展的歷程以及未來可能的創新方案。研究發現包括:
一、 創新網絡的萌發期
(一) 相同的參與動機和跨部門間價值觀的衝突是創新發展初期的基礎
(二) 透過社會資本建立相互合作關係
(三) 各參與者是平等的互動關係
(四) 導覽課程的規劃做為各參與者之間的溝通平台
(五) 跳脫與傳統公部門的互動方式
二、 創新網絡的發展期
(一) 以信任為基礎的合作關係有助於網絡的穩固和擴展
(二) 與社群媒體的互動有助於創新理念在地扎根
(三) 合作的行動策略是影響創新成功的因素之一
(四) 跨部門身分的參與者是創新過程中重要的中介角色
三、 創新網絡的困境與未來展望
(一) 對街遊創新方案價值觀上的差異是主要困境
(二) 跨部門的互動連結是未來發展的重點
關鍵詞:非營利組織、網絡、社會創新
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 目次 I
表次 III
圖次 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的和問題 6
第三節 重要名詞解釋 7
第二章 文獻回顧 13
第一節 社會創新的發展 13
第二節 非營利組織的網絡關係 25
第三節 非營利組織的社會創新 33
第三章 研究設計 35
第一節 研究架構 35
第二節 研究方法 38
第三節 研究效度 41
第四節 街遊Hidden Taipei個案分析 44
第五節 深度訪談 47
第四章 社會創新網絡發展過程分析 50
第一節 創新網絡的萌發期 54
第二節 創新網絡的發展期 72
第三節 創新網絡的困境及未來展望 86
第四節 綜合討論 95
第五章 結論 101
第一節 研究發現 101
第二節 研究限制 106
第三節 後續研究建議 107
參考文獻 109
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1945382 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1012560021en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 非營利組織zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網絡zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 非營利組織社會創新網絡之探討zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on the Social Innovation Network of Nonprofit Organizationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部分
王雅林、晚春東(2002)。論社會創新。學習與探索,1,44-95。
司徒達賢(1999)。非營利組織的經營管理。台北:天下遠見事業有限公司。
石桂榕(2007)。遊民問題之研究---以臺北縣為例。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
江明修(1994)。非營利組織領導行為之研究。台北:行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告,未出版。
江明修、陳定銘(1999)。我國基金會之問題與健全之道。中國行政評論,8(3),23-72。
李貞怡(2002)。從社會資本觀點探討非營利組織資源連結過程之研究--以「財團法人伊甸社會福利基金會附設中區服務中心」為例--。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文,未出版,台中。
尚容安譯(2001)。.個案研究(R. K Yin原著)。台北:弘智文化。
林佩璇(2000年1月)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。在國立中正大學主辦,質的研究研討會,嘉義市。
林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務(初版)。台北:巨流。
高華強(1991)。個案研究法。台北:師大書苑。
張強、胡雅萌、陸奇斌(2013)。中國社會創新的階段性特徵─基於” 政府─市場─社會”三元框架的實證分析。經濟社會體制比較,4,125-136。
許世雨(2000)。非營利組織與公共行政。載於江明修(主編),第三部門—經營策略與社會參與。(155-190頁)。台北:智勝文化。
陳向明(2011)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
陳金貴(2005年6月)。非營利組織與社會資本。公共行政與社會資本圓桌論壇(四),台北。
黃俊傑(2004)。全球化時代大學通識教育的新挑戰。高雄:中華民國通識教育學會。
黃昱珽(2014)。「Unseen Tours」到「街遊Hidden Taipei」:社會創新的在地移植,2015年4月10日,取自:http://hisp.ntu.edu.tw/news/epapers/22/articles/62。
黃惠勤(2009)。非營利組織社會創新之研究:以台北市文化教育基金會受託管理四個機構為例。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
楊舒蓉(2006)。從社會資本觀點論非營利組織如何協助兒童脫貧-以「台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會」為例。T&D 飛訊,48,1-18。
廖俊松(2006)。非營利組織與福利社區營造--龍眼林社區之經驗分析。環境與藝術期刊,4,81-94。
管倖生等人(2010)。設計研究方法(三版)。新北:全華圖書股份有限公司。
劉維公(2005)。讓創新成為社會運動,2015年3月15日,取自:http://udn.com/news/story/7340/681200。
鄭文義(1989)。公益團體的設立與經營。台北:工商教育出版社。
鄭怡世(2002)。個案研究方法之介紹─兼論其在社會工作實務研究中的運用。社區發展季刊,99,415-430。
鄭勝分(2007)。社會企業的概念分析。政策研究學報,7,65-108。
蕭新煌編著(2000)。非營利部門:組織與運作。台北:巨流圖書。
顧遠(2014)。社會創新中常見的四個盲點,你有幾個?,2015年3月17日,取自:http://www.seinsights.asia/story/1434/794/1897。

二、英文部分
Andriof, J., & Waddock, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder engagement. Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory, responsibility and engagement (pp. 19-42). UK: Greenleaf.
Ashman, D. (2000). Promoting corporate citizenship in the global south: Towards a model of empowered civil society collaboration with business (Rep. No. 16.3). Boston: IDR Publication.
Austin, J. (2000). The collaborative challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bates, S. M. (2012). The social innovation imperative: Create winning products, services, and programs that solve society’s most pressing challenges. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Bessant, J., Lamming, R., Noke, H, & Phillips, W. (2005). Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation, 25(12), 1366-1376.
Bloom.E., Reeves. M., Sunseri A., & Nyhan-Jones V. (2008). Strengthening networks: Using organizational network analysis to promote network effectiveness, scale, and accountability (Rep. Capacity development briefs No. 28). World Bank Institute.
Bodin, Ö., & B, Crona. (2009). The role of socialnetworks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366–374.
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002).Government-nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19-30.
Bureau of European Policy Advisers (2010). Empowering people, driving change: social innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. London: Oxford University Press.
De Brentani, U. (2001). Innovative versus incremental new business services: Different keys for achieving success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 169-187.
Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Edquist, C. (2001). The system of innovation approach and innovation policy: An account of the state of the art. DRUID Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
Franz, H., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (Eds.). (2012). Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Gibson-Graham, J. K., & Roelvink, G. (2009). Social innovation for community economics. In F. Moulaert (Ed), Social innovation and territorial development (pp.25-38). Aldershot: Ashgate
Gilsing, V. A., & Duysters, G. M. (2008). Understanding novelty creation in exploration networks: structural and relational embeddedness jointly considered. Technovation, 28 , 693–708.
Googins, B., & Rochlin, S. (2000). Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 127-144.
Gray, B., & Wood, D. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467-498.
Hämäläinen, T. J., & Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations, institutional change and economic performance: Making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions and societies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Haque, U. (2009). Is your innovation really unnovation? Retrieved Oct 12, 2015, from https://hbr.org/2009/05/unnovation.
Harrison, D. (2012). Social innovation: What is coming apart and what is being rebuilt. H. W. Franz et al. (Eds.), Challenge Social Innovation (pp. 73-86). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Hodgson, L. (2004). Manufactured civil society: Counting the cost. Critical Social Policy, 24(2), 139-164.
Hougaard, K. F. (2014). Understanding barriers to social innovation. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://siresearch.eu/blog/barriers-social-innovation.
Iyer, E. (2003). Theory of alliances: Partnership and partner characteristics. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 41-57.
Kahler, M. (Ed.). (2009). Networked politics: agency, power and governance. New York: Cornell University Press.
Kaplan, K. (2003). The purist’s partnership: Debunking the terminology of partnerships. Partnership Matters Journal, 1, 31-35.
Keast, R., Mandell, M.P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G.(2004).Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371.
Klijn, Erik-Hans (2003). Networks and governance: A perspective on public policy and public administration. In A. Salminen (Ed.), Governing Networks (pp. 29-39). Brussels: International Institute of Administrative Sciences Monographs.
Klitgaard, R., & Treverton, G. F. (2003). Assessing partnerships: New forms of collaboration. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 455-484.
Leadbeater, C. (2008). We-Think: Mass innovation, not mass production. London: Profile books.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17, 251-267.
Light, P. C. (2005, November). Searching for social entrepreneurs: Who they might be, where they might be found, what they do. The meeting of the association for research on nonprofit and voluntary associations, New York.
Lister, Sarah (2000). Power in partnership? An analysis of an NGO’s relationships with its partners, Journal of International Development, 12, 227 -239.
Massarsky, C. W. (2006). Coming of age: Social enterprise reaches its tipping point. In R. Mosher-Williams (Ed.), Research on social entrepreneurship: Understanding and contributing to an emerging field (pp. 67-88). Indianapolis: Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action.
McQuaid, R. W. (2000). The theory of partnership: why have partnerships? In S. Osborne (Ed.), Public-Private Partnerships. Theory and practice in international perspective (pp. 9-35). London: Routledge.
Mette Jørgensen (2006). Evaluating cross-sector partnerships. Public-private partnerships in the post WSSD context, Copenhagen Business School.
Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 2, 60–67.
Miller C., & Ahmad Y. (2000). Collaboration and partnership: An effective response to complexity and fragmentation or solution built on sand? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20, 1 -38
Mirabella, R., & Wish, N. B. (2001). University based educational programs in the management of nonprofit organizations: An updated census on US programs. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(1), 30-41.
Mishler, E.G. (1986). Research interviewing: context and narrative. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Moore, M-L., & Westley F. (2011). Surmountable chasms: networks and social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and Society, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42, 1969-1990.
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sander, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how can it be accelerated. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145-162.
Murray R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. Retrieved from:http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/open-book-social-innovation.
Neff, D. J., & Moss, R.C. (2011). The future of nonprofits: innovate and thrive in the digital age. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research method: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. MA: Boston Press.
Newman, L., & A, Dale. (2005). Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: a response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society 10(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp2/.
Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to Reconfigure Markets. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD (1999). Social Enterprise. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2011).Fostering Innovation to Address Social Challenges. Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy (CSTP), Paris.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review 6 (4), 33-43.
Pol, E. & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38 (6), 878-885.
Provan, K., & Kenis, P.(2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
Provan, K., Fish, A., & Sydow, J.(2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479-516.
Roberts, N. C. & Bradley, R. T. (1991). Stakeholder collaboration and innovation: A study of public policy initiation at the state level. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 209-227.
Skarzynski, P., Gibson, R. (2008). Innovation to the core: A blueprint for transforming the way your company innovates. Boston: Harvard Business Press .
Song, X.M., Montoya-Weiss, M.M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 124-135.
Sherif, D., Saber, A., & Murad, N. (2011). Prospects for collaboration in the region from the vantage points of government, business and civil society. Deepening Research on Cross‐Sector Social Partnerships in the Middle East, Abu Dhabi.
TEPSIE (2012). Defining social innovation. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from: http://siresearch.eu/sites/default/files/1.1%20Part%201%20%20defining%20social%20innovation_0.pdf.
Totterdill, P., Cressey, P., & Exton, R. (2012). Social innovation at work: Workplace innovation as a social process. In H-W. Franz et al. (Eds.), Challenge social innovation. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
Uzzi, B. (2008). A social network’s changing statistical properties and the quality of human innovation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, 1–12.
Van Slyke, David M. & Newman, Harvey K.(2006). Venture philanthropy and social entrepreneurship in community redevelopment. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16(3), 345-368.
Watts, D. J. (2003). Six degrees: the science of a connected age. New York: W. W. Norton and Company Inc.
Weather, W. B., & E. M. Berman. (2001). Third sector management: The art of managing nonprofit organizations. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Weber, E.P., & Khademian, A.M.(2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334– 349.
Wei-Skillern, J., & S, Marciano. (2008). The network nonprofit. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 38-43.
Westley F., & Antadze N. (2010). Making a difference strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2-19.
Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.
Wolf T., & Cater B.,(1999). Managing a nonprofit organization in the twenty-first century. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Wymer, W. W., & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of business and nonprofit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3-22.
Yeung, M. (2007). Social Innovation in Canada: An update. Canada, Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc.
Young, D. R. (2001). Organizational identity in nonprofit organizations: Strategic and structural implications. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 12(2), 139-157.
Zammit, Ann (2003). Development at risk: Rethinking UN-Business Partnerships (Rep. Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development). Geneva :United Nations Research institute for Social Development.
zh_TW