Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133995| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林日璇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lin, Jih-Hsuan | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 孫珮菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Sun, Pei-Ching | en_US |
| dc.creator | 孫珮菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Sun, Pei-Ching | en_US |
| dc.date | 2020 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-01T06:33:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-01T06:33:54Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-02-01T06:33:54Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0107464030 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133995 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 107464030 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以遊戲研究中的「自然對應（Natural Mapping）」概念以及Deci和Ryan在1985年提出的「自我決定論（Self-determination theory，SDT）」切入，探究在虛擬實境中自然對應對玩家享樂感的影響。\n\n本研究以Skalski等人（2011）提出的遊戲控制器自然對應型態為架構，採用實驗法，以2（玩家類型：玩家vs.非玩家）x 2（自然對應：實際可觸摸自然對應vs. 定向自然對應）的參與者組間設計，透過研究《Nintendo Labo Toy-Con 04: VR Kit》沉浸式遊戲組，探討不同自然對應組別與不同玩家類型對於享樂感的影響。此外，加入空間臨場感與「自我決定論」中的自主性和勝任感需求滿足作為中介變項，進而探究空間臨場感與內在需求滿足，如何影響不同自然對應類型與不同玩家類型對於享樂感的影響。\n\n研究結果顯示：在虛擬實境環境中，實際可觸摸自然對應形式控制器的自然對應程度最高，並證實Tamborini等人（2010）之論述，具有較好自然對應的控制器，會產生更高程度的自主性與勝任感需求滿足，進而預測享樂感。此外也驗證Skalski等人（2011）提出，遊戲控制器的自然對應可以創造空間臨場感進而影響享樂感之觀點。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次\n\n第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景 1\n第二節 研究動機與目的 3\n\n第二章 文獻探討 5\n第一節 虛擬實境 5\n一、虛擬實境定義 5\n二、虛擬實境特質 5\n三、商業虛擬實境裝置 6\n四、Cardboard 8\n第二節 自然對應 11\n一、自然對應與心智模型 11\n二、自然對應形式 12\n第三節 臨場感 15\n一、臨場感 15\n二、空間臨場感與自然對應 16\n第四節 自我決定論 18\n一、自我決定論 18\n二、自然對應、空間臨場感、內在需求與享樂感之間關係 22\n第五節 玩家類型：玩家與非玩家 24\n第六節 玩家類型與內在需求的調節中介模型 26\n第七節 玩家類型與空間臨場感調節中介模型 27\n\n第三章 研究方法 28\n第一節 研究架構與假設 28\n一、概念架構 28\n二、研究假設 29\n第二節 實驗設計 31\n一、實驗設計 31\n二、實驗刺激物 32\n三、研究對象 35\n四、認知訪談 35\n五、實驗流程 36\n第三節 變項測量 38\n一、自變項 38\n二、中介變項 39\n三、調節變項 43\n四、依變項 44\n五、控制變項 45\n\n第四章 研究結果與分析 46\n第一節 實驗受試者樣本分佈 46\n第二節 量表信度檢測 48\n第三節 操弄檢定 49\n第四節 假設檢定 50\n一、假設一驗證 51\n二、假設二驗證 52\n三、假設三驗證 54\n四、假設四驗證 55\n五、假設五驗證 55\n六、假設六驗證 56\n七、假設七驗證 57\n八、假設八驗證 57\n九、假設九驗證 58\n十、假設十驗證 62\n十一、假設檢定小結 65\n\n第五章 研究結論與建議 67\n第一節 研究發現與討論 67\n一、操弄檢定 67\n二、自然對應、空間臨場感、內在需求滿足與享樂感之間關係 69\n三、玩家類型對於空間臨場感、內在需求滿足的調節效果 70\n四、玩家類型與內在需求之調節中介效果 72\n五、玩家類型與空間臨場感調節中介效果 72\n第二節 研究貢獻 73\n一、學術貢獻 73\n二、實務貢獻 75\n第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 76\n一、研究限制 76\n二、未來建議 77\n\n參考文獻 78\n附錄 87 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 5945014 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464030 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 虛擬實境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自然對應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 空間臨場感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自我決定論 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | 以自我決定理論探討VR遊戲中自然對應與玩家類型對享樂感的影響— 以《NINTENDO LABO TOY-CON 04:VR KIT》為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effect of Natural Mapping and Player Types on Enjoyment in a VR Game. | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 一、中文部分\n〈IHS 估全球 VR 產值，2020 年上看 112 億美元〉（2016年10月11日）。取自Tech News https://technews.tw/2016/10/11/ihs-vr-2020/\n〈Nintendo Switch 也可以玩VR，Labo Toy-Con VR Kit 4/12開賣〉（2019年3月7日）。取自SAYDIGI TECH https://saydigi-tech.com/ 2019/03/2189.html\n〈VR業2016年總產值27億美元，谷歌Cardboard出貨量排第一〉（2016年12月22日）。取自每日頭條 https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/tech/zmjlbzq.html\n〈任天堂的紙板Switch套件LABO，有什麼稀奇的？〉（2016年12月22日）。取自每日頭條 https://kknews.cc/zh-tw/tech/zmjlbzq.html\n〈《任天堂實驗室VR套裝》釋出詳細介紹影片 以簡單手作體驗玩心十足的VR虛擬實境樂趣〉（2019年03月22日）。取自巴哈姆特https://gnn.gamer.com.tw/detail.php?sn=177031\n〈淺談遊戲分類，帶你了解六大主流的遊戲類型〉（2018年1月22日）。取自數位時代 https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/47889/switch-nintendo-labo-game\n〈最新一代互動式操作裝置：Kinect〉（2010年12月23日）。取自Heresy`s Space https://kheresy.wordpress.com/2010/12/23/kinect/\n才華實驗室（2016）。《VR來了！第一本虛擬實境專書》。台北市：寫樂文化。\n洪仲威、李峻德（2017）。《遊戲化感知、運動動機、運動自我效能之關聯\n性研究》。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文，1-126。\n徐兆吉、馬君、何仲、劉曉宇（2017）。《電腦、網路、手機之後？虛擬實境：新世代運算平台》。台北市：佳魁資訊。\n陳其昌，謝文娟（2008）。〈國中生體育課動機量表的編製與測量〉。《休閒運動期刊》，7：97-108 。\n陳俞帆（2017）。《身歷其境：虛擬實境360度影片中自然對應程度的廣告效\n果 —以空間臨場感及娛樂感為中介》。國立政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學\n位程碩士論文。\n蔡佳蒓（2019）。《合作好嗎？從自我決定論探討在《OVERCOOKED》合作模擬遊戲中目標結構與玩家類型對享樂感與未來合作意願的影響》。國立政治大學傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文。\n顏志龍、鄭中平（2015）。《給論文寫作者的統計指南：傻瓜也會跑統計》。\n台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。\n顏志龍、鄭中平（2020）。《給論文寫作者的統計指南：傻瓜也會跑統計II》。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。\n蘇蘅（2019）。《傳播研究方法新論》。台北市：雙葉書廊有限公司。\n\n二、英文部分\nAdie, J. W., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). Autonomy support, basic need. satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 189–199. doi:10.1007/s11031-008-9095-\nAnnetta, L. A., & Holmes, S. (2006). Creating presence and community in asynchronous virtual learning environment using avatars. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3, 27-43.\nBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive. theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc\nBiocca, F. (1992) Virtual reality technology: A tutorial. Journal of Communication. 42(4): 23–72.\nBiocca, F. (1997). The cyborg`s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual. environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved May 29, 2004, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html\nBonanno, P., & Kommers, P. (2008). Exploring the influence of gender and gaming. competence on attitudes towards using instructional games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 97-109.\nBowman, N. D., Pietschmann, D., & Liebold, B. (2017). The golden (hands) rule: Exploring user experiences with gamepad and natural-user interfaces in popular video games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual World, 9, 71-85.\nBranstetter, G. (2015, June 28). Cardboard is everything Google Glass never was. THE KERNEL. Retrieved from https://kernelmag.dailydot.com/issue-sections/staff-editorials/13490/google-cardboard-review-plus/\nBraun, B., Stopfer, J. M., Müller, K. W., Beutel, M. E., & Egloff, B. (2016). Personality and video gaming: Comparing regular gamers, non-gamers, and gaming addicts and differentiating between game genres. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 406-412.\nBurdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (1994). Virtual Reality technology. London: Wiley-Interscience.\nClark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 00346543053004445\nCoates, G. (1992). Program from Invisible site-a virtual sho, a multimedia. performance work presented by George` Coates Performance Works. San Francisco, CA.\nDeci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.\nDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An. organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33.\nDeci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of. experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627\nDeci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human. Behavior (Vol. 3).\nDede, C. (2005). Planning for “neomillennial” learning styles: Implications for in- vestments in technology and faculty. Retrieved from: In Citeseer http:// citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary? doi1⁄410.1.1.119.9896.\nEmmons, M. (2003, June). Cutting-edge video games have a place in race-day. preparation. The San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved May 1, 2004, from http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/6144871.htm?1c\nFeng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender.\ndifferences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18(10), 850-855. http://.\ndx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990. x.\nGibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.\nGlenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 1–55.\nGreenbaum, P. (1992, March). The lawnrnower man. Film and video,9(3), 58-62.\nGriffiths, M. (2002). The educational benefits of videogames. Education and Health,\n20(3), 47-51.\nHamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015a). Why do people use gamification services? International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.006\nHamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? —A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Paper presented at the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.\nHayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publication.\nHeeter, C., Lee, Y.-H., Magerko, B., Medler, B. J. I. J. o. G., & Simulations, C.-M. (2011). Impacts of forced serious game play on vulnerable subgroups. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 3(3), 34- 53.\nISPR (2001). What is Presence? [Online]. Available: http://www.temple.edu/mmc/ispr/ explicat.htm[9.10.2002].\nJonnalagadda, H. (2017, Mar1). Google has shipped 10 million Cardboard VR. headsets since 2014. androidcentral. Retrieved from https://www.androidcentral.com/google-has-shipped-10-million-cardboard-vr-headsets-2014\nJuul, J. (2009). Fear of failing? The many meanings of difficulty in video games. In: Wolf MJP, Perron B, eds. Video Game Theory Reader 2. New York: Routledge; 2009, pp. 237–252.\nJuul, J. (2013). The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2013.\nKivikangas, J.M., & Ravaja, N. (2013). Emotional responses to victory and defeat as a function of opponent. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 2013, 4,173–182.\nKlimmt, C., & Vorderer, P. (2003). Media psychology " is not yet there": Introducing theories on media entertainment to the prsence debate. Presence: Teleprerators and Virtual Environments, 12(4), 346-359.\nKowal, M., Toth, A. J., Exton, C., & Campbell, M. J. (2018). Different cognitive. abilities displayed by action video gamers and non-gamers. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 255-262.\nLee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27-50.\nLjsselsteijn, W. A., de Ridder, H., Freeman, J., & Avons, S. E. (2000). Presence: Concept, determinants, and measurement. Procedings of the SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging V, 3959-3976.\nLombard, M., & Ditton, T. B. (2000). Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to. the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. Paper presented at 3rd Presence Workshop, Delft, March 27–28.\nLyons, E. J. (2015). Cultivating engagement and enjoyment in exergames using feedback, challenge, and rewards. Games for Health Journal, 4(1), 12-18. http://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0072.\nMcAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric Properties of the. Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a Competitive Sport Setting: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48-58.\nMcGloin, R., Farrar, K. M., & Krcmar, M. (2011). The impact of controller. naturalness on spatial presence, gamer enjoyment, and perceived realism in a tennis simulation video game. Presence: Teleperators and virtual environments, 20(4), 309-324.\nMitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning. A Review of the Literature. Retrieved from: http://soma-project. googlecode.com/svn-history/r252/Documents/game_based_learning/_ VideoGamesforLearning.pdf.\nNorman, D. (1986). Cognitive engineering. In Norman, D.A., & Draper, S.W.(Eds.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human–Computer Interaction(pp.31-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.\nNorman, D. A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.\nPeng, W., Lin, J.-H., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Winn, B. (2012). Need Satisfaction Supportive Game Features as Motivational Determinants: An Experimental Study of a Self-Determination Theory Guided Exergame. Media Psychology, 15(2), 175-196.\nPierce, D. (2015, May 28). Google Cardboard Is VR`s Gateway Drug. WIRED. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2015/05/try-google-cardboard/\nPrzybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154-166.\nRavaja, N., Saari, T., & Salminen, M. (2006). Phasic emotional reactions to video game events: A psychophysiological investigation. Media Psychol 2006, 8, 343–367.\nReeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the Competitive Situation that Affect Intrinsic Motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(1), 24-33.\nReeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.\nRogers, R., Bowman, N. D., & Oliver, M. B. (2015). It’s not the model that doesn’t fit, it’s the controller! The role of cognitive skills in understanding the links between natural mapping, performance, and enjoyment of console video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 588–596. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.027\nRoskos-Ewoldsen, D.R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Dillman., & Carpentier, F.R. (2009). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In Bryant, J.B., & Oliver, M.B. (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (pp74–93). New York: Routledge.\nRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological inquiry, 11(4),319-338.\nRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic. Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.\nRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000c). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.\nRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141–166.\nRyan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., Przybylski, A. J. M., & Emotion. (2006). The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and. Emotion, 30(4), 344-360.\nSchmierbach, M., Xu, Q., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Dardis, F. E. (2012). Electronic Friend or Virtual Foe: Exploring the Role of Competitive and Cooperative Multiplayer Video Game Modes in Fostering Enjoyment. Media Psychology, 15(3), 356-371.\nSeligman, M. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.\nSkalski, P., Lange, R., & Tamborini, R. (2006). Mapping the way to fun: The effect of video game interface on presence and enjoyment. Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Presence. Cleveland, OH: Cleveland State University.\nSkalski, P., Tamborini, R., & Westerman, D. (2002, November). Script development. through virtual worlds. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.\nSkalski, P., Tamborini, R., Shelton, A., Buncher, M., & Lindmark, P. (2011). Mapping the road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. New Media & Society, 13(2), 224-242.\nStatt, N. (2014, June 25). Facebook has Oculus, Google has Cardboard. Cnet. Retrieved from https://www.cnet.com/news/facebook-has-oculus-google-has-cardboard/\nSteuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.\nTamborini, R., & Bowman, N. (2010). Presence in video games. In Bracken, C.C., & Skalski, P.D. (Eds), Immersed in Media: Telepresence in Everyday Life (pp. 87–109). New York: Routledge.\nTamborini, R., & Skalski, P. (2006). The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. In Vorderer, P., & Bryant, J. (Eds.), Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences (pp.225-240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.\nTamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of. Communication, 60, 758-777. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010. 01513.x\nTamborini, R., Eastin, M., Skalski, P., Lachian, K., Fediuk, T., & Brady, R., (2004). Violent virtual video games and hostile thoughts. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3).\nTauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2004). The Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 849-861.\nVergara, D., Rubio, M., & Lorenzo, M. (2017). On the Design of Virtual Reality. Learning Environment in Engineering. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 1(2), 11.\nVorderer, P., Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2003). Explaining the enjoyment of. playing video games: the role of competition. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the second international conference on Entertainment computing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.\nVorderer, P., Wirth, W., Gouveia, F. R., Biocca, F., Saari, T., Jancke, F., …Hartmann, T. (2004). MEC spatial presence questionnaire (MEC-SPQ): Short. documentation and instructions for application. Report to the European Community, Project Presence: MEC (IST-2001-37661), 3.\nWarden, C. A., Stanworth, J. O., Ren, J. B., & Warden, A. R. (2013). Synchronous learning best practices: An action research study. Computers & Education, 197-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.010. April.\nWebster, A. (2019, Apr 11). NINTENDO LABO VR KIT REVIEW: A PLAYFUL, BITE-SIZED VIRTUAL REALITY ARCADE. Verge. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/11/18304954/nintendo-labo-vr-kit-review-switch-virtual-reality\nWirth, W., Hartmann, T., Boecking, S., Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., Schramm, …Gouveia, F. (2007). A process model of the formation of spatial presence experiences. Media. Psychology, 9(3), 493–525.\nWu, D. -Y., & Lin, J. -H. (2018). Ways of Seeing Matter: The Impact of a Naturally. Mapped Perceptual System on the Persuasive Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality Advertising. Communication Research Reports, 35(5), 434-444. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6814/NCCU202100145 | en_US |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.grantfulltext | embargo_20260126 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 403001.pdf | 5.81 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.