1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 法學院
  4. 國科會研究計畫
  5. Item

學術產出-國科會研究計畫

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 專利資訊揭露與權利範圍之界定—以權利公示與公信的角度開展
其他題名 Patent Disclosure and Scope of Claims—A Study in Terms of Public Notice and Possession
作者 沈宗倫
貢獻者 法律學系
日期 2012
上傳時間 12-四月-2016 15:40:56 (UTC+8)
摘要 專利有別傳統物權，為一無體財產權。由於權利屬性使然，專利所保護的技術內容常具 有「非敵對性」與「無耗竭性」，權利邊界不易測定，不僅弱化專利權人行使權利的正 當性，更衝擊公眾對於專利權範圍的信賴，影響交易安全與對於專利的合法實施。為解 決上述的問題，本計畫嘗試以專利資訊揭露為核心，本於權利公示與公信的法理，討論 專利資訊揭露與專利權利範圍的關係。在專利公示的法理下，本計畫將以比較法的方法 深入檢討「申請專利範圍」的「明確性」與「專利說明書」的「得據以實施」或「可實 施性」。同時，本計畫亦就美國專利法下的「書面說明」要件，研究其於我國專利法體 系下的可行性。另外，在專利公信的法理下，本計畫以前述「得據以實施」或「可實施 性」的概念，作為調節權利的樞紐，此構想將實踐於專利侵害與新穎性的判斷。
Patents, different from traditional properties, are intangible. Such attribution leads to the phenomena that the inventions protected by patents are non-rivalrous and inexhaustible. As a consequence, the unpredictability of patents does not only weaken the justification of exclusive rights under patent law, but also impact the secure transactions and embodying the inventions. In order to resolve the aforesaid hardship, this project, under the jurisprudence of “public notice” and “possession” attempts to probe into the relation between patent disclosures and the scope of patents. The concept of “public notice” will bring the project to study the issues of “definiteness” of claims and “enablement” of specification. The requirement of “written description” established under U.S. patent law is also examined in this project to check whether it is necessary to achieve the goal of sufficient patent disclosures under Taiwanese patent system. Additionally, this project will follow the concept of “possession” to study whether “enablement” should function as impetus to measure the reasonable scope of patents.
關聯 計畫編號 NSC101-2410-H004-036
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 法律學系
dc.creator (作者) 沈宗倫zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012
dc.date.accessioned 12-四月-2016 15:40:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-四月-2016 15:40:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-四月-2016 15:40:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84167-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 專利有別傳統物權，為一無體財產權。由於權利屬性使然，專利所保護的技術內容常具 有「非敵對性」與「無耗竭性」，權利邊界不易測定，不僅弱化專利權人行使權利的正 當性，更衝擊公眾對於專利權範圍的信賴，影響交易安全與對於專利的合法實施。為解 決上述的問題，本計畫嘗試以專利資訊揭露為核心，本於權利公示與公信的法理，討論 專利資訊揭露與專利權利範圍的關係。在專利公示的法理下，本計畫將以比較法的方法 深入檢討「申請專利範圍」的「明確性」與「專利說明書」的「得據以實施」或「可實 施性」。同時，本計畫亦就美國專利法下的「書面說明」要件，研究其於我國專利法體 系下的可行性。另外，在專利公信的法理下，本計畫以前述「得據以實施」或「可實施 性」的概念，作為調節權利的樞紐，此構想將實踐於專利侵害與新穎性的判斷。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Patents, different from traditional properties, are intangible. Such attribution leads to the phenomena that the inventions protected by patents are non-rivalrous and inexhaustible. As a consequence, the unpredictability of patents does not only weaken the justification of exclusive rights under patent law, but also impact the secure transactions and embodying the inventions. In order to resolve the aforesaid hardship, this project, under the jurisprudence of “public notice” and “possession” attempts to probe into the relation between patent disclosures and the scope of patents. The concept of “public notice” will bring the project to study the issues of “definiteness” of claims and “enablement” of specification. The requirement of “written description” established under U.S. patent law is also examined in this project to check whether it is necessary to achieve the goal of sufficient patent disclosures under Taiwanese patent system. Additionally, this project will follow the concept of “possession” to study whether “enablement” should function as impetus to measure the reasonable scope of patents.
dc.format.extent 4254504 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 計畫編號 NSC101-2410-H004-036
dc.title (題名) 專利資訊揭露與權利範圍之界定—以權利公示與公信的角度開展zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Patent Disclosure and Scope of Claims—A Study in Terms of Public Notice and Possession
dc.type (資料類型) report