Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146858
題名: 台灣統計生命價值之經濟計量方法與實證研究
Econometric methods and empirical research on the value of statistical life in Taiwan
作者: 林昆良
Lin, Kuen-Liang
貢獻者: 張興華
Chang, Hsing-Hua
林昆良
Lin, Kuen-Liang
關鍵詞: 統計生命價值
特徵工資模型
value of statistical life
hedonic wage model
日期: 2023
上傳時間: 1-Sep-2023
摘要: 本文利用特徵工資模型 (Hedonic Wage Model),估計台灣勞工統計生命價值 (Value of Statistical Life, VSL)。研究期間為2013年至2021年,資料來源為中央研究院學術調查研究資料庫(Survey Research Data Archive, Academia, SRDA) 之人力運用調查資料。實證結果顯示,台灣勞工統計生命價值 (VSL) 之平均估計值為2,120萬美元。特徵工資模型風險變數之估計係數,在各年度均呈現高度顯著性。本文建立一個新的特徵工資模型,提供一個較為穩健的統計生命價值(VSL)估計值。改善傳統特徵工資模型之跨年度資料分析,其VSL估計值變異數過大之問題。進一步分析,以各年度之平均值而言,台灣女性勞工之統計生命價值(VSL)為2,700萬美元,高於男性勞工之VSL估計值1,370萬美元。 本文之實證結果,有助於政府當局進行降低職業工作風險、改善公共衛生和安全政策計畫之經濟成本效益評估。
This study employs the Hedonic Wage Model to estimate the Value of Statistical Life (VSL) for the laborers in Taiwan. The research period spans from 2013 to 2021, utilizing ‘The manpower utilization survey’ from the Survey Research Data Archive (SRDA), which is affiliated with the Academia Sinica. The empirical findings reveal an average estimated value of US$ 21.2 million for the VSL in Taiwan. The coefficients of the risk variables in the Hedonic Wage Model exhibit a high level of statistical significance across all years. This paper establishes a ‘New’ Hedonic Wage Model that provides a more robust estimation of the Value of Statistical Life (VSL). It addresses the issue of excessive variance in VSL estimates resulting from cross-year data analysis by using the traditional hedonic wage method. Further analysis indicates that, on average, the VSL for female laborers in Taiwan is estimated at US$ 27 million, surpassing the estimated VSL of US$ 13.7 million for male laborers. The empirical results presented in this paper offer valuable insights for government authorities in conducting economic cost-benefit assessments for occupational risk reduction and enhancing public health and safety policy initiatives.
參考文獻: Journal\n\nAldy, J. E., & Viscusi, W. K. (2008). Adjusting the value of a statistical life for age and cohort effects. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 573-581.\nBanzhaf, H. S. (2022). The value of statistical life: A meta-analysis of meta-analyses. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 13(2), 182-197.\nBowland, B. J., & Beghin, J. C. (2001). Robust estimates of value of a statistical life for developing economies. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(4), 385-396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-8938(01)00072-2\nEvans, M. F., & Schaur, G. (2010). A quantile estimation approach to identify income and age variation in the value of a statistical life. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(3), 260-270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.11.004\nLiou, J. L. J. (2019). Effect of income heterogeneity on valuation of mortality risk in Taiwan: An application of unconditional quantile regression method. International Journal of Environmental Research Public Health, 16(9), 1620.\nLiu, J. T., Hammitt, J. K., & Liu, J. L. J. (1997). Estimated hedonic wage function and value of life in a developing country. Economics Letters, 57(3), 353-358.\nLiu, J. T., Hammitt, J. K., Wang, J. D., & Tsou, M. W. (2005). Valuation of the risk of SARS in Taiwan. Health Economics, 14(1), 83-91.\nMajumder, A., & Madheswaran, S. (2017). Meta-analysis of value of statistical life estimates. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 6(1), 110-120.\nPersson, U., Norinder, A., Hjalte, K., & Gralén, K. (2001). The value of a statistical life in transport: findings from a new contingent valuation study in Sweden. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 121-134.\nViscusi, W. K. (2018). Best estimate selection bias in the value of a statistical life. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 9(2), 205-246.\nViscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1), 5-76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025598106257\n\nBook\n\nASCC. (2008). The health of nations: the value of statistical life. Australian Safety and Compensation Council.\nChestnut, L. G., & De Civita, P. (2009). Economic valuation of mortality risk reduction: Review and recommendations for policy and regulatory analysis. Policy Research Initiative, Canada.\n\nReport\n\nEuropean Commission DG Environment (2001). Recommended interim values for the value of preventing a fatality in DG Environment cost benefit analysis. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/others/pdf/recommended_interim_values.pdf.\nSinoPac. (2022). Sustainability Report. SinoPac Financial Holdings Company Limited.\nTSMC. (2022). Environmental Profit and Loss, EP&L. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.\nUS Environmental Protection Agency, EPA. (2020). Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Review Copy Prepared for EPA’s Science Advisory Board’s Economic Guidelines Review Panel.
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
金融學系
103352503
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103352503
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
250301.pdf1.44 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.