學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 我國暴力犯罪嚴重性指標與權重體系之建構
The Study of theViolent Crime Serious Index and Weight System In Taiwan
作者 林適湖
Lin, Shih-Hu
貢獻者 黃國彥<br>邱錦昌
林適湖
Lin, Shih-Hu
關鍵詞 犯罪嚴重性
指標
暴力犯罪
權重
Crime Serious
Index
Violent Crime
Weight
AHP
S-W index
日期 1999
上傳時間 1-四月-2016 17:16:38 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在使用分析階層程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)依據我國官方犯罪統計數字,採取Sellin-Wolfgang index的犯罪嚴重性建構模式,建構我國暴力犯罪嚴重性指標及其權重體系,並進一步探討背景變項對犯罪嚴重性權重給分一致性的差異。本研究第一階段之「暴力犯罪嚴重性可用指標之調查」共選取五類人員進行調查,包括:1.大學教授、2.警政人員、3.調查人員、4.司法人員(只包括法官或檢察官)、5.中學校長老師,總共樣本數24人;第二階段之「暴力犯罪嚴重性指標及權重體系之建構」,共選取包括1.學者專家、2.法官、3.警政調查人員、4.家庭主婦、5.大學生6.中學校長、老師、7.監獄受刑人等七大類,有效樣本357份。
The purpose of this study was to utilize (Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP). According to the official criminal statistics in Taiwan, it was used crime serious structure model of Sellin-Wolfgang index to establish Taiwan "Violent Crime Serious Index and Weight System".In addition, this study was to discuss the differences between variances and "crime serious weight" scores. At the first phase, "the Investigation of Violent Crime Serious Index" was used in this study. The subjects were classified into five different categories including: 1. University professors; 2. Police officers; 3. Investigators; 4. Judicial officers (only Judges or Prosecutor); 5. High school principals and teachers. The totally sample was twenty-four subjects (N= 24). At the second phase, "the Structure of Violent Crime Serious Index and Weight System" was selected. The subjects were classified into seven different categories including: 1. Scholars and Specialists; 2. Judges; 3. Police officers and Investigators; 4. House keepers; 5. Undergraduate students; 6. High school principals and teachers; 7. Prisoners. The sample included three hundred and fifty seven subjects (N= 357).
描述 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002000215
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃國彥<br>邱錦昌zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林適湖zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Lin, Shih-Huen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林適湖zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Shih-Huen_US
dc.date (日期) 1999en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-四月-2016 17:16:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-四月-2016 17:16:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-四月-2016 17:16:38 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) A2002000215en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83922-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在使用分析階層程序法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)依據我國官方犯罪統計數字,採取Sellin-Wolfgang index的犯罪嚴重性建構模式,建構我國暴力犯罪嚴重性指標及其權重體系,並進一步探討背景變項對犯罪嚴重性權重給分一致性的差異。本研究第一階段之「暴力犯罪嚴重性可用指標之調查」共選取五類人員進行調查,包括:1.大學教授、2.警政人員、3.調查人員、4.司法人員(只包括法官或檢察官)、5.中學校長老師,總共樣本數24人;第二階段之「暴力犯罪嚴重性指標及權重體系之建構」,共選取包括1.學者專家、2.法官、3.警政調查人員、4.家庭主婦、5.大學生6.中學校長、老師、7.監獄受刑人等七大類,有效樣本357份。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study was to utilize (Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP). According to the official criminal statistics in Taiwan, it was used crime serious structure model of Sellin-Wolfgang index to establish Taiwan "Violent Crime Serious Index and Weight System".In addition, this study was to discuss the differences between variances and "crime serious weight" scores. At the first phase, "the Investigation of Violent Crime Serious Index" was used in this study. The subjects were classified into five different categories including: 1. University professors; 2. Police officers; 3. Investigators; 4. Judicial officers (only Judges or Prosecutor); 5. High school principals and teachers. The totally sample was twenty-four subjects (N= 24). At the second phase, "the Structure of Violent Crime Serious Index and Weight System" was selected. The subjects were classified into seven different categories including: 1. Scholars and Specialists; 2. Judges; 3. Police officers and Investigators; 4. House keepers; 5. Undergraduate students; 6. High school principals and teachers; 7. Prisoners. The sample included three hundred and fifty seven subjects (N= 357).en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 封面頁
     證明書
     致謝詞
     論文摘要
     目錄
     表目錄
     圖目錄
     第一章 緒 論
     第一節 研究緣起與目的
     第二節 名詞解釋
     第三節 研究範圍與限制
     第二章 文獻探討
     第一節 犯罪與偏差行為
     第二節 暴力犯罪之分類及其現況
     第三節 犯罪嚴重性指標之測量及發展
     第四節 權重體系的概念與設計
     第三章 研究設計
     第一節 研究架構及流程
     第二節 研究樣本
     第三節 研究工具
     第四節 資料分析
     第四章 研究結果與討論
     第一節 可用指標調查結果分析
     第二節 指標相對權重調查結果分析
     第三節 指標相對權重一致性分析
     第四節 討論
     第五章 結論與建議
     第一節 結論
     第二節 建議
     中文參考書目
     英文參考書目
     附錄
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002000215en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 犯罪嚴重性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 指標zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 暴力犯罪zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 權重zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Crime Seriousen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Indexen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Violent Crimeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Weighten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) AHPen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) S-W indexen_US
dc.title (題名) 我國暴力犯罪嚴重性指標與權重體系之建構zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Study of theViolent Crime Serious Index and Weight System In Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US