Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136596
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor吳文傑zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWu, Wen-Chiehen_US
dc.contributor.author李若維zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jo-Weien_US
dc.creator李若維zh_TW
dc.creatorLee, Jo-Weien_US
dc.date2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T08:06:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-04T08:06:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-04T08:06:45Z-
dc.identifierG0108255028en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136596-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description財政學系zh_TW
dc.description108255028zh_TW
dc.description.abstract我國房價明顯偏離合理範圍,本研究主要目的為透過觀察不動產持有稅之有效稅率對不動產價格的影響,為本國租稅資本化研究提供新的一份實證結果,藉此預期不動產稅率調整之政策將帶來的影響。本文利用民國108年至109年間台北市內湖區之不動產交易資料進行財產稅資本化研究。透過最小平方法發現不動產有效稅率對不動產價格具顯著負向影響,有效稅率增加1%的幅度,將使不動產價格下降0.9%,具財產稅資本化現象,值得注意的是,樣本中平均有效稅率為0.03897%,遠低於房屋稅及地價稅之名目稅率。從分量迴歸可以發現,與中間分量相比,有效稅率在最高分量下對不動產價格的負面影響較小,可能意味財產稅的調升對高所得者來說影響不大。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, real estate prices have been booming in Taiwan. The main purpose of this study is to provide a new empirical evidence for tax capitalization by investigating the impact of effective property tax rates on real estate prices, in order to expect the effect of raising property tax rate. The data utilized in this study were selected from the real estate transaction information that occurred in Nei-hu district, Taipei city, between 2019 and 2020. The empirical results of OLS show that the effective property tax rate significantly affects real estate prices. When the effective tax rate increases by 1%, real estate prices will decrease by 0.9%, which represents that property tax capitalization phenomenon is apparent. Moreover, the average effective tax rate in the sample is 0.03897%, much lower than the nominal property tax rate. According to quantile regression, compared with the median quantile, the effective tax rate has a smaller negative impact on the real estate price under the highest quantile, which means raising property tax may have little effect on high-income group.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機與目的 1\n第二節 研究方法 3\n第三節 研究流程架構 4\n第二章 文獻回顧與討論 6\n第一節 財產稅理論 6\n第二節 租稅與公共設施資本化 8\n第三節 小結 13\n第三章 不動產稅制及不動產市場問題探討 16\n第一節 不動產持有稅現制 16\n第二節 不動產持有稅制度問題 21\n第三節 不動產市場問題 24\n第四節 小結 28\n第四章 研究設計 29\n第一節 實證模型 29\n第二節 變數定義與預期效果 31\n第五章 資料來源 34\n第一節 資料來源 34\n第二節 樣本限制 35\n第三節 敘述性統計 35\n第六章 實證結果 38\n第一節 OLS迴歸結果 38\n第二節 分量迴歸結果 41\n第七章 結論與建議 44\n第一節 結論 44\n第二節 建議 45\n第八章 參考文獻 46\n第一節 英文文獻 46\n第二節 中文文獻 48\n表 次\n表一 文獻整理 14\n表二 台北市房屋稅率表 18\n表三 台北市地價稅率表 21\n表四 變數定義及預期效果 33\n表五 敘述統計量 37\n表六 對不動產價格的 OLS 分析 40\n表七 對不動產價格的分量迴歸分析 43\n圖 次\n圖一 全國住宅價格指數 1\n圖二 研究流程圖 5\n圖三 全國自有住宅比例 23\n圖四 全國低度使用(用電)住宅比例 24\n圖五 全國房價所得比 25\n圖六 房貸餘額占 GDP 比重 26\n圖七 營建工程業與不動產業生產毛額占 GDP 比重 27\n圖八 不動產價格與有效稅率之散佈圖 36zh_TW
dc.format.extent1302886 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108255028en_US
dc.subject財產稅zh_TW
dc.subject不動產有效稅率zh_TW
dc.subject資本化效果zh_TW
dc.subject不動產價格zh_TW
dc.subjectProperty Taxen_US
dc.subjectEffective Property Tax Rateen_US
dc.subjectCapitalization Effecten_US
dc.subjectReal Estate Pricesen_US
dc.title不動產價格與財產稅資本化之研究zh_TW
dc.titleResearch on Real Estate Prices and Property Tax Capitalizationen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference第一節 英文文獻\nAsabere, P. K., Huffman, F. E., & Mehdian, S. (1994), “The Adverse Impacts of Local Historic Designation: the Case of Small Apartment Buildings in Philadelphia,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 8(2), 225-234.\nCoombs, C. K., Sarafoglou, N., and Crosby, W. (2012), “Property Taxation, Capitalization, and the Economic Implications of Raising Property Taxes,” International, Advances in Economic Research, 18(2), 151-161.\nEbertz, A. (2013), “The Capitalization of Public Services and Amenities into Land Prices — Empirical Evidence from German Communities,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 2116-2129.\nEdel, M. and Sclar, E. (1974), “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: Supply Adjustment in a Tiebout-Oates Model,” Journal of Political Economy, 82(5), 941-954.\nEdelstein, R. (1974), “The Determinants of Value in the Philadelphia Housing Market: A Case Study of the Main Line, 1967-1969,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56, 319-28.\nEpple, Dennis, Zelenitz, Allan and Visscher, Michael. (1978), “A Search for Testable Implications of the Tiebout Hypothesis,” Journal of Political Economy, 86, no. 3, 405-425.\nGyourko, J. and J. Tracy (1991), “The Structure of Local Public Finance and the Quality of Life,” Journal of Political Economy, 99.4, 774-806.\nKing, A. T. (1977). “Estimating Property Tax Capitalization: A Critical Comment,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, no. 2, 425-431.\nKuttner, Kenneth N and Ilhyock Shim (2013), “Can Non-Interest Rate Policies Stabilise Housing Markets? Evidence from A Panel of 57 Economies,” BIS: Working Papers, No 433, Nov.\nLeichenko, R. M., Coulson, N. E., & Listokin, D. (2001), “Historic Preservation and Residential Property Values: an Analysis of Texas Cities,” Urban Studies, 38(2), 173-187.\nLinneman, Peter (1978), “The Capitalization of Local Taxes: A Note on Specification,” Journal of Political Economy, 86, 535-538.\nLutz, B. (2008), “The Connection Between House Price Appreciation and Property Tax Revenues.” National Tax Journal, 61(3), 555-572.\nMeadows, George Richard (1976), “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: A Comment and Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, 84, no. 4, 869-80.\nOates, W. E. (1969), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis,” Journal of Political Economy, 77(6), 957-971.\nOates, W. E. (1973), “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: A Reply and Yet Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1004-1008.\nPalmon, O. and Smith, B. A. (1998), “New Evidence on Property Tax Capitalization,” Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 1099-1111.\nPollakowski, H.O. (1973) “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: A Comment and Further Results,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, no. 4, 994-1003.\nReinhard, Raymond M. (1981), “Estimating Property Tax Capitalization: A Further Comment,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 1251-1260.\nRichardson, D. H. and Thalheimer, R. (1981), “Measuring the Extent of Property Tax Capitalization for Single Family Residences,” Southern Economic Journal, 47(3), 674-689.\nRosen, Harvey S. and Fullerton, David J. (1977), “A Note on Local Tax Rates, Public Benefit Levels, and Property Values,” Journal of Political Economy, 85, 433-440.\nSmith, R. (1970), “Property Tax Capitalization in San Francisco,” National Tax Journal, 23, 177-193.\nSonstelie, Jon C. and Portney, Paul R. (1980), “Gross Rents and Market Values: Testing the Implications of Tiebout`s Hypothesis,” Journal of Urban Economics, 7, 102-118.\nTiebout, Charles (1956), “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, 416-424.\nWales, T.J. and Wiens, E.G. (1974), “Capitalization of Residential Property Taxes: An Empirical Study,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 56, 329-333.\nYinger, John. (1982), “Capitalization and the Theory of Local Public Finance,” Journal of Political Economy, 90, 917-943.\nZodrow, G. R. (2001), “The Property Tax as a Capital Tax: A Room with Three Views,” National Tax Journal, 54(1), 139-156.\n\n第二節 中文文獻\n王宏文、曾彥閔,2013,臺北市與高雄市住宅財產稅之比較:兼論兩市財稅努力之差異,政治科學論叢,第56期,頁119-156。\n利秀蘭,2012,不動產相關稅制之研究,經濟研究,第12期,頁73-99。\n花敬群,2014,臺灣不動產稅制改革問題與方向,財稅研究,第43卷第5期,頁61-77。\n陳南光、王泓仁,2011,資產價格變動對民間消費支出影響效果之研究,中央銀行季刊,第33卷第1期,頁7-40。\n陳德翰、王宏文,2013,臺北市財產稅公平性之研究,臺灣土地研究,第16卷第2期,頁89-139。\n陳美辰,2015,地方支出及不動產持有稅對房價影響之實證分析,國立高雄應用科技大學財富與稅務管理系在職專班碩士論文。\n陳亞筠,2019,我國不動產稅制及地方支出對不動產市場價格之影響,國立臺北大學財政學研究所碩士論文。\n張碧珠,2012,房屋街路等級調整率之探討,稅務旬刊,2202期,頁7-10。\n彭建文、吳森田、吳祥華,2007,不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析─以臺北市大同區與內湖區為例,臺灣土地研究,第10卷第2期,頁49-66。\n黃耀輝,2011,從稅制面看臺灣房地產偏低的交易和持有成本,2011臺灣地區房地產年鑑,頁468-472。\n黃耀輝、陳清秀、羅時萬,2018,我國不動產持有稅負擔之研究,財稅研究,第47卷第5期,頁62-104。\n鄭維瑩,2013,不動產稅制對不動產價格影響分析─論不動產稅制改革,國立臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文。\n蘇惠屏,2017,房屋稅條例課稅制度之分析-以評定現值及稅率為中心,財稅研究,第46卷第3期,頁47-73。\n中央銀行,國際間對房價、利率、審慎政策的相關看法,上網日期110年4月12日,檢自:https://www.cbc.gov.tw/public/Attachment/422416342071.pdfzh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202100711en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20260704-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
502801.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.