Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136562| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃柏鈞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Huang, Po-Chun | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃新亞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Huang, Hsin-Ya | en_US |
| dc.creator | 黃新亞 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Huang, Hsin-Ya | en_US |
| dc.date | 2021 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-04T07:59:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-04T07:59:27Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-08-04T07:59:27Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0108258026 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136562 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 經濟學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 108258026 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要探討婚姻狀態改變對臺灣男性與女性勞動市場表現的影響，本文採用2005年至2016年間的「華人家庭動態資料庫」的樣本資料，運用固定效果模型，藉此控制住男性與女性個體無法觀察到且不隨時間改變的特性，並考量相關影響的變數後，重新檢驗婚姻與勞動表現的關係。實證結果顯示，在固定效果模型下，臺灣的男性與女性兩者皆不存在顯著的婚姻溢酬。然而，結婚的確會對女性平均週工時與工作機率造成負面的影響，其效果是立即且持續的，但對男性則無影響。此外，婚姻對女性勞動參與的負面衝擊很大一部分是因為婚姻伴隨了小孩的出現－是否有小孩解釋了約80%的此負面影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis estimates the impact of changes in marital status on Taiwanese male and female labor market outcomes. To control unobserved heterogeneity and do not change over time and analyze the relationship between marriage and labor market outcomes, data from the 2005-2016 Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) are investigated using fixed effect model. The empirical results show that there is no significant marriage premium between married men and married women in Taiwan under fixed effect model. Getting married has a negative impact on the average weekly working hours and working probability for female in the year of being married and the effect is immediate and persistent, while male are not affected. Further, I find that the negative impacts on female working probability and hours are largely (but not fully) driven by the presence of children－having children or not explains about 80% of this negative impact. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I\n摘要 II\nAbstract III\n圖次 VI\n表次 VII\n第一章 緒論 1\n第二章 文獻回顧 4\n第一節 生產力假說 4\n第二節 選擇性假說 5\n第三節 雇主歧視假說 7\n第四節 小結 8\n第三章 資料來源與樣本 9\n第一節 資料來源 9\n第二節 資料處理 10\n第三節 變數選擇與敘述統計 11\n第四章 實證模型 14\n第五章 估計結果 18\n第一節 OLS與固定效果模型之分析 18\n第二節 小孩與婚姻效果 22\n第三節 婚姻對家務時間之效果分析 24\n第四節 婚姻的動態效果 25\n第五節 穩健性檢測分析 27\n第六章 結論 31\n第一節 研究結果 31\n第二節 研究限制 32\n參考文獻 34\n主要圖表 37\n附錄圖表 48 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 517502 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108258026 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 婚姻溢酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 未觀察到個人異質性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 固定效果模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Marriage Premium | en_US |
| dc.subject | Unobserved heterogeneity | en_US |
| dc.subject | Fixed Effect Model | en_US |
| dc.title | 婚姻對勞動市場表現的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effects of Marriage on Labor Market Outcomes | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 李郁英(2014)，《婚育與女性薪資研究》，國立臺北大學社會學系碩士論文。\n周育蓁(2013)，《婚育對女性薪資的影響－以台灣勞動婦女為例》，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。\n莊慧琳與林世昌(2006)，「台灣婦女勞動供給實證研究之發展」，《經濟論文叢刊》，第34卷第2期，頁119-172。\n許碧純與邱皓政(2015)，「照顧子女的代價：母職對臺灣女性薪資影響的貫時性分析」，《臺灣社會學刊》，第56期，頁53-113。\n陳建良與陳昱彰(2010)，「台灣男性的婚姻溢酬：以內生性選擇模型探討」，《經濟研究》，第46卷第2期，頁171-216。\n楊乙茹(2014)，「結婚，好嗎？－婚姻狀態對男女收入的影響」，國立暨南國際大學經濟學系研究所碩士論文。\n蔡雅琪(2011)，《台灣地區婚姻對女性薪資的影響》，逢甲大學經濟學系碩士論文。\n謝慧美(2006)，《成功男性背後的推手－再談男性婚姻溢酬》，國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。\nBarg, K., & Beblo, M. (2007), “The Male Marital Wage Premium in Germany: Selection versus Specialization,” Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 59–73.\nBecker, Gary S. (1973), “The Theory of Marriage: Part I,” Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813-846.\nBuding, M. J. & England, P. (2001), “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood,” American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204-225.\nBreusch, T.E.G. (2004), “Does Marriage Improve the Wages of Men and Women in Australia?” 12th Biennial Conference. Australian Population Association.\nCornwell, C. & Rupert P. (1997), “Unobservable Individual Effects, Marriage and the Earnings of Young Men,” Economic Inquiry, 35(2), 285-294.\nDaniel, Kermit (1995), “The Marriage Premium,” In: Tommasi M, Ierulli K (eds) The New Economics of Human Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113-125.\nDougherty, Christopher (2006), “The Marriage Earnings Premium as a Distributed Fixed Effect,” Journal of Human Resources, 41(2), 433-443.\nGinther, Donna and Madeline Zavodny (2001), “Is the Male Marriage Premium Due to Selection? The Effects of Shotgun Weddings on the Return to Marriage,” Journal of Population Economics, 14, 313-328.\nGray, J. S. (1997), “The Fall in Men’s Return to Marriage,” The Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 481-504.\nGreenhalgh, C. A. (1980), “Male-Female Wage Differentials in Great Britain: Is Marriage an Equal Opportunity?” The Economic Journal, 90, 751-755.\nGrossbard-Shechtman, Shoshana (1986), “Marriage and Productivity: An Interdisciplinary Analysis,” in B. Gilad and S. Kaish, (ed.), Handbook of Behavioral Economics, Greenwich, Conn. and London: JAI Press, 289-302.\nHersch, J. & Stratton, L. S. (1997), “Housework, Fixed Effects, and Wages of Married Workers,” The Journal of Human Resources, 32(2), 285-307.\nHersch, J. & Stratton, L. S. (2000), “Household Specialization and the Male Marriage Wage Premium,” Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 54(1), 78-94.\nHersch, J. & Stratton, L. S. (2002), “Housework and Wages,” The Journal of Human Resources, 37(1), 217-229.\nHill, M. S. (1979), “The Wage Effects of Marital Status and Children,” Journal of Human Resources, 14(4), 579-594.\nKillewald, A. & Gough, M. (2010), “Money Isn’t Everything: Wives’ Earnings and Housework Time,” Social Science Research, 39, 987-1003.\nKorenman, Sanders and David Neumark (1991), “Does Marriage Really Make Men More Productive?” Journal of Human Resources, 26(2), 282-307.\nKorenman, S. & Neumark, D. (1992), “Marriage, Motherhood, and Wages.” Journal of Human Resources, 27(2), 233-255.\nLoh, E. S. (1996), “Productivity Difference and the Marriage Wage Premium for White Males,” Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 566-589.\nNakosteen, R. and M. Zimmer (1997), “Men, Money, and Marriage: Are High Earners More Prone than Low Earners to Marry?” Social Science Quarterly, 78, 66-82. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6814/NCCU202100759 | en_US |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 802601.pdf | 505.37 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.