Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/6799
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creator孫本初zh_TW
dc.creatorRobert T. Golembiewskia ; Sun, Ben-chu-
dc.date1992en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-11-12T01:44:46Z-
dc.date.available2008-11-12T01:44:46Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11-12T01:44:46Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/6799-
dc.description.abstractThis article builds on reports of substantial success rates in Quality of Working Life (QWL) applications, and tests the criticism that these attractive outcomes merely reflect wimpish methodology. As the rigor of research designs increases, critical observers predict, so also will outcomes deteriorate. This panel of QWL applications, N = 44, does not support a positive-findings bias in public-sector applications, where QWL success rates approximate those in business applications.-
dc.formatapplication/en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.languageen-USen_US
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.relationInternational Journal of Public Administration, 15(6),1263-1279en_US
dc.titleQWL Applications in Public Agencies: Do Sucess Rates Reflect a Positive-Findings Bias?en_US
dc.typearticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01900699208524759-
dc.doi.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900699208524759-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
04.pdf748.49 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.