Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/147729| 題名: | 容積移轉訊息外溢效果對房屋價格的影響 The Impact of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Information Spillover Effect on Housing Prices |
作者: | 范凱閎 Fan, Kai-Hung |
貢獻者: | 陳國樑<br>羅時萬 范凱閎 Fan, Kai-Hung |
關鍵詞: | 容積移轉 房價 外溢效果 差異中之差異 TDR housing price spillover effect difference-in-differences |
日期: | 2023 | 上傳時間: | 3-Oct-2023 | 摘要: | 在住宅問題的討論當中，都市的高房價被視為實踐居住正義的一大阻礙。其中，容積移轉是一個經常被批評的政策工具，輿論經常指責容積移轉是助長高房價的幫兇。然而，對容積政策的批評缺乏量化的證據支持，以至於容積移入對房價的影響效果究竟為何，依舊眾說紛紜。\n為了釐清來自容積移轉的容積移入訊息和房價的關係，本文透過普通最小平方法 (ordinary least square, OLS) 以及差異中之差異法 (difference-in-differences, DID) 分析臺北市自2012年第四季至2022年第四季的房屋交易資料，探討在短期內，房屋交易價格是否因為接受基地容積移入訊息產生之外溢效果 (spillover effect) 而發生顯著的變化。此外，本文進一步剖析外溢效果的細節，討論距離產生之外溢效果分布差異，以及因接受基地密集度差異產生之多重外溢效果對房價的影響。\n實證結果顯示，外溢效果顯著地影響房價，約產生3~4%的溢價；DID的結果顯示外溢效果的溢價幅度達到4.1%；然而，去除多重外溢效果的結果顯示外溢效果不顯著。外溢效果的分布結果發現，分布確實有不均的現象；然而在去除多重外溢效果之後，即未發現有顯著的分布不均。\n本文的研究結果表明，只有在接受基地群聚的情況下，容積移入訊息對房價才有影響，在接受基地群聚區域本身即為較高房價地區的情況下，容積移入讓本來房價已經較高的區域變得更高。 Housing prices are a highly concerning issue. Among them, transfer of development rights (TDR) is a policy tool that is frequently criticized, with public opinion often accusing TDR of exacerbating higher housing prices. However, the criticism of TDR lacks quantifiable evidence to support these claims.\nTo clarify the relationship between TDR information and housing prices, this study employs ordinary least squares (OLS) and difference-in-differences (DID) methods to analyze housing transaction data in Taipei City from 2012 to 2022. The study aims to explore whether there have been significant changes in housing prices in the short term due to spillover effects. Additionally, this research delves into the details of spillover effects by discussing the distribution of spillover effects based on distance and the impact of multiple spillover effects.\nThe empirical results indicate that spillover effects significantly impact housing prices, resulting in a premium of approximately 3% to 4%. DID analysis reveals that the magnitude of the spillover effect premium reaches 4.17%. However, the main reason is closely related to the density of receiving sites. When considering only the spillover effects resulting from distance, the results are not statistically significant. Furthermore, the distribution of spillover effects also shows that the uneven distribution is primarily attributed to the differences in the density of receiving sites.\nThe research findings of this study indicate that the impact of TDR information on housing prices only occurs when there is a clustering of receiving sites. Considering that the receiving site clusters are already in higher-priced areas, volume transfer leads to further increases in housing prices in these regions. |
參考文獻: | 一、中文文獻\n內政部 (2023) 「不動產成交案件實際資訊資料」，臺北市：內政部。取自：https://plvr.land.moi.gov.tw/DownloadOpenData，2023年2月4日。\n王紹威 (2022)，《容積移轉對鄰近預售屋價格影響之研究- 以臺北市為例》，政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班學位論文。\n王薇凱 (2008)，《台中市公共設施保留地容積移轉機制檢討之研究》，逢甲大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。\n王鴻源 (2007)，《現行容積移轉制度下相關課題之研究－以損失補償為中心》，政治大學地政研究所學位論文。\n江穎慧 (2023) 「都市容積疊疊熱？蓋得越多、房子越貴，高強度開發的迷思與真相」，《天下獨立評論》，2023年2月2日。\n住展雜誌 (2015) 「這樣蓋最划算─容積移轉的省錢魔術」，《住展月刊》，2015年1月5日。\n何世昌 (2017) 「落日取消、延續雙軌制！北市容移修法三讀」，《自由時報》，2017年5月31日。\n吳憶如 (2008)，《容積外部對房價影響之實證-以台北市為例》，臺北大學都市計劃研究所學位論文。\n呂苡榕 (2017) 「容積代金惹火20萬公保地主的三大敗因」，《今周刊》， 2017年6月15日。\n李家儂 (2007)，「容受力應用於都市地區建築容積總量管制之探討」，《土地問題研究季刊》，6(3)，82–97。\n林子欽，林士淵與周昱賢 (2021)，「臺北市住宅興建決定因素：市場特性、開發政策與土地產權的整合觀點」，《公共事務評論》，19(2)， 25–43。\n林佳慧，郭祐誠與周駿騰 (2022) 「實現居住正義？社會住宅政策對周邊房屋租金之影響—以台北市為例」，《台灣經濟學會 2022 年年會》， 國立政治大學綜合院館（臺北市文山區指南路二段 64 號）：台灣經濟學會、國立政治大學經濟系、中央研究院經濟研究所。\n林崇傑 (2008)，「台灣運用容積移轉於歷史保存之政策與實踐之檢討」，《文資學報》，(4)，27–92。\n洪敬哲 (2013)，《我國都市計畫法制中容積移轉運用之檢討—由美國發展權移轉之功能出發》，中原大學財經法律研究所學位論文。\n胡海豐 (2015)，「都市更新、建築容積移轉與獎勵的經濟效率性」，《建築學報》，(93)，105–124。\n徐燕興與丁育群 (2010)，「臺北市古蹟容積移轉政策內涵與困境之探討」，《文化資產保存學刊》，(12)，5–22。\n張孟秋 (2011)，「檢討容積移轉實施辦法－台中市七期重劃區為例」，《土地問題研究季刊》，10(2)，71–77。\n張剛維與林森田 (2008)，「以容積移轉進行都市保存之制度與執行－財產權觀點分析」，《建築學報》，(66)，97–118。\n陳麗平 (2015)，《容積銀行於容積移轉交易市場之作用》，臺北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系學位論文。\n楊元宜 (2020)，《容積移轉在不同公共設施服務水準地區對房價之影響》，政治大學地政研究所學位論文。\n楊重信與林瑞益 (1994)，「可轉讓土地發展權市場之效率與公平性」，《人文及社會科學集刊》，6(2)，21–62。\n臺北市政府 (2023) 「臺北市資料大平台」。臺北市：臺北市政府。檢自：https://data.taipei/，2023年3月23日。\n臺北市政府都市發展局 (2023) 「容積移轉公告」。臺北市：臺北市政府。取自：https://www.udd.gov.taipei/volumn-transfer/avdwckf，2023年6月19日。\n劉厚連 (2004)，「我國實施古蹟容積移轉制度之問題檢討」，《土地問題研究季刊》，3(2)，65–74。\n劉建宏 (2012) 「低價買古蹟變高價豪宅 容積暴利絕招公開」，《時報周刊》，2012年3月2日。\n蔡育新，王大立與劉小蘭 (2011)，「土地混合使用對住宅價格的影響－解析混合使用、密度與可及性」，《都市與計畫》，38(2)，119–146。\n蔡佳明與彭揚凱 (2017) 「無中生有的土地，到底肥了誰？──容積轉移的真相」，《天下獨立評論》，2017年8月31日。\n謝琦強與莊翰華 (2009)，「台中市都市土地使用強度「區位特性」之研究－以容積移轉制度為例」，《地理研究》，(51)，23–43。\n鍾泓良 (2017) 「北市容積代金論壇 地主怒嗆要市府還錢」，《自由時報》，2017年6月8日。\n二、英文文獻\nAhluwalia, R., Unnava, H. R., and Burnkrant, R. E. (2001), “The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communications.” Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 458–470.\nBarrese, J. T. (1983), “Efficiency and Equity Considerations in the Operation of Transfer of Development Rights Plans.” Land Economics, 59(2), 235–241.\nBrueckner, J. K., Fu, S., Gu, Y., and Zhang, J. (2017), “Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China`s Building Height Limits.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(4), 663–677.\nBrueckner, J. K. and Rosenthal, S. S. (2009), “Gentrification and Neighborhood Housing Cycles: Will America`s Future Downtowns Be Rich?.” The review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 725–743.\nCai, H., Wang, Z., and Zhang, Q. (2017), “To Build above the Limit? Implementation of Land Use Regulations in Urban China.” Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 223–233.\nClapp, J. M. and Salavei, K. (2010), “Hedonic Pricing with Redevelopment Options: A New Approach to Estimating Depreciation Effects.” Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 362–377.\nDong, H. and Hansz, J. A. (2019), “Zoning, Density, and Rising Housing Prices: A Case Study in Portland, Oregon.” Urban Studies, 56(16), 3486–3503.\nEdel, M. and Sclar, E. (1974), “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: Supply Adjustment in a Tiebout-Oates Model.” Journal of Political economy, 82(5), 41–54.\nFesselmeyer, E. and Seah, K. Y. S. (2018), “The Effect of Localized Density on Housing Prices in Singapore.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 68, 304–315.\nFreemark, Y. (2019), “Upzoning Chicago: Impacts of a Zoning Reform on Property Values and Housing Construction.” Urban Affairs Review, 56(3), 758–789.\nGlaeser, E. and Gyourko, J. (2003), “The Impact of Building Restrictions on Housing Affordability.” Economic Policy Review, 9(Jun), 21–39.\nGlaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., and Saks, R. (2005), “Why is Manhattan so Expensive? Regulation and the Rise in Housing Prices.” The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), 331–369.\nGreen, R. K., Malpezzi, S., and Mayo, S. K. (2005), “Metropolitan-Specific Estimates of the Price Elasticity of Supply of Housing, and Their Sources.” American Economic Review, 95(2), 334–339.\nGreenaway-McGrevy, R., Pacheco, G., and Sorensen, K. (2020), “The Effect of Upzoning on House Prices and Redevelopment Premiums in Auckland, New Zealand.” Urban Studies, 58(5), 959–976.\nGuerrieri, V., Hartley, D., and Hurst, E. (2013), “Endogenous Gentrification and Housing Price Dynamics.” Journal of Public Economics, 100, 45–60.\nGyourko, J. and Molloy, R. (2015). Regulation and Housing Supply. In Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 5, pp. 1289–1337). Elsevier.\nIhlanfeldt, K. R. (2007), “The Effect of Land Use Regulation on Housing and Land Prices.” Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 420–435.\nIrwin, E. G. and Bockstael, N. E. (2001), “The Problem of Identifying Land Use Spillovers: Measuring the Effects of Open Space on Residential Property Values.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 698–704.\nJackson, K. (2016), “Do Land Use Regulations Stifle Residential Development? Evidence from California Cities.” Journal of Urban Economics, 91, 45–56.\nJoshi, K. K. and Kono, T. (2009), “Optimization of Floor Area Ratio Regulation in a Growing City.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(4), 502–511.\nJou, S.-C., Clark, E., and Chen, H.-W. (2014), “Gentrification and Revanchist Urbanism in Taipei?.” Urban Studies, 53(3), 560–576.\nKim, H.-G., Hung, K.-C., and Park, S. Y. (2015), “Determinants of Housing Prices in Hong Kong: A Box-Cox Quantile Regression Approach.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 50(2), 270–287.\nKono, T., Kaneko, T., and Morisugi, H. (2010), “Necessity of Minimum Floor Area Ratio Regulation: A Second-Best Policy.” Annals of Regional Science, 44(3), 523–539.\nLan, C. I. C. and Lee, C.-J. (2021), “Property-Led Renewal, State-Induced Rent Gap, and the Sociospatial Unevenness of Sustainable Regeneration in Taipei.” Housing Studies, 36(6), 843–866.\nLevinson, A. (1997), “Why Oppose TDRs?: Transferable Development Rights Can Increase Overall Development.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27(3), 283–296.\nLin, T.-C. (2010), “Property Tax Inequity Resulting from Inaccurate Assessment—The Taiwan Experience.” Land Use Policy, 27(2), 511–517.\nLinden, L. and Rockoff, J. E. (2008), “Estimates of the Impact of Crime Risk on Property Values from Megan`s Laws.” American Economic Review, 98(3), 1103–1127.\nLinkous, E. R. (2017), “Transfer of Development Rights and Urban Land Markets.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(5), 1122–1145.\nLiong, J. T., Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., Herlambang, S., and Astuti, W. (2020), “Space Grabs: Colonizing the Vertical City,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(6), 1072–1082.\nMcConnell, V., Walls, M., and Kopits, E. (2006), “Zoning, TDRs and The Density of Development.” Journal of Urban Economics, 59(3), 440–457.\nQuigley, J. and Raphael, S. (2005), “Regulation and the High Cost of Housing in California.” American Economic Review, 95, 323–328.\nRosen, S. (1974), “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political economy, 82(1), 34–55.\nSchill, M. H. (2005), “Regulations and Housing Development: What We Know.” Cityscape, 8(1), 5–19.\nSclar, E. (2021), “The Infinite Elasticity of Air: New York City’s Financialization of Transferable Development Rights.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 80(2), 353–380.\nShih, M., Chang, H.-t. B., and Popper, F. J. (2018), “Development Rights: Regulating Vertical Urbanism in Taiwan.” Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), 717–733.\nShih, M. and Chang, H. B. (2015), “Transfer of Development Rights and Public Facility Planning in Taiwan: An Examination of Local Adaptation and Spatial Impact.” Urban Studies, 53(6), 1244–1260.\nShih, M. and Chiang, Y.-H. (2022), “A Politically Less Contested and Financially More Calculable Urban Future: Density Techniques and Heightened Land Commodification in Taiwan.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1–18.\nShih, M., Chiang, Y.-H., and Chang, H. B. (2019), “Where Does Floating TDR Land? An Analysis of Location Attributes in Real Estate Development in Taiwan.” Land Use Policy, 82, 832–840.\nShih, M., Chiang, Y.-H., Chang, H. B., and Chang, C.-O. (2017), “Commodification of Development Rights and What It Does to the Urban Housing Market in Taiwan.” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(2), 194–205.\nSingla, H. and Bendigiri, P. (2019), “Factors Affecting Rentals of Residential Apartments in Pune, India: an Empirical Investigation.” International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, ahead-of-print.\nTakeda, Y., Kono, T., and Zhang, Y. (2019), “Welfare Effects of Floor Area Ratio Regulation on Landowners and Residents with Different Levels of Income.” Journal of Housing Economics, 46, 101656.\nTan, Y., Wang, Z., and Zhang, Q. (2020), “Land-Use Regulation and the Intensive Margin of Housing Supply.” Journal of Urban Economics, 115, 103199.\nUntermann, R. K. (1984), Accommodating the Pedestrian: Adapting Towns and Neighbourhoods for Walking and Bicycling. Van Nostrand Reinhold.\nYang, D. Y. R. and Chang, J. C. (2018), “Financialising Space Through Transferable Development Rights: Urban Renewal, Taipei Style.” Urban Studies, 55(9), 1943–1966. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 財政學系 110255025 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110255025 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 502501.pdf | 4.16 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.