Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56309
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor郭炳伸zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorKuo, Biing Shenen_US
dc.contributor.author謝書書zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsieh, Shu Shuen_US
dc.creator謝書書zh_TW
dc.creatorHsieh, Shu Shuen_US
dc.date2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-03T03:23:57Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-03T03:23:57Z-
dc.date.issued2012-12-03T03:23:57Z-
dc.identifierG0098932059en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56309-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description98932059zh_TW
dc.description100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract企業社會責任的實踐,已然成為當前企業經營的「顯學」,企業以永續經營為思考主軸,是企業經營時不能漠視的動力。同時,評量企業社會責任實踐績效的機制也應運而生。雖然還沒有一套評量方式可以放諸四海皆準,但是企業社會績效與企業財務績效的正向關聯,日益獲得國際社會的認同,追求企業永續經營的永續性指數量化指標,則成為檢視企業社會責任執行效益的評分卡。\n\n本文以道瓊永續性指數(DJSI)成份股的評選機制,做為檢核企業社會責任實踐成果的工具,並以宏碁公司為探討個案,以價值鏈模式,分析宏碁從事企業社會責任的驅動原因,並進一步以道瓊永續性指數成份股的入選評量準則,探究宏碁企業社會責任的實踐現狀與該準則間之落差,繼而提出改善建議。期望有助於宏碁及台灣其他有志於入列道瓊永續性指數之企業,強化其企業社會責任的實踐績效。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe notion of ""Corporate Social Responsibility"" (CSR) has come to fall into place as a driver to sustain any companies` growth. While there have been lacking well recognized criteria to assess performance of companies that put CSR into actions, it has been found that their associated financial performance frequently signals the efforts. As a result, whether to be able to be listed in publicly accessible financial sustainability indexes provides a convenient yardstick for the companies enforcing the notion. \n\nIn this study, given a goal to be a component in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), we evaluate in depth why Acer, an international brand personal computer company, has been motivated to assume the CSR as well as pursue the goal. The value-chain model is applied to gauge the strength and weakness in managements presently facing Acer. Serving other Taiwanese companies equally well, our analyses contribute to identify various dimensions in the value chain on which the company could make good improvements.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 II\n摘要 1\nAbstract 2\n第一章 緒論 6\n第一節 研究背景與動機 6\n第二節 研究目的與內容 9\n第三節 研究範圍與限制 12\n第二章 企業社會責任 13\n第一節 企業社會責任的定義 13\n第二節 什麼樣的企業需要實踐企業社會責任 21\n第三節 為什麼宏碁要爭取列入道瓊永續性指數 25\n第三章 宏碁的企業社會責任實踐歷程 29\n第一節 決心與啟動 29\n第二節 進步與接軌 31\n第三節 轉型與挑戰 36\n第四節 策略與實踐 36\n第四章 宏碁列入道瓊永續性指數的挑戰 42\n第一節 道瓊永續性指數的評選標準 42\n第二節 宏碁與DJSI的落差分析-執行成果較顯著者 55\n第三節 宏碁與DJSI的落差分析-執行成果較不顯著者 72\n第五章 結論與建議 81\n第一節 結論 81\n第二節 建議 83\n參考文獻 88zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098932059en_US
dc.subject道瓊永續性指數zh_TW
dc.subject企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject宏碁公司zh_TW
dc.subjectDJSI, Dow Jones Sustainability Indexen_US
dc.subjectCSR, Corporate Social Responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectAceren_US
dc.title企業社會責任的實踐挑戰:宏碁爭取列入道瓊永續性指數個案探討zh_TW
dc.titleThe implementation challenge of corporate social responsibility:case study of Acer`s Striving to Enter DJSI component listen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference1.Campbell, John L. (2007), “Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility,“ Academy of Management Review, 32(3), p. 950-952\n2.Carroll, Archie B. (1979), “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,” Academy of Management Review, 4(4), p. 497.\n3.Carroll, Archie B. (1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organization Stakeholders,” Business Horizons, July-August, p. 39.\n4.Carroll, Archie B. (1999), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct,” Business & Society, Vol. 38 No. 3, p. 268-269.\n5.Dahlsrud, Alexander (2008), “How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 15(1), p.1-3.\n6.Davis, Keith (1973), “The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 16, P. 312.\n7.Elkington, John (1998), Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (The Conscientious Commerce Series), New Society Publishers\n8.Kupers, Wendelin M. , “Integral Responsibilities for a Responsive and Sustainable Practice in Organization and Management,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 2011, I8, p. 137-139\n9.Porter, Michael E., Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (USA: Free Press, 1 edition, 1998)\n10.Porter, Michael E. and Kramer, Mark R. (2006), “Strategy and Society,” Harvard Business Review, Dec., 2006, p. 2-9\n11.Roberts, Russell (2002), The Invisible Heart-An Economic Romance, The MIT Press\n12.Spreckley, Freer (1981), Social Audit - A Management Tool for Co-operative Working, Beechwood Collegezh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
205901.pdf1.85 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.