Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122217
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor亞太博
dc.creator柏門
dc.creatorBerman, Evan M.;West, Jonathan P.
dc.date2003-12
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T09:35:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-30T09:35:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-30T09:35:00Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122217-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the extent and impact of mediocrity in management. Mediocrity among public managers is defined as having only a modest commitment to contemporary values and practices of public administration. Based on a national survey of senior managers in city governments with populations over 50,000, this study finds that in about 41% of jurisdictions most managers have only a mediocre commitment to contemporary values and practices. Managerial mediocrity is shown to have strong, negative impacts on workplace productivity and on citizen trust in government. This first of two articles concludes with practical tips for assessing mediocrity in the workplace. The second article, which also is in this issue of PPMR, focuses on strategies for addressing managerial mediocrity.
dc.format.extent881318 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relationPublic Performance & Management Review, Vol.27, No.2, pp. 9-29
dc.titleWhat is Managerial Mediocrity? Definition, Prevalence and Negative Impact (Part 1)
dc.typearticle
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
3381179.pdf860.66 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.