Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134452
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王增勇zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Tsen-Yungen_US
dc.contributor.author徐梓倫zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Tzu-Lunen_US
dc.creator徐梓倫zh_TW
dc.creatorHsu, Tzu-Lunen_US
dc.date2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T03:26:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-01T03:26:22Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-01T03:26:22Z-
dc.identifierG0108921321en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134452-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description108921321zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本文探討同志軍人在軍旅生涯中的親密關係歷程變化,並呈現軍人工作的特殊性及他們如何面對這些特殊性,對同志軍人伴侶關係之影響,與其所產生出的生存之道作歸納,並找尋共同性。再以受訪者的個人經驗持續延伸,透過探究每個人在軍中維持親密關係歷程的個別性,提供更完整的分析。現今部隊雖提倡性別平權,但效果有限,軍中環境仍充斥著對同志軍人的不友善與歧視,希望本文的研究結果,可作為各級部隊參考,提昇部隊環境,轉變成對同志軍人友善的地方。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the changes in the intimate relationship history of gay soldiers in the military career, and summarizes the uniqueness of military work and how they face these particularities, which in turn affects the relationship between gay soldiers, and the way to survive. Commonality. Continue to extend the personal experience of the inter-viewees and provide a more complete analysis by exploring the individuality of each per-son`s process of maintaining close relationships in the military. Although the current army advocates gender equality, the effect is limited. The military environment is still full of un-kindness and discrimination against gay soldiers. I hope that the author’s research results can be used as a reference for all levels of the army to improve the army environment and transform it into a friendly environment for gay soldiers.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機 1\n第二節 研究目的 2\n第三節 研究問題 2\n第二章 文獻探討 3\n第一節 國軍人事制度與婚姻 3\n第二節 同志伴侶關係發展模式 5\n第三節 同志與軍隊文化 9\n第三章 研究方法與設計 18\n第一節 研究概念架構 18\n第二節 研究方法 18\n第三節 研究設計與實施 20\n第四章 他們的彩虹人生故事 24\n第一節 尋求家人認同的阿金 24\n第二節 不願被侷限的阿青 26\n第三節 因為意外而做自己的阿民 28\n第四節 低調過日子的阿倫 30\n第五章 在鐵的紀律中,揚起彩虹旗 32\n第一節 同志的察覺與認同 32\n第二節 軍隊的特殊性 43\n第三節 愛人同志 46\n第四節 如何在團體中做自己 54\n第六章 結論與建議 63\n第一節 研究結論 63\n第二節 研究建議 65\n參考文獻 67\n附錄 訪談大綱 71zh_TW
dc.format.extent1859836 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108921321en_US
dc.subject深度訪談zh_TW
dc.subject同志認同zh_TW
dc.subject軍人認同zh_TW
dc.subject同性結婚zh_TW
dc.subject親密關係zh_TW
dc.subjectin-depth interviewsen_US
dc.subjecthomosexual identityen_US
dc.subjectmilitary identityen_US
dc.subjectsame-sex marriageen_US
dc.subjectintimacyen_US
dc.title軍中同志伴侶維持親密關係之初探zh_TW
dc.titleA Preliminary Study on Maintaining Intimate Relationship between Homosexual Couples in the Armyen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference一、中文文獻\n利翠珊(1999)。已婚女性家庭系統的交會:親情與角色的兩難。中華心理衛生學刊,(12),3,1-26。\n李怡青(2014)。同性戀者的親密關係與家庭功能之剖析。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,(35), 123-145。\n李林(2011)。男同志伴侶的開放式關係之研究。成功大學教育研究所學位論文,未出版,臺南。\n林志清(2007)。男伴男行-男同志伴侶生活經驗之探究。國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。\n邱全裕(2011)。邁向「熟男」之路--中年男同志在老化歷程中的伴侶與家人關係。國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。\n高穎超(2006)。做兵、儀式、男人類:台灣義務役男服役過程之陽剛氣質研究(2000-2006)。臺灣大學社會學研究所學位論文,未出版,臺北。\n商予愷(2007)。大學男同志伴侶親密關係之研究。國立臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理學系碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台中。\n梁世武、伍佩鈴(2016)。研究方法。臺北:普林斯頓國際。\n莊景同(2002)。超越政治正確的「女女」牽「拌」:從「我和我朋友」的故事看生命掙扎與價值體現。應用心理研究,(13),109-146。\n陳向明(2002)。社会科學質的硏究。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。\n陳怡婷、郭麗安(2002)。婚姻諮商中的性別議題。諮商與輔導月刊,(202),10-13。\n黃文峙(2012)。活出自己的樣貌: 男同志青年之性別多元建構內涵。玄奘大學應用心理學系碩士班碩士論文,未出版,新竹。\n裴學儒(2001)。軍隊文化、男性氣概與性傾向壓迫~台灣男同性戀者的兵役經驗分析。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。\n劉安真、程小蘋、劉淑慧(2002)。「我是雙性戀,但選擇做女同志!」~兩位非異性戀女性的性認同形成歷程。中華輔導學報,(12),153-183。\n謝文宜(2008)。台灣同志伴侶的分手調適-生命歷程的觀點。中華輔導與諮商學報,(47),113-143。\n謝文宜(2008)。看不見的愛情:初探台灣女同志伴侶親密關係的發展歷程。中華輔導與諮商學報,(24),181-214。\n謝文宜、曾秀雲(2008)。探討伴侶關係滿意度及其相關因素:比較已婚夫妻、未婚情侶與同志伴侶的差異。臺灣性學學刊,13(1),71-86。\n\n二、英文文獻\nBelkin, A. (2008). “Don`t Ask, Don`t Tell” Does the Gay Ban Undermine the Military`s Reputation?. Armed Forces & Society, 34(2), 276-291.\nBrown, J. G., & Ayres, I. (2004). The inclusive command: Voluntary integration of sexual minorities into the US military. Mich. L. Rev., 103, 150.\nClunis, D. M., & Green, G. D. (1988). Lesbian couples. Seal Press (CA).\nCochran, S. D., & Mays, V. M. (1988). Disclosure of sexual preference to physicians by black lesbian and bisexual women. Western Journal of Medicine, 149(5), 616.\nConnell, R. W. (2002). On hegemonic masculinity and violence: Response to Jefferson and Hall. Theoretical criminology, 6(1), 89-99.\nCruikshank, J. (1994). Oral tradition and oral history: Reviewing some issues. The Canadian Historical Review, 75(3), 403-418.\nD`emilio, J. (2012). Sexual politics, sexual communities. University of Chicago Press.\nFarnen, R. F. (Ed.). (2000). Democracies in Transition: Political Culture and Socialization Transformed in West and East. Bis.\nFitzpatrick, B. (1987). The sex discrimination act 1986. The Modern Law Review, 50(7), 934-951.\nGary Lehring (1996). Constructing the ‘Other’soldier: Gay identity’s military threat. Gay rights, military wrongs: Political perspectives on lesbians and gays in the military, 269-293.\nGary Lehring (2003). Officially Gay: The Political Construction Of Sexuality. Temple University Press.\nHalley, J. E. (1999). Don`t: A Reader`s Guide to the Military`s Anti-gay Policy. Duke University Press.\nHerek, G. M. (1990). Gay people and government security clearances: A social science perspective. American Psychologist, 45(9), 1035.\nHerek, G. M. (1996). Heterosexism and homophobia. In R. P. Cabaj & T. S. Stein (Eds.), Textbook of homosexuality and mental health (p.101–113). American Psychiatric Association.\nKaplan, D., & Rosenmann, A. (2012). Unit Social Cohesion in the Israeli Military as a Case Study of “Don`t Ask, Don`t Tell”. Political Psychology, 33(4), 419-436.\nKier, E. (1998). Homosexuals in the US military: Open integration and combat effectiveness. International Security, 23(2), 5-39.\nKurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986). Relationship quality of partners in heterosexual married, heterosexual cohabiting, and gay and lesbian relationships. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 51(4), 711.\nKurdek, L. A., Fine, M. A., & Sinclair, R. J. (1995). School adjustment in sixth graders: Parenting transitions, family climate, and peer norm effects. Child development, 66(2), 430-445.\nKurdek, L. A., Fine, M. A., & Sinclair, R. J. (1995). School adjustment in sixth graders: Parenting transitions, family climate, and peer norm effects. Child development, 66(2), 430-445.\nMattison, A. M., & McWhirter, D. P. (1995). Lesbians, gay men, and their families: Some therapeutic issues. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 18(1), 123-137.\nMcWhirter, D. P., & Mattison, A. M. (1984). The male couple: How relationships develop. Prentice Hall.\nMeyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of health and social behavior, 38-56.\nMoss, P., & Prince, M. J. (2014). Weary warriors: power, knowledge, and the invisible wounds of soldiers. Berghahn Books:New York.\nShawver, L. (1995). And the flag was still there: Straight people, gay people, and sexuality in the US military. Psychology Press.\nShilts, R. (2014). Conduct unbecoming: Gays & lesbians in the US military. Open Road Media:New York.\nStark, K. D., Humphrey, L. L., Crook, K., & Lewis, K. (1990). Perceived family environments of depressed and anxious children: Child`s and maternal figure`s perspectives. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 18(5), 527-547.zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202100406en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20260316-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
132101.pdf1.82 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.