Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122788| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 董祥開 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Dong, Hsiang-Kai | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳國蒓 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Guo-Chun | en_US |
| dc.creator | 陳國蒓 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Chen, Guo-Chun | en_US |
| dc.date | 2019 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-01T07:03:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-04-01T07:03:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-04-01T07:03:18Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G1032560384 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122788 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 公共行政學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 103256038 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 在社會科學領域，風險偏好這一概念越來越被大家所關注，不論是心理學中研究其作為個人特質的某一方面，或者是探索其對於個人或組織行為與決策的影響。研究者都一直在尋找更好的方法测量風險偏好這一複雜概念。而社會科學在測量複雜概念時，經常必須使用一套複雜的量表來進行，但不同量表的測量結果往往不同。本研究即選取「台灣文官調查IV：公務人員風險偏好、服務動機、與決策類型之關係—建立一個勇於任事的政府」2016 年與2017 年中關於個人風險偏好之測量題項，試圖比較與分析問卷中已被研究者廣泛使用於測量個人風險偏好的兩種不同的量表「多面向風險問題」和「收入博弈問題」（Income GambleQuestions）」的測量結果。研究發現不同性別、不同最高學歷、是否曾在公家機關以外的單位工作過之受試者之平均風險接受程度具有顯著差異，且女性的平均風險接受程度顯著低於男性，曾在公家機關以外的單位工作過的受試者之平均風險接受程度顯著高於沒有在公家機關以外的單位工作過的受試者之平均風險接受程度。學歷較低之受試者的平均風險接受程度顯著低於學歷較高之受試者的平均風險接受程度。不同量表的測量整體結果具有一致性，但是仍可對受試者個體之進行判讀，篩選「區別程度」過大之對象，學歷背景是影響受試者「區別程度」過大之重要因素。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 5\n第一節 研究背景與動機 5\n第二節 研究目的與問題 7\n第二章 文獻檢閱 9\n第一節 風險偏好 9\n第二節 風險偏好的測量 14\n第三節 測量方法的比較 20\n第四節 「台灣文官調查IV」中之個人風險偏好測量 22\n第三章 研究設計與方法 29\n第一節 研究架構 29\n第二節 數據篩選與變項處理 32\n第四章 研究結果與分析 41\n第一節 敘述統計 41\n第二節 假設檢定 46\n第三節 量表測量差異與受試者填答品質 52\n第五章 研究發現、建議與研究限制 68\n第一節 研究發現 68\n第二節 研究限制與建議 73\n參考文獻 75\n附錄 81 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 825435 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1032560384 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 個人風險偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 測量方法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 測量比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | 不同量表，不同結果? 探索兩組使用頻率最高的風險偏好量表 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Different Scales, Different Results? An Exploration on the Two Commonly-Used Measurement Scales of Risk Preference | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 一、中文部分\n余致力（2000）。論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色黑堡宣言的內涵, 定位與啟示。公共行政學報，20001（4），1-9。\n林秀雲（譯）（2016）。社會科學研究方法（Earl Babbie原著）。臺北：雙葉。\n陳俊樺（2017）。個人動機與風險偏好對志願服務行為的影響。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文，未出版，台北。\n廖懿萱（2012）。自我效能、情緒、知覺環境不確定對創業意圖的影響-以風險偏好為中介變數。國立高雄應用科技大學企業管理系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。\n蔡淑敏（2008）。組織文化強度, 文化調適訓練及風險偏好對變革後員工滿意度影響之研究-以銀行合併為例。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。\n蕭乃沂、黃東益、陳敦源、呂佳螢（2008）。台灣文官意見調查的挑戰與反思–以「2008年台灣民主治理機制鞏固之研究」為例。載於詹中原、陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂、蔡秀涓主編，台灣政府文官調查（Taiwan Government Bureaucrat Survey）研究文集（一）:方法篇。台北市：國立政治大學公共行政學系。\n\n二、英文部分\nAnderson, L. R., & Mellor, J. M. (2009). Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(2), 137-160.\nAhn, T. (2010). Attitudes toward risk and self-employment of young workers. Labour Economics, 17, 434-442.\nBajtelsmit, V. L., & VanDerhei, J. L. (1997). Risk aversion and pension investment choices. Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century, 45-66.\nBajtelsmit, V. L., Bernasek, A., & Jianakoplos, N. A. (1999). Gender differences in defined contribution pension decisions. Financial Services Review, 8(1), 1-10.\nBajtelsmit, V., & Bernasek, A. (1996). Why do women invest differently than men?. Financial Services Review 8 (1999) 1–10\nBaker, H. K., & Haslem, J. A. (1974). Toward the Development of Client‐Specified Valuation Models. The Journal of Finance, 29(4), 1255-1263.\nBass, E. B., Steinberg, E. P., Pitt, H. A., Griffiths, R. I., Lillemoe, K. D., Saba, G. P., & Johns, C. (1994). Comparison of the rating scale and the standard gamble in measuring patient preferences for outcomes of gallstone disease. Medical Decision Making, 14(4), 307-314.\nBellante, D., & Link, A. N. (1981). Are public sector workers more risk averse than private sector workers?. ILR Review, 34(3), 408-412.\nBinswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American journal of agricultural economics, 62(3), 395-407.\nBlume, A. J. (1978). Interaction of ligands with the opiate receptors of brain membranes: regulation by ions and nucleotides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 75(4), 1713-1717.\nBrockhaus Sr, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of management Journal, 23(3), 509-520.\nCampbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Handbook of research on teaching, 171-246.\nCohn, R. A., Lewellen, W. G., Lease, R. C., & Schlarbaum, G. G. (1975). Individual investor risk aversion and investment portfolio composition. The Journal of Finance, 30(2), 605-620.\nColler, M., & Williams, M. B. (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics, 2(2), 107-127.\nCronbach, L. J. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements. Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles, 1-33.\nCronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16(2), 137-163.\nDaughters, S. B., Lejuez, C. W., Bornovalova, M. A., Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2005). Distress tolerance as a predictor of early treatment dropout in a residential substance abuse treatment facility. Journal of abnormal psychology, 114(4), 729-826.\nDawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International journal of market research, 50(1), 61-104.\nDong, H. K. D. (2015). Th effects of individual risk propensity on volunteering. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 26(1), 5-18.\nDong, H. K. D. (2017). Individual Risk Preference and Sector Choice: Are Risk-Averse Individuals More Likely to Choose Careers in the Public Sector? Administration & Society, 49(8), 1121-1142.\nDreber, A., Von Essen, E., & Ranehill, E. (2011). Outrunning the gender gap—boys and girls compete equally. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 567-582.\nEysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: Their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological reports, 43(3_suppl), 1247-1255.\nGardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. Developmental psychology, 41(4), 625-635.\nGilliam, J., Chatterjee, S., & Grable, J. (2010). Measuring the perception of financial risk tolerance: A tale of two measures. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning 21(2),30-43.\nGollier, C., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2002). Horizon length and portfolio risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(3), 195-212.\nGrable, J. E. (2000). Financial risk tolerance and additional factors that affect risk taking in everyday money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(4), 625-630.\nGrable, J. E., & Joo, S. H. (1997). Determinants of risk preference: Implications for family and consumer science professionals. Family Economics and Resource Management Biennial, 2, 19-24.\nGrable, J. E., & Joo, S. H. (2000). A cross-disciplinary examination of financial risk tolerance. Consumer Interests Annual, 46, 151-157.\nGrable, J. E., & Rabbani, A. (2014). Risk tolerance across life domains: Evidence from a sample of older adults. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 25(2), 174-183.\nGrable, J., & Lytton, R. H. (1999). Financial risk tolerance revisited: the development of a risk assessment instrument. Financial services review, 8(3), 163-181.\nGullone, E., & Moore, S. (2000). Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of adolescence, 23(4), 393-408.\nHaliassos, M., & Bertaut, C. C. (1995). Why do so few hold stocks?. the economic Journal, 1110-1129.\nHallahan, T. A., Faff, R. W., & McKenzie, M. D. (2004). An empirical investigation of personal financial risk tolerance. financial services review-greenwich-, 13(1), 57-78.\nHanna, S. D., & Lindamood, S. (2004). An improved measure of risk aversion. Financial Counseling and Planning Volume 15 (2),27-45.\nHanna, S., & Chen, P. (1997). Subjective and objective risk tolerance: Implications for optimal portfolios. Financial Counseling and Planning, Volume 8(2),17-26.\nHanna, S., Gutter, M., & Fan, J. (1998). A theory based measure of risk tolerance. Proceedings of the Academy of Financial Services, 15, 10-21.\nHariharan, G., Chapman, K. S., & Domian, D. L. (2000). Risk tolerance and asset allocation for investors nearing retirement. Financial Services Review, 9(2), 159-170.\nHsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross‐national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 165-179.\nHunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., ... & Oates, J. A. (2009). 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(15), 1-90.\nIsaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences. Edits publishers.\nJackson, D. N., Hourany, L., & Vidmar, N. J. (1972). A four‐dimensional interpretation of risk taking . Journal of personality, 40(3), 483-501.\nJianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse?. Economic inquiry, 36(4), 620-630.\nLejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., ... & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(2), 75-84.\nMacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1990). Characteristics of risk taking executives. Management science, 36(4), 422-435.\nMcInish, T. H. (1982). Individual investors and risk-taking. Journal of economic psychology, 2(2), 125-136.\nMeier, K. J., & O`Toole Jr, L. J. (2009). The proverbs of new public management: Lessons from an evidence-based research agenda. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 4-22.\nMerton, R. C. (1969). Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. The review of Economics and Statistics, 247-257.\nMorin, R. A., & Suarez, A. F. (1983). Risk aversion revisited. The Journal of Finance, 38(4), 1201-1216.\nPålsson, A. M. (1996). Does the degree of relative risk aversion vary with household characteristics?. Journal of economic psychology, 17(6), 771-787.\nPowell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997). Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. Journal of economic psychology, 18(6), 605-628.\nRiley Jr, W. B., & Chow, K. V. (1992). Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(6), 32-37.\nRoberts, R. G., & Roszkowski, L. (1993). Implications for minimal supersymmetry from grand unification and the neutralino relic abundance. Physics Letters B, 309(3-4), 329-336.\nSchooley, D. K., & Worden, D. (1996). Risk aversion measures: Comparing attitudes and asset allocation. Financial Services Review,5(2),87-99.\nSunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 207-211.\nSung, J., & Hanna, S. (1996). Factors related to risk tolerance. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 7, 11-19\nTversky, A., Slovic, P., & Kahneman, D. (1990). The causes of preference reversal. The American Economic Review, 204-217.\nWallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1961). Aspects of judgment and decision making: Interrelationships and changes with age. Behavioral science, 6(1), 23-36.\nWatson, J., & McNaughton, M. (2007). Gender differences in risk aversion and expected retirement benefits. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(4), 52-62. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.PA.008.2019.F09 | en_US |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038401.pdf | 806.09 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.