Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60025
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor葉潔宇zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYeh, Chieh Yueen_US
dc.contributor.author甘秀琪zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKan, Hsiu Chien_US
dc.creator甘秀琪zh_TW
dc.creatorKan, Hsiu Chien_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-04T06:55:25Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-04T06:55:25Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-04T06:55:25Z-
dc.identifierG0097951001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60025-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description97951001zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract單字練習題常作為英語教師提升第二外語學習者單字學習成效的方式之一,然而針對不同單字練習題的實際成效,其相關研究仍顯不足。因此,本研究採用量化研究方法,以探究階層式單字練習題與抄寫練習題對國小學童英語字彙習得(word gains)與記憶保留(retention)的影響。\n研究對象為臺灣北部一所公立國小四年級兩個班的五十五位學生,此均質的兩個班級被隨機指定為實驗組與控制組,實驗組於一般教學後施予階層式單字練習題,而控制組則於一般教學後施予抄寫練習題。兩組受試者皆接受每週一次、歷時六週的單字練習題,一共練習二十四個主要單字。之後,兩組受試者隨即接受包含所有主要單字的單字知識等級表(VKS)測驗,以得知兩組受試者的單字習得情形。一個月後,兩組受試者再次接受相同的單字測驗,以進一步得知單字的記憶保留情形。本研究主要發現如下:(1)在單字習得成效方面,接受階層式單字練習題的實驗組學生顯著優於接受抄寫練習題的控制組學生;(2)單字保留成效方面,接受階層式單字練習題的實驗組學生亦顯著優於接受抄寫練習題的控制組學生;(3)階層式單字練習題對於高、低英語學習成就者而言,在單字習得與記憶保留上皆有正面影響;(4)對於高、低英語學習成就者而言,抄寫練習題亦皆有助於提升其單字習得與保留成效;(5)對於高英語學習成就者之單字習得而言,階層式單字練習題與抄寫練習題的成效相同;然而,對於單字記憶保留而言,階層式單字練習題的成效優於抄寫練習題;(6)對於低英語學習成就者之單字習得與保留而言,階層式單字練習題的成效皆優於抄寫練習題。最後,研究者針對階層式單字練習題及抄寫練習題在實際教學上之應用提供建議,以作為教育學者們參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractVocabulary exercises are regarded as one of the ways English teachers frequently utilize to enhance English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ vocabulary learning efficiency. Yet, studies focusing on the comparisons of the effects of different vocabulary exercises on learners’ vocabulary acquisition and retention seem comparatively few. Thus, the present study adopted a quantitative research method to investigate the effects of two types of vocabulary exercises, i.e., hierarchy vocabulary exercises and copying exercises, on learners’ word gains and retention.\nParticipants of the study were two classes of 55 fourth-grade students in a public elementary school in northern Taiwan. With the homogeneity of English proficiency on Cambridge Young Learners English Test (CYLET), the two classes were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. During the instructional experiment, the experimental and control groups received hierarchy vocabulary exercises and copying exercises respectively once a week, with a total of six times, to practice a total of 24 target words selected in this study. After receiving the last vocabulary exercises, both groups received post-test 1, based on a Chinese version of Vocabulary Knowledge Scale (VKS), to measure their word gains of all the target words. One month after receiving the last vocabulary exercises, both groups also received post-test 2, which was the same as post-test 1, to assess their word retention. The major findings are summarized as follows. (1) In terms of word gains, learners receiving hierarchy vocabulary exercises significantly outperformed those receiving copying exercises. (2) In terms of word retention, hierarchy vocabulary exercises possessed greater facilitative effects than copying exercises. (3) Hierarchy vocabulary exercises exerted a significant effect on both high and low English achievers’ word gains and retention. (4) Not only high English achievers but also low English achiever reaped benefits from copying exercises on word gains and retention. (5) Hierarchy vocabulary exercises demonstrated superior effectiveness than copying exercises on high English achievers’ word retention, but not on their word gains. (6) Hierarchy vocabulary exercises led to both more word gains and retention than copying exercises for low English achievers. At the end of the thesis, pedagogical implications and recommendations for further research were provided.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgements iv\nChinese Abstract xi\nEnglish Abstract xiii\nChapter One: Introduction 1\nBackground and Motivation 1\nPurpose of the Study 2\nResearch Questions 2\nSignificance of the Study 3\nDefinition of Terms 3\nHierarchy Vocabulary Exercises 3\nCopying Exercises 4\nChapter Two: Literature Review 5\nVocabulary Acquisition through Reading 5\nWord Learning through Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises 6\nGass’s Five-Stage Framework for the L2 Input Processing 7\nHierarchy Vocabulary Exercises 7\nResearch on Word Gains through Reading plus Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises 9\nChapter Three: Methodology 12\nParticipants 12\nInstruments 14\nCambridge Young Learners English Test (CYLET): Starters 15\nA Pre-test and Two Post-tests 16\nSelections of Reading Materials: An English Textbook 19\nSelections of Target Words 20\nHierarchy Vocabulary Exercises 22\nCopying Exercises 24\nProcedures 25\nPilot Study 26\nMain Study 27\nData Analysis 29\nChapter Four: Results 31\nComparisons of Word Gains between the Two Groups 31\nComparisons of Word Retention between the Two Groups 32\nEffects of Vocabulary Exercises on Students with Different Proficiency Levels 33\nThe Statistic Results of the CYLET Scores for High and Low English Achievers 34\nComparisons of Word Gains and Retention for Students with Different Proficiency within Each Group and between the Two Groups 37\nSummary 44\nChapter Five: Discussion and Conclusion 46\nAnswers to the Research Questions 46\nDiscussion of the Comparison between the Present Study and the Previous Studies 49\nConsistent Findings with the Previous Research 49\nNew Findings 55\nPedagogical Implications of the Study 56\nLimitations of the Study 58\nRecommendations for Further Research 60\nStudents’ Feedback after the Project 61\nConclusion 62\nReferences 64\nAppendix A: Cambridge Young Learners English Test (CYLET): Starters 71\nAppendix B: A Chinese Version of Vocabulary Knowledge Scale 76\nAppendix C: A Chinese Version of VKS Pre- and Post-tests of the Study 77\nAppendix D: Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises: Part I of Lesson 1 80\nAppendix E: Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises: Part II of Lesson 1 81\nAppendix F: Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises: Part III of Lesson 1 82\nAppendix G: Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises: Part I of Lesson 2 83\nAppendix H: Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises: Part II of Lesson 2 84\nAppendix I: Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises: Part III of Lesson 2 85zh_TW
dc.format.extent1614233 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097951001en_US
dc.subject單字習得zh_TW
dc.subject單字練習題zh_TW
dc.subject階層式單字練習題zh_TW
dc.subject抄寫練習題zh_TW
dc.subjectvocabulary acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectvocabulary exercisesen_US
dc.subjecthierarchy vocabulary exercisesen_US
dc.subjectcopying exercisesen_US
dc.title教學後單字練習題對臺灣國小學童英語字彙習得的影響:階層式單字練習題與抄寫練習題之比較zh_TW
dc.titleThe effects of after-instruction vocabulary exercises on Taiwanese young learners` vocabulary acquisition: hierarchy vocabulary exercises vs. copying exercisesen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAmiryousefi, M., & Kassaian, Z. (2010). The effects of reading only vs. reading plus enhancement activities on vocabulary learning and production of Iranian pre-university students. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 94-98. \nAtay, D., & Kurt, G. (2006). Elementary school EFL learners’ vocabulary learning:\nThe effects of post-reading activities. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(2), 255-273. \nBeck, I., McKeown, M., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life. New York: Guildford.\nBensoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7(1), 15-32.\nBygate, M. (1996). Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.). \nCarnine, D., Kameenui, E. J., & Coyle, G. (1984). Ultilization of contextual information in determining the meaning of unfamiliar words. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), 188-204.\nCheng, Y. L. (2008). Enhancing noun acquisition through reading: The impact of a hierarchy of vocabulary exercise on young learners of different English Proficiency in an EFL context. Unpublished master thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.\nCoxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.\nDepartment of Education, Taipei City Government. (2010, November). Curriculum Guidelines of Elementary English Language Teaching and Learning. Retrieved\nApril 29, 2011, from http://etweb.tp.edu.tw/fdt/D03/ share/soushow.aspx?CDE= RSB20101213182433OIA&RESCDE=RES20100920142037OUP\nEbbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (H.A. Ruger, & C.E., Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications, Inc. (Originally published, 1885).\nEhri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel`s Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393-447.\nFolse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary myths. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. \nFolse, K. S. (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 273-293. \nFromkin, V., Rodman, R, & Hyams, N. (2003). An introduction to language (7th ed.). Boston: Thomson Heinle.\nGass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. \nApplied Linguistics, 9(2), 198-217.\nGu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.\nHan, W. H. (2009). A Study of Vocational High School Students’ English Learning Motivation, Learning Style, Learning Strategy and English Learning Achievement. Unpublished master thesis, National Chung Cheng University.\nHaycraft, J. (1978). An introduction to English Language Teaching. London: Longman.\nHaynes, M. (1990). Examining the impact of L1 literacy on reading success in a second writing system. In H. Burmeister & P. L. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in second language acquisition: Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the second language research forum. Eugene, OR: Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.\nHenry, L. R., & Andrew, C. B. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in \nlong-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27.\nHsu, W. S. (2005). The effects of vocabulary enhancement instruction and reading only instruction on EFL Senior High School Students’ vocabulary acquisition in the context of a reading program. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Cheng Kung University.\nHuckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second \nlanguage: A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 181-193.\nHulstijn, J. H. (1997). Mnemonic methods in foreign language vocabulary learning. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 203-224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nHulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327-339.\nHulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558.\nJames, W. (1890). The Principle of Psychology, Holt.\nJohn, S. et al. (Eds.). (1995). Collins CoBuild English Dictionary (1st ed.). London: HarperCollins Publishers.\nJones, F. (1995). Learning an alien lexicon: A teach-yourself case. Second Language Research, 11(2), 95-111.\nKrashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 445-464. \nLai, H. L. (2004). The Effects of Phonics Instruction on Reading and Spelling in a Taiwanese Junior High School: An Action Research. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University.\nLai, Y. H. (2009). The effect of post-reading vocabulary –enhancing activities on EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention. Unpublished master`s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.\nLaufer, B. (1991). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In J. L. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics (pp. 126-132). London: MacMillan.\nLiu, D. (2003). The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 671-700.\nMin, H. T. (2008). EFL Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58(1), 73-115. \nMinistry of Education, Republic of China. (2004, May 13). The Nine-Year Integrated English Curriculum Guidelines of Elementary and Junior High School. Retrieved April 29, 2011, from http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0056/english-1.doc\nNagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233-253.\nNagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum. \nNassaji, H. (2003). L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 645-670.\nNation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nNation, I. S. P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3)\nParibakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1993). The relationship between reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11(1), 9-29. \nParibakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 155-178.\nParibakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp.174-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nParibakht, T., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195-224.\nParry, K. (1993). Too many words: Learning the vocabulary of an academic subject. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 46-64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.\nPeter, Y. G. (2003). Vocabulary Learning in a Second Language: Person, Task, Context and Strategies. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 7(2)\nPrince, P. (1995). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 478-493.\nRead, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nRodríguez, M., & Sadoski, M. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword, and context/keyword methods on retention of vocabulary in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50(2), 385-412.\nRott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’incidential vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 589-619.\nSanaoui, R. (1995). Adult learners` approaches to learning vocabulary in second languages. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 15-28.\nSchmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nShu, H., Anderson, R. C., & Zhang, H. (1995). Incidental learning of word meanings while reading: a Chinese and American cross-cultural study. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(1), 76-95.\nStuart, M. (1999). Getting ready for reading: Early phonemic awareness and phonics teaching improves reading and spelling in inner-city second language learners. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 587-605.\nSung, C. L. (2006). An investigation into English vocabulary learning strategies used by college students in Taiwan. Master thesis, Leader University, Tainan, Taiwan.\nSwanborn, M., & de Glopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 261-285.\nThornbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.\nWesche, M., & Paribakht, T. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13-40.\nWesche, M. & Paribakht, T. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 196-213.\nWilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (p.111). London: Edward Arnold.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
100101.pdf1.58 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.