Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68583
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | 美歐研究所 | en_US |
dc.creator | 湯紹成 | zh_TW |
dc.creator | Tang, Shao-Cheng | en_US |
dc.date | 2010.12 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-12T06:35:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-12T06:35:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08-12T06:35:35Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68583 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A comparison of the German and Chinese cases clearly shows their differences and parallels. In Germany, despite confrontation between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, they were still able to work out a modus vivendi and interact with each other. This kind of "agree to disagree" compromise must be based on goodwill on both sides and a favorable international environment. In spite of all the parallels with the German case, 8eijing is still concerned about Taiwan separatism, the sustainability of the rule of the Kuomintang, and the possible reaction of the United States to cross-Strait rapprochement. Therefore, "constructive ambiguity" based on the 1992 Consensus has to serve as an interim structure before a peace accord can be signed. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 10033715 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.relation | Issues & Studies, 46(4), 1-36 | en_US |
dc.subject | cross-Strait relations;special relationship;German experiences;diplomatic moratorium;renounce violence | en_US |
dc.title | A Comparison between Intra-German Relations in 1970s and Cross-Strait Relations since 2008 | en_US |
dc.type | article | en |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.