Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51135
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.author李明威zh_TW
dc.creator李明威zh_TW
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-29T10:57:48Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-29T10:57:48Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-29T10:57:48Z-
dc.identifierG0096911014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51135-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description學校行政碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description96911014zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討教師印象管理與組織公民行為之關係,究採用問卷調查法,以臺北市69所高中職學校高中職為研究範圍,採分層隨機抽樣,抽出540位受試者,回收有效問卷429份,所得資料分別以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析及迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料的分析與處理,以瞭解高中職教師印象管理與組織公民行為之現況、差異情形及其預測力。研究結論如下:\n一、 臺北市高中職教師印象管理現況略低於平均值,以「奉承」最高。\n二、 高中職教師組織公民行為之表現屬中等程度,以「對學生之公民行為」表現最佳。\n三、 性別、年齡、職務等三個背景變項在印象管理、組織公民行為上有顯著差異,男性、51歲以上、兼任主任職務之教師較高。\n四、 服務總年資及本校服務年資等二個背景變項在組織承諾與組織公民行為上有顯著差異,以服務11年以上之教師比10年以下的教師對學校產生了更高的認同感,表現相對較佳的公民行為。\n五、 學歷背景變項在印象管理、組織公民行為上無顯著差異;服務總年資、本校服務年資、公私立學校背景變項在印象管理無顯著差異\n六、 印象管理對組織公民行為具顯著正相關及預測力\n最後依據研究結果與結論,提出具體建議,以作為教育行政機關、高中職校長、以及未來研究的參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractA Study on Relationship between Impression Management and Organizational Citizenship Behavior\nAbstract\n\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between impression management(IM) and Organizational citizenship behavior(OCB).\nA survey research was conducted using a sample of high school and vocational school teachers in Taipei city in Northern Taiwan. 540 teachers from 69 schools were selected by stratified random sampling. 429 valid sample data collected was analyzed and processed with the methods of descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, multiple-regression analysis. The major findings of this study are as follows:\n1. The teachers’ impression management in Taipei is less than average, “ingratiation” ranks the top.\n2. Teacher’s OCB is above average, “OCBIS” ranks the top.\n3. Three demographic variables, including gender, age, position, show significant differences in both IM and OCB. Teachers who are male, older than 51, work as the chief of department, show higher performance of IM and OCB.\n4. Two demographic variables, total serving years and serving years in this school, show significant differences in IM, OCB. Teachers with more than 11 serving years show much sense of identification and better performance of OCB.\n5. The variables, education, shows no significant differences in IM, OCB. Total serving years, serving years in this school, and school category show no significant differences in IM, either.\n6. IM is positively related to OCB. \n\nBased on the results of the research, suggestions for educational administration authorities, principals and future related study are proposed.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒 論 1\n第一節 研究動機與目的 1\n第二節 待答問題 3\n第三節 名詞釋義 3\n第四節 研究範圍與限制 5\n第二章 文獻探討 7\n第一節 印象管理理論與相關研究 7\n第二節 組織公民行為理論與相關研究 20\n第三節 印象管理與組織公民行為關係之研究 35\n第三章 研究設計與實施 47\n第一節 研究架構與變項 47\n第二節 研究假設 48\n第三節 研究對象 49\n第四節 研究方法與工具 53\n第五節 資料處理與分析 61\n第六節 研究程序 63\n第四章 研究結果分析與討論 65\n第一節 印象管理與教師組織公民行為之現況分析 65\n第二節 不同背景變項之印象管理差異分析 66\n第三節 不同背景變項之教師組織公民行為差異分析 79\n第四節 印象管理對組織公民行為之預測力分析 90\n第五章 結論與建議 95\n第一節 研究發現 95\n第二節 結論 102\n第三節 建議 103\n參考文獻 107\n附錄一 教師印象管理、組織公民行為關係【預試問卷】 115\n附錄二 教師印象管理、組織公民行為關係【正式問卷】 119\n\n \n \n\n圖表目錄\n\n圖 1 印象管理組織公民行為模式 39\n圖 2 研究架構圖 47\n\n表 1 國外學者對印象管理之定義 8\n表 2 國內學者對印象管理之定義 8\n表 3 組織公民行為的構面分類表 27\n表 4國內組織公民行為相關研究 30\n表 5 印象管理相關的組織公民行為特徵 42\n表 6 組織公民行為的構面比較表 44\n表 7 預試問卷寄發與回收率摘要表 50\n表 8 教師分層母群體分析表 51\n表 9 正式問卷樣本基本資料一覽表 51\n表 10 印象管理量表各層面與題項 54\n表 11 組織公民行為量表各層面與題項 54\n表 12 「印象管理」因素分析摘要表 55\n表 13 「教師組織公民行為」因素分析摘要表 58\n表 14 「印象管理預試量表」信度分析摘要表 59\n表 15 「教師組織公民行為預試量表」信度分析摘要表 60\n表 16印象管理正式問卷題數分配表 61\n表 17教師組織公民行為正式問卷題數分配表分 61\n表 18高中職教師印象管理現況分析摘要表 65\n表 19 高中職教師組織公民行為現況分析摘要表 66\n表 20教師性別在印象管理之t考驗分析摘要表 67\n表 21 教師年齡在印象管理之單因子變異數分析摘要表 69\n表 22 教師服務總年資在印象管理之單因子變異數分析摘要表 71\n表 23教師本校服務年資在印象管理之單因子變異數分析摘要表 73\n表 24教師學歷在印象管理之單因子變異數分析摘要表 75\n表 25教師擔任職務在印象管理之單因子變異數分析摘要表 77\n表 26公私立學校教師在印象管理之t考驗分析摘要表 78\n表 27教師性別在教師組織公民行為之t考驗分析摘要表 79\n表 28教師年齡在教師組織公民行為之單因子變異數分析摘要表 81\n表 29 教師服務總年資在教師組織公民行為之單因子變異數分析摘要表 83\n表 30 教師本校服務年資在教師組織公民行為之單因子變異數分析摘要 85\n表 31 教師學歷在教師組織公民行為之單因子變異數分析摘要表 86\n表 32 教師擔任職務在教師組織公民行為之單因子變異數分析摘要表 88\n表 33 公私立學校教師在教師組織公民行為之t考驗分析摘要表 89\n表 34 印象管理與組織公民行為之相關分析摘要表 90\n表 35 印象管理對「整體組織公民行為」逐步多元迴歸分析摘要表要表 91\n表 36 印象管理對「對組織之公民行為」逐步多元迴歸分析摘要表 92\n表 37 印象管理對「對同事之公民行為」逐步多元迴歸分析摘要表 93\n表 38印象管理對「對學生之公民行為」逐步多元迴歸分析摘要表 94\n表 39 不同背景變項之教師在印象管理之知覺顯著差異綜合摘要表 99\n表 40 不同背景變項之教師組織公民行為顯著差異綜合摘要表 100\n表 41 研究假設驗證結果彙整表 101zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096911014en_US
dc.subject印象管理zh_TW
dc.subject組織公民行為zh_TW
dc.subjectImpression managementen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational Citizenship Behavioren_US
dc.title印象管理與教師組織公民行為關係之研究zh_TW
dc.titleA study on the relationship between impression management and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavioen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference壹、 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王淑貞(1999)。新進人員角色期望對其工作行為之影響-並檢驗與主管關係及與同事關係干擾效果。國立中央大學人力資源管理所碩士論文。未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳政達(2009)。學校組織中領導者與部屬交換關係、組織公平、組織自尊與工作滿意度對組織公民行為影響之研究。教育政策論壇,12(1),141-161zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水(2007)。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證:以台北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教育政策論壇,10(1),133-159。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳雅玲 (1989)。印象整飾理論對教育應用的啟示。教育資料文摘月刊,42(6),144-153。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference宋立國(2005)。應徵者印象管理策略對主試官評量之影響-面談主試官作筆zh_TW
dc.relation.reference記之內容分析暨干擾效果研究。國立台灣大學商學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂旺澤(2008)。國小校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為之研究—以組織承諾為中介變項。亞洲大學經營管理學系碩士論文,未出版,台中。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李雯智(2008)。教師組織公民行為之評析。學校行政雙月刊,56,95-106。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周惠玲(2005)。組織公民行為前因與印象管理動機對組織內知識分享成效影響zh_TW
dc.relation.reference之研究。私立輔仁大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪麗花(2008)。組織公民行為與主管-部屬交換關係-印象管理動機的調節角色。私立清雲科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林淑姬(1992)。薪酬公平、程式公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林淑姬、樊景立、吳靜吉、司徒達賢(1994)。薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,管理評論,13(2),87-108。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林鉦棽(1996)。組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點。管理科學學報,13(3),391-415。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林鉦棽(1999)。組織承諾、工作滿意與組織公民行為之研究:各種不同理論模式之比較。中山管理評論,7(4),1049-1073。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林鉦棽、蕭淑月、何慧清(2005)。社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究:以信任與關係為分析切入點。人力資源管理學報,5(1),77-110。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪慶華(2003)。簡論教師印象管理。教學與管理,12,34-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱麗蓉(2003)。組織公平與組織公民行為關係之研究--以苗栗縣國民小學為例。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference姜定宇、鄭伯壎(2003)。組織忠誠、組織承諾、及組織公民行為研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,4(19),175-209。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡雅棠(2008)。教師覺知校長服務領導與教師組織公民行為的關係研究-以台南市國民中學為例。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高級中等學校校別資料(不含進修學校) 98.12.24,(990108取自教育部統計處http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn= 21549)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許文敏(2004)。高職教師之校長領導風格知覺、組織承諾知覺及公民行為知覺相關之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系博士論文,未出版,彰化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許順興(2006)。臺北市國中校長轉型領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許道然(2002)。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究。未出版之博士論文。國立政治大學公共行政系,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳啟東(2004)。高級職業學校校長領導型態對教師組織公民行為與學校組織績效影響之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系博士論文,未出版,彰化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006),管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救,管理學報,23(1),77-98。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐宗盛(2010)。校長印象管理與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉餘模(1999)。印象整飾。公務人員月刊,36,44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃俊傑(2006)。「組織公民行為」在學校組織革新上的啟示。學校行政,43,134-145。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃柏勳(2004)。國民中小學校長轉型領導、學校組織氣候與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃國隆(1986)。中學教師的組織承諾與專業承諾。國立政治大學學報,53,55-84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃嘉雄(2006)。聚合或潛在構念:探討組織公民行為的構念特性。人力資源管理學報,6(1),pp31-45。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡珮芬(2005)。從事派遣工作之原因、內外控人格、自我監控能力與要派企業zh_TW
dc.relation.reference組織文化對派遣員工印象管理行為之影響。國立彰化師範大學人力資源管理zh_TW
dc.relation.reference研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡健銓(2004)。印象管理行為對組織內人際互動之影響;多觀點之研究。國立zh_TW
dc.relation.reference東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭燿男(2002)。國中小教師的組織公民行為及其影響因素之研究:學校組織公民行為模型初構。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,高雄。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇文郁(2005)。人格特質、印象管理與組織公民行為關係之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference嚴文廷(2007)。中學數學教師運用印象管理策略對學生學習滿意度與學習成效之影響-以新化國中數學課程為例。私立南台科技大學技職教育與人力資源發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高雅曼(2009)。國民中學教師角色定義幅度對組織公民行為影響之研究-質量混合方法之應用。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference嚴叔湘(2010)。臺北市國中教師運用印象管理策略之研究。未出版,國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference貳、 西文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBandura,A.(1977), Self-Efficacy: Towards a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePsychological Review, 84, 191-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-598.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBatman, T., & Organ, D. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee \"citizenship\". Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBelogolovsky, E., & Somech, A. (2009) Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the perspective of teachers, principals and parents, Teaching and Teacher Education (2009), doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.032zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBogler, R, & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277-289zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or goodzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceactors? Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003). More than one way to make an impression:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceExploring profiles of impression management. Journal of Management, 29, 141-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H. (2003) Going the extra mile: Cultivating and managing employee citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Executive 17(3): 60-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBowler M.(2006), Organizational goals versus the dominant coalition: A critical view of the value of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7, 258-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBozeman, D. P., & Kacmar, K. M. (1997). A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(1), 9-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceByrne, B. M. (2001). Structure equation modeling with amos: basic concepts,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceapplications, and programming. N J: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academiczh_TW
dc.relation.referencePresszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, A., & Vigoda, E.(2000). Do good citizens make good organizational citizens? An empirical examination of the relationship between general citizenship and organizational citizenship behavior in Isral. Administration & Society, 32(5), 596-624.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceColeman, V. I., & Borman, W.C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 25-44zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement of high school students. High School Journal, 88(3), 35-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFandt, P. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). The Management of Information and Impression:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhen Employees Behave Opportunistically. Organization Behavior and Humanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDecision Processes, 45 (1), 140-158.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGardner, W. L., & Martinko, M.J. (1988). Impression Management in Organizations.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal of Management, 14 (2), 321-338.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology , 58, 479-514.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249-270.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrusky, O. (1966). Career mobility and organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 488-503.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIckes, W., Reidhead, S., & Patterson, M. (1986). Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as “me” and “you.” Social Cognition, 4, 58-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJones, E.E. (1965), Ingratiation: A Social-Psychological Analysis, New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAAppelton-Century-Crofts.( http://faculty.babson.edu/krollag/org_site/soc_psych/jones_ingrat.html)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKatz, D. (1964). The motivation bases of organizational behavior, Behavioral Science, 9,131-133.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKonovsky, M. A.,&Pugh, S. D.(1994) .Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656-669.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKumar K., & Beyerlein M. (1991). Construction and validation of an instrument forzh_TW
dc.relation.referencemeasuring ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Appliedzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePsychology, 76, 619-627.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLam, S. S. K., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. (1999). Organizational Citizenship Behavior:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceComparing perspectives of supervisors subordinates across four international Samples, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 594-601.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. (1990). Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiden, R. C. & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 572-587.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLuthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 26zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1993). The impact of organizationalzh_TW
dc.relation.referencecitizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 57, 70-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMudrack, P. E., Mason E. S., & Stepanski K. M., (1999), Equity Sensitivity and Business Ethics, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,72(4), 539-560.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOrgan, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOrgan, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48 ,775-802.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePodsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational Citizenship Behavior and the Quantity and Quality of Work Group Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 262-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePodsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 351-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, B.,& Bachrach, D. (2000).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOrganizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 513-563.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePorter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T.,& Boulion, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59, 603-609.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRioux, S., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motiv-ational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobinson, J. P., & Shaver P R. (1985). Measures of social psychological attitudes.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInstitute for social research, 590-594.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRobinson, S. L. & Morrison, E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civil virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289-298.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosenfeld, L., Anderson, T., Hatcher, G., Roughgarden, J., & Shkedy, Y. (1995).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUpwelling fronts and barnacle recruitment in central California. MBARI tech. report,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference95-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchnake, M. (1991). Organizatinal Citizenship: A Review, Proposed Model, andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceResearch Agenda. Human Relations, 44, 735-759.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSherer, M., & Adams C. (1983). Construct Validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePsychological Reports, 53(3), 899-902.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSherer, M., & Maddux, J.E. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation, Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J.P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSomech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 555-577zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSomech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: an investigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 341-371.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSomech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: the relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers` extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649-659.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSomech, A., & Drach-zahavy, A. (2004). Exploring organizational citizenship behaviour from an organizational perspective: The relationship between organizational learning and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 281-298.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSnyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSnyder, M., & DeBono K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnderstanding the psychology of advertising, Journal of Personality and Socialzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePsychology, 49, 586-597.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSnyder, M., & Gangestad, S.(1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceassessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,125-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTedeschi, J., & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression Management and Influence in thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOrganization, Research in the Sociology of Organization, 3, 31-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTurnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoidingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceundesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 351-360.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVey, M. A., & Campbell, J. P. (2004). In-role or extra-role organizational citizenship behavior: which are we measuring? Human Performance, 17(1),119-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVigoda-Gadot, E., Beeri, I., Birman-Shemesh, T., & Somech, A. (2007). Group level organizational citizenship behavior in the education system: A scale reconstruction and validation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 462-493.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWayne, S. J., & Green, S. A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46(12), 1431-1440.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality inzh_TW
dc.relation.referencesupervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487-499.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWest, B. J., Patera, J. L., & Carsten, M. K. (2009). Team level positivity: Investigating positive psychological capacities and team level outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 249–267.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E.(1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management,17(3), 601-617.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management, 17,601–617.zh_TW
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.