Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111446
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林士貴<br>翁久幸zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLin, Shih Kuei<br>Weng, Chiu Hsingen_US
dc.contributor.author黃國展zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Kuo Chanen_US
dc.creator黃國展zh_TW
dc.creatorHuang, Kuo Chanen_US
dc.date2017en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-31T02:57:21Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-31T02:57:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-31T02:57:21Z-
dc.identifierG0104354023en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111446-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description統計學系zh_TW
dc.description104354023zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究以Lévy過程為模型基礎,考慮Merton Jump及跳躍強度服從Hawkes Process的Merton Jump兩種跳躍風險,利用Particle Filter方法及EM演算法估計出模型參數並計算出對數概似值、AIC及BIC。以S&P500指數為實證資料,比較隨機波動度模型、Variance Gamma模型及兩種不同跳躍風險對市場真實價格的配適效果。實證結果顯示,隨機波動度模型其配適效果勝於Variance Gamma模型,且加入跳躍風險後可使模型配適效果提升,尤其在模型中加入跳躍強度服從Hawkes Process的Merton Jump,其配適效果更勝於Merton Jump。整體而言,本研究發現,以S&P500指數為實證資料時,SVHJ模型有較好的配適效果。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper, based on the Lévy process, considers two kinds of jump risk, Merton Jump and the Merton Jump whose jump intensity follows Hawkes Process. We use Particle Filter method and EM Algorithm to estimate the model parameters and calculate the log-likelihood value, AIC and BIC. We collect the S&P500 index for our empirical analysis and then compare the goodness of fit between the stochastic volatility model, the Variance Gamma model and two different jump risks. The empirical results show that the stochastic volatility model is better than the Variance Gamma model, and it is better to consider the jump risk in the model, especially the Merton Jump whose jump intensity follows Hawkes Process. The goodness of fit is better than Merton Jump. Overall, we find SVHJ model has better goodness of fit when S&P500 index was used as the empirical data.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n1.1 研究動機 1\n1.2 研究目的 2\n第二章 文獻回顧 3\n2.1 Lévy Process 3\n2.2 隨機波動度模型 3\n2.3 Particles Filter 5\n第三章 研究方法 6\n3.1 Lévy Process 6\n3.2 報酬率模型 9\n3.3 Particle Filter 13\n3.4 Expectation-Maximization Algorithm 16\n第四章 實證分析 18\n4.1 模擬分析 19\n4.2 實證結果 19\n第五章 結論 22\n參考文獻 23\n\n附錄\n附錄 A:概似函數推導 25zh_TW
dc.format.extent1979226 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104354023en_US
dc.subject隨機波動度模型zh_TW
dc.subject波動度聚集zh_TW
dc.subjectLévy過程zh_TW
dc.subject跳躍風險zh_TW
dc.subject粒子濾波器zh_TW
dc.subjectStochastic volatility modelen_US
dc.subjectVolatility clusteringen_US
dc.subjectLévy-processen_US
dc.subjectJump risken_US
dc.subjectParticle filteren_US
dc.titleLévy過程下Stochastic Volatility與Variance Gamma之模型估計與實證分析zh_TW
dc.titleEstimation and Empirical Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Model and Variance Gamma Model under Lévy Processesen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference[1] Bakshi, G., Cao, C., & Chen, Z. W., 1997. Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models. Journal of Finance, 52: 2003-2049.\n[2] Bates, D. S., 1996. Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit in deutsche mark options. Review of Financial Studies, 9: 69-107.\n[3] Bollerslev, T., 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31: 307-327.\n[4] Christoffersen, P., Jacobs, K., & Mimouni, K., 2010. Volatility dynamics for the S&P500: Evidence from realized volatility, daily returns, and option prices. Review of Financial Studies, 23: 3141-3189.\n[5] Eraker, B., 2004. Do stock prices and volatility jump? Reconciling evidence from spot and option prices. Journal of Finance, 59, 1367-1404.\n[6] Heston, S. L., 1993. A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Review of Financial Studies, 6: 327-343.\n[7] Hull, J., White, A., 1987. The pricing of options on assets with stochastic volatilities. Journal of Finance, 42(2): 281-300. \n[8] Madan, D. B., Milne, F., 1991. Option Pricing With V.G. Martingale Components. Mathematical Finance, 1(4): 39–55.\n[9] Madan, D. B., Seneta, E., 1990. The variance gamma (V.G.) model for share market returns. Journal of Business, 63: 511-524.\n[10] Madan, D. B., Carr, P. P.,Chang, E.C., 1998. The variance gamma (V.G.) model for share market returns. European Finance Review ,2: 79–105.\n[11] Merton, R. C., 1976. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous, Journal of Financial Economics, 63: 3-50.\n[12] Ornthanalai, C., 2014. Lévy jump risk: Evidence from options and returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 112: 69-90.\n[13] Pitt, M., Shephard, N., 1999. Filtering via simulation based on auxiliaryparticle filters. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94: 590-599.\n[14] Pitt, M., 2002. Smooth particle filters for likelihood evaluation and maximization.Unpublished working paper. University of Warwick.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
402301.pdf1.93 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.