Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110653
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor羅光達<br>楊子霆zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳韋安zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wei Anen_US
dc.creator陳韋安zh_TW
dc.creatorChen, Wei Anen_US
dc.date2017en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-03T06:35:43Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-03T06:35:43Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-03T06:35:43Z-
dc.identifierG0104255004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110653-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description財政學系zh_TW
dc.description104255004zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文利用台灣2010年降低營利事業所得稅稅率之改革,檢驗公司稅率對受雇員薪資之影響。與過去文獻不同之處為,本文考量稅率與公司決策互相影響而產生內生性,因此以工具變數進行兩階段最小平方法以避免產生偏誤。並以綜合所得稅與營利事業所得稅資料對全體受雇員之個體進行分析,而非僅針對上市櫃之公司。最後發現有效稅率下降1% 能提升台灣整體受雇員平均 0.16% 的薪資。而考量個體異質性下,進行次組分析,發現在技術密集產業、大型公司、公司頂層員工所受到的影響較大;而其他產業,中小型公司以及公司基層員工的薪資受到稅率的影響較小,使得政府稅改政策並不如預期提升全民薪資。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper estimates the effect of corporate income tax rate on wage by using the Taiwan Corporate Income Tax Reform of the year 2010 as a natural experiment. Different from the previous literature, we consider the endogenous relationship between the tax rate and the policy of the company. Thus, the two stage least squares method is used to overcome the endogeneity bias. Additionally, our participants include all the individual employees from the data of Individual Income Tax and Corporate Income Tax rather than only the employees of listed company. Our results indicate that a drop of 1% in corporate income tax rate would increase the wage by 0.16%. Furthermore, we test for the heterogeneous firm and worker effects by using subgroup analysis and find the technology-intensive industries, the large companies and the high-classed employees within firm have a greater impact. On the other hand, the non-technology-intensive industries, the small and medium company and the low-classed employees within firms have a smaller impact. Therefore, the Tax Reform didn’t increase the overall wage as expected.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄 I\n表次 III\n圖次 IV\n第壹章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機 1\n第二節 研究目的 6\n第貳章 背景介紹 9\n第一節 2010年營利事業所得稅改革 9\n第二節 中小企業與大型企業 11\n第參章 文獻探討 15\n第一節 公司稅對薪資的影響 15\n第二節 影響薪資的其他因素 17\n第肆章 研究方法 19\n第一節 模型設定 19\n第二節 樣本資料 21\n第三節 變數解釋 23\n第伍章 實證結果 29\n第一節 敘述統計 29\n第二節 實證結果 31\n第三節 穩健性分析 38\n第陸章 結論 45\n第一節 結論與政策意涵 45\n第二節 研究限制與建議 45\n參考文獻 47\n表次\n表2.1.1:稅率結構變動表 10\n表5.1.1:相關變數敘述統計量 30\n表5.2.1:基本模型與區分中小企業迴歸結果 32\n表5.2.2:區分產業迴歸結果 34\n表5.3.1:公司與獨資合夥合成稅率差對薪資差迴歸結果 39\n表5.3.2:穩健性分析迴歸結果 40\n圖次\n圖1.1.1:工業及服務業受雇員工實質經常性薪資 4\n圖1.1.2:化學製品製造業與成衣服飾品製造業實質經常性薪資變動率 5\n圖1.1.3:電子零件組製造業與批發零售業實質非經常性薪資變動率 5\n圖5.1.1:產業人數分布圖 30\n圖5.2.1:各公司內部十分位迴歸結果 37\n圖5.3.1:各公司內部包含與不含分紅配股十分位迴歸結果 42zh_TW
dc.format.extent1197115 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104255004en_US
dc.subject公司稅率zh_TW
dc.subject員工薪資zh_TW
dc.subject工具變數zh_TW
dc.subjectCorporate income tax rateen_US
dc.subjectWagesen_US
dc.subjectInstrumental variableen_US
dc.title公司有效稅率對員工薪資之影響-以2010稅改為例zh_TW
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference于宗先與王金利(2000),《台灣中小企業的成長》,台北:聯經。\n林艷麗(2015),《2010年營所稅變革對員工薪資與受僱人數影響》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。\n孫克難(2016),「租稅優惠與產業發展-台灣經驗評析」,《財稅研究》,45卷,3期,8-14。\n財政部統計處(2015),《中華民國財政統計年報》,台北:財政部。\n陳明進(2002),「營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究」,《會計評論》,34期,57-75。\n陳明進(2003),「我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響」,《管理評論》,22卷,1期,127-151。\n劉姿君(1992),《教育投資與薪資報酬—人力資本理論之應用》,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。\n張芳全(2012),「勞動者教育收益與影響薪資因素之研究」,《臺東大學教育學報》,23卷,1期,91-124。\n黃美祝與李映茹(2009),「最低稅負制對企業租稅負擔影響之研究-高科技產業與傳統產業之比較」,《當代會計》,10卷,2期,189-224。\n楊建成與張靜貞(2007),《促進產業升級條例租稅減免措施、兩稅合一制度及最低稅負制之總合檢討》,財政部賦稅署95年度委託研究計畫(編號PG9512-0071)。\n楊子江(2013),「營利事業所得稅統計分析」,《財政新知》,34期,63-73。\n經濟部中小企業處(2006),《2006中小企業白皮書》,台北:經濟部中小企業處。\n經濟部中小企業處(2010),《2010中小企業白皮書》,台北:經濟部中小企業處。\n賴亮文(1992),「男性所得差距擴大的原因」,《勞工研究季刊》,106卷,101-110。\nArulampalam, W., M. Devereux and G. Maffini (2012), “The Direct Incidence of Corporate Income Tax on Wages,” European Economic Review, 56(6): 1038-1054.\nAutor, D., L. Katz and M. Kearney (2008), “Trends in U.S.Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2): 300-323.\nAuten, G. and R. Carroll (1999), “The Effect of Income Taxes on Household Income,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4): 681-693.\nBartlett, R. and C. Callahan (1984), “Wage Determination and Marital Status: Another Look,” Industrial Relations, 23(1): 90-96.\nBecker, G. (1991), A Treatise on the Family, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.\nBishop, J., A. Grodner, H. Liu and J. Chiou (2007), “Gender Earnings Differentials in Taiwan: A Stochastic Frontier Approach,” Journal of Asian Economics, 18(6), 934-945.\nBrown, C. and J. Medoff (1989), “The Employer Size-Wage Effect,” The Journal of Political Economy, 97(5): 1027-1059.\nBradford, D. (1978), “Factor Prices may be Constant, but Factor Returns are not,” Economics Letters 1:199-203.\nCornwell, C. and P. Rupert (1997), “Unobservable Individual Effects, Marriage and the Earnings of Young Men,” Economic Inquiry, 35(2): 285-294.\nEuropean Commission (2005)¬¬, The New SME Definition: User Guide and Model Declaration, Luxembourg: European Commission Publications Office.\nFelix, A. (2009), “Do State Corporate Income Taxes Reduce Wages?” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Second Quarter: 77-102.\nFelix, A. and J. Hines (2009), “Corporate Taxes and Union Wages in the United States,” NBER Working Paper, No. 15263.\nFuest, C., A. Peichl and S. Siegloch (2015), “Do Higher Corporate Taxes Reduce Wages?” IZA Discussion Paper No. 7390. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.\nGalenson, W., ed., (1979), Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan: The Postwar Experience of the Republic of China, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.\nGallemore, J. and E. Labro (2015), “The Importance of the Internal Information Environment for Tax Avoidance,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1): 149-167.\nGruber, J. and E. Saez (2002), “The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications,” Journal of Public Economics, 84(1): 1-32.\nHarberger, A. (1962), “The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax,” Journal of Political Economy 70(3): 215-240.\nHassett, K. and Aparna Mathur (2006), “Taxes and Wage,” American Enterprise Institute Working Paper, 128.\nHill, M. (1979), “The Wage Effects of Marital Status and Children,” The Journal of Human Resources, 14(4): 579-594.\nHossain, S. and G. Psacharopoulos (1994), “The Profitability of School Investments in an Educationally Advanced Developing Country,” International Journal of Educational Development, 14(1): 35-42.\nHoopes, j., D. Mescall and J. Pittman (2012), “Do IRS Audits Deter Corporate Tax Avoidance,” The Accounting Review, 87(5): 1603-1639.\nHuang, C.-L. (2009), “Labor Militancy and the Neo-mercantilist Development Experience: South Korea and Taiwan in Comparison,” Ph. D. Dissertation, Political Science, University of Chicago.\nIEG (2008), Financing Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises: An Independent Evaluation of IFC’s Experience with Financial Intermediaries in Frontier Countries, Independent Evaluation Group, the International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group.\nJuhn, C. K. Murphy and B. Pierce (1993), “Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill,” Journal of Political Economy, 101(3): 410-442.\nKotlikoff, L. and L. Summers (1987), “Tax Incidence,” in Handbook of Public Economics 2: 1043-1092, Edited by Auerbach, A. and Feldstein, Martin, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.\nMincer, J. (1984), “Human Capital and Economic Growth,” Economics of Education Review, 3(3): 195-205.\nMoore, N., T. Kasten and C. Schmidt (2014), “Do Wages Rise when Corporate Taxes Fall? Evidence from Germany`s Tax Reform 2000,” Ruhr Economic Papers: 532.\nPsacharopoulos, G. and H. Patrinos (2004), “Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update,” Education Economics, 12(2): 111-134.\nRao, N. (2016), “Do Tax Credits Stimulate R&D Spending? The Effect of the R&D Tax Credit in its First Decade,” Journal of Public Economics, 140(August): 1-12.\nSong, J., D. Price, F. Guvenen, N, Bloom and T, Wachter (2015), “Firming Up Inequality,” NBER Working Paper, No. 21199.\nStafford, F. (1980), “Firm Size, Workplace Public Goods, and Worker Welfare,” In The Economics of Firm Size, Market Structure, and Social Performance, Edited by J. Siegfried, Washington: Fed. Trade Comm.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
500401.pdf1.17 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.