Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33367
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor張郇慧zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorClaire Hsun-huei Changen_US
dc.contributor.author柯羽珊zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKe,Yu-shanen_US
dc.creator柯羽珊zh_TW
dc.creatorKe,Yu-shanen_US
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T08:24:02Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T08:24:02Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T08:24:02Z-
dc.identifierG0090555006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33367-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description90555006zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討以中文為母語之人士如何學習英語條件句,及其在習得時所遭遇之困難及相關原因。本文除對英語條件句之分類方式做詳盡介紹外,並嘗試以形式功能對應之理論架構,研究其習得之順序,並利用『錯誤分析』區分出條件句之動詞各類錯誤的誤用形式及原因。本研究語料來源為包含一百萬字,以電腦輔助建立錯誤標記之『中國學習者英語語料庫』。\n研究結果發現,外語學習者之習得順序為一形式功能對應之過程,具較多形式或功能內涵者愈晚且愈難習得,符合功能認知模式的預測。 中文學習者的錯誤特徵為添加及省略,原因為過度矯正(hypercorrection)及過度類化(overgeneralization)。學習者最大的困難來自對條件句動詞變化規則不熟悉、形式及功能的複雜性、以及對應失敗的結果。本論文建議未來研究方向可深入探討時間指涉與假設程度對條件句使用之影響。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIssues of conditionals have been highlighted for a long time, but the focus was seldom fixed on acquisition, particularly for L2. The determinate features of tense, mood and modality are interwoven in the conditional construction, thus resulting in an insurmountable obstacle for L2 learners. However, the factors impede acquisition have never been satisfactorily treated. Therefore, this paper attempts to explore the L2 developmental sequence, and to probe the error characteristics of acquiring if-conditionals.\nDisengaging the expression of conditionality into two dimensions: temporality and hypotheticality, we identified the features of syntactic forms and semantic functions of different conditional types, and created a new scheme to account for their mapping, on which the difficulty levels of acquisition were inferred. In contrast to the previous studies on the grounds of markedness theories, this research described the acquisition of conditionals in a Functional-Cognitive Model. Furthermore, the factors of difficulties were examined via an error analysis.\nThe targets are Chinese English learners, who were well-known to face great problems in expressing conditionals. The data was searched from CLEC (Chinese Learner English Corpus), a big-scale corpus consisting of roughly 1,000,000 words with error tags.\nThe investigation on the acquisition sequence and error patterns shows: (1) the acquisition order parallels to the prediction on the form-function mapping underpinnings: those with heavy content load and complex lexical shapes are acquired later (2) the two prominent misuses of the Chinese learners are addition and omission, resulted from hypercorrection and oversimplification. It was concluded that their difficulties could be ascribed to unfamiliarity of rules, complexities of forms and functions, and their mapping failure. Hence, this present work serves to provide some explanatory accounts, in a hope to unveil the mystery of the arduousness of acquiring conditionals, contribute to the tightening of acquisition theorizing and shed new insights into pedagogical growth.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgements iv\nTable of Contents v\nList of Tables vii\nList of Abbreviations viii\nChinese Abstract ix\nEnglish Abstract x\n\nChapter One\nINTRODUCTION 1\n1.1 Motivation 1\n1.2 Goals 3\n1.3 Focus 4\n1.4 Overview of the Thesis 5\nChapter Two\nLITERATURE REVIEW 9\n2.1. Conditionals 9\n2.1.1. Background Knowledge 9\n2.1.2. Classifications of Conditional Types 10\n2.1.3. An Integrative Scheme 14\n2.1.4. Summary 21\n2.2. Learning Difficulties: Problems of conditionals 22\n2.2.1. Preliminaries: Tackling the Problems 22\n2.2.2. Temporality and Tense 25\n2.2.3. Hypotheticality and Mood 25\n2.2.4. Modals and Verbs 27\n2.2.5. Summary 28\n2.3. Acquisition Theories 29\n2.3.1. Acquisition of Conditionals 29\n 2.3.1.1. Late emergence in childhood…………………………….29\n2.3.1.2. Previous accounts for L2 development 30\n2.3.2. An Alternative Account 34\n2.3.3. Summary 37\n2.4. Error analysis (EA) 38\n2.4.1. Introduction of EA 38\n2.4.2. Using Error Analysis 40\n2.4.3. Summary 41\nChapter Three\nMETHODOLOGY 42\n3.1. Material 42\n3.2. Procedure 43\n3.2.1. Identifying If-conditionals 43\n3.2.2. Identifying Errors 44\n3.2.3. Identifying Conditional Types 47\n3.3. Coding Errors 47\nChapter Four\nRESULTS AND DISCUSSION 48\n4.1. Overview of Conditionals 48\n4.2. Developmental Sequence of Form-function Mapping 49\n4.3. Error Analysis 56\n4.3.1. Error Identification 57\n4.3.2. Error Description 62\n4.3.3. Error Diagnosis 63\nChapter Five\nCONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION 67\n5.1. Final Remarks 67\n5.2. Limitation and Implication 69\nReference 73\nAppendix A 80\nAppendix B 83\nAppendix C 86zh_TW
dc.format.extent77799 bytes-
dc.format.extent44056 bytes-
dc.format.extent47734 bytes-
dc.format.extent99903 bytes-
dc.format.extent65274 bytes-
dc.format.extent94102 bytes-
dc.format.extent185530 bytes-
dc.format.extent62069 bytes-
dc.format.extent25011 bytes-
dc.format.extent58819 bytes-
dc.format.extent67743 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090555006en_US
dc.subject學習者語料庫zh_TW
dc.subject第二語言習得zh_TW
dc.subject條件句zh_TW
dc.subject英語為外語學習zh_TW
dc.subject形式功能對應zh_TW
dc.subjectlearner corpusen_US
dc.subjectsecond language acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectconditionalsen_US
dc.subjectEFLen_US
dc.subjectform-function mappingsen_US
dc.titleForm-function Mappings in the Acquisition of If-conditionals: A Corpus-based Studyzh_TW
dc.title以語料庫為本對英語條件句形式功能對應習得之研究zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAmidon, A. (1976). Children’s understanding of sentences with contingent relations: why are temporal and conditional connectives so difficult? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22 (3), 423-437.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAthanasiadou, A., & R. Dirven (1997). On conditionals again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. SSLA, 11, 17-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBates, E., & B. MacWhinney. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3-73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerent, G. P. (1985). Markedness considerations in the acquisition of conditional sentences. Language Learning, 35, 337-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBloom, L. M. Lahey, L. Hood,K. Lifer, & K. Fiess. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the meaning relations they encode. Journal of Child Language, 7, 235-261.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBloom, A. H. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBloom, A. H. (1984). Caution - The words you use may affect what you say: A response to Au. Cognition, 17, 275-287.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBowerman, M. (1979). The acquisition of complex sentences. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language Acquisition, (pp.285-305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBowerman, M. (1986). First steps in acquiring conditionals. In E.C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J.S. Reilly, & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals, (pp.285-307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBraidi, S.M. (1999). The acquisition of second language syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, R. (1973). A first Language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvardzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBull, W. (1960). Time, tense, and the verb: A study in theoretical and applied linguistics, with particular attention to Spanish. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCancino, H., E.J. Rosansky, & J. Schumann. (1978). The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E.M. Hatch (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition: A Book of Reading, (pp. 207-30).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCelce-Murcia, M., & D. Larsen-Freeman. (1999). The grammar book (2nd ed.). New York: Heinle & Heinle.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChou, C.L. (2000). Chinese speakers’ acquisition of English conditionals: Acquisition order and L1 transfer effects. Second Language Studies 19(1), 57-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceComrie, B. (1986). Conditionals: A typology. In E. C. Traugott, A., Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals, (pp. 77-99). Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCook, V.J. (1993). Linguistics and second language acquisition. Macmillan, Basingstoke.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCorder, S. P. (1974). Error Analysis. In J. P. B. Allen and S. Pit Corder (Eds.) Techniques in Applied Linguistics (pp. 122-154.). London: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCovitt, R.I. (1976). Some problematic grammar areas for ESL teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, UCLA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCromer, R. (1974). The development of language and cognition: The cognition hypothesis. In B. Foss. (Ed.), New perspectives in child development. Harmondsworth: Penguin.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrouch, R. (1993). Tense in simple conditionals. Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, p.133-146.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDulay, H., M. Burt, & D. Krashan. (1982). Language Two. Rowley: Newbury House.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27,315-330.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEckman, F. (1996). A functional-typological approach to second language acquisition theory. In W, C. Ritchie & J.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.195-211). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFujii, S.Y. (1993). The use and learning of clause-linkage: Case studies in Japanese and English conditionals. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1993).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFulcher, Glenn. (1991). Conditionals revisited. ELT Journal ,45 (2), 164-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGordon, D. (1985). The marking of conditionality in one learner’s interlanguage: A semantic analysis. Working papers, Department of English as a Second Language, University of Hawaii, Manoa 4(1), 77-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGranger, S. (1998). The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer. Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHasse, I. (1988). Temporafolge und Bedingungstyp im konditionalen Satzgefuge. In D. Mindt (Ed.) EDV in der Angewandten Linguistik: Ziele—Methoden—Ergebnisse. Diesterweg, Frankfurt am Main, (pp. 69-76).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaiman, J. (1978). Conditionals are Topics. Language 54(3), 564-589.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHalliday, M. & R. Hasan. (1976). Cohesion in English. London:Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHill, L .A. (1960). The sequence of tenses with If clauses. Language Learning 10(3), 165-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHwang, M. (1979). A semantic and syntactic analysis of if-conditionals. Unpublished master’s thesis, UCLA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJames, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJames, D. (1982). Past tense and the hypothetical: A cross-linguistic study. Studies in Language 6(3), 375-403.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnson-Laird, P.N. (1986). Conditionals and mental models. In E.C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J.S. Reilly, & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals, pp55-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKatis, D. (1997). The emergence of conditionals in child language: Are they really so late? In A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven (Eds.). On conditionals again, (pp. 355-387). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuczaj, S. & M. Daly. (1979). The development of hypothetical reference in the speech of young children. Journal of Child Language 6, 563-579.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLardiere, D. (1992). On the linguistic shaping of thought: Another response to Alfred Bloom. Language in Society 21 (2), 231-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeech, G.. (1987). Meaning and the English verb (2nd ed). London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLord, C. (2002). Are subordinate clauses more difficult? In J. Bybee & M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse, (pp 224-233).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLyon, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaule, D. (1988). ‘Sorry, but if he comes, I go’: Teaching conditionals. ELT Journal 42 (2), 117-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCabe, E., S. Evely ,R. Abramovitch ,C. Corter, & D. Pepler. (1983). Conditional statements in young children’s spontaneous speech. Journal of Child Language 10, 253-258.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeisel, J.M., H. Clahsen, & M. Pienemann. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3, 109-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMellow, D., & K. Stanley. (2001). Alternative accounts of developmental patterns: Toward a functional-cognitive model of second language acquisition. In K. A. Smith & D. Nordquist (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual High Desert Linguistics Society Conference (pp.51-65). Albuquerque, N.M.: High Desert Linguistics Society.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMike, S. (1998). Wordsmith tools (Version 3.0) [Computer softwear]. Mike Scott and Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMindt, D. (1996). English corpus linguistics and the foreign language teaching syllabus. In J. Thomas & M. Short (Eds.), Using Corpora for Language Research. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoffie,H.L.(2000). Conditionals. Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://writing.colostate.edu/assignments/archives/e515/Conditionals1.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorgan, L., M. Bonamo, & L. Travis. (1995). Negative evidence on negative evidence. Developmental Psychology 31(2): 180-197.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNayef, K. & A. Hajjaj. (1997). Errors in English among Arabic speakers: Analysis and remedy, (pp. 129-142). Beirut, Lebanon: York Press and Librainie du Liban.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorris, W. (2003). How do we overcome the difficulties of teaching conditionals? Bulletin of Fukuoka International University 9, 39-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO’Grady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePalmer, F.R. (1986). Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePalmer, F.R. (1990). Modality and the English modals. Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePartington, A. (1998). Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching (pp. 79-88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePerkins, M.R. (1983). Modal expressions in English. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePodlesskaya, Vera Isaakovna. (1997). Syntax and semantics of resumption: Some evidence from Russian conditional conjuncts. Russian Linguistics, 21 (2), 125-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQui, S., & H, Yang. (2003). Chinese Learner English Corpus. Shanghai: Foreign Language Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQuirk, R., S. Greenbaum, N. Leech, & J. Svartvik. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReilly, J.S. (1982). The acquisition of conditionals in English. (Doctoral dissertation, UCLA).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReilly, J.S. (1986). The acquisition of temporals and conditionals. In E.C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J.S. Reilly, & C.A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp. 309-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRichards, J.C. & G.P. Sampson (1974). The study of learner English. In J.C. Richards (Ed.), Error Analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 3-18). London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSalsbury, T. (2000). The acquisitional grammaticalization of unreal conditionals and modality in L2 English: A longitudinal perspective. (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Indiana Universtiry, 2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaxton, M. (2000). Negative evidence and negative feedback: Immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. Unpublished Manuscript, University of London, U.K.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchachter, C. (1971). Presupposition and counterfactual conditional sentences (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1971). Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, A Xerox Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchachter, C. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24, 205-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchwenter, A. (1998). The pragmatics of conditional marking: Implicature, scalarity, and exclusivity. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1998)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSlobin, I. (1973). Cognitive Prerequisites for the Development of Grammar. In C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in Child Language Development (pp.175-208). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, G. (1986). Errors and explanations. Applied Lingusitics 7 (2), 144-165.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTraugott, C., A. Meulen, S. Reilly, & A. Ferguson. (Eds). (1986). Onzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceconditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWierzbicka, A. (1997). Conditionals and counterfactuals: conceptual primitives and linguistic universals. In A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven (Eds.). On conditionals again (pp. 15-61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWode, H. (1981). Learning a Second Language. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe American Heritage Book of English Usage: A practical and authoritative guide to cotemporary English. (1996). http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/061.html 2004/3/19zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
55500601.pdf75.98 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500602.pdf43.02 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500603.pdf46.62 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500604.pdf97.56 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500605.pdf63.74 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500606.pdf91.9 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500607.pdf181.18 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500608.pdf60.61 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500609.pdf24.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500610.pdf57.44 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55500611.pdf66.16 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.