Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
- pdf(512)pdf(472)pdf(507)pdf(532)pdf(529)pdf(482)pdf(472)pdf(560)pdf(487)pdf(469)pdf(471)pdf(534)pdf(450)pdf(556)pdf(503)pdf(554)pdf(487)pdf(553)pdf(615)pdf(506)
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 企業併購最適支付方式契約設計 作者 朱建彥 貢獻者 胡聯國
朱建彥關鍵詞 企業併購
代理問題
雙方道德風險
混合性支付方式
線性契約
Mergers & Acquisitions
Principal-Agent Model
Double-Sided Moral Hazard
Mixed Payment
Linear Contract日期 2000 上傳時間 30-Mar-2016 17:25:06 (UTC+8) 摘要 企業併購的成敗，基本上應視其併購的策略性目標是否達成，然而策略性的目標往往只能從收購後整體的營運績效或投資收益來進行評估。事實上，企業併購即是一種投資活動，投資後的環境變化事先即難以掌握，如何有效的預防企業併購的風險問題，尤為進行併購規劃時重要的課題。本文嘗試以「代理問題」來解釋企業併購完成後的「雙方道德風險問題」，希望利用支付方式的財務規劃，有效的對企業併購完成後的道德風險作防範。 參考文獻 中文部分：\r\n王泰允，「企業購併實用」，遠流出版社，民國80年初版。\r\n伍忠賢，「企業購併聖經」，遠流出版社，民國87年初版。\r\n潘隆政（民86），「企業併購支付方式影響因素之研究—台灣上市主併公司之研究」，淡江大學國際貿易學系碩士班論文。\r\n楊維君（民82），「台灣企業購併支付方式與財務特質關係之實證研究」，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士班論文。\r\n常景翔（民81），「道德風險下公司的融資與投資行為」，國立清華大學經濟學研究所碩士班論文。\r\n戚務君（民85），「訊息操弄與多類型工作對誘因機制的影響」，國立台灣大學商學研究所博士班論文。\r\n（民85），「訊息不對稱下最適租賃契約之決定」，國立政治大學國際貿研究所碩士班論文。\r\n蕭玄逸（民80），「比例契約和偽報契約之分析—當事人-代理人模型之應用」，國立台灣大學經濟研究所碩士班論文。\r\n蕭黎明（民81），「台灣上市公司最高主管之報償、持股比例與公司績效之關係研究」，國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士班論文。\r\n英文部分：\r\nAl-Najjar, N. I., 1997, Incentive Contracts in Two-Sided Moral Hazards with Multiple Agents. Journal of Economic Theory 74: 174-195.\r\nAllen, D. W., and D. Lueck, 1995, Risk Preference and the Economics of Contracts. American Economic Review 62(December): 777-95.\r\nBernard Salanie, 1998, The Economics of Contracts, The MIT Press.\r\nBhattacharyya, S. and F. Lafontaine, 1995, Double-Sided Moral Hazard and the Nature of Shared Contracts. Rand Journal of Economics Vol. 26. No.4. (Winter): 761-781.\r\nBlackburn, Dark, and Hanson, 1997, Mergers, Method of Payment and Returns to Manager-and Owner-Controlled Firms. The Financial Review Vol. 32. No. 3 (August): 569-589.\r\nBrown, David, and Michael Ryngaert, 1991, The Mode of Acquisition in Takeovers: Taxes and Asymmetric Information, Journal of Finance 46, 653-669.\r\nChang, S. , 1998, Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns, The Journal of Finance. Vol. LIII, No.2 (April): 773-784.\r\nCheung , S. N. S., 1969, Transaction costs, Risk Aversion, and the Choice of Contractual Arrangement. The Journal of Law and Economics 12(1) (April):23-42.\r\nCoff, Russell W.,1999, How Buyers Cope with Uncertainty when Acquiring Firms in Knowledge-Incentive Industries: Cavest Emptor. Organization Science Vol. 10, (March-April): 144-161.\r\nEckbo, B. Espen, Ronald M. Giammarino, and Robert L. Heinkel, 1990, Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests. Review of Financial Studies 3, 651-675.\r\nFishman, Michael, 1989, Preepptive Bidding and the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Acquisitions. Journal of Finance 44, 41-58.\r\nHansen, Robert, 1987, A Theory of the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Business 60, 75-95.\r\nHolmstrom, B. and P. Milgrom, 1991, Multitask Principal-Agent Analysis : Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations 7:24-52.\r\nHolmstrom, B. and P. Milgrom, 1994, The Firm as an Incentive System. American Economic Review 84(September): 972-991.\r\nJoel F. Houston and Michael D. Ryngaert, 1997, Equity Issuance and Adverse Selection: A Direct Test Using Conditional Stock Offers. The Journal of Finance Vol. LII, No.1(March): 197-219.\r\nKarmann, A., 1994, Multiple-Task and Multiple-Agent Models: Incentive Contracts and an Application to Point Pollution Control. Annals of Operations Research Vol.54, 57-78.\r\nKim ,Son Ku and Wang Susheng, 1998, Linear Contracts and the Double Moral-Hazard. Journal of Economic Theory Vol.82 342-378.\r\nLuporini and Parigi, 1996, Multi-Task Sharecropping Contracts: the Italian Mezzadria. Economica Vol.63, 445-57.\r\nMartin, K. J. 1996, The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership. Journal of Finance Vol. LI. No.4.\r\nMilgrom, P. and J. Roberts, 1992, Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall.\r\nRomano, R. E. and S. Gupta, 1998, Monitoring the Principal with Multiple Agents. Rand Journal of Economics Vol. 29, No.2, 427-442.\r\nSaeyoung Chang, 1998, Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns. The Journal of Finance Vol. LIII, No. 2 (April): 773-784.\r\nScott, J. H.,1997, On the Theory of Conglomerate Mergers, Journal of Finance, September , 1235-1250.\r\nVirginia L. Blackburn, Frederick H. Dark, and Robert C. Hanson, 1997, Mergers, Method of Payment and Returns to Manager- and Owner-Controlled Firms. The Financial Review Vol.32 No.3 (August): 569-589. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易學系
86351004資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002002040 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 胡聯國 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 朱建彥 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 朱建彥 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2000 en_US dc.date.accessioned 30-Mar-2016 17:25:06 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 30-Mar-2016 17:25:06 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Mar-2016 17:25:06 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) A2002002040 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=92578 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 86351004 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 企業併購的成敗，基本上應視其併購的策略性目標是否達成，然而策略性的目標往往只能從收購後整體的營運績效或投資收益來進行評估。事實上，企業併購即是一種投資活動，投資後的環境變化事先即難以掌握，如何有效的預防企業併購的風險問題，尤為進行併購規劃時重要的課題。本文嘗試以「代理問題」來解釋企業併購完成後的「雙方道德風險問題」，希望利用支付方式的財務規劃，有效的對企業併購完成後的道德風險作防範。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁\r\n證明書\r\n致謝詞\r\n論文摘要\r\n目錄\r\n符號彙總表\r\n第一章 緒論\r\n第一節 研究動機\r\n第二節 分析目的與方法\r\n第三節 本文的結構\r\n第二章 文獻回顧\r\n第一節 支付方式簡介\r\n第二節 相關理論文獻回顧\r\n第三節 代理問題下道德風險模型文獻\r\n第三章 不完全訊息下企業併購雙方道德風險模型分析\r\n第一節 模型背景與假設\r\n第二節 理論模型推演\r\n第三節 契約特性分析\r\n第四節 本章結論\r\n第四章 比較靜態分析\r\n第一節 風險趨避係數對目標公司持股比例之影響\r\n第二節 外在衝擊風險對目標公司持股比例之影響\r\n第三節 努力成本變動對目標公司持股比例之影響\r\n第四節 本章結論\r\n第五章 模型比較分析\r\n第一節 不同訊息結構下模型比較\r\n第二節 風險中立下模型比較\r\n第三節 不同支付方式模型選擇\r\n第四節 本章結論\r\n第六章 結論與建議\r\n第一節 研究結論\r\n第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向\r\n附錄\r\n參考文獻 zh_TW dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.extent 129278 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002002040 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 企業併購 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 代理問題 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 雙方道德風險 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 混合性支付方式 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 線性契約 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mergers & Acquisitions en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Principal-Agent Model en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Double-Sided Moral Hazard en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mixed Payment en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Linear Contract en_US dc.title (題名) 企業併購最適支付方式契約設計 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分：\r\n王泰允，「企業購併實用」，遠流出版社，民國80年初版。\r\n伍忠賢，「企業購併聖經」，遠流出版社，民國87年初版。\r\n潘隆政（民86），「企業併購支付方式影響因素之研究—台灣上市主併公司之研究」，淡江大學國際貿易學系碩士班論文。\r\n楊維君（民82），「台灣企業購併支付方式與財務特質關係之實證研究」，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士班論文。\r\n常景翔（民81），「道德風險下公司的融資與投資行為」，國立清華大學經濟學研究所碩士班論文。\r\n戚務君（民85），「訊息操弄與多類型工作對誘因機制的影響」，國立台灣大學商學研究所博士班論文。\r\n（民85），「訊息不對稱下最適租賃契約之決定」，國立政治大學國際貿研究所碩士班論文。\r\n蕭玄逸（民80），「比例契約和偽報契約之分析—當事人-代理人模型之應用」，國立台灣大學經濟研究所碩士班論文。\r\n蕭黎明（民81），「台灣上市公司最高主管之報償、持股比例與公司績效之關係研究」，國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士班論文。\r\n英文部分：\r\nAl-Najjar, N. I., 1997, Incentive Contracts in Two-Sided Moral Hazards with Multiple Agents. Journal of Economic Theory 74: 174-195.\r\nAllen, D. W., and D. Lueck, 1995, Risk Preference and the Economics of Contracts. American Economic Review 62(December): 777-95.\r\nBernard Salanie, 1998, The Economics of Contracts, The MIT Press.\r\nBhattacharyya, S. and F. Lafontaine, 1995, Double-Sided Moral Hazard and the Nature of Shared Contracts. Rand Journal of Economics Vol. 26. No.4. (Winter): 761-781.\r\nBlackburn, Dark, and Hanson, 1997, Mergers, Method of Payment and Returns to Manager-and Owner-Controlled Firms. The Financial Review Vol. 32. No. 3 (August): 569-589.\r\nBrown, David, and Michael Ryngaert, 1991, The Mode of Acquisition in Takeovers: Taxes and Asymmetric Information, Journal of Finance 46, 653-669.\r\nChang, S. , 1998, Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns, The Journal of Finance. Vol. LIII, No.2 (April): 773-784.\r\nCheung , S. N. S., 1969, Transaction costs, Risk Aversion, and the Choice of Contractual Arrangement. The Journal of Law and Economics 12(1) (April):23-42.\r\nCoff, Russell W.,1999, How Buyers Cope with Uncertainty when Acquiring Firms in Knowledge-Incentive Industries: Cavest Emptor. Organization Science Vol. 10, (March-April): 144-161.\r\nEckbo, B. Espen, Ronald M. Giammarino, and Robert L. Heinkel, 1990, Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests. Review of Financial Studies 3, 651-675.\r\nFishman, Michael, 1989, Preepptive Bidding and the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Acquisitions. Journal of Finance 44, 41-58.\r\nHansen, Robert, 1987, A Theory of the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Business 60, 75-95.\r\nHolmstrom, B. and P. Milgrom, 1991, Multitask Principal-Agent Analysis : Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations 7:24-52.\r\nHolmstrom, B. and P. Milgrom, 1994, The Firm as an Incentive System. American Economic Review 84(September): 972-991.\r\nJoel F. Houston and Michael D. Ryngaert, 1997, Equity Issuance and Adverse Selection: A Direct Test Using Conditional Stock Offers. The Journal of Finance Vol. LII, No.1(March): 197-219.\r\nKarmann, A., 1994, Multiple-Task and Multiple-Agent Models: Incentive Contracts and an Application to Point Pollution Control. Annals of Operations Research Vol.54, 57-78.\r\nKim ,Son Ku and Wang Susheng, 1998, Linear Contracts and the Double Moral-Hazard. Journal of Economic Theory Vol.82 342-378.\r\nLuporini and Parigi, 1996, Multi-Task Sharecropping Contracts: the Italian Mezzadria. Economica Vol.63, 445-57.\r\nMartin, K. J. 1996, The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership. Journal of Finance Vol. LI. No.4.\r\nMilgrom, P. and J. Roberts, 1992, Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall.\r\nRomano, R. E. and S. Gupta, 1998, Monitoring the Principal with Multiple Agents. Rand Journal of Economics Vol. 29, No.2, 427-442.\r\nSaeyoung Chang, 1998, Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns. The Journal of Finance Vol. LIII, No. 2 (April): 773-784.\r\nScott, J. H.,1997, On the Theory of Conglomerate Mergers, Journal of Finance, September , 1235-1250.\r\nVirginia L. Blackburn, Frederick H. Dark, and Robert C. Hanson, 1997, Mergers, Method of Payment and Returns to Manager- and Owner-Controlled Firms. The Financial Review Vol.32 No.3 (August): 569-589. zh_TW
