Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100133
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | 張偉 | zh_TW |
dc.creator | ZHANG, Wei | |
dc.date | 2012-07 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-11T08:07:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-11T08:07:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-08-11T08:07:58Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100133 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 藉由倫理學開端上的初始爭論人們可以追問:倫理學究竟建基於理性或是情感?在康德倫理學中,通過道德判斷原則和道德執行原則的區分,他規定了理性和情感在倫理學中各自的功能,並且最終堅持倫理學的理性先天原則。然而,胡塞爾和謝勒卻宣稱,康德沒有認清情感領域中的先天本質法則性。相對於康德,他們通過質料先天理論揭示了情感領域中的先天性。但與胡塞爾繼續高舉理性大旗,終而將倫理學視為「第二哲學」不同,謝勒張揚了情感的獨立性、原本性,並將其倫理學建基於此種先天-情感之上,據此堅持了現象學倫理學的絕對的、第一性地位。 | |
dc.description.abstract | Due to the dispute on the origin of ethics, one can ask such a question, whether ethics is grounded on reason or feeling/emotion. In Kant’s ethics, he determined the functions of reason and feeling/emotion in ethics by the distinction of the principle of judgment of morality and the principle of execution of morality, and eventually held to a principle of “rational a priori”. However, Husserl and Scheler believed that Kant disregarded the a priori essential laws of feeling. In contrast with Kant, they revealed the a priori in the fields of feeling/emotion by the theory of material a priori. Husserl held the flag of reason high and finally regarded ethics as “secondary philosophy”. But Scheler did not follow him. He revealed the independence and primacy of feeling/emotion, and founded his ethics on the apriori-emotion. Thus, he held on the absolute, primary status of the phenomenological ethics. | |
dc.format.extent | 588132 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.relation | 政治大學哲學學報, 28, 131-180 | |
dc.relation | The national Chengchi university philosophical | |
dc.subject | 理性先天; 情感先天; 倫理學的建基; 康德; 胡塞爾 | |
dc.subject | Rational a Priori; Emotional a Priori; the Foundation of Ethics; I. Kant; E. Husserl | |
dc.title | 康德、胡塞爾和謝勒在倫理學建基問題上的爭執 | zh_TW |
dc.title.alternative | The Dispute of Kant, Husserl and Scheler Regarding the Foundation of Ethics | |
dc.type | article | |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
28-131-180.pdf | 574.35 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.