Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32342
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor羅德城zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳紀瑩zh_TW
dc.creator陳紀瑩zh_TW
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T05:42:21Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-14T05:42:21Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-14T05:42:21Z-
dc.identifierG0096255029en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32342-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description96255029zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究主要探討非營利組織董事會組成結構與經營績效的關聯性程度。研究對象以台灣非營利組織-文化藝術團體基金會為主,研究期間為民國 94年至96年,採行獨立董事機制者為本研究的研究範圍,得出樣本數共計126 家。\r\n經實證的結果發現:內部董事為志工占董事規模的比例對於管理費用的迴歸是顯著的負相關;內部董事為關係企業員工的比例對於管理費用的迴歸是顯著正相關;家族成員占董事規模的比例對管理費用的迴歸有負向顯著相關。\r\n 而原發起人為董事對於目的事業費用占總費用的比例迴歸有顯著的正相關;執行長為董事對於目的事業費用占總費用的比例迴歸有顯著的負相關。至於具文化藝術氣息的董事對於管理費用與目的事業費用迴歸均呈顯著正相關;執行長是否有支薪與目的事業費用的迴歸是顯著的正向。\r\n 非營利組織之董事會組成結構與其組織目標的關聯性,可作為主管機關制訂規範的參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractNonprofit Board Composition and Organizational Efficiency: The Case of Art Organizations in Taiwan\r\nChen Chi-Ying\r\nAbstract\r\n This article investigates the relationship between nonprofit board composition and organizational efficiency. This research is a case study of art organizations in Taiwan. The research covers the period from 2005 to 2007, and there are only 126 proved usable because of missing data.\r\n We find out the administrative expenses are significantly and negatively associated with the ratio of board size to insider volunteers. The administrative expenses also have the significantly and positively association with the ratio of board size to insider employees. And the administrative expenses are significantly and negatively associated with the ratio of board size to relatives.\r\n Overall, the multivariate analysis shows that the ratio of total expenses to program expenses is significantly and positively associated with major donor. The ratio of total expenses to program expenses has the significantly and negatively association with the ceo on board. Besides, both of the ratio of total expenses to program expenses and administrative expenses are significantly and positively with the talented board members. And the ratio of total expenses to program expenses is significantly and positively associated with the pay to the ceo.\r\n The study implies that there is a relationship between board composition and organizational efficiency on average only and for the specific sample analyzed. The analysis is a worthy subject for future research and the reference for the related law.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究背景與動機 2\r\n第二節 研究目的與範圍 2\r\n第三節 論文架構 3\r\n第二章 文獻探討 5\r\n第一節 非營利組織相關理論探討 5\r\n第二節 非營利組織之內涵 7\r\n第三節 董事會與代理問題 13\r\n第四節 非營利組織績效評估 17\r\n第三章 研究方法 21\r\n第一節 研究架構 21\r\n第二節 研究資料說明 23\r\n第三節 研究變項設計 23\r\n第四節 研究假設 27\r\n第五節 資料分析與統計方法 31\r\n第四章 實證分析結果 33\r\n第一節 敘述統計分析 33\r\n第二節 相關分析 35\r\n第三節 迴歸結果 38\r\n第五章 結論與建議 45\r\n第一節 結論與建議 45\r\n第二節 研究限制 47\r\n參考文獻 48\r\n\r\n\r\n圖次\r\n圖1-1 研究流程架構圖 4\r\n圖2-1 台灣非營利組織體系圖 12\r\n圖3-1 本研究架構圖 22\r\n\r\n表次\r\n表2-1 非營利組織分類方式 11\r\n表4-1應變數與董事會治理變項的敘述資料 34\r\n表4-2-1董事會組成之Pearson相關係數 36\r\n表4-2-2董事會特質之Pearson相關係數 37\r\n表4-3-1董事會組成對管理費用的迴歸結果 39\r\n表4-3-2董事會組成對目的事業費用占總費用的迴歸結果 42\r\n表4-3-3董事會特質的迴歸結果 44zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096255029en_US
dc.subject非營利組織zh_TW
dc.subject董事組成結構zh_TW
dc.title非營利組織董事組成結構與績效關聯之研究-以文化藝術財團法人基金會為例zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference司徒達賢 (1996),《我國非營利組目標制定與績效評估之研究》,政治大學zh_TW
dc.relation.reference企業管理研究所國科會專題研究。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference司徒達賢 (1999),《非營利組織的經營管理》,台北:天下遠見出版股有zh_TW
dc.relation.reference限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修 (2000),《第三部門經營策略與社會參與》,台北:智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修 (2002),《非營利管理》,台北:智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂芳堯 (1985),《台灣地區基金會經營績效綜合評估》,新竹:國立交通大zh_TW
dc.relation.reference學管理科學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂育一 (1992),《非營利組織績效指標之研究- 以文教基金會為例》,國立zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 543-564.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZald, M. N. (1967). Urban differentiation, characteristicszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceof boards of directors and organizational effectiveness.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 73, 261-272.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂豐足 (1995),《老人扶療養機構的績效評估及其影響因素之探討》,國立zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中正大學社會福利學系研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫本初 (1994),《非營利組織管理之研究》,台北市政府研究發展考核委員zh_TW
dc.relation.reference會,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭玉禎 (1999),《台灣基金會現象與經營管理之研究─以大型企業基金會為zh_TW
dc.relation.reference例》,高雄:國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許士軍 (1994),《管理學》,十版,台北:東華書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳金貴 (1994),《美國非營利組織的人力資源管理》,瑞興圖書股份有限zh_TW
dc.relation.reference公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳金貴 (1996),《美國非營利組織的研究》。美歐月刊,11 (6),台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳樹 (1997),《領導風格與組織文化關聯性之研究》,國立台灣大學商學研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳正宏 (2001) ,《非營利組織績效評估指標之研究-以台灣300 家主要基zh_TW
dc.relation.reference金會為例》,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馮燕 (1993),《非營利組織的角色》,台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉淑貞 (2000),《財團法人文教基金會策略管理之研究》,大業大學事業經zh_TW
dc.relation.reference營研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference簡明輝 (2004),《組織行為》,台北:文京圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭新煌 主編 (2000),《非營利部門組織與運作》,台北:巨流圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭新煌 (1999),《台灣的非營利部門現狀、新動向和未來發展》,香港海zh_TW
dc.relation.reference峽兩岸關係研究中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAgrawal, A., & Knoeber, C.R. (1996). Firm performance andzh_TW
dc.relation.referencemechanisms to control agency problem between managerszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitativezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnalysis, 31, 377-397.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaysinger, B. D., & Bulter, H. N. (1985). Corporatezh_TW
dc.relation.referencegovernance and the board of directors: Performancezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceeffects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEconomics, and Organization, 1, 101-124.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBradshaw, P., Murray., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofitzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceboards make a difference? An exploration of thezh_TW
dc.relation.referencerelationship among board structure, process, andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceeffectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21, 227-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCallen, J. L. (1994). Money donations, volunteering andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceorganizational efficiency. Journal of Productivityzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnalysis, 5, 215-228.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceD’Aunno, T. (1992). The effectiveness of human servicezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceorganizations: A comparison of models. In Y. Hasenfeldzh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Ed.), Human service as complex organizations (pp.341-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference361). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFama, E. F., & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownershipzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 301-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFama, E. F., & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Agency problems andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceresidual claims. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 327-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYale Law Journal, 89, 825-901.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHermalin B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceboard composition and direct incentives on firmzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceperformance. Financial Management, 20, 101-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHerman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997). Multiplezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceconstituencies and the social construction of nonprofitzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceorganization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntaryzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSector Quarterly, 26, 185-206.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKlein A. (1998). Firm performance and board committeezh_TW
dc.relation.referencestructure. Journal of Law & Economics, 41, 275-303.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiller, L. E., Weiss, R. M., & MacLeod, B. V. (1988).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoards of directors in nonprofit organizations:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceComposition, activities, and organizational outcomes.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal of Voluntary Action Research, 17, 81-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOlson, D. E. (2000). Agency theory in the non-for-profit szh_TW
dc.relation.referencesector: Its role at independent colleges. Nonprofit andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVoluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 280-296.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement inzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe selection of newzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceboard members: An empirical analysis. Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFinance, 54, 1829-1853.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTinkelman, D. (1998). Differences in sensitivity ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencefinancial statement users to joint cost allocations: Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referencecase of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Accounting,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAuditing & Finance, 13, 377-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTinkelman, D. (1999). Factors affecting the relationzh_TW
dc.relation.referencebetween donations tozh_TW
dc.relation.referencenon-profit organizations and the efficiency ratio.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceResearch in Government and Nonprofit Accounting, 10, 135- 161.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeisbrod, B. A., & Dominguez, N. D. (1986). Demand forzh_TW
dc.relation.referencecollective goods in private markets: Can fundraisingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceexpenditures help outcome free-rider behavior? Journalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceof Public Economics, 30, 83-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliamson, O. E. (1983). Organization form, residualzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceclaimants, and corporate control. Journal of Law &zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEconomics, 26, 351-366.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companieszh_TW
dc.relation.referencewith a small board of directors. Journal of Financialzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEconomics, 40, 185-212.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYoung, G. R., Beekun, I. & Ginn, G. O. (1992). Governingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceboard structure, business strategy, and performance ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceacute care hospitals: A contingency perspective.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.