Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67779
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor政治系en_US
dc.creatorShields Todd G.;黃紀en_US
dc.creatorHuang, Chien_US
dc.date1995en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-28T09:47:37Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-28T09:47:37Z-
dc.date.issued2014-07-28T09:47:37Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67779-
dc.description.abstractWe argue that past models of presidential veto behavior have not adequately conceptualized the fundamental nature of the dependent variable - a count of the total number of vetoes per unit of analysis. Consequently, ordinary least squares techniques have been employed when more appropriate statistical estimation techniques are warranted. Further, past conceptualization (and measurement) of theoretically relevant variables have masked important relationships such as the importance of a bicameral legislature. We show that rigorous consideration of research methodologies provides theoretical insights obscured by relying on more traditional approaches. Finally, this investigation updates understanding of the veto process through the first year of the Clinton administration.en_US
dc.format.extent1129152 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.relationPolitical Research Quarterly, 48(3), 559-572en_US
dc.titlePresidential Vetoes: An Event Count Modelen_US
dc.typearticleen
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
559-572.pdf1.1 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.