Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147256
題名: 文化資產應用於英語課程教學之研究-以國小六年級學童為例
A Study of Applying Cultural Heritage in English Courses of Elementary School Students
作者: 林庭秀
Lin, Ting-Hsiu
貢獻者: 李沛錞
Lee, Pei-Chun
林庭秀
Lin, Ting-Hsiu
關鍵詞: 文化資產
文化資產教育
文化資產融入英語課程
Cultural heritage
Cultural heritage education
Integration of cultural heritage into the English curriculum
日期: 2023
上傳時間: 1-Sep-2023
摘要: 本研究旨在探討文化資產應用於英語課程教學對於國小六年級學童之影響。以六年級國小學童為研究與教學對象,將社區文化資產與英語課程結合,讓學生在課程中培養十二年國教所提倡之核心素養。研究方法採行動研究法;教學課程設計期程為十八週,包含進行前測、教學、後測與個別深度訪談。\n\n本研究以英語課程為核心,文化資產為主題,探討學生在經過文化資產應用於英語教學課程後之影響,同時針對教師實踐此課程會遭遇的困境與挑戰進行剖析,提出兩項研究問題:(1)探討文化資產應用於英語課程教學對於國小六年級學童有何影響與效益?(2)探討教師實踐文化資產應用於英語課程教學之困難與挑戰為何?\n\n研究資料來源包含:(1)課程前後測之問卷;(2)學生課程後的半結構個人訪談;(3)學生學習成果(含小組任務、課堂海報、學生反饋);(4)教師參與式觀察;以及(5)教學札記與省思。資料分析主要採質性方式;透過深入分析多元化的資料,以了解在文化資產融入英語課程教學後,學生的學習歷、課程對學生的影響,以及教師在研究過程中的心得與省思。\n本研究希冀承前啟後,發展出符應十二年國教素養導向與文化資產教育之課程。透過將文化資產融入於英語教學,讓學生的語言與領域科目學習有所正向影響,並培養其對家鄉的認同與共感。\n\n本研究結果如下:\n(一)學生對當地文化資產產生認同與認識,但未必深入\n(二) 將文化資產融入於英語課程,有助於學生提升學習興趣與知識\n(三)教師須根據回饋反思,對教學設計滾動式調整,以順應挑戰與困難\n關鍵字:文化資產、文化資產教育、文化資產融入英語課程
The study aims to explore the impact of applying cultural heritage to the English language curriculum for sixth grade students. Taking the sixth-grade elementary school children as the research and teaching objects, the community cultural heritage was combined with the English curriculum to cultivate the core literacies advocated by Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education. This research adopted action research method. The duration of the course was 18 weeks, including pre-testing, teaching, post-testing stages and individual in-depth interviews.\n\nTo explore the impact of students` experiences after applying cultural heritage in English courses, and to analyze the difficulties and challenges that teacher would encounter when practicing in this study, two research questions are raised: (1) What are the effects and benefits of applying cultural heritage to the English language curriculum for sixth grade students? (2) What are the difficulties and challenges for teacher to implement the English curriculum of cultural heritage integrated in it?\n\nThe research data source contains: (1) pre- and post-test questionnaires; (2) semi-structured personal interviews with students after the course; (3) student learning outcomes (including group tasks, classroom posters, and students’ feedback); (4) teacher participatory observations; and (5) teaching journals and reflections. The data analysis was mainly qualitative. Through in-depth analysis of diverse data, we were able to understand students` learning experiences, the impact of the curriculum on students, and teachers` insights and reflections during the research process after the integration of cultural heritage into English language instruction.\n\nThis study aims to develop a curriculum that is in line with Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education. Through the curriculum, students` language and subject learning would be positively influenced, and their sense of identity and communion with their homeland would be cultivated. The findings of the study are as follows: (1) Students’ sense of identity and communion with their homeland were cultivated, but not really in depth. (2) Integrating cultural heritage into the English curriculum helps students to enhance their learning interests and knowledge. (3) Teachers need to make rolling adjustments to their teaching design based on feedback and reflections in order to respond to challenges and difficulties.
參考文獻: 一、中文文獻\nPatton, M. Q. (1995)。質的評鑑與研究(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。台北:桂冠。(原著出版於 1990年)\n文化部(2016)。文化資產保存法。全國法規資料。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0170001\n文化部(2019)。文化部預告《文資法》修正草案 四大重點強化文資保存體系。文化新聞。https://www.moc.gov.tw/information_250_101477.html\n文化部(2022)。文化資產保存法施行細則。全國法規資料。取自https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0170004\n文化部文化資產局(2017)。文化資產。國家文化資產網。檢自https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/\n王文科、王智弘(2017)。教育研究法(增訂第十七版)。臺北市:五南。\n王麗蕉(2015)。數位人文系統的建置與加值應用:以臺灣日記知識庫為探討中心。漢學研究通訊,34(4),30-39。\n江明親(2016)。文化資產教育與博物館。新北市立黃金博物館學刊,(4),48-56。\n行政院(2021)。國家文化資產的保存與活化。重要政策。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/d70c6ee4-d64f-44a6-ba11-2136390f9ba7\n谷鴻暐(2019)。運用文化回應教學提升英語學習動機與口說能力之行動研究以國小四年級原住民學童為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺中教育大學。\n周幸儀(2015)。校園古蹟活化運用於多媒體教學課程之設計研究--以長榮女子中學紅樓為例〔碩士論文,長榮大學媒體設計科技學系〕。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0015-0208201520401500\n周新富(2012)。教育研究法(頁310-337)。臺北市:五南。\n林佳蓉(2013)。北投區文化資產融入國小社會領域教學。國教新知,60(1),30-37。\n林承緯(2016)。夾雜於文化資產與觀光資源認知下的日本神社遺跡:以金瓜石神社、鹿野神社,臺中神社大鳥居為例。新北市立黃金博物館學刊,(4), 6-19。\n林淑馨(2010)。質性研究:理論與實務。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。\n邱育昶(2015)。文化資產運用於國中教學之研究-以台南安平劍獅為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立高雄大學。\n施國隆(2012)。從世界遺產看臺灣文化資產永續發展的經驗與因應策略。文化資產保存學刊,(21),5-22。\n教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。國家教育研究院。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf\n教育部(2017)。十二年國教課程綱要教育部修正發布令。國家教育研究院。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/106%E5%B9%B45%E6%9C%8810%E6%97%A5%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3%E7%99%BC%E5%B8%83%E4%BB%A4.pdf\n許菱雅(2020)。知識翻新活動融入達悟族大船文化課程教學之行動研究 : 以臺東縣蘭嶼鄉朗島國小六年級學生為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所。\n許筱苹(2005)。古蹟之教育資源應用於國民小學課程之探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立成功大學建築研究所。\n陳向明(2002)。教師如何作質的研究。臺北市:洪葉文化。\n陳欣瑜(2016)。文化回應教學在國小國語課程實踐之行動研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立屏東教育大學。\n陳淑君(2017)。鏈結資料於數位典藏之研究:以畫家陳澄波為例。圖書館學與資訊科學,43(1), 71-96。\n黃光男(2017)。文化資產中的教育。台灣教育,(706),2-11。\n楊馥甄(2014)。鄉土教學課程融入國中社會領域教學研究─以五條港文化園區為例〔碩士論文,長榮大學土地管理與開發學系〕。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0015-2108201413531000\n葉重新(2017)。教育研究法(第三版)。臺北市:心理。\n榮芳杰(2019)。古蹟就是我們的教室-強調現地教學的文化資產教育。文化資產保存學刊,(50),92-96。\n蔡明志(2014)。談文化資產保存的創新與未來。臺灣建築學會會刊雜誌,(76),88-93。\n蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。臺北市:五南。\n \n二、外文文獻\nAslan, Z. and Ardemagni, M. (2006). Introducing Young People to the Protection of Heritage Sites and Historic Cities, Rome: UNESCO–ICCROM.\nBarghi, R., Zakaria, Z., Hamzah, A., & Hashim, N. H. (2017). Heritage education in the primary school standard curriculum of Malaysia. Teaching and Teacher education, 61, 124-131. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.012\nCalbó, M., Juanola, R. & Vallés, J. (2011) Visiones interdisciplinarias en educación del patrimonio: Artes, Culturas, Ambiente [Interdisciplinary Visions in Heritage Education: Arts, Cultures, Environment]. Girona: Documentia Universitaria.\nCastro-Calviño, L., Rodríguez-Medina, J., & López-Facal, R. (2020). Heritage education under evaluation: the usefulness, efficiency and effectiveness of heritage education programmes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1-11.\nCopeland, T. (2004). Heritage and education: A European perspective (pp. 18e22). The Hague Forum 2004.\nCopeland, T. (2006). European democratic citizenship, heritage education and identity. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.\nCouncil of Europe (1998). Proceedings of Cultural heritage and its educational implications:a factor for tolerance, good citizenship and social integration. Brussels: Council of Europe.\nCouncil of Europe. Recommendation No. R(98) 5, of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning Heritage Education, Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 March 1998 at the 623rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. Available online: http://rm.coe.int/16804f1ca1 (accessed on 20 March 2022).\nDe Troyer, V. (Coord.). (2005). Heritage in the classroom. A practical manual for teachers. Brussel: Hereduc.\nEuropean Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, (2019). European framework for action on cultural heritage, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/949707\nGarcía-Sampedro Fernández-Canteli, M. (2018). Cultural Heritage as a Resource for English as an Additional Language Learner: An Out-of Class Approach. Linguistics and Literature Studies 6 (6).\nGüler-Bıyıklı, S., & Aslan, C. C. (2013). A review of cultural heritage education in Turkish schools (1962–2011). Public Archaeology, 12(4), 255-270.\nHunter, K. (1988). Heritage Education in the Social Studies. Eric Digests.\nMartínez Rodríguez, M., & Fontal Merillas, O. (2020). Dealing with heritage as curricular content in Spain’s Primary Education. The Curriculum Journal, 31(1), 77-96.\nOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. https://bit.ly/2IhJXYs\nPotočnik, R. (2017). Effective approaches to heritage education: Raising awareness through fine art practice. International Journal of Education Through Art, 13(3), 285-294.\nSimşek, G., & Kesici, A. E. (2012). Heritage education for primary school children through drama: The case of Aydın, Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3817-3824.\nStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basic of Qualitatiove research:Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage\nUNESCO World Heritage Centre (2021). 2021 Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
110913023
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110913023
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
302301.pdf8.52 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.