Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94925
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor莊委桐zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorJuang, Wei Torngen_US
dc.contributor.author邱惠蘭zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChiou, Hui Lanen_US
dc.creator邱惠蘭zh_TW
dc.creatorChiou, Hui Lanen_US
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-09T05:27:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-09T05:27:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-09T05:27:44Z-
dc.identifierG0095258039en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94925-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description95258039zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWe attempt to analyze why the adoption of the mobile number portability policy incurs no (or very little) effect in encouraging competition in the telecommunication market. The cause is related to network externality. The level of network externality can be characterized by the proportion of any individual’s friends who are also adopting in the same carrier as the individual does. We find that such network externality may prohibit competition in the telecommunication market when termination-based pricing is prevailing. When termination-based pricing is prohibited, carriers cannot take advantage of network externality. We characterize the conditions such that without termination-based pricing, carriers become more competitive and consumers benefit more than with termination-based prices. Our study provides insightful implication on how to effectively impose the mobile number portability policy to improve competition in the telecommunication market.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsChapter 1\r\nIntroduction 4\r\nChapter 2\r\nLiterature Review 10\r\n2.1 Mobile Number portability 10\r\n2.2 Pricing Strategy 11\r\nChapter 3\r\nModel and Discussion 13\r\n3.1 Model 13\r\n3.2 Degree of Competition 19\r\n3.3 Two mobile phone numbers or one ? 26\r\nChapter 4\r\nConclusions and extensions 28\r\nReferences 29zh_TW
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095258039en_US
dc.subjectnetwork externalitiesen_US
dc.subjectmobile number portabilityen_US
dc.subjectcommunication networken_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the Mobile Number Portability Policy in the Telecom Market with or without Price Discriminationen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference1. I-ping, Chang Chien (2000), “Two-part tariff in the mobile phone industry.” Thesis for master of National Cheng Kung University.\r\n\r\n2. Ching-I, Huang (2006), “Peers effect and consumption behavior in interconnected networks.”\r\n\r\n3. Laffront, J.-J and J. Tirole (2000), “Competition in telecommunications.” Cambridge, MA: MIIT Press.\r\n\r\n4. Littlechild, Stephen C. (1975), “Two-part tariffs and consumption externalities.” The Bell Journal of Economics, vol.6, pp. 661-670\r\n\r\n5. Chorng-Jian, Liu (1995), “Telecommunication network with externalities and the two-part tariff.” Taipei Economic Inquiry, vol 33, no.2, pp.1-19\r\n\r\n6. Pa-Wen, Liu (2003), “Pricing strategies for mobile phone service.” Thesis for master of Shih Hsin University\r\n\r\n7. Reinke, T.H. (1998) “Local number portability and local loop competition : critical issues.” Telecommunication Policy, vol 22, pp.73-87\r\n\r\n8. Hong-Hsiang, Yeh (2005) “Research of the impact of switching cost, customer satisfaction and MNP on customer retention in mobile telecommunication market.” Thesis for master of Tatung Universityzh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.