Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100115
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | 祖旭華 | zh_TW |
dc.creator | Tsu, Peter Shiu-Hwa | |
dc.date | 2010-01 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-11T07:59:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-11T07:59:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-08-11T07:59:17Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100115 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Frank Jackson, Michael Smith與Philip Pettit在〈道德個別主義與模式〉一文中為原則主義者辯護,他們主張「對」這個道德語詞的意義,必定受一個統攝性的意義模式所規範。而如果這個統攝性的意義模式是X,那麼我們就可以推導出一個為真的道德原則「X是對的」。如此一來,主張沒有為真的道德原則存在的個別主義就被否證了。 就文獻上來看,有四種用來證成有此統攝性的意義模式存在的論證。它們分別是概念掌握論證 (conceptual competence argu-ment)、意義的規範性論證 (the normativity of meaning)、一致性論證 (consistency) 與可普遍性論證 (universalizability)。本文目的在於悍衛個別主義,筆者將論證以上四種論證都不成功。在文章末尾,筆者將更進一步論證,即便有此統攝性的意義模式存在,這也無助於原則主義者宣稱有真的道德原則存在,因為「對」這個道德語詞的意義模式 (pattern) 不同於對的判準 (criterion)。 | |
dc.description.abstract | Frank Jackson, Michael Smith and Philip Pettit, in their co-authored paper “Ethical Particularism and Pattern” argue on behalf of the principlists that there must be a unifying meaning pattern gov-erning the term “rightness”. And if there is a unifying meaning pat-tern, let’s say X, that governs the use of the term “rightness”, then we can get a true moral principle of the following form: X is right. Par-ticularism, a doctrine which denies the existence of any true moral principles, would thus be falsified. In defense of particularism, I will critique four arguments invoked in support of the claim that there is such a pattern: the conceptual competence argument, the normativity of meaning argument, the consistency argument, and the universalizability argument. I contend that none of these arguments work. In the end of my paper, I argue that even if there is a pattern of the term “rightness”, it will not help the principlists to establish their claim that there are true moral principles, for a meaning pattern of rightness has to be distinguished from a criterion of rightness. | |
dc.format.extent | 319038 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.relation | 政治大學哲學學報, 23, 79-116 | |
dc.relation | The national Chengchi university philosophical | |
dc.subject | 個別主義; 原則主義; 規則遵循; 意義的規範性; 可普遍性 | |
dc.subject | particularism; principlism; rule-following; the normativity of meaning; universalizabilit | |
dc.title | Particularism, Pattern and Rule-following | |
dc.title.alternative | 個別主義、模式、規則遵循 | |
dc.type | article | |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
23-79-116.pdf | 311.56 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.