Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125590
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor尚孝純zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShang, Sharien_US
dc.contributor.author史泰磊zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorTaylor John Scobbieen_US
dc.creator史泰磊zh_TW
dc.creatorScobbie, Taylor Johnen_US
dc.date2019en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T07:57:38Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-05T07:57:38Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-05T07:57:38Z-
dc.identifierG0102933037en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125590-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)zh_TW
dc.description102933037zh_TW
dc.description.abstractzh_TW
dc.description.abstractFundraising as a modern startup is hard. Although more funding than ever is flowing into new companies from venture capitalists (VCs), angel investors, and governments, the bar is higher than ever for securing that capital. Modern VC funds are designed with one purpose: creating “unicorns” - companies with $1B USD+ valuations. To be under consideration for VC funding startups must be able to tell a growth story that achieves this kind of valuation within 3-5 years. This represents a vanishingly small subset of all new companies created. 

Fundraising as a social enterprise is another thing altogether. Investors look upon unfamiliar “for-purpose” companies with skepticism - as charities in disguise. Their purposes are viewed as cash consuming cost centers that may adversely affect the ability to scale. With few true venture scale social enterprises existing in the marketplace, social enterprise startups have few peers to point to as success cases. This makes progress in a fundraising context that values doing more of what has worked in the past extremely challenging.

This paper explores the nature of the modern social enterprise - their key features, different types of impact models, and their benefits and drawbacks in the marketplace. Understanding how social enterprises differ from traditional companies is a key component of our ability to craft compelling fundraising stories to traditional equity investors.\n\nOne such story will be examined through a real-world case study: impctcoffee. As founder and CEO of impctcoffee, the author has just successfully closed a new round of funding from leading San Francisco/Bay Area angels and VC investors. This case study will outline impctcoffee’s social enterprise model, actual due dilligence questions from investors, and the answers to those questions that ultimately led to successfully being funded. This will be followed by an extrapolation of the strategy found within those answers to advice for social enterprises who wish to follow this fundraising path.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction 1\n2. The Social Enterprise 2\n2.1. Introduction 2\n2.2. What is a Social Good? 3\n2.3. Necessary Features of a Social Enterprise 4\n2.3.1. Explicitly built to create some social good. 4\n2.3.2. A Positive Feedback Loop Between Impact and Revenue 5\n2.4. Optional Features of a Social Enterprise 5\n2.4.1. Impact be measurable, measured, and in-line with commonly accepted impact outcomes. 6\n2.4.2. Negative externalities be controlled for/minimized. 6\n2.4.3. Legal structure. 7\n2.5. Types of Social Enterprise Impact Models 7\n2.5.1. The product sold creates impact through its use. 7\n2.5.2. The product allows consumers to create impact through their consumption. 8\n2.5.3. The model and/or operations creates the impact. 9\n2.6. Drawbacks and Benefits of the Social Enterprise 10\n2.6.1. Drawbacks 10\n2.6.2. Benefits 12\n3. Case Study: impctcoffee. 15\n3.1. Company Overview 15\n3.2. Real-world Investor Due Dilligence Questions/Answers 16\n3.2.1. Business Model and Product Questions 16\n3.2.2. Expansion/Scale-up Questions 30\n3.2.3. Platform Questions 33\n3.2.4. Company History and Impact Questions 37\n3.2.5. Fundraising Questions 43\n4. Fundraising as a Social Enterprise 45\n4.1. Know your investor, context matters. 45\n4.2. Investors aren’t going to tell you what you’re doing wrong. 45\n4.3. You’re doing everything wrong. 46\n4.4. Investors want to do more of what has made them successful. 47\n4.5. You need local traction and local stamps of approval 47\n4.6. Investors are going to think you’re a charity 49\n5. Conclusion 50\n6. Bibliography 51zh_TW
dc.format.extent3849633 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102933037en_US
dc.subject社會企業zh_TW
dc.subject募資zh_TW
dc.subjectSocial Enterpriseen_US
dc.subjectFundraisingen_US
dc.title社會企業募資實務zh_TW
dc.titleFundraising as a social enterpriseen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.referenceBloomberg.com. (2019). Bloomberg - Are you a robot?. [online] Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-08-15/tyson-s-quest-to-be-your-one-stop-protein-shop [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].\n\nFast Company. (2019). Inside San Francisco’s Deaf Owned And Operated Pizzeria. [online] Available at: https://www.fastcompany.com/3043126/inside-san-franciscos-deaf-owned-and-operated-pizzeria [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].\n\nForbes.com. (2019). A Better Way To `Buy One, Give One`. [online] Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashoka/2014/10/08/a-better-way-to-buy-one-give-one/#2dfce3cb485e [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].\n\nHa‐Brookshire, J. and Norum, P. (2011). Willingness to pay for socially responsible products: case of cotton apparel. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(5), pp.344-353.\n\nInc.com. (2019). Report: 75% of Venture-backed Start-ups Fail. [online] Available at: https://www.inc.com/john-mcdermott/report-3-out-of-4-venture-backed-start-ups-fail.html [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].\n\nLinnane, C. (2019). Beyond Meat goes public with a bang: 5 things to know about the plant-based meat maker. [online] MarketWatch. Available at:\nhttps://www.marketwatch.com/story/beyond-meat-is-going-public-5-things-to-know-about-the-plant-based-meat-maker-2018-11-23 [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].\n\nLondon Business School. (2019). Most millennials will only work for purpose-driven firms | London Business School. [online] Available at:\nhttps://www.london.edu/news-and-events/news/most-millennials-will-only-work-for-purpose-driven-firms-1431 [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].\n\nSustainabledevelopment.un.org. (2019). SDGs .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. [online] Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].\n\nVox. (2019). Warby Parker is valued at $1.75 billion after a pre-IPO investment of $75 million. [online] Available at: https://www.vox.com/2018/3/14/17115230/warby-parker-75-million-funding-t-rowe-price-ipo [Accessed 30 Jun. 2019].zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU201900678en_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
303701.pdf3.76 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.