Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147255| 題名: | 資訊科技融入英語課程教學對國小英語低成就學生之學習動機與學習成效之影響 A Study of Information Technology Integrated into English Teaching and Learning for Elementary School Underachievers in English |
作者: | 凃宛妤 Tu, Wan-Yu |
貢獻者: | 李沛錞 Lee, Pei-Chun 凃宛妤 Tu, Wan-Yu |
關鍵詞: | 資訊科技融入英語教學 低成就學生 學習動機 學習成效 Information Technology Integrated into English Instruction Underachievers Learning Motivation Learning Effectiveness |
日期: | 2023 | 上傳時間: | 1-Sep-2023 | 摘要: | 本研究之目的為探討資訊科技融入英語課程教學，對於國小英語低成就學生之影響，包含學習動機與學習成效。運用資訊科技融入英語課程教學，本研究使用三種資訊科技融入英語課程之教學資源，以六位國小六年級英語低成就學生為研究對象，實施為期三週之教學，並進行以英語學習動機與學習成效為主軸之前、後測。\n\n本研究主要採用問卷調查法，輔以深度訪談法進行質性資料的蒐集與分析，以探討研究對象在經歷資訊科技融入英語課程教學之後，其學習動機、學習成效之改變，了解學生真實的感受與認知，進而提出研究結果。\n\n研究發現，資訊科技融入英語課程教學能提升國小英語低成就學生之學習動機與學習成效，而學生對於資訊科技融入英語課程教學的感受與想法多為正向。本研究旨於填補相關研究缺口，並根據本研究結論、研究實施經歷及發現，提出對英語教學工作者實施資訊科技融入英語課程教學與未來進行相關研究者之建議，期望為教育實踐提供有益之啟示。 The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of integrating information technology into English teaching and learning for elementary school underachievers in English, including their learning motivation and learning effectiveness. Three different information technology-integrated teaching resources were utilized in the English teaching and learning, and the study was conducted with six sixth-grade elementary school underachievers in English. The intervention lasted for three weeks, during which pre and post-tests focusing on English learning motivation and learning effectiveness were administered.\n\nThis study primarily adopts a questionnaire survey method, supplemented by in-depth interviews for qualitative data collection and analysis. The aim is to explore the changes in learning motivation and learning effectiveness of the research subjects after experiencing information technology-integrated English teaching and learning. Through this approach, the study seeks to understand the students` genuine feelings and perceptions, and subsequently present research findings.\n\nResearch findings indicate that the integration of information technology into English teaching and learning can enhance the learning motivation and learning effectiveness of elementary school underachievers in English. Moreover, students generally exhibit a positive attitude towards the integration of information technology into English teaching and learning. This study aims to bridge the gap in existing research and, based on the conclusions, implementation experiences, and discoveries from this research, propose recommendations for English educators to implement the integration of information technology into English language instruction. Furthermore, suggestions are provided for future researchers in this field, with the ultimate goal of providing valuable insights for educational practices. |
參考文獻: | 中文文獻：\n于第 (2006)。英語教師運用圖書館電子資源提升學生學習成效之探討。北區技專校院與高中職策略聯盟英語課程研討會論文集。85-95。 https://doi.org/10.29544/BGYY.200612.0085\n王如哲 (2010)。解析「學生學習成效」。評鑑雙月刊，27，62-62。 https://doi.org/10.6445/eb.201009.0062\n王惠君 (2006)。網路問卷調查服務系統之研究〔碩士論文，中國文化大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/mra7rk\n王嬿惠、羅承浤、鮑惟豪、謝秉叡 (2011)。數位動態與靜態影像之輔助學習成效比較－以英語學習為例。工程科技與教育學刊，8(3)，343-350。https://doi.org/10.6451/jete.201109.0343\n文崇一 (2001)。調查訪問法。楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園（主編），社會及行為科學研究法下冊。臺北：東華。\n江英勉 (2016)。情境教學對國小四年級學童英語學習動機和英語學習成就影響之研究〔碩士論文，國立臺中教育大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wryz85\n吳靜怡、林彩岫 (2022)。國小資訊科技雙語教學面臨問題與對策。臺灣教育評論月刊，11(12)，92-98。\n宋曜廷、侯惠澤、張國恩 (2005)。資訊科技融入教學: 借鏡美國經驗，反思台灣發展。教育研究集刊，51(1)，31-62。\n李佳琪、洪智倫 (2019)。Cool English平臺教材融入教學對國小四年級學生英語聽讀學習成效與學習動機影響之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，12(1)，163-205。https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492019041201007\n李勇輝 (2017)。學習動機、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究－以數位學習為例。經營管理學刊，14，68-86。\n李珮瑜、連采宜 (2014)。資訊科技融入教學的契機及再思。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(7)，13-16。\n李詠吟 (2001)。學習心理學的應用。台北：心理。\n周映汝 (2015)。探討採用傳統紙筆測驗與Kahoot網路平台測驗對學生的英語閱讀理解表現與態度之影響-以學生命題為基礎〔碩士論文，國立虎尾科技大學〕。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zz6a4m\n周家賢、佘永吉 (2016)。字母拼讀法結合平板電腦對國中學習障礙學生學習英語字彙之成效。特殊教育季刊，140，1-10。https://doi.org/10.6217/seq.2016.140.1-10\n施宥廷 (2016)。英語學習動機與學習困擾: 理論的觀點。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(7)，111-128。\n袁媛、許錦芳 (2007)。資訊融入教學對國中資源班數學低成就學生學習影響之個案研究。教育科學期刊，7(1)，36-57。https://doi.org/10.6388/jes.200706.0036\n張安緹、陳鴻仁 (2018)。即時適性英語字彙遊戲學習系統教學之學習成效與學習動機分析。數位學習科技期刊，10(4)，31-58。https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260x2018101004002\n張春興 (2007)。教育心理學——三化取向的理論與實踐（第二版）。台北：東華。\n張雅芳、朱鎮宇、徐加玲 (2007)。國小教師資訊科技融入教學現況之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，44(4)，413-434。\n教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。教育部。\n教育部 (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域-英語文。教育部。\n郭生玉 (1973)。國中低成就學生心理特質之分析研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，15，451-534。\n郭為藩 (2007)。特殊兒童心理與教育(第五版)。台北：文景。\n陳建銘 (2008)。外師英語教學對國小高年級學童課堂學習歷程影響之研究—以一所臺北市的公立國民小學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，1(1)，51-72。\n陳純音 (2021)。推動雙語國家政策於公務人員訓練之英語力培訓策略。國立臺灣師範大學。\n陳萩紋、廖遠光 (2017)。應用教育 APP 輔助國中生數學閱讀理解之教學歷程與成效。中等教育，68(3)，34-52。\n陳劍涵 (2016)。翻轉的國中英語教室：App 融入教學之研究。Journal of Computer Science and Educational Technology，6(1)，27-37。\n陳鴻仁、林彣珊、張雅雯 (2022)。運用認知風格探討虛擬實境適性英語字彙教學學習成效與學習動機。數位學習科技期刊，14(1)，31-53。\n黃芷琪 (2021)。國小英語學習扶助之問題與改進策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，10(2)，158-164。\n萬文隆 (2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊，37(4)，17-23。\n楊秀停、王國華 (2007)。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊，15(4)，439-459。https://doi.org/10.6173/cjse.2007.1504.05\n楊定瑜、劉貞妤、劉玉涵、郭屹恩、蔡宜庭 (2017)。大型英語教學網站設計及使用者偏好分析。數位學習科技期刊，9(4)，81-107。\n臺北市政府教育局 (2022)。臺北市雙語教育白皮書 建置校園雙語環境、培養跨語學習力。臺北市政府教育局。\n劉世雄 (2002)。探討資訊科技融入教學之課程設計。生活科技教育，35(6)，24-31。https://doi.org/10.6232/lte.2002.35(6).5\n劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志、吳有城 (2010)。「國中小學習動機量表」之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊，57(3)，371-402。https://doi.org/10.7108/pt.201009.0371\n黎瓊麗、莊筱玉、傅敏芳 (2006)。國小學童英語學習動機量表之編製。高應科大人文社會科學學報，3，141-167。 https://doi.org/10.29888/kuasjhss.200607.0007\n顏龍源 (2000)。主題化的電腦融入課程概念。資訊與教育雜誌，80，32-40。\n\n英文文獻：\nAlizadeh, M. (2016). The impact of motivation on English language learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 11-15.\nAltun, M. (2015). The integration of technology into foreign language teaching. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(1), 29-34.\nBrown, H. D. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (6 ed.). Pearson Education.\nBueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Nemeth, K. (2022). Quizlet and podcasts: effects on vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1407-1436.\nChakrabarty, A. K., & Saha, B. (2014). Low achievers at elementary stages of EFL learning: The problems and possible ways-out. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(3), 160-165.\nChiang, H.-H. (2020). Kahoot! in an EFL reading class. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(1), 33-44.\nChristensen, R. R. (1997). Effect of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and their students. University of North Texas.\nÇil, E. (2021). The effect of using Wordwall. net in increasing vocabulary knowledge of 5th Grade EFL students. Language Education and Technology, 1(1), 21-28.\nDelacruz, S. (2014). Using Nearpod in elementary guided reading groups. TechTrends, 58, 62-69.\nDollah, S., Sehuddin, M., & Sakkir, G. (2021). Motivating EFL Learners to Write Using Padlet Application. ELT Worldwide, 8(2), 240-254.\nDrigas, A., & Charami, F. (2014). ICTs in English learning and teaching. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 2(4), 4-10.\nDuncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational psychologist, 40(2), 117-128.\nEl-Sofany, H., & El-Haggar, N. (2020). The effectiveness of using mobile learning techniques to improve learning outcomes in higher education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(8), 4-18.\nErkaboyeva, S. (2023). MOTIVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING. Proceedings of International Conference on Educational Discoveries and Humanities, 2(4), 137-138.\nEsra, M., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22.\nFuchs, B. (2014). The writing is on the wall: using Padlet for whole-class engagement. Loex Quarterly, 40(4), 4.\nGardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Newbury House Publishers.\nGunuç, S., & Babacan, N. (2018). Technology integration in English language teaching and learning. Positioning English for Specific Purposes in an English Language Teaching Context, 1.\nHadaya, A., & Hanif, M. (2019). The Impact of Using the Interactive E-Book on Students` Learning Outcomes. International journal of instruction, 12(2), 709-722.\nHapsari, A. S., & Hanif, M. (2019). Motion graphic animation videos to improve the learning outcomes of elementary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1245-1255.\nIlter, B. G. (2009). Effect of technology on motivation in EFL classrooms. Turkish online journal of distance education, 10(4), 136-158.\nJiang, M.-L., & Liou, H.-C. (2022). Mobile Assisted Academic Vocabulary Learning. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 19(2), 1-28.\nJohns, K. (2015). Engaging and assessing students with technology: a review of Kahoot! Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(4), 89.\nKawinkoonlasate, P. (2019). Technology integration and English language instruction for education. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 3(2), 203-213.\nLicorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 1-23.\nLin, H.-M., Chen, W.-J., & Nien, S.-F. (2014). The Study of Achievement and Motivation by e-Learning–A Case Study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(5), 421-425. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2014.V4.442\nLin, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of Quizlet-based IELTS Reading Vocabulary Acquisition. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 5(5), 198-204.\nMa, X., Shen, J., Krenn, H. Y., Hu, S., & Yuan, J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the relationship between learning outcomes and parental involvement during early childhood education and early elementary education. Educational psychology review, 28(4), 771-801.\nMahmud, M. Z. (2019). Students’ perceptions of using Padlet as a learning tool for English writing. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 7(2), 29-39.\nOroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 994-1000.\nPanagiotidis, P., Krystalli, P., & Arvanitis, P. (2018). Technology as a motivational factor in foreign language learning. European Journal of Education, 1.\nPintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).\nPuspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a\nRahayu, I. S. D., & Purnawarman, P. (2019). The use of Quizizz in improving students’ grammar understanding through self-assessment. Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018). 102-106. Atlantis Press.\nRea, J. (2014). Tablet technology learning outcomes in elementary education. Southern New Hampshire University.\nReinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning and Instruction, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101264\nRodinadze, S., & Zarbazoia, K. (2012). The advantages of information technology in teaching English language. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 3(5), 271-275.\nSanosi, A. B. (2018). The effect of Quizlet on vocabulary acquisition. Asian Journal of Education and e-learning, 6(4), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v6i4.5446\nSeven, M. A. (2020). Motivation in Language Learning and Teaching. African Educational Research Journal, 8, 62-71.\nShyamlee, S.D., & Phil, M. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, Singapore, 150-156.\nSiddiq, F., Scherer, R., & Tondeur, J. (2016). Teachers` emphasis on developing students` digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers & Education, 92-93, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006\nSusanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and pedagogical models: Analysis of factors and measurement of learning outcomes in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1-14.\nTinio, V. L. (2003). ICT in Education. e-ASEAN Task Force.\nWan Yusoff, W. M. (2018). The Impact of Philosophical Inquiry Method on Classroom Engagement and Reasoning Skills of Low Achievers. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 7(1), 135-146.\nYakovleva, Y. V., & Goltsova, N. V. (2016). Information and communication technologies as a means of developing pupils’ learning motivation in elementary school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 233, 428-432.\nYusuf, N. M., & Kasmi, K. (2022). Menemukenali Faktor Penyebab Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Yang Mengalami Underachiever [Identifying Factors Caused Learning Difficulties For Students Who Have Underachiever]. Al-Ihtiram: Multidisciplinary Journal of Counseling and Social Research, 1(1).\nZhao, F. (2019). Using Quizizz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 37-43. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班 110913015 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110913015 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 301501.pdf | 2.41 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.