Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49321
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor黃仁德zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHwang, Jen Teen_US
dc.contributor.author賴淑容zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLai, Shu Jungen_US
dc.creator賴淑容zh_TW
dc.creatorLai, Shu Jungen_US
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-07T18:05:17Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-07T18:05:17Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-07T18:05:17Z-
dc.identifierG0097925013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49321-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)zh_TW
dc.description97925013zh_TW
dc.description98zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study adopt input orientation data envelopment Analysis approaches to evaluate the operational efficiency for major international airports in terms of the top 20 ranking by total passengers handling in Asia region in 2008. Unlike the most the other airport literature researches only using the one-stage DEA to measure the efficiency, in this study, two-stage, the extension of DEA, adding the concept of the intermediates product, separate the airport operation into airport capital side and airport capability side, is applied to evaluate the two-side efficiency of each airport under the assumption of constant returns to scale, variable returns to scale, scale efficiency and super efficiency model by employing four inputs, four intermediate products and two outputs.\r\nThe result of this study shows that the China Shenzhen Baoan airport is the best airport in overall technical efficiency in different stages. It indicates that the operation of small size airports (category by the passengers handling) are run more efficiency than the large one. In addition, by two-stage DEA analysis, the airport capital usage is better than in capacity utilization. It found that the China Beijing Capital airport is good in airport infrastructure usage but the capacity utilization is not enough. Finally, the number of increasing return scale airports are more than the decreasing return scale airports among Asia region (e.g. Taiwan Taoyuan airport), therefore, the expansions of facility and capacity in those increasing return scale airports are worthy to invest to promote the operational efficiency and its competitiveness.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction...1\r\n1.1 Motivation.....1\r\n1.2 Purpose........2\r\n1.3 Objective and Framework......4\r\n2. Literature Review............6\r\n2.1 Airport Efficiency Measurement Using DEA.......6\r\n2.2 The Two-stage DEA Studies........10 \r\n3. Empirical Methods................11\r\n3.1 The Basic DEA Models.............11\r\n3.2 Two-stage DEA for Airport........15\r\n4. Empirical Process and Results....18\r\n4.1 Data Explanation.................19\r\n4.2 Empirical Results................25\r\n4.2.1 One-stage Overall Performance Analysis.....25\r\n4.2.2 Ranking of Efficiency Score by One-stage...26\r\n4.2.3 Two-stage Overall Peformance Analysis......29\r\n4.2.4 Ranking of Efficiency Score by Two-stage...31\r\n4.2.5 Scale Efficiency Comparison......35\r\n5. Conclusion.......................39\r\nReference................................40\r\nAppendix.................................43 \r\nTable 1: Summary of DEA Research on Airport Efficiency...9\r\nTable 2: The Growth of Airports in Worldwide — 2008.....18\r\nTable 3: Top 20 of Busiest Asia Airports — Total Passengers ----19\r\nTable 4: Variables of One-Stage DEA....21\r\nTable 5: Variables of Two-Stage DEA....21\r\nTable 6: Pearson Correlation Between Input and Output — One Stage.....22\r\nTable 7: Pearson correlation Between Input and Output — Capital Side..22\r\nTable 8: Pearson Correlation Between Input and Output — Capacity Side..22\r\nTable 9: Descriptive Statistic of Empirical Variables...24\r\nTable 10: Ranking of CCR Overall Efficiency....25\r\nTable 11: Comparison of Ranking by One Stage...26\r\nTable 12: Efficiency Score of PTE and SE by One Stage...27\r\nTable 13: Ranking of CCR Overall Efficiency by Capital..29\r\nTable 14: Ranking of CCR Overall Efficiency by Capacity.30\r\nTable 15: Ranking Comparison Between One Stage and Two Stage ...31\r\nTable 16: Average Score of Technical Efficiency...34\r\nTable 17: Efficiency Score of PTE and SE by Two Stage...36\r\nTable 18: Score of Scale Efficiency....37\r\nTable 19: Efficiency Evaluation by CCR/BCC/SE Models...37\r\nFigure 1: Intermediate Concept of Inner Operation......15\r\nFigure 2: Network Process..............................16\r\nFigure 3: Two-Stage Process............................17\r\nFigure 4: Two-Stage of Airport Inner Operation.........20\r\nFigure 5: Efficiency Score of PTE and SE in Different Airports........28\r\nFigure 6: Overall Efficiency of Different Stage...32\r\nFigure 7: Proportion of Efficiency Score is Equal to 1...38zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097925013en_US
dc.subject機場資產zh_TW
dc.subject機場能量zh_TW
dc.subject效率zh_TW
dc.subject二階段DEAzh_TW
dc.subjectAirport Capitalen_US
dc.subjectAirport Capacityen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectTwo-Stage DEAen_US
dc.title亞洲主要機場的績效比較研究-資料包絡法的分析zh_TW
dc.titleEfficiency evaluation of major airports in Asia-data envelopment analysisen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAdler, N. and J. Berechman (2001), “Measuring Airport Quality from the Airlines` Viewpoint: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” Transport Policy, 8:3, pp. 171-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceACI (2007), ACI Position Brief: The Airport Business. Geneva: Airport International Council.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBanker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 30, pp. 1078-1092.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBazargan, M. and B. Vasigh (2003), “Size Versus Efficiency: a Case Study of US Commercial Airports,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 9:3, pp. 187-193.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarros, C. P. and P. U. C. Dieke (2008), “Measuring the Economic Efficiency of Airports: A Simar-Wilson Methodology Analysis” Transportation Research, 44:6, pp. 1039-1051.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBowlin, W. F. (1987), “Evaluating the Efficiency of US Air Force Real-Property Maintence,” Journal of Operational Research Society, 38:2, pp. 32-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCesar, V. O. and M. T. Benjamin (2005), “An International Comparison of Banking Sectors: A DEA Approach,” Global Economic Review, 34:3, pp. 291-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChen, Y. J. (2003), “The Operational Efficiency of Major Airports in Asia: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” master thesis, Department of Logistics Management, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology. (In Chinese)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCharnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2:6, pp. 429-444.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCheng, J. H., R. T. Wang, and M. F. Hsieh (2007), “Combining the GRA and the Two-Stage DEA Methods for Assessing the performance of Air Cargo Terminals,” Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/130000087559zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCoelli, T. J. (1996), “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program,” CEPA Working Paper, No. 8/96, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.une.edu.au/econometrics/cepa2.htm#softwarezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooper, W. W., L. M. Seiford, and J. Zhu (2004), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDempsey, P. S. (1999), Airport Planning and Development Handbook. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFarrell, M. J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120:3, pp. 253-290.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFare, R. and S. Grosskopf (1996), “Productivity and Intermediate Products: A Frontier Approach,” Economics Letter, 50:1, pp. 67-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFan, Y. C. (2005), “The Study on the Operating Efficiency of Main Airports in the World-on the Application of DEA,” master thesis, Department of Accounting Management, Yuan Ze University. (In Chinese)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFielding A. L., T. T. Babitsky, and M. E. Brenner (1985), “Performance Evaluation of Bus Transit,” Transportation Research, 19:1, pp. 73–82.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGillen, D. and A. Lall (1997), “Developing Measures of Airport Productivity and Performance: an Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 33:4, pp. 261-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGollani, B and Y. Roll (1989), “An Application Procedure for DEA,” Omega International Journal of Management Sciences, 17, pp. 237–250.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHooper, P. (2002), “Privatization of Airports in Asia,” Journal of Air Transport Management, 8:5, pp. 289-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHong, C. H. (2005), “An Evaluation Framework for Operational Performance of World major Airports with Application of DEA,” master thesis, Department of Logistics Management, National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology. (In Chinese)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIATA (2009), World Air Transport Statistics 2008. Montreal: International Air Transport Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIATA (1995), Airport Development Reference Manual. Montreal: International Air Transport Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceICAO (2009), Annual Report: The State of International Civil Aviation. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKalirajan, K. P. (1990), “On Measuring Economic Efficiency,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 5:1, pp. 75–85.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLovell, C. A. K. (1993), “Production Frontier and Productive Efficiency,” in H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, and S. S. Schmidt, eds., The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. (New York: Oxford University Press) pp. 3-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSarkis J. and S. Talluri (2004), “Evaluating and Selecting E-Commerce Software and Communication Systems for a Supply Chain,” European Journal of Operational Research, 159:2, pp. 318-329.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSexton, T. R. and H. F. Lewis (2003), “Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19:2, pp. 227-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny (1986), “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp. 461-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTseng, K. J., J. F. Ho, and Y. J. Liu (2008), “A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Major International Airports in the World, ” Journal of Modeling in Management, 3:1, pp. 71-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTone, K. and M. Tsutsui (2007), “Application of Network DEA Model to Vertically Integrated Electric Utilities,” GRIPS Discussion Papers, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, No. 07-03.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.