Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125499
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor溫偉任zh_TW
dc.contributor.author張芸睿zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChang, Yun-Juien_US
dc.creator張芸睿zh_TW
dc.creatorChang, Yun-Juien_US
dc.date2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T07:38:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-05T07:38:59Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-05T07:38:59Z-
dc.identifierG0106351009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125499-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description國際經營與貿易學系zh_TW
dc.description106351009zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文以台灣售電業現況為發想,建構一垂直產品差異之模型 。分析售電業 市場中,有一家使用較多再生能源的綠電廠商及傳統火力發為主灰電廠商,兩家會如何決定力品質並討論政府介入管制輸配價格如何影響兩廠商生產之品質決策及社會福利。結果顯示,灰電選擇最低品質的電力;綠廠商品質決策會受選擇成本及輸配費用影響,當選擇品質的成本足夠小時,綠電廠商會自動生產最高力。另外政府介入管制輸配電成本,有助於提升綠品質增加社會福利。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents1 緒論 1\n2 模型設定 5\n2-1 消費者 5\n2-2 廠商 7\n2.2.1 獨佔,售電市場未開放 7\n2.2.2 雙佔,售電市場開放自由競爭 9\n2.2.3 售電市場開放,輸配電費用由政府管制 12\n3 模型結果 14\n4 準線性效用函數下的結果 29\n4.1 消費者 29\n4.2 廠商 30\n5 結論 34\n6 參考文獻 35zh_TW
dc.format.extent1337873 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106351009en_US
dc.subject電業自由化zh_TW
dc.subject輸配電價格管制zh_TW
dc.subject垂直產品差異zh_TW
dc.subject提升社會福利zh_TW
dc.subjectThe electricity liberalizationen_US
dc.subjectDistribution tariff regulationen_US
dc.subjectVertical differentiationen_US
dc.subjectIncreasing social welfareen_US
dc.title提升社會福利的配送價格管制zh_TW
dc.titleIncreasing Social Welfare through Distribution Tariff Regulationen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.referenceAndré, F. J., González, P., & Porteiro, N. (2009).\nStrategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(2), 182-194.doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002\n\nBoccard, N., & Wauthy, X. Y. (2010).\nEnsuring quality provision through capacity regulation under price competition. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10(1).\n\nChoi, C. J. (1992).\nA comment on a model of vertical product differentiation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(2), 229-231. doi:10.2307/2950513\n\nFousekis, P. (2010).\nQuality Choices in a Vertical Structure: National Brands vs Private Labels in Grocery Retailing. Agricultural Economics Review, 11(2), 1-10.\n\nHoltedahl, P., & Joutz, F. L. (2004).\nResidential electricity demand in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 26(2), 201-224.\n\nLambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2012).\nVertical differentiation in a Cournot industry: The Porter hypothesis and beyond. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 374-380. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.03.001\n\nMussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978).\nMonopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic theory, 18(2), 301-317.\n\nShaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1983).\nNatural oligopolies. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 1469-1483.\n\n鍾嘉雯(2017)。\n電業改革第一步:新電業法上路,綠電先行。取自: https://energymagazine.tier.org.tw/Cont.aspx?CatID=&ContID=5zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU201901155en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
100901.pdf1.31 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.