學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 技術移轉或自行研發：跨期與不確定模型之運用 作者 張芝榕 貢獻者 何靜嫺
張芝榕關鍵詞 技術移轉
技術研發日期 2001 上傳時間 31-三月-2016 16:45:22 (UTC+8) 摘要 本論文討論一廠商在面臨不同的市場環境及對手的競爭狀況時，此廠商為求得其最大之總跨期的預期報酬下，它最佳的技術提昇策略選擇為何？此外並討論廠商市場佔有的消長以及在特殊的有關技術水準之假設下，此廠商可能的策略選擇結果。 參考文獻 1、Loury, G., 1979, “Market Structure and Innovation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93 , pp.395-410.\r\n2、Lee and Wilde, 1980, “Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 , pp.429-436.\r\n3、Kamien, M. and Tauman, Y., 1984, “The private value of a patent :a game theoretic analysis,” Journal of Economics (Supplyment), 4 , pp.93-118.\r\n4、Kamien, M. and Tauman, Y., 1986, “Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent ,” the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 , pp.471-491.\r\n5、Schmalensee, R. and Willing, R., 1989, “Handbook of industrial organization volume 1,” chapter 14.\r\n6、Delbono, F. and Denicolo, V., 1990, “ R&D investment in a symmetric and homogeneous oligopoly: Bertrand vs. Cournot,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8 , pp.297-313.\r\n7、Delbono, F. and Denicolo, V., 1991, “Incentives to innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 , pp.951- 961.\r\n8、Martin, S., 1993, “Advanced Industrial Economics,” chapter 13.\r\n9、陳忠榮，李鴻志, 1997, “市場結構、研究發展與專利授權,” 台大經濟論叢, pp.555-568.\r\n10、Wang, X. H., 1998, “Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model,” Economics Letters, 60, pp.55-62.\r\n11、Yi, S. S., 1999, “Market structure and incentives to innovate：the case of Cournot oligopoly,” Economics Letters, 65, pp.379-388.\r\n12、Vossen, R. W., 1999, “Market Power, Industrial Concentration and Innovative Activity,” Review of Industrial Organization, 15, pp.367-378.\r\n13、Love, J. H. and Roper, S., 1999, “The Determinants of Innovation：R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects,” Review of Industrial Organization, 15, pp.43-64.\r\n14、Branstetter, L. and Chen, J. R., 1999, ”The Impact of Technology Transfer and R&D on Productivity Growth in the Taiwanese Electronics Industry：Microeconomics Analysis Using Plant-Level Data,” draft submitted for presentation at the international conference on the role of technology transfer in east Asian economic growth. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
87258005資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001802 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 何靜嫺 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) 張芝榕 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 張芝榕 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2001 en_US dc.date.accessioned 31-三月-2016 16:45:22 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 31-三月-2016 16:45:22 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 31-三月-2016 16:45:22 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) A2002001802 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=92969 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經濟學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 87258005 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文討論一廠商在面臨不同的市場環境及對手的競爭狀況時，此廠商為求得其最大之總跨期的預期報酬下，它最佳的技術提昇策略選擇為何？此外並討論廠商市場佔有的消長以及在特殊的有關技術水準之假設下，此廠商可能的策略選擇結果。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁\r\n證明書\r\n致謝詞\r\n論文摘要\r\n目錄\r\n第一章 緒論\r\n第一節 研究動機與目的\r\n第二節 文獻回顧\r\n第三節 論文方法與架構\r\n第二章 單產品市場之廠商策略選擇\r\n第一節 前言\r\n第二節 廠商Ｂ兩期皆維持原本技術水準\r\n第三節 廠商Ｂ兩期皆研發\r\n第四節 結論\r\n第三章 兩個產品市場之廠商策略選擇\r\n第一節 前言\r\n第二節 廠商Ｂ兩期皆維持原本技術水準\r\n第三節 廠商Ｂ兩期皆研發\r\n第四節 結論\r\n第四章 結論\r\n參考文獻 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001802 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術移轉 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術研發 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 技術移轉或自行研發：跨期與不確定模型之運用 zh_TW dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1、Loury, G., 1979, “Market Structure and Innovation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93 , pp.395-410.\r\n2、Lee and Wilde, 1980, “Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 , pp.429-436.\r\n3、Kamien, M. and Tauman, Y., 1984, “The private value of a patent :a game theoretic analysis,” Journal of Economics (Supplyment), 4 , pp.93-118.\r\n4、Kamien, M. and Tauman, Y., 1986, “Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent ,” the Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 , pp.471-491.\r\n5、Schmalensee, R. and Willing, R., 1989, “Handbook of industrial organization volume 1,” chapter 14.\r\n6、Delbono, F. and Denicolo, V., 1990, “ R&D investment in a symmetric and homogeneous oligopoly: Bertrand vs. Cournot,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8 , pp.297-313.\r\n7、Delbono, F. and Denicolo, V., 1991, “Incentives to innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 , pp.951- 961.\r\n8、Martin, S., 1993, “Advanced Industrial Economics,” chapter 13.\r\n9、陳忠榮，李鴻志, 1997, “市場結構、研究發展與專利授權,” 台大經濟論叢, pp.555-568.\r\n10、Wang, X. H., 1998, “Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model,” Economics Letters, 60, pp.55-62.\r\n11、Yi, S. S., 1999, “Market structure and incentives to innovate：the case of Cournot oligopoly,” Economics Letters, 65, pp.379-388.\r\n12、Vossen, R. W., 1999, “Market Power, Industrial Concentration and Innovative Activity,” Review of Industrial Organization, 15, pp.367-378.\r\n13、Love, J. H. and Roper, S., 1999, “The Determinants of Innovation：R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects,” Review of Industrial Organization, 15, pp.43-64.\r\n14、Branstetter, L. and Chen, J. R., 1999, ”The Impact of Technology Transfer and R&D on Productivity Growth in the Taiwanese Electronics Industry：Microeconomics Analysis Using Plant-Level Data,” draft submitted for presentation at the international conference on the role of technology transfer in east Asian economic growth. zh_TW
