Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36599
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor郭炳伸<br>林信助zh_TW
dc.contributor.author張惠玲zh_TW
dc.creator張惠玲zh_TW
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T10:56:35Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T10:56:35Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T10:56:35Z-
dc.identifierG0913510131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36599-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description91351013zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn most of the empirical research about the uncovered interest rate parity (UIP), estimation of the condition at short horizons rejects this theoretical proposition and presents just opposite outcome, while estimation at long horizons reports more consistent results with the proposition. Based on the belief that permanent components may convey more information in the UIP condition, we adopt in this thesis the permanent-transitory decomposition approach introduced by Gonzalo\r\nand Granger (1995) to estimate the common long memory components\r\nof interest rates and that of exchange rate. We then re-evaluate the UIP condition using the decomposed permanent and transitory parts, respectively. Our results reinforce the stylized facts existing in the literature, while it remains to be answered why empirical evidence does not favor the UIP condition.zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn most of the empirical research about the uncovered interest rate parity (UIP), estimation of the condition at short horizons rejects this theoretical proposition and presents just opposite outcome, while estimation at long horizons reports more consistent results with the proposition. Based on the belief that permanent components may convey more information in the UIP condition, we adopt in this thesis the permanent-transitory decomposition approach introduced by Gonzalo\r\nand Granger (1995) to estimate the common long memory components\r\nof interest rates and that of exchange rate. We then re-evaluate the UIP condition using the decomposed permanent and transitory parts, respectively. Our results reinforce the stylized facts existing in the literature, while it remains to be answered why empirical evidence does not favor the UIP condition.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1 Introduction 3\r\n2 Methodology 6\r\n3 Data and Empirical Results 9\r\n4 Re-examination of the performance of the UIP condition 12\r\n5 Conclusion 17\r\nList of Tables\r\n1 The results of the UIP estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20\r\n2 Estimation of Cointegration Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22\r\n3 Re-examination of the UIP condition after decomposition . . . 32\r\n4 Summary of the Unit Root Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33\r\nList of Figures\r\n1 The time series plot of the decomposed interest rates . . . . . 25\r\n2 The time series plot of the decomposed exchange rates . . . . 30zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913510131en_US
dc.subjectUIPen_US
dc.subjectdecompositionen_US
dc.titleAccounting for Uncovered Interest Rate Parity - The Permanent and Transitory Decomposition Approachzh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference[1] Alexius, A. (2001), \\Uncovered Interest Parity Revisited,\" Review of In-zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceternational Economics, 9(3), pp.505-517.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[2] Bekaert, G., M. Wei and Y. Xing (2002), \\Uncovered Interest Rate Parityzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand the Term Structure,\" NBER Working Paper No.8795, February.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[3] Beveridge, S. and C. R. Nelson (1981), \\A New Approach to Decomposi-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencetion of Economic Time Series into Permanent and Transitory Componentszh_TW
dc.relation.referencewith Particular Attention to Measurement of the "Business Cycle`,\" Jour-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencenal of Monetary Economics, 7, pp.151-174.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[4] Chinn, M. D. and G. Meredith (2003), \\Monetary Policy and Long-zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHorizon Uncovered Interest Parity,\" forthcoming, IMF Sta® Papers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[5] Chinn, M. D. and G. Meredith (2002), \\Testing Uncovered Interest Parityzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceat Short and Long Horizons during the Post-Bretton Woods Era,\" UCSCzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCenter for International Economics Working Paper, June.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[6] Froot, K. A. and R. H. Thaler (1990), \\Anomalies: Foreign Exchange,\"zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), Summer, pp.179-192.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[7] Gonzalo, J. and C. Granger (1995), \\Estimation of Common Long-zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMemory Components in Cointegrated Systems,\" Journal of business &zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceeconomic statistics, Jan., 13(1), pp.27-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[8] Johansen, S. (1988), \\Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors,\" Jour-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencenal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp.231-254.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[9] Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990), \\Maximum Likelihood Estimationzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Inference on Cointegration- with Applications to the Demand forzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoney,\" Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), pp.169-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[10] MacDonald, R. and M. P. Taylor (1992), \\Exchange Rate Economics: Azh_TW
dc.relation.referencesurvey,\" IMF Sta® Papers, 39(1), pp.1-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[11] Marey, P. S. (2004), \\Uncovered Interest Parity Tests and Exchange Ratezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceExpectations,\" Working Papers, ROA, Maastricht University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[12] McCallum, B. T. (1994), \\A Reconsideration of the Uncovered Interestzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParity Relationship,\" Journal of Monetary Economics, 33, pp.105-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[13] Meredith, G. and Y. Ma (2002), \\The Forward Premium Puzzle Revis-zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceited,\" IMF Working Papers 02/28, November.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[14] Quah, D. (1992), \\The Relative Importance of Permanent and Transitoryzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceComponents: Identi‾cation and some Theoretical Bounds,\" Economet-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencerica, 60, pp.107-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[15] Popper, H. (1993), \\Long-Term Covered Interest Parity: Evidence fromzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCurrency Swaps,\" Journal of International Money and Finance, 12,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencepp.439-448.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference[16] Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson (1988), \\Testing for common trends,\"zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 83, pp.1097-1107.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.