Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68584
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor美歐研究所en_US
dc.creator湯紹成zh_TW
dc.creatorTang, Shao-Chengen_US
dc.date2011.08en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-12T06:35:49Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-12T06:35:49Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-12T06:35:49Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68584-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, China’s overall performance stood out extraordinarily. Although the PRC is not only a socialist but also a developing country, it still has offered financial relief to European countries. None of Beijing’s leaders has been directly elected by the people, but most of them have been proven to be competent. Does this mean that the “Beijing Consensus” has taken over “Washington Consensus”? Given China’s vast population and its unique geographical environment and historical development, compared to European countries, China is sui generis. In the traditional Confucianism, benevolence (仁) is a virtue which human beings are born with, while the Western world is rooted deeply in the Christian culture of “original sin”. As a result the rule of virtue in China contrasts the rule of law in the West, harmony vs. contradiction. China’s “socialist market economy” and “Three Represents” are typical oxymorons but with great success. Since the implementation of a “socialist market economy” in 1992 there has been much more market economy than socialism. Currently, political, social and cultural sectors are lagging behind. Therefore, the gap between the rich and the poor must be reduced efficiently. Nonetheless, the corruption problem remains as another serious and important issue for the CCP. Without independent anti-corruption authorities, it would be extremely difficult for them to tackle this problem. For the time being the Mainland has to count on the leadership to set examples for others.en_US
dc.format.extent299671 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.relationOpen Journal of Political Science (OJPS), 1(1), 1-9en_US
dc.subjectChina;Sui Generis;Oxymoron;Value;Leadership;Socialism à la Chineen_US
dc.titleChina’s Sui Generis plus Oxymoron - its Justificationen_US
dc.typearticleen
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
0109.pdf292.65 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.