Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38508
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor李明zh_TW
dc.contributor.author黃長泰zh_TW
dc.creator黃長泰zh_TW
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T01:46:20Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-09T01:46:20Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-09T01:46:20Z-
dc.identifierG0094922011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38508-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description外交學系戰略與國際事務碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description94922011zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract  人類自有歷史以來,權力的競逐或文明的流動即從未停歇,其所造成的衝突與影響更是複雜無比。911事件是否為杭廷頓教授所言之文明衝突,抑或是源於美國霸權失衡的中東政策所造成的影響?俱為本論文欲試圖探索的中心命題。\n911事件深刻地改變了美國對於本土以及國際安全環境的思維,全球安全環境亦因而隨之改變。恐怖主義與文明衝突成就了美國難得的戰略機遇,美國除藉此確立其全球優勢地位外,更大幅擴張其國際活動的空間與戰略運用,相對於國際間反美勢力的聲浪,明顯地對小布希政府的外交政策與全球戰略造成威脅與諷刺。\n尤以阿拉伯世界而言,巴勒斯坦問題的無解、美國霸權的過度介入、令人垂涎的石油與經濟等利益,造成中東國家反美反西方情緒高漲,甚而恐怖主義因此盛行。凡此種種,均無法簡單的以「文明衝突」之說,解釋東西方間、以色列與巴勒斯坦間長久以來複雜的歷史情仇。\n而911事件,只是如同已發生在世界各地無數恐怖行動一樣,都是令人無法接受的暴行,而這些人類所無法容忍的罪行,不只是「凱達」組織,許多國家或組織事實上以正義之名,亦同樣行使過或正在行使這些人類的罪行,因而造成今日世界混亂與暴力循環的惡果。\n人類歷史向來無法逃脫弱肉強食的宿命,然而,適者生存卻非強者獨占的道理卻也亙古不變。就遙望未來站在世界頂端的美國而言,當世人引頸企盼或虎視眈眈時,尤應深切牢記全球化的同時,許多國家及其人民因為過去的累積與錯誤,仍在與飢餓和死亡、憤怒與絕望中掙扎與茍活,欲真正消弭恐怖主義、面對中東問題,巴勒斯坦的爭議終必尋得解決之道。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章 緒論 / 01 \n第一節 研究動機與目的 / 01\n一、研究動機 / 01\n二、研究目的 / 03\n第二節 研究途徑、研究方法、研究架構 / 04\n一、研究途徑 / 04\n二、研究方法 / 07\n三、研究架構 / 08\n第三節 研究範圍與限制 / 09\n一、研究範圍 / 09\n二、研究限制 / 09\n第四節 文獻探討 / 10\n第五節 章節安排 / 17\n第貳章 美國全球權力競逐 / 19\n第一節 美國權力競逐 / 20\n一、本位主義、利益優先 / 20\n二、美國霸權的抉擇與爭辯 / 21\n三、唯武是尚、非敵即友 / 24\n第二節 唯我獨強 / 26\n一、轉變中的軍事霸權 / 26\n二、911事件前之美國安全戰略 / 31\n三、911事件後之美國安全戰略 / 36\n四、布希主義與全球霸權 / 39\n第三節 中東政策與中東問題 / 43\n一、美國在中東 / 44\n二、中東的歷史問題 / 50\n三、分裂的阿拉伯 / 53\n四、小結 / 57\n第參章 文明衝突論再檢視 / 59\n第一節 文化、文明與文明衝突 / 60\n一、宗教、種族與文明衝突 / 61\n二、文明衝突與美國全球霸權 / 63\n三、是文明衝突還是權力衝突 / 66\n第二節 杭亭頓文明衝突論再檢視 / 67\n一、文明衝突論的觀點 / 68\n二、文明衝突論的爭辯 / 71\n第三節 911事件與文明衝突論再檢視 / 77\n一、911事件與文明衝突正面向之論述 / 77\n二、911事件與文明衝突負面向之論述 / 79\n三、文明衝突勢不可免 / 81\n第肆章 911事件與中東伊斯蘭世界 / 83\n第一節 911事件 / 84\n一、背景因素 / 84\n二、經過記要 / 85\n三、反應與影響 / 85\n第二節 伊斯蘭世界 / 91\n一、所謂伊斯蘭 / 92\n二、阿拉伯主義與伊斯蘭主義 / 93\n三、伊斯蘭基本教義主義 / 96\n四、伊斯蘭激進主義 / 99\n第三節 文明秩序的挑戰 / 100\n一、不平等的全球化 / 100\n二、安全困境 / 107\n三、伊斯蘭 / 110\n第伍章 911事件與恐怖主義 / 113\n第一節 恐怖主義對文明秩序的挑戰 / 114\n一、難解的文明之爭 / 115\n二、永無止盡的戰爭 / 117\n三、反美勢力的反撲 / 121\n第二節 恐怖主義由誰定義? / 125\n一、恐怖主義的定義 / 126\n二、新國際恐怖主義 / 129\n三、美國權力競逐與恐怖主義 / 136\n四、是人道主義還是恐怖主義 / 140\n第三節 911事件後全球反恐 / 144\n一、美國之反恐作為 / 145\n二、中共之反恐作為/ 146\n三、美歐等國反恐成效 / 149\n四、美、歐等國反恐之檢討 / 151\n第陸章 結論 / 157\n一、觀察與省思 / 157\n二、美國國家安全戰略 / 160\n三、失衡的中東政策 / 161\n四、伊斯蘭不等於恐怖主義 / 163\n五、全球反恐 / 163\n六、911惡夢難以化解,人類紛爭勢將繼續 / 165\n七、貢獻與期許 / 166\n\n附錄 / 168 ~ 207\n參考書目 / 208 ~ 219zh_TW
dc.format.extent63663 bytes-
dc.format.extent139277 bytes-
dc.format.extent108723 bytes-
dc.format.extent121536 bytes-
dc.format.extent326629 bytes-
dc.format.extent546033 bytes-
dc.format.extent389319 bytes-
dc.format.extent435408 bytes-
dc.format.extent627542 bytes-
dc.format.extent278398 bytes-
dc.format.extent721997 bytes-
dc.format.extent240225 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094922011en_US
dc.subject文明衝突zh_TW
dc.subject911事件zh_TW
dc.subject以巴問題zh_TW
dc.title911事件後小布希政府中東政策:文明衝突論之觀點zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference一、政府出版品zh_TW
dc.relation.reference史密斯、湯瑪斯合編。《恐怖主義威脅與美國政府的回應》。台北:國防部史政編譯室出版,民國91年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference田弘茂、羅致政編。《21世紀的文明挑戰》。台北:行政院文化建設委員會出版,2001年4月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳東野、鄭瑞耀。《911與國際反恐》。台北:國防部史政編譯室出版,民國91年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林正義。《國際政治》。台北:國立空中大學,民85年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference約翰W.伯頓。《全球衝突-國際危機的國內根源》。北京:中國人民公安大學出版社,1991年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡聯合。《恐怖主義溯源》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference紐先鍾譯,Martin van Creveld原著。《科技與戰爭》。台北:國防部史政編譯局出版,80年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference國防大學彙編。《對美國911事件及反恐戰爭研究論文專輯》。台北:遠景基金會,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference國防部史政編譯局。《2001美國四年期國防總檢重大議題》。台北:國防部史政編譯局出版,民國91年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。《核生化武器擴散》。台北:國防部史政編譯室出版,91年8月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張日銘。《伊斯蘭世界》。台北:國立編譯館出版,1998年7月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference丁連財譯,諾姆.喬姆斯基(noam Chomsky)原著。《9-11》。台北:大塊文化出版,2002年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中華歐亞基金會、改革開放論壇合著。《反恐戰後的美中關係與台海局勢》。台北:大屯出版,民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孔令晟。《大戰略通論》。台北:好聯出版,1995年10月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尤淑雅譯,瑪麗.派特.費雪(Mary Pat Fisher)原著。《廿一世紀宗教》台北:貓頭鷹出版,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王崑義、蔡裕明合著。《臺灣安全的拱心石》台北:華揚文教出版,2006年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王崑義。《恐怖與危機-美利衝突的戰略分析》台北:漢新出版,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王逢振。《文化研究》台北:揚智出版,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王菲菲譯,諾姆.杭士基(noam Chomsky)著。《權力與恐怖》台北:商周出版,2004年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王逸舟主編。《恐怖主義溯源》北京:社會科學文獻出版,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王緝思編。《文明與國際政治:中國學者評亨廷頓的文明衝突論》上海:上海人民出版,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference巨克毅。《國際衝突的解決與和平研究》台中市:國立中興大學國際政治研究所出版,民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。《國際衝突理論》台中市:國立中興大學國際政治研究所出版,民國92年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱宏源主編。《撰寫碩博士論文實戰手冊》台北:正中出版,民國90年10月第6版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱威列。《世界熱點》香港:三聯出版,1993年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference艾愷(Alitto Guy)。《文化守成主義-反現代思潮的剖析》台北:時報出版,1986年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳釗燮。《中東的戰爭與和平:衝突降低與爭端解決》台北:志一出版,民國85年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳雲貴、周燮藩。《近現代伊斯蘭教思潮與運動》北京:社會科學文獻出版,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋稚青。《邏輯與科學方法》台北:大中國出版,民國60年第12版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李美馨譯,Ralph Berry原著。《研究論文寫作指導》台北:韋伯出版,2002年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李英明著。《全球化時代下的臺灣和兩岸關係》台北:揚智出版,2001年初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李鳳新譯,馬可、克黑朋(Marc Crepon)著。《製造敵人的文化》台北:果實出版、2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference杜默譯,普雷斯托維茨(Clyde prestowitz)原著。《美國遊戲》台北:大塊文化出版,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈玄池。《國際關係》台北:高立出版,民國91年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈明室主編。《新世紀反恐大作戰》台北:軍事迷文化出版,2002年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林祐聖、葉欣怡譯,杭士基(noam Chomsky)原著。《恐怖主義文化》台北:弘智出版、2003年3月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林添貴譯,布里辛斯基(Zbigniew Brzezinski)原著。《大棋盤》台北:立緒文化出版,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference,嘉戴爾思編。《世紀之路:改變中的全球秩序》台北:立緒文化出版,民國88年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference埃爾古恩、查潘編(Ergun Capan)。《伊斯蘭與恐怖主義》台北:希泉出版,2006年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張小明譯,小約瑟夫.奈原著。《理解國際衝突:理論與歷史》中國:上海人民出版,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張召忠、周碧松等著。《明天我們安全嗎?》杭州:浙江人民出版,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張尚德譯,普林頓著。《革命的剖析》台北:帕米爾出版,1967年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張春柏、陸乃聖譯,保羅.甘迺迪(Paul Kennedy)原著。《霸權興衰史》台北:五南出版,1995年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭希誠譯,布里辛斯基原著。《美國的抉擇》台北:左岸文化出版,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳曉林譯,史賓格勒原著。《西方的沒落》(The Decline of the West)台北:遠流出版,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭滂沱著。《天擇-猶太人的故事》台北:臺灣商務出版,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference華勒斯坦、布里辛斯基等著。《後911時代的世界格局-大變局》南昌:江西人民出版,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃裕美譯,Samuel P. Huntington著。《文明衝突與世界秩序的重建》台北:聯經出版,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃漢耀譯,丹尼爾•昆恩原著。《探索文明的出路》台北:新自然主義出版,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊日清等譯,Andrew Heywood原著。《政治學》台北:韋伯文化出版,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊永明。《國際安全與國際法》台北:元照出版,民國92年2月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference董更生譯,Robert A. Pastor編著。《二十世紀之旅/七大強權如何塑造二十世紀》台北:聯經,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference雷飛鴻主編。《新辭海》台北:世一書局出版,民國88年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉志勇、楊清主編。《全球衝突與爭端-亞洲卷》北京:世界知識出版,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉靖華。《現代政治與伊斯蘭教》北京:社會科學文獻出版,2000年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference樊亢主編。《資本主義興衰史》北京:北京出版,1984年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧瑞珠譯,賈瑪.愛利雅思(Jamal J. Elias)原著。《伊斯蘭教的世界》台北:城邦文化出版,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭志強譯,每日新聞社外信部編著。《從地圖看世界紛爭》台北:世潮出版,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference龍冠海。《社會學》台北:三民書局,民國65年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference魏元珪。《當代文明的危機》台北:先知出版,民國65年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅靜蘭等著。《西方文化之路》台北:揚智出版,1994年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鯨鲲、和敏譯,拉斯威爾著。《政治:論權勢人物的成長、時機和方法》台北:時報出版,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇進強主編。《911事件後全球戰略評估》台北:臺灣英文新聞出版,2002年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。《美國反恐戰爭臺灣觀點》台北:臺灣英文新聞,2002年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference丘臺峰。〈恐怖主義與反恐怖主義〉,《中央警察大學警政研究所,碩士論文》,民國76年6月,頁3-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference巨克毅。〈全球化下的宗教衝突與基要主義〉,《全球政治評論》,創刊號,民國91年,頁66-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何秉松。〈現代恐怖主義之意義與反恐怖主義的國際實踐〉,《國政研究報告》,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,民國91年,頁16-191。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈現代恐怖主義演進之研究〉,《國政研究報告》民國91年7月31日,頁67-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何信全。〈文化:世界衝突的來源抑或融合的起點〉,《二十一世紀》,1993 年12月,頁10-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳玉山。〈仍是現實主義的傳統:911與布希主義〉,《政治科學論叢》,第17期,2002年12月,頁7-15。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳東野。〈全球反恐聯盟及其相關問題之探討〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第4卷,第1期,2003年1月,頁4-6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳釗燮。〈文明的衝突或衝突而文明?評韓廷頓「文明衝突論」〉,《問題與研究》第36卷,第5期,民國86年5月,頁75-79。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂其昌。〈小布希政府的新軍事戰略〉,《現代國際關係》,2001年第5期,頁33-37。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李文志。〈杭亭頓的戰略思想與美國全球戰略的關係〉,《問題與研究》,第41卷,第4期。2002年7、8月,頁1-20。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈從對美「說不」看「文明的衝突」- 西方新統一戰線的建構與挑戰〉,《國家政策雙週刊》,第149期,1996年10月,頁16-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李黎明。〈美國對新世紀中共戰爭思維之假設:「不對稱戰爭」概念之發軔〉,《共黨問題研究》第3卷,第26期,民國89年3月,頁18-23。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林吉朗。〈當前美國國家軍事戰略之研究〉,《歐美月刊》,第11卷,第11期,1996年11月,頁12-16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林岩哲。〈國際恐怖主義的威脅〉,《問題與研究》,第18卷,第3期,民國76年12月,頁296-199。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林長寬。〈「伊斯蘭與其他宗教研究」序〉,《思與言》,第32卷,第1期,民國83年3月,頁i。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈中東伊斯蘭基本教義主義運動〉,「政治大學伊拉克戰爭後之國際關係」學術研討會。國立政治大學主辦,2004年6月12日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈西方伊斯蘭學〉,《當代》,第27期,民國88年9月,頁12-16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈理解現代伊斯蘭〉,「第一屆政治大學伊斯蘭研習營」。國立政治大學主辦,95年9月16日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林碧炤。〈國際衝突的研究途徑與處理方法〉,《問題與研究》,第35卷第3期85年3月,頁1-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference美國新國防規劃專題。《國防譯粹》,21卷第4期,1994年4月,頁1-42。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡瑞舟。〈911事件對戰爭研究的影響:主要意涵與思考〉,「國家安全與軍事戰略國際學術研討會」。民國91年11月,頁4-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈反恐戰爭對美國內外互動關係的影響:一年後的分析性概述〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第4卷第1期,2003年1月,頁46-49。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高一中譯,John Eldridge原著。〈恐怖份子使用大規模毀滅性武器的威脅對策〉,《國防譯粹》,第33卷,第3期,民國95年3月,頁24-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張中勇。〈美國反制國際恐怖主義的決策運作〉,《美國月刊》,第4卷,第8期,民國78年12月,頁23-24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈國際恐怖主義的演變與發展〉,《戰略與國際研究季刊》,第4卷,第1期,台北:台綜院,民國91年1月,頁8-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭震遠。〈非敵非友、亦敵亦友的中美關係〉,《中國評論》,第45期,2001年9月,頁5-8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳佩堯。〈透視美國對華政策:安全戰略變化與美國對華政策的調整〉,《中國評論》,第51期,2002年3月,頁6-11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳偉華。〈從「戰略嚇阻」論臺灣「國防戰略」發展上的兩難〉,《戰略與國際研究》,第2卷2期,2000年4月,頁77-79。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈論先制美國戰略思維之轉變與實踐〉,《國防雜誌》,第18卷,第6期,民國91年,頁36-42。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈論結構性嚇阻與決策性嚇阻〉,《問題與研究》,第41卷,第2期,民國91年3、4月,頁32-36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳紫財、汪士鑑。〈國家安全戰略報告〉,《空軍學術月刊》,第557期,91年4月,頁17-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃文啟譯,William S. Lind原著。〈瞭解第代戰爭〉,《國防譯粹》,第32卷,第7期,民國94年7月,頁56-59。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃旻華。〈伊斯蘭教真的被「妖摩化」了嗎?〉,《問題與研究》第41卷,第4期,民國91年7、8月,頁23-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊吉林。〈反美主義:文明衝突亦或權力政治?〉Languages, Literary Studies and International Studies: An International Journal, vol. 2, May 2005, p. 37-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊適忠。〈美國新軍事霸權戰略〉,《當代亞太》,2004年第4期,頁16-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹世亮。〈中東問題的歷史與現狀〉,《中國國際問題研究基金會外交學院學報》,2003年第1期,頁21-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蓋爾.盧夫特,安妮.科林。〈恐怖份子的下一個目標〉,《國際安全事務期刊》,2003年12月,頁69-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference遠景基金會。〈2001年國際情勢之回顧與展望〉,《遠景季刊》第3卷,第1期,2002年1月,頁180-182。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉長政。〈Middle East Politics〉,「第一屆政治大學伊斯蘭研習營」。國立政治大學主辦,95年9月16日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉革軍。〈新世紀初美國軍事戰略走向〉,《現代軍事》,2001年第5期,頁45-47。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘志平。〈「東突」恐怖主義透視〉,《新疆社會科學》,2002年第1期,頁18-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference滕昕雲。〈由911事件看美利堅帝國的殞落〉,《尖端科技》,第207期,民國90年11月,頁9-10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭赤琰。〈「先發制人」戰略逐漸成型〉,《中國評論》,2002年7月,頁56-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭瑞耀。〈布希政府安全戰略發展研析〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,第4卷,第2期,2003年4月,頁13-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference。〈國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析〉,《問題與研究》,第42卷,第2期,頁1-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅致政。〈布希主義與美伊戰爭〉,《國防政策評論》第3卷,第3期,2003年春季,頁71-75。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference譚中。〈美國能贏得戰後的和平嗎?〉,《中國評論》,2003年5月號,頁12-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference四、網際網路資源zh_TW
dc.relation.reference人民日報。<http://www.peopledaily.com.cn>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大紀元電子報。<http://www.epochtimes.com>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中時新聞網。<http://big5.china.com.cn/international/txt/2006-09/04/content_7129177.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中時電子報。<http://money.chinatimes.com/spot/america/war/news/901026-1.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台北政策論壇電子報。<http://www.socialsciences.nccu.edu.tw/society/composition.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference自由電子報。<http://www.libertytimes.com.tw>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference亞洲時報。<http://asiatimes-chinese.com/818east.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference國家政策論壇。<http://www.npf.org.tw/mpnthly/00110/theme-099.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference華盛頓觀察週刊。<http://www.washingtonobserver.org/document.cfm?documentid=1408&charid=2>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference新華網。<http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/sjzs/index.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference新臺灣新聞週刊。<http://iwebs.url.com.tw/main/heml/newtaiwan.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference維基百科。<http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B9%9D%E4%B8%80%E4%B8%E4%B8.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference遠景基金會。<http://www.future-china.org.tw>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference環球網。<http://www.singtaonet.com:82/america/t20060608_251238.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference聯合新聞網。<http://www.udn.com>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference五、新聞及報紙zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《中國時報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《文匯報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《香港信報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《國際先驅報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《基督教科學箴言報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《華盛頓郵報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《新華每日電訊》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《解放軍報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《環球時報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference《聯合報》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference一、政府出版品zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBush, George W. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, D.C.: The White House, September 17, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClinton, William J. A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement. Washington, D.C.: The White House, February 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDepartment of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, September 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKhan, Herman Thinking About the Unthinkable. New York:Horizon Press, 1962.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNational Foreign Assessment Center, U. S. Central Intelligence Agency. International Terrorism in 1979. Washington, D. C.: Central Intelligence Agency, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOffice of Homeland Security, White House. National Strategy for Homeland Security, July 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePerry, William J. Annual Report to the President and Congress. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense, March 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of State, Exercise Right of Self-Defense Against Libyan Terrorism. Department of State Bulletin, August 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceU.S. Department of State, Patterns of Global Terrorism 1994. Washington, D.C.: Department of State. April 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、專書zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArnold, Toynbee J. A Study of History. Challenge and Response PartⅡ, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarter, Ashton B. and William J. Perry. Preventive Defense:A New Security Strategy For America. New York, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEppright, Charles T. Counterterrorism and Conventional Military Force: The Relationship Between Political Effect and Utility; in Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. Taylor & Francis,1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEsposito, John L. The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? 3rded. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeinberg, Stephen. Homeland Security And Economic Prosperity: Defending Our Country and the Survival of American Capitalism. New York, Universe, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFlory, Maurice. International Law: An Instrument to Combat Terrorism, in Terrorism and International Law. Rosalyn Higgins and Maurice Flory, eds. London: Routledge, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreedman, Lawrence. A New Type of War. London: Oxord University Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London: Simon & Schuster, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKaplan, Robert D. Warrior Politics: Why Leadership Demands a Pagan Ethos. New York: Random House, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLawrence Freedman, Christopher Hill, Adam Roberts, R.J. Vincent, Paul Wilkinson & Philip Windsor, Terrorism and International Order. London Routledge and Kegan: Paul,1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLesser, Ina O. Bruce Hoffman, John Arquilla, Michele Zanini, David Ronfeldt, Countering the New Terrorism. Washington D. C.: RAND Corporation, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLivingston, Neil C. and David Halevy, Inside the PLO: Covert Units, Secret Funds, and the War against Israel and the United States. New York: Morrow, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO`Brien, Conor Cruise. Terrorism Under Democratic Conditions-The Case of the IRA.”in M. Crenshaw(ed.) Terrorism, Legitimacy and Power – The Consequences of Political Violence. Manufactured :Wesleyan University, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOcerien, Conor Cruise. Terrorism Under Democratic Conditions-The Case of the IRA,? In M.Crenshaw, ed., Terrorism, Legitimcy and Power-The Consequences of Political Violence. Manufactured: Wesleyan University, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePayne, Also in Keith B. Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age Lexington. The University, Press of Kentucky, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePayne, Keith B. The Fallacies of Cold War Deterrence and a New Direction. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePoland, James M. Understanding Terrorism: Group, Strategies and Responses. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQuester, George H. “Some Thoughts on Deterrence Failures.” Paul C. Stern, Robert Axelrod, Robert Jervis, and Roy Radner, eds., Perspectives on Deterrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchelling, Thomas. A Strategy of Conflict. Washing DC: CSIS Publisher, 1971.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmid, Alex P. Political Terrorism : A Research Guide to Concepts Theories. Data Bases and literature Amsterdam : north-Holland Publishing Company, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShalikashvili, John M. National Military Strategy of the United States of America:A Strategy of Flexible and Selective Engagement. Washington, D.C.: The White House, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShulsky, Abram N. Deterrence Theory and Chinese Behavior. California, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSnyder, Glenn H. and Paul Diesing, Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making and System Structure in International Crisis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliam, L. Cleveland, A History of the Modern Middle East. Boulder,Co: Westview Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStein Patricia Wrightson and Alice Ackermann, The Nexus Between Peace Studies and International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, in Michael T. Klare, ed., Peace and World Security Studies : A Curriculum Guide Boulder : Lynn Rienner Publishers, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZagare, Frank C. and D. Marc Kilgour, Perfect Deterrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAhrari, Mohammed E. “The Clash of Civilizations: an Old Story or New Truth?” New Perspectives Quarterly 14, no. 2, Spring 1997, pp. 56-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAjami, Fouad. “The Summoning: But They Said, We Will not Hearken.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 4, Summer/October 1993, pp. 2-9zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArquilla, John. “Bound to Fail: Regional Deterrence after the Cold War. ” Comparative Strategy, vol. 14, no. 2, April-June 1995, pp. 123-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBailes, Alyson. “The Yin and Yang of counter-terrorism.” RUSI Journal, London: December 2002.vol. 147, Iss. 6, pp. 10-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBartley, Robert L. “The Case for Optimism: The West Should Believe in Itself.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 4, Summer/October 1993, pp. 15-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBinyan, Liu. “Civilization Crafting, no Culture is an Island.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 4, September/October 1993, pp. 19-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoot, Max. “The Case for American Empire.” Weekly Standard. October 15, 2001, pp. 27-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrodie, Bernard. “The Anatomy of Deterrence. ” World Politics, vol. XI, no. 2, January 1959, pp. 173-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDickey, Christopher and Adam Rogers, et al. “Smoke and Mirrors: The World Reacted in Outrage when President Bush Last Summer Spurned the Kyoto Treaty to Cut Emissions. His New Plan Won’t Make Him Any Friends Either. ”Newsweek International Atlantic Edition. February 25, 2002, pp. 12-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEliot, Cohen. “A Strange War.” The National Interest, no. 65-s, Thanksgiving 2001, pp. 11-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreedman, Lawrence “The Third World War?” Survival, vol. 43, no. 4, Winter 2001-02, pp. 61-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGray, Colin S. “Deterrence in the 21th Century. ” Comparative Strategy, vol. 19, no.3, July-September 2000, pp. 255-6.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreenwood, Christopher. “International Law and the ‘War Against Terrorism’.” International Affairs, vol. 78, no. 2. 2002, pp. 301-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHadar, Leon T. “What Green Peril?.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 2, Spring 1993, pp. 27-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHassner, Pierre. “Morally Objectionable, Politically Dangerous.” National Interest 46, winter 1996/ 1997, pp. 63-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeilbrunn, Jacob. “The Clash of Samuel Huntington.” The American Prospect 39, Jul/ Aug 1998, pp. 22-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHirsh, Michael. “Bush and the World.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 3, September/October, 2002, pp. 15-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolsti, K. J. “The Dividing Discipline. ” Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1985, pp. 82-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuntington, Samuel P. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 3, Summer 1993, pp. 22-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference__________________ “The West Civilizations:Unique, not Universal.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 75, no. 6, november/December 1996, pp. 26-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIgnatieff, Michael. “The Divided West.” Financial Times, 31 August 2002, pp. 41-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIkenberry, John G. “America`s Imperial Ambition.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 2, September/October, 2002, pp. 44-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference_______________ “Just Like the Rest.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 76, no. 2, March/ April 1997, pp. 162-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJenkins, Brian M. “Defense Against Terrorism.” Political Science Quarterly. 1986,vol.101.Number 5. pp. 781-783.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference______________ “International Terrorism: A Balance Sheet.” Survival, July/August 1975, pp. 160-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnston, Alastair Iain. “Thinking About Strategic Culture. ” International Security, vol. 19, no. 4, Spring 1995, pp. 32-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKader, Zerougui A. Review of The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, by Samuel P. Huntington, Arab Studies Quarterly, vol. 20, no.1, Winter 1998, pp. 89-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKennedy, Paul. “nothing Has Ever Existed Like This Disparity of Power nothing.” Financial Times, February 1, 2002, pp. 19-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKirkatrick, Jeane J. and others, “The Modernization Imperative: Tradition and Change.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 4, Summer/October 1993, pp. 22-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoh, Harold Hongju. “The Spirit of the Laws.” Harvard Journal of International Law, vol. 43, no. 1,Winter 2002, pp. 23-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKristof, Nicholas D. “The Rise of China. ” Foreign Affairs, vol.72, no. 5, november/December 1993, pp. 59-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKurth, James. “The Real Clash.” The National Interest, no. 37, Fall 1994, pp. 9-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLemann, Nicholas. “The Next World Order: The Bush administration may have a brand new doctrine of power.” The New Yorker, Feb. 1. 2002, pp. 21-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMahbubani, Kishore. “The Dangers of Decadence: What the Rest Can Teach the West.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 4, Summer/October 1993, pp. 10-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMainuddin, Rolin. “Review of The Future of Islam and the West: Clash of Civilizations or Peaceful Coexistence? ” by Shireen T. Hunter, Journal of Third World Studies 17, Spring 2000, pp. 277-278.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMalaby, Sebastian. “The Reluctant Imperialist: Terrorism, Failed States, and the Case for American Empire.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 80, no. 4, March / April 2002, pp. 2-3.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMilburn, Thomas W. “What Constitutes Effective Deterrence? ” Conflict Resolution, vol. III, no. 2, June 1959, pp. 138-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMonshipouri, Mahmood. “The West’s Modern Encounter with Islam From Discourse.” Journal of Church and States, vol. 40, no. 1, Winter 1998, pp 29-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKaplan, Morton A. “The Calculus of Deterrence.” World Politics, vol. XI, no. 1, October, 1958, pp. 20-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMunro, Ross H. “Awakening Dragon:The Real Danger in Asia is from China.” Policy Review, no. 62, Fall 1992, pp. 10-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO`Brien, William V. “Reprisals, Deterrence and Self-Defense in Counter-terror Operations.” Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 3, 1990, pp. 421-465.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO`Hanlon, Michael. “Rumsfeld`s Defence Vision.” Survival, vol. 44, no.2 Summer 2002, pp. 104-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePiel, Gerard. “The West Is Best.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 4, September/ October 1993, pp. 25-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoeder, Philip G. “Clash of Civilizations and Escalation of Domestic Ethnopolitical Conflicts.” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 36, no. 5, June 2003, pp. 534.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosecrance, Richard. Review of The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, by Samuel P. Huntington, American Political Science Review, vol. 92, no.4, December 1998, pp. 978-980.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRothschild, Emma. “What is Security? ” Deadalus, vol. 124, no. 3, Summer 1995, pp. 55-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRubenstein Richard E. and Jarle Crocker, “Challenging Huntington.” Foreign Policy, no. 96, Fall 1994, pp. 121-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRumsfeld, Donald H. “Transforming the Military.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 81, no. 3, May/June, 2002, pp. 20-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRussett, Bruce M. John R. Oneal, and Michalene Cox. “Clash of Civilizations, or Realism and Liberalism Déjà vu? Some Evidence,” Journal of Peace Research, vol. 37, no. 5, September 2000, pp. 592-595.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaid, Edward W. “The Clash of Ignorance.” The Nation 273, no. 12, October 22, 2001, pp. 11-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchwarz, Benjamin and Christopher Layne. “A Grand New Strategy.” The Atlantic Monthly, January 2002, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. 36-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Anthony D. “The Ethnic Sources of Nationalism.” Survival 35, no. 1, Spring 1993, pp. 48-62.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVogel, Frank E. “The Trial of Terrorists Under Classical Islamic Law.” Harvard Journal of International Law, vol. 43, no. 1,Winter 2002, pp. 53-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWalt, Stephen N. “Building Up New Bogeymen.” Foreign Policy, no. 106, Spring 1993, pp. 184-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYamazaki, Masakazu. “Asia: A Civilization in the Making.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 7, no. 4 , July/ August 1996, pp. 106-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference四、網際網路資源zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11 September Attacks: The European Union´s broad response – September. atzh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://europa.ed.int/news/110901/september.htm, September 12, 2001.>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceA Dirty Business: Mr. Bush Has Put U.S. Credibility on the Line, ”Guardian, March 30, 2001, p. 21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://news.sina.com/phoenixtv/105-103-102-101/2006-11-02/03111476000.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmin, Samir mperialism and Globalization, Monthly Review, June 2001. <http://www.findarticles.com>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAPEC Leaders Statement on Counter-terrorism, Shanghai, October 21, 2001. <http://www.apecsec.org.sg.>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBush’s Iraq Policy Stalled in U. N., New York Times, October 3, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-US-Iraq.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoffmann, Stanley.“ The High and the Mighty: Bush’s national-security strategy and the new American hubris.” The American Prospect, vol. 13, no. 24, Jan.13, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.prospect.org/print/V13/24/hoffmann-s.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Islamic Front for Jihad Against the Jews and Crusaders, Usama Ibn Ladin / Osama bin Laden. <http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/Iadin.htm>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohn Lewis Gaddis, “A Grand Strategy of Transformation.” atzh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.foreignpolicy.com/issue_novdec_2002/gaddis.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrauthammer, Charles “The Obsolescence of Deterrence.” The Weekly Standard, vol. 008, lssue 13, Dec. 9, 2002. <http://www.theweeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/964dzkuf.asp.>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOdora, Alex Obote “Defining International Terrorism.” Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 6, March, 1999.<http://www.Murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v6nl/obote-odora6ltext.html,19 August 2000.>zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePresident Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point, Remarks by the President at 2002 Graduation Exercise of the United States Military Academy West Point, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020601-3.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePresident Bush Discusses Global Climate Change. June 11, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/06/20010611-2.html.>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSee Office of the Pass Secretary, Adress to a joint Session of Congress and the American people, United States Capitol, Washington, D.C., September 20, 2001, atzh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.whitehouse.gov./news/releases/2001/09/20010920.-8.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShay, Shaul “The Afghan Alumni and the Clash Between Civilizations.” in Muhammad`s Monsters, ed. David Bukay, Balfour Books, 2004, Retrieved from.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.acpr.org.il/publications/policy-papers/pp128-xs.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSokolski, Henry “Post 911 nonproliferation.” Foreign Policy Research Institute, at <http://www.fpri.org>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStatement by the President in His Address to the Nation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010911-16.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhite House, The National Security Stategy of the United States, September 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference< http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference五、新聞及報紙zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<Agency France Press>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<The New York Times>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<Newsweek>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<Defense News>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<Financial Times>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<International Herald Tribune>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<Los Angeles Times>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<The Washington Post>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference<Washington File>zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201101.pdf62.17 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201102.pdf136.01 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201103.pdf106.17 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201104.pdf118.69 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201105.pdf318.97 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201106.pdf533.24 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201107.pdf380.19 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201108.pdf425.2 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201109.pdf612.83 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201110.pdf271.87 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201111.pdf705.08 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
201112.pdf234.59 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.