Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33344
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王心玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang,Hsin-lingen_US
dc.contributor.author黃駿捷zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang,Chun-chiehen_US
dc.creator黃駿捷zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang,Chun-chiehen_US
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:19:51Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:19:51Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:19:51Z-
dc.identifierG0905510162en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33344-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description90551016zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本篇碩士論文的寫作目的在於用系統化的方法來分析距今六百二十多年前傑福瑞.喬塞的«眾鳥之會»一詩中對於自然的這個概念的三種不同層面的透視觀點 本詩在文本的分類上屬於夢幻愛情詩 乃是詩人藉著夢境來傳達愛情的神秘和象徵的意涵 本文中所謂自然的觀點就是指人類如何理解及認知這個外在自然的世界 身為自然的一份子 人類觀察了外界環境並企圖要了解這個世界 這樣的認知包含了神話 傳奇 及古典時期的學術研究 在文學的世界中 詩人在文本中創造了一個奇幻的世界 由奇異的時空 充滿想像力的動植物的再現 以及富有愛與性的原始力量的自然神祇 這是人文主義式的世界架構 而其世界的中心乃是人類 而不是遙不可及的上帝 詩中人感受並享受著自然的美好 同時 他也察覺到自己和這個世界的存在 透過他的觀察 在文本中投射出一個他對於一個系統化層級分明的理想世界 在西洋中古時期的文學之中 對於自然的理解和感受的表達的確是個相對稀有的一個現像 所以本詩值得我們更深入的檢視與研究\n 本篇論文分為五大部份 第一章是序言 簡述作者生平 文本背景 歷代學者的研究心得 和本論文研究的主旨 第二章討論夢境中時間與空間的結構 分析夢境文學中常見的時間跳躍的現像 和對於中古花園的空間設計 第三章討論花園中的植物圈和動物圈 喬塞安置了許多種的動植物在花園中 這些草木鳥獸反映了中古時期的自然史和許多被他所引用的文獻 這些動植物都被賦與象徵性的意義 在第四章中 分析在黃銅神殿裡外的羅馬神祇 一有七個不同的神出現 直接或間接地提到 他們有愛與性的影響力 而性與愛使得自然中的生物得以生生不息 第五章是結論 整篇論文以 “自然之愛” 和 “愛的天性” 作結zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this thesis is to analyze the three perspectives of nature in this poem. By definition, “perspective” means the way that objects appear smaller when they are further away and the way parallel lines appear to meet each other at a point in the distance. It, in the level of thought, means a particular way of considering something. In other words, it means a point of view. The perspective of nature is the way how human beings perceive the natural world. Human beings, as members of the whole nature, observe the environment and try to understand the world. Ancient people did not rely on science entirely; they used their cognition and imagination to form their knowledge of the world. It is mixed with mythology, folklore, legend, and classical academics. In literature, the writers create a world, which is full of nature deities, imaginative animals and plants in the fantastic space and time. This is a humanistic way to recognize the world whose center is man, not an abstract and remote God.\nIn this poem, the persona perceives and enjoys nature. He senses the existence of himself and nature. Through his senses, he projects a model of the world by setting nature deities, plants and animals in the methodized nature. It is rather a comparatively rare phenomenon in mediaeval literature. Even the persona of mediaeval literature is surrounded by nature, the writers are never or seldom aware of this fact. The writers and readers of mediaeval literature do not seem to care about much the beauty and pleasure of nature.\nThe thesis is divided into five parts. Chapter One is the introduction. Chapter Two discusses the structure of time and space. It will convey the concept of time and the design of the garden in the dream vision. Chapter Three discusses Flora and Fauna in the garden. Chaucer settles many kinds of plants and animals in the garden according to his knowledge from many sources. The plants and animals have symbolic meanings. The data shows us the cognition of nature people in the Middle Ages had. Chapter Four analyzes the Roman deities outside and inside the brass temple. There are seven gods and goddess of fertility in the background of the dream vision. All of them share the attributes of love and sex. They are divinized drives of live and the origin of the nature. Chapter Five is the conclusion.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgements..............................................iv\nChinese Abstract..............................................vi\nEnglish Abstract.............................................vii\n\nChapter\nI.Introduction................................................01\nII.Time and Space: The Natural Environment in Dream Vision....12\nIII.Flora and Fauna: The Symbols of Nature in the Garden......33\nIV.Love and Sex: The Nature Deities in/outside the Temple.....59\nV.Conclusion..................................................85\n\nAppendixes\nI.Dream Vision in Literature..................................90\nII.The Martyred Lovers........................................91\n\nWorks Cited...................................................96\n\nBiographical Sketch..........................................103zh_TW
dc.format.extent13944 bytes-
dc.format.extent14090 bytes-
dc.format.extent14290 bytes-
dc.format.extent15608 bytes-
dc.format.extent13957 bytes-
dc.format.extent14516 bytes-
dc.format.extent44405 bytes-
dc.format.extent63876 bytes-
dc.format.extent78483 bytes-
dc.format.extent80761 bytes-
dc.format.extent26031 bytes-
dc.format.extent17546 bytes-
dc.format.extent25090 bytes-
dc.format.extent30499 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0905510162en_US
dc.subject傑弗瑞.喬塞zh_TW
dc.subject眾鳥之會zh_TW
dc.subject自然zh_TW
dc.subject十四世紀英國文學zh_TW
dc.subject中古英文zh_TW
dc.subjectGeoffrey Chauceren_US
dc.subjectThe Parlement of Foulesen_US
dc.subjectNatureen_US
dc.subjectThe Fourteenth-Century British Literatureen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Englishen_US
dc.titleThe Three Perspectives on Nature in Geoffrey Chaucer`s The Parlement of Fouleszh_TW
dc.title喬塞《眾鳥之會》一詩中對於自然的三種觀點zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceWorks Citedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAesop. Aesop’s Fables. Trans. Laura Gibbs. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlighieri, Dante. The Portable Dante. Ed. Paolo Milano. London: Penguin, 1978.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndrew, Malcolm and Ronald A. Waldron eds. The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript: Pearl, Cleanness, Patience, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. 4th ed. Exeter: U of Exeter Press, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceApuleius, Lucius. The Golden Ass. Trans. W. Adlington. Rev. S. Gaselee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1958.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAttar, Farid Ud-din. The Conference of the Birds. Trans. Afkham Darbandi and Dick Davis. London: Penguin: 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBackhouse, Janet. Medieval Birds in the Sherborne Missal. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBennett, J. A. W. The Parlement of Foules: An Interpretation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBenson, Larry D. “The Occasion of the Parliament of Fowls.” In The Wisdom of Poetry: Essays in Early English Literature in honor of Morton Bloomfield. Ed. Larry D. Benson and Siegfried Wenzel. Kalmazoo, MI: Medieval Institute P, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoccaccio, Giovanni. The Decameron: A New Translation. Eds. and trans. Mark Musa and Peter E. Bondanella. New York: Norton, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoethius. The Consolation of Philosophy. Trans. W. V. Cooper. Ed. Israel Golancz. London: J. M. Dent, 1902.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBorroff, Marie trans. Pearl: A New Verse Translation. New York: Norton, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBraddy, Haldeen. Chaucer`s “Parlement of Foules” in Relation to Contemporary Events. 2nd ed. New York: Octagon, 1969.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrewer, D. S. “Introduction.” Geoffrey Chaucer: “The Parlement of Foulys.” New York: Barnes, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. An Introduction to Chaucer. New York: Longman, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBronson, Bertrand H. “In Appreciation of Chaucer’s ‘Parliament of Foules’” University of California Publications in English, Vol. 3, No. 5. Berkeley, CA: U of California P, 1935.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCawley, A. C. “Chaucer`s Valentine: The Parlement of Foules.” Chaucer`s Mind and Art. Essays Old and New, No. 3. London: Oliver & Boyd, 1969.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChaucer, Geoffrey. Troilus and Criseyde. Trans. Nevill Coghill. London: Penguin, 1971.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. Love Visions. Trans. Brian Stone. London: Penguin, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. The Canterbury Tales. Trans. David Wright. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. Chaucer’s Dream Poetry. Ed. Helen Phillips and Nick Navely. London: Longman, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCirlot, J. E. A Dictionary of Symbols. Trans. Jack Sage. Taipei: Bookman, n. d.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClemen, Wolfgang. Chaucer’s Early Poetry. Trans. C. A. M. Sym. London: Methuen, 1963.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCotterell, Arthur. A Dictionary of World Mythology. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCowgill, Bruce Kent. “The Parlement of Foules and the Body Politic.” Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEnglish and Germanic Philology 74 (1975): 315-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDavies, R. T. ed. Medieval English Lyrics. London: Faber, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuckwroth, George E. ed. The Complete Roman Drama. Vol. 2. New York: Random, 1942.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEldredge, Laurence. “Poetry and Philosophy in the Parlement of Foules.” Revue de l`Universite d`Ottawa 40 (1970): 441-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEmerson, Oliver Farrar. Chaucer Essay and Studies: A Selection from the Writings of Oliver Farrar Emerson (1860-1927). Cleveland, OH: Western Reserve UP, 1929.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFulghum, Walter B., Jr. A Dictionary of Biblical Allusions in English Literature. Taipei: Bookman, n. d.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFyler, John M. Chaucer and Ovid. London: Yale UP, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiffin, Mary. Studies on Chaucer and His Audience. Hull, PQ: L’Éclair, 1956.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGower, John. Selected Poetry. Ed. Carole Weinberg. Manchester, Eng.: Carcanet, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrudin, Michaela Paasche. Chaucer and the Politics of Discourse. Columbia, SC: U of South Carolina P, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHehl, Dieter. Geoffrey Chaucer: An Introduction to His Narrative Poetry. Cambridge: UP of Cambridge, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHermann, John P. and John J. Burke, Jr. eds. Signs and Symbols in Chaucer’s Poetry. University, AL: The U of Alabama P, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHomer. The Iliad. Trans. Andrew Lang, Walter Leaf, and Ernest Myers. New York: Grolier, n.d.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHussey, S. S. Chaucer: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Methuen, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJordan, Robert M. “The Question of Unity and the Parlement of Foules.” English Studies in Canada 3 (1977): 373-85.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. Chaucer’s Poetics and the Modern Reader. Berkeley, CA: U of California P, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKean, P[atricia] M[argaret]. Chaucer and the Making of English Poetry. London: Routledge, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKearney, J. A. “The Parliament of Fowls: The Narrator, the ‘Certyn Thyng’, and the ‘Commune Profyt’.” Theoria 45 (1975): 55-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKnight, Stephen. Geoffrey Chaucer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKreisler, Nicholai von. “The Locus Amoenus and Eschatological Love in the Parliament of Fowls, 204-10.” Philological Quarterly 50 (1971): 16-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLangland, William. Will’s Vision of Piers Plowman. Trans. E[thelbert] Talbot Donaldson. Eds. Elizabeth D. Kirk and Judith H. Anderson. New York: Norton, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLille, Alain de. The Complaint of Nature. Trans. D. M. Moffat. Hamden, CT: Archon, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLorris, Guillaume de, and Jean de Meun. The Romance of the Rose. Trans. Frances Horgan. New York: Oxford UP, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLumiansky, R. M. “Chaucer`s Parlement of Foules: A Philosophical Interpretation.” Review of English Studies 24 (1948): 81-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLuria, Maxwell S. and Richard L[ester] Hoffman eds. Middle English Lyrics. New York: Norton, 1974.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMalory, Thomas. Tales of King Arthur. Ed. Michael Senior. New York: Schocken, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCall, John P. “The Harmony of Chaucer`s Parliament.” Chaucer Review 5 (1970): 22-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. Chaucer Among the Gods. N.p.: The Pennsylvania State U, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcDonald, Charles O. “An Interpretation of Chaucer`s Parlement of Foules.” Speculum 30 (1955): 444-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMinnis, A[astair] J., V. J. Scattergood, and J. J. Smith. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Shorter Poems. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. Eds. and trans. Raymond Geuss and Ronald Speirs. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorwich, Julian of. The Revelation of Divine Love in Sixteen Showings Made to Dame Julian of Norwich. Ed. M. L. del Mastro. Liguori, MO: Triumph, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOlson, Paul A. “The Parlement of Foules: Aristotle`s Politics and the Foundations of Human Society.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 2 (1980): 53-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOvid. Ovid’s Fasti. Trans. James George Frazer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1959.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. Metamorphoses. Trans. A. D. Melville. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParker, W. H. trans. and ed. Priapea: Poems for A Phallic God. London: Croom Helm, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePelen, Marc M. “Form and Meaning of the Old French Love Vision: The Fableau dou Dieu d`Amors and Chaucer`s Parliament of Fowls.” Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 9 (1979): 277-305.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolzella, Marion L. “‘The Craft So Long to Lerne’: Poet and Lover in Chaucer`s Envoy to Scogan and Parliament of Fowls.” Chaucer Review 10 (1976): 279-86.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQuilligan, Maureen. “Allegory, Allegoresis, and the Deallegorization of Language: The Roman de la Rose, the De Planctu Naturae, and the Parlement of Foules.” Allegory, Myth, and Symbol. Ed. Morton W. Bloomfield. Harvard English Studies, No. 9. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichlin, Amy. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. Rev. ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichmond, Velma Bourgeois. Geoffrey Chaucer. New York: Continuum, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRothschild, Victoria. “The Parliament of Fowls: Chaucer`s Mirror up to Nature?” Review of English Studies 35 (1984): 164-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRowland, Beryl. Blind Beasts: Chaucer’s Animal World. Kent, OH: The Kent State UP, 1971.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference---. Companion to Chaucer Studies. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchless, Howard H. Chaucer and Dante: A Revaluation. Norman, OK: Pilgrim, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Cyrus Hoy. New York: Norton, 1963.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Francis J. “Mirth and Marriage in the Parlement of Foules.” Ball State University Forum 14, No. 1 (1973): 15-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpenser, Edmund. Edmund Spenser’s Poetry. Ed. Hugh Maclean. New York: Norton, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTatlock, J. S. P. The Mind and Art of Chaucer. New York: Gordian, 1966.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTinkle, Theresa. Medieval Venuses and Cupids: Sexuality, Hermeneutics, and English Poetry. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTroyes, Chrétien de. Arthurian Romances. Trans. D. D. R. Owen. London: J. M. Dent, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWest, M[artin] L[itchfield] trans. Greek Lyric Poetry. New York: Oxford UP, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZimmerman, J. E. Dictionary of Classical Mythology. Taipei: Bookman, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZuylen, Gabrielle van. Tous les Jardins du Monde. N. p.: Gallimard, 1994.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
51016201.pdf13.62 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016202.pdf13.76 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016203.pdf13.96 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016204.pdf15.24 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016205.pdf13.63 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016206.pdf14.18 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016207.pdf43.36 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016208.pdf62.38 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016209.pdf76.64 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016210.pdf78.87 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016211.pdf25.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016212.pdf17.13 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016213.pdf24.5 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
51016214.pdf29.78 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.