Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102440
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor中文系
dc.creator喬衍琯zh_TW
dc.creatorChiao, Yen-kuan
dc.date1985-05
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-30T06:01:06Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-30T06:01:06Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-30T06:01:06Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102440-
dc.description.abstract歷代史乘中藝文志或經籍志,多係通代成書,然方式又頗有異同。明清兩代,則斷代成書,而續清通考經籍考,利用叢書子目,又兼具通代的功能。本文選取漢書藝文志到清史稿藝文志等史志十餘種,分別討論其在斷限上的得失。而隋志和千頃堂書目的體例和漢志一系有別。通志藝文略和文獻通考經籍考在體例上多有值得吾人參考之處,尤值得注意。討論前人所修史志,旨在探討其體例優劣,以取各家所長,避免其缺夫,以改善史志,從而編成歷代藝文總志,以發揮辨章學術的功效。
dc.format.extent3061928 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relation國立政治大學學報, 51, 47-75
dc.title歷史藝文志的斷限zh_TW
dc.title.alternativeThe Period Divisions of the Historical Catalogs
dc.typearticle
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
51-47-75.pdf2.99 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.